/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 237 KB, 642x674, In-Flight Abort Patch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

SpaceX Falcon 9 Launch Thread - In-Flight Abort Anonymous Fri Jan 17 13:01:44 2020 No.11308904 [Reply] [Original]

Kablooey edition

WHEN: 4-Hour window starting 8:00 AM EST / 13:00 UTC on Saturday, January 18
STREAM: https://www.spacex.com/webcast [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhrkdHshb3E]
Probability of weather delay: 10% [https://www.patrick.af.mil/Portals/14/Weather/L-1%20Forecast%2018%20Jan%20Launch.pdf?ver=2020-01-17-103518-317]
Backup launch date: January 19 & January 20 (Same window)

Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida (East Coast)
Booster number & previous flights: B1046.4 [Bangabandhu 1, Merah Putih, SSO-A]
First stage landing: No—the booster will be destroyed
SpaceX press kit: https://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/in-flight_abort_test_press_kit.pdf
Dragon number & previous flights: C205.1; N/A (Has Mark 3 parachutes)

In-Flight Abort overview:
>For this test, Falcon 9’s ascent trajectory will mimic a Crew Dragon mission to the International Space Station to best match the physical environments the rocket and spacecraft will encounter during a normal ascent. However, SpaceX has configured Crew Dragon to intentionally trigger a launch escape after Max Q, the moment of peak mechanical stress on the rocket.
>After Crew Dragon’s SuperDracos shutdown, the spacecraft will passively coast to apogee, the highest point in its arc. Near apogee, Crew Dragon’s trunk will separate and the smaller Draco thrusters will re-orient the spacecraft for reentry and parachute deploy. When the appropriate conditions are met, Dragon’s drogue and main parachutes will sequence to provide for a soft landing in the Atlantic Ocean near SpaceX Dragon recovery teams.

More mission information:
>https://www.nasa.gov/feature/spacex-nasa-gear-up-for-in-flight-abort-demonstration
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qObBRM4euxk (Mission animation)
>https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/01/16/spacex-abort-test-serves-as-practice-run-for-astronauts-rescue-teams/

Stats:
This will be the 30th booster reflight, and 79th Falcon 9 launch. It is the 2nd SpaceX launch of 2020.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 13:01:59 2020 No.11308907 File: 168 KB, 1336x726, Timeline.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 13:03:02 2020 No.11308913 File: 727 KB, 3000x2000, EOfAS2-UUAUvFjH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Pre launch press conference starting now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 15:07:09 2020 No.11309177 AFTS will not activate at the time of abort, so the booster might just sort of crumple and spill fuel instead of exploding

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 16:10:23 2020 No.11309275 >>11308904 >Probability of weather delay: 10% Oh no! Imagine if they had to do an in-flight abort for starting in the wrong weather!

Anonymous Fri Jan 17 16:16:08 2020 No.11309279
File: 2.88 MB, 2260x2560, Crew-Dragon-scaled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11309275
the real problem is not the weather but the conditions in the ocean for the recovery crews. So, the % delay probability is technically a bit higher.
Also, the launch weather criteria are different for this launch, and the % reflects as such.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 16:56:44 2020 No.11309329 How long is it from now? Please help west coast bros.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 16:58:18 2020 No.11309337 >>11309329 it's at 5 am communist time

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 16:59:56 2020 No.11309342 >>11309337 >>11309337 why the fuck are all the threads rn boooo

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:00:40 2020 No.11309343 >>11309342 fifteen hours, and it's a four hour long window and they think they'll hit the end of it

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:22:19 2020 No.11309372 Hot on the heels of this is Starlink-3

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:24:17 2020 No.11309378 >>11308907 >-37:00 launch escape system is armed Would it count if it triggers before launch for some reason?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:25:57 2020 No.11309382 File: 216 KB, 2048x1365, 87338C11-2244-4823-8DD3-CCE833545B79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11309378 https://youtu.be/AqeJzItldSQ

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:38:54 2020 No.11309411 >>11309378 >ULA and Boeing snipers standing by

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 17:39:29 2020 No.11309413 >>11309382 >when fail makes things go better than expected

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 18:36:45 2020 No.11309525 >>11309382 Wonderful.

Anonymous Fri Jan 17 19:24:19 2020 No.11309618

>Latest weather data suggests sustained winds and rough seas in the recovery area during the top of tomorrow’s four-hour launch escape test window; now targeting toward the end of the window. Will continue to monitor weather and update the T-0 accordingly in the morning
SpaceX tweet just now

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 19:25:26 2020 No.11309619 >>11309618 God damn it its going to be a fucking scrub.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 19:32:42 2020 No.11309631 File: 45 KB, 800x419, SpaceX_scrub_brush.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11309618

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 21:50:43 2020 No.11309868 10 bongs

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 22:02:23 2020 No.11309887 >>11309618 oh good I won't need to be up at 5

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 17 22:16:13 2020 No.11309911 >>11309887 implying you would miss a F9 exploding on purpose because >muh sleep

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 02:22:54 2020 No.11310398 >>11309618 does this mean there is a 0% chance they will launch in the first 2 hours of the window, or is it more a they think they will probably get their chance later in the window, but if it opens earlier they will take it scenario?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 02:53:12 2020 No.11310420 >>11309911 Wait, no way they're actually going to destruct the rocket. They'll just trigger an abort in nominal conditions, right?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 03:16:13 2020 No.11310442 >>11310420 When the capsule separates, there will be no fairing on the core, and it will be aerodynamically very unhappy. It will be a Rapid Scheduled Disassembly.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 03:21:08 2020 No.11310452 >>11310420 I mean, what do you think the rocket will do, flip around and land spontaneously? It's going boom anon. Soon.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 03:41:48 2020 No.11310481 >>11310442 >>11310452 I figured the core would just fall back into the ocean. This is cooler.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 05:17:09 2020 No.11310616 Scrubbed. Try again tomorrow folks.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 05:24:57 2020 No.11310623 File: 507 KB, 1070x601, 33481015d04b3974f9ed7acf616592901b13507ebdabf48ee1d6d09d63acc2c4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 05:31:48 2020 No.11310630 stayed up all night for this called in for work, used sick day for this SO HYPED

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 05:48:25 2020 No.11310657 File: 81 KB, 879x485, 8A70FEF5-F1F9-4C94-8280-98E5B0918B9A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >I see my superiority has caused some controversy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 06:00:56 2020 No.11310676 >>11310657 >i aimed for the ISS, but hit Nevada

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 06:22:37 2020 No.11310706 >>11310657 A starliner launch abort will still be over the ocean.

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 06:25:33 2020 No.11310712

>>11310452
It would be cool of they still tried to at least splash land it because why the fuck not. But I guess there's still too much air for sideways flight at that altitude to turn it ass backwards for retro burn even if they retain enough control authority to keep it stable with main engine shut down. Also there may be just too much red tape and general bureaucracy when it comes to NASA and manned flight to risk anything going wrong with the capsule just because they wanted to dick around.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 07:01:36 2020 No.11310766 >>11310616 Falcon 9 right now: :3

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 07:05:47 2020 No.11310775 File: 34 KB, 634x346, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Scrubbed for tomorrow.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 07:29:23 2020 No.11310795 File: 722 KB, 576x432, SpaceX Launch.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11308904 I'M UP!!!! I'VE HAD MY COFFEE!!! I'M READY FOR LAUN.....scrubbed for tomorrow #$%%$%^&$%&#%^#!!!! I'm going back to bed if anyone needs me...

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 08:58:50 2020 No.11310940

>>11310616
>>11310775
>>11310795
> today is my last day of work before vacation
> I was going to have to miss the launch
> now I can stare at an unchanging launch pad fir 6 hours
This work's in my favor. Who cares about the rest of you ~I~ am happier for this development.
>>11310657
Quiet, Boomer. Actual adults are talking. (Its boring stuff you wouldn't understand anyway. Budgets, deadlines, actually completing goals. That sort of thing.)

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 09:34:55 2020 No.11310994 people still think SpaceX can launch something on schedule?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 09:40:52 2020 No.11311010 >>11310994 No one ever thought that, newfag.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 09:45:13 2020 No.11311016 >>11310994 They're launching their Starlink on schedule. Few minor slips due to weather related issues for tests don't mean much.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 10:29:55 2020 No.11311110 >>11310994 Florida weather fucking sucks, gotta finish that Texas launch site

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 10:40:00 2020 No.11311132 File: 1.19 MB, 5184x3888, 1548259969657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311110 Texas weather can suck too.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 10:42:55 2020 No.11311137 >>11311132 Build a wall so high that it stops weather.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 10:54:57 2020 No.11311165 >>11311137 But who is gonna pay for it?

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 10:56:34 2020 No.11311172

Will elon actually finish starlink? I can't imagine everyone just being on board with one company potentially providing a service that the majority of the planet will want to utilize and basically control internet access. I mean wouldn't China go ape shit over having unregulated access to the internet available to their people? I'm a brainlet so the whole idea is intriguing to me.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:07:04 2020 No.11311193 >>11311165 Taxpayers

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:13:08 2020 No.11311204

>>11311172
China will just do with starlink what it's already doing with their own ISPs, It will tell musk that if it want to give services in china, it need to block pages. China is actually excited about starlink, many homes in chine doesn't have access to chinese propaganda.

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:13:52 2020 No.11311207

>>11311172
you need to have the terminal in order to get internet from the satellites, and until the in-space laser link network is up, they need local ground outlet stations
China can just disallow both types of ground stations and nobody could get service even if they smuggled one or the other in

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:17:41 2020 No.11311217 >>11311137 It's on the border, maybe we can get it to stop border crossers too.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:24:53 2020 No.11311238 >>11311207 >you need to have the terminal in order to get internet from the satellites I thought one could access the internet directly from Starlink using a pizza box sized antenna?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:26:54 2020 No.11311247 >>11311238 yes, it's a pizza boxed size antenna, it's a specialty piece of hardware

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:28:26 2020 No.11311250 >>11311172 Are you dumb? Starlink needs ground stations and China can do whatever they want in those ground stations

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:29:26 2020 No.11311254 >>11311238 Those that can afford a pizza box sized antenna are not the same people that lack internet access

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:30:01 2020 No.11311258 >wanted to watch it >forgot about it >it has been delayed Nice >out all day tomorrow Fucks sake

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:31:21 2020 No.11311262 >>11311172 VPN is much cheaper than ground stations or antennas. People wishing Starlink to be some magic "internet as a human right" solution (which is better part of reddit) is gonna be disappointed.

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:32:45 2020 No.11311269

>>11311238
>>11311172
Elon Musk has stated that you wouldn't be able to get internet unless the country you're living in has allowed it. I'm assuming it works like geofencing.
>>11311165
Mexico, of course. Their wind is streaming across the border and ruining Starship.

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:35:22 2020 No.11311282

>>11311204
>Elon makes deal with China to allow Starlink in the country
>The usual Chinese censorship
>Starlink gets installed into every rural neighborhood across the country
>Elon turns off the censorship and runs pro-freedom material through Starlink
Imagine.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:38:02 2020 No.11311289 >>11311282 >China shuts down ground stations and confiscates terminals >China nationalizes Tesla Shanghai factory Yes, imagine.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:44:32 2020 No.11311304 >>11311289 Imagine not creating a bioweapon that kills only Han Chinese to get rid of the most dangerous country on Earth

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:46:37 2020 No.11311310 >>11311282 >China obliterates any satellite that enters orbit above it

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:49:20 2020 No.11311320 >>11311289 It'll take some time to confiscate the antennae, and some would try to hide them. By that point though, the damage would have been done. >>11311310 >USSF gets more funding to smack down any Chinese satellites

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:53:01 2020 No.11311326 >>11311320 Even as a thought experiment this is way too stupid and convoluted. People can already access banned sites in China using a VPN.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:53:39 2020 No.11311328 >>11311304 They tried with SARS and it failed.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:56:54 2020 No.11311333 >>11311304 it's probably already too late to not initiate bioweapons MAD. China seems to be ahead of US in gene tech

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 11:56:57 2020 No.11311334 >>11311320 The idea that if somehow Chinese access "muh freedom" sites they'll be turned is condescending at best and racist at worst. 100M Chinese travel outside of China annually and that hasn't done any "damage".

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:01:46 2020 No.11311341 >>11311334 americans somehow believe that if only other people saw how great their country was, they would immediately fall on their knees and pray to mcdonalds

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:04:31 2020 No.11311346 >>11311334 This most of the middle class, study in EU or Anglo, unis

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:04:33 2020 No.11311347 File: 110 KB, 849x565, American_Gigachad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311341 Because it's true.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:12:20 2020 No.11311359 >>11311341 it's happened before, have you seen the French Revolution?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:42:54 2020 No.11311439 File: 72 KB, 620x413, im-82189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311359 You can't deny that French people have a tendency to sperg out more than average.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:45:50 2020 No.11311448 File: 784 KB, 1268x819, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311341 Are they wrong though?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 12:54:55 2020 No.11311468 File: 48 KB, 480x480, 1575783610875.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311341 Some of us are monarchists.

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 13:06:43 2020 No.11311514
File: 328 KB, 600x856, PA sperg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

The Pennsylvania Treasury twitter decided to go after Elon Musk for some unknown reason. It's so cute to see our government employees talk about wasting money, and all while they're getting paid to write this shit.

https://twitter.com/PATreasury

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 13:09:18 2020 No.11311522 >>11311514 I bet eastern Pennsylvania is behind this

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 13:14:09 2020 No.11311535 abort you're self

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 13:19:54 2020 No.11311555
File: 197 KB, 850x790, __hayabusa_original_drawn_by_makohan__sample-d6f6af2e722c41a26e1d4507baf3397a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11311514
Why does a treasury need a twitter account
Why is a state treasury paying someone to post on twitter

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 13:44:47 2020 No.11311613 >>11311514 >that twitter account lol wtf is wrong with this fucking world?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 14:45:33 2020 No.11311755 >>11311613 Are you sure it's not really some gold-hoarding preppers with delusions of grandeur?

Anonymous Sat Jan 18 15:05:35 2020 No.11311797

>>11311514
I think they rationalized it by saying "we wanna discuss income equality" bullshit lmao. The gov holding all your tax money is trying to blame a guy creating 50,000 jobs that the guy is bad. The level of delusional belief some people have us sad. If they want to solve inequality, use tax money and give the poorest money back. Targeting people who give 50,000 people their livelihood is retarded.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 15:10:58 2020 No.11311807 >>11311258 Scrub your plans for tomorrow. Tell your boss you're practicing a pre-work abort.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 16:33:26 2020 No.11311969 >>11311613 We are in a post-trump world where the US and Iran share sassy tweets at eachother while diplomaticly lobbing missiles.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 17:38:31 2020 No.11312103 File: 37 KB, 540x540, 1576577999278.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11311755 I don't think it is even worth finding out. >>11311969 >pic

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 20:28:31 2020 No.11312473 >>11311341 Yet millions of people try to get in every year.

>>	Elon Musk Sat Jan 18 20:53:38 2020 No.11312517 >>11311797 Oh yes, AAAH, OOOOH anon, YEEES, good anon, you're so good at sucking my dick! Don't stop now, OOOOOFFF!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 21:53:43 2020 No.11312647 >>11312517 >Projects dick sucking fantasies in a thread about spacecraft >Has the nerve to imply another poster is gay Fuck off, you cringy faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 18 23:01:09 2020 No.11312797 >>11312517 What an embarrassing post to have made.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 00:05:32 2020 No.11312966 last milestone besides data reviews before DM-2!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 00:41:46 2020 No.11313039 Same time again today lads?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 00:43:46 2020 No.11313042 >>11313039 yup

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 02:20:34 2020 No.11313176 >>11313039 yup, test will be scrubbed at the same time

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 06:25:33 2020 No.11313431 >>11313176 Nooooooo

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 06:27:53 2020 No.11313433 Is it scrubbed yet?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 06:58:55 2020 No.11313477 >@SpaceX >Targeting T-0 of 9:00 a.m. EST. Teams are continuing to monitor weather; Falcon 9 and Dragon remain healthy for today's test

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 07:00:08 2020 No.11313478 >>11313433 Just pushed backed 2 hours for now. Launch is 10 EST.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 07:01:11 2020 No.11313479 >New T-0 of 10:00 a.m. EST to optimize for decreasing winds in the recovery area

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 07:10:42 2020 No.11313490 >>11313479 https://www.ventusky.com/?p=28.71;-80.23;6&l=wind-10m Doesn't look good for today then.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 07:30:45 2020 No.11313523 Looks like cunts fucked, night bros.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 09:07:40 2020 No.11313655 Moved back another half hour to 10.30 AM EST

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 09:12:23 2020 No.11313660 File: 41 KB, 600x599, Launch Space X.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313655

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 09:49:15 2020 No.11313733 ACCESS ARM RETRACTED

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:02:03 2020 No.11313768 File: 2 KB, 234x61, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 10:01

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:02:29 2020 No.11313770 >>11313733 Need to scrub the arm? Hopefully no more delays at this point, do they even have a launch attempt available tomorrow or do they need to scrub completely and check all hardware before another attempt?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:02:57 2020 No.11313771 >>11313770 Monday and then Thursday.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:03:26 2020 No.11313774 >>11313768 everyday estronaut has a stream of the launch countdown https://youtu.be/VrPq8vC7C4E

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:03:43 2020 No.11313775 File: 218 KB, 596x388, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Seems like there's still the same wind speeds as before.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:04:44 2020 No.11313777 >>11313774 Yes, but it does not have SpaceX music.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:06:33 2020 No.11313784 File: 317 KB, 2048x1365, 1468819026634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313774 >tech nerds >don't know how to calibrate a joystick

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:06:40 2020 No.11313785 File: 2 KB, 150x27, plsrespond.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Is this what Elon always talks about, maybe instead of just waiting for SpaceX we should be trying to find some way to help space exploration along.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:35 2020 No.11313787 MUSIC ON

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:35 2020 No.11313788 https://youtu.be/mhrkdHshb3E LIVE LIVE LIVE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:35 2020 No.11313789 MUSIC

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:48 2020 No.11313790 Music check: Nominal

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:51 2020 No.11313791 File: 93 KB, 1281x716, 20 min.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 20 mins

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:52 2020 No.11313792 File: 118 KB, 365x450, 3eb456be10fea38e360324812a45bb06.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] WUB WUB WUB

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:07:55 2020 No.11313793 >>11313768 LIVE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhrkdHshb3E

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:08:06 2020 No.11313795 File: 44 KB, 642x482, 1345410742182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] > live is on

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:09:11 2020 No.11313797 ITS HAPPENING EVERYBODY CALM THE FUCK DOWN

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:09:15 2020 No.11313798 Scrubbed for next week

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:09:49 2020 No.11313799 HOLD

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:09:58 2020 No.11313801 File: 1.50 MB, 270x480, soy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313791 >everyday redditor

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:10:24 2020 No.11313803 File: 2.88 MB, 490x544, Musk Dancing.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:11:16 2020 No.11313805 File: 117 KB, 1434x804, action.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313791 Some action now

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:11:20 2020 No.11313806 Stay on target.. Stay on target...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:12:29 2020 No.11313807 It's starting

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:12:33 2020 No.11313808 File: 516 KB, 806x496, 1545833510144.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ALT STREAM: https://youtu.be/ARIZnaMXTEU NASA official stream - likely to have very good up close tracking cam.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:05 2020 No.11313810 File: 148 KB, 559x368, 1418853663229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313798 >>11313799

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:23 2020 No.11313813 I wonder which stream will have the best tracking

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:33 2020 No.11313814 BASED INSPRUCKER

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:34 2020 No.11313815 WE GOT JOHN

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:47 2020 No.11313816 It's smoking already

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:13:56 2020 No.11313817 File: 1.97 MB, 420x264, Hype Thrusters.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:14:26 2020 No.11313818 File: 32 KB, 360x270, 1411872922424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] IS IT FINALLY HAPPENING?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:14:42 2020 No.11313819 >>11313816 >on fire already

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:15:35 2020 No.11313821 File: 18 KB, 270x270, 1559404834848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313819

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:15:58 2020 No.11313823 File: 157 KB, 1725x966, dragon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:17:48 2020 No.11313826 Is it habbening?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:18:03 2020 No.11313828 >already damage controlling The crew dragon it's going to blow into a million pieces isn't it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:18:18 2020 No.11313829 File: 16 KB, 325x236, 1563996283499.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Hello will there be explosions?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:19:09 2020 No.11313832 File: 1.22 MB, 1280x832, Big Bang Dong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313829 Yes

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:19:19 2020 No.11313833 >>11313829 Yes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:19:45 2020 No.11313836 >>11313829 Yes. Definetly. That thing is gonna tear apart and explode.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:19:51 2020 No.11313837 >>11313829 Yes, multiple, including Estronaut exploding in his pants.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:19:52 2020 No.11313838 The NASA stream is just the same as the space x one delayed

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:20:08 2020 No.11313839 >>11313829 maybe, we didn't get any explosions after CRS-7

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:20:57 2020 No.11313843 SpaceX going all out with presenters today

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:21:02 2020 No.11313844 File: 292 KB, 1868x1602, 201.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] oh fug

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:21:42 2020 No.11313848 File: 32 KB, 687x309, muskyboi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >implying NASA will allow a successful test after their Boeing overlords failed.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:21:58 2020 No.11313849 >>11313838 Yes, in the past this has been the case but they will occasionally show different NASA camera angles during the actual flight.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:22:09 2020 No.11313850 How many mins till liftoff? I'd like some food before the kino begins.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:22:47 2020 No.11313851 >>11313850 Around 7-8 minutes if no HOLD.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:22:50 2020 No.11313853 >>11313850 7

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:22:53 2020 No.11313854 >>11313850 7

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:22:53 2020 No.11313855 >>11313850 7

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:23:04 2020 No.11313857 >>11313848 >ULA sniper team standing by

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:23:19 2020 No.11313859 File: 19 KB, 1950x230, spacexplosion.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313850 About 7 minutes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:23:21 2020 No.11313860 >>11313850 6m50s

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:00 2020 No.11313862 WHO WROTE THIS COMEDY SCRIPT

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:19 2020 No.11313863 >loads on the seats There's gonna be load on my seat

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:32 2020 No.11313864 File: 144 KB, 900x1200, Golem 5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313851 >>11313853 >>11313854 >>11313855 >>11313859 >>11313860 fuck

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:34 2020 No.11313865 I'll bet you could find someone to ride that, even with a high potential for death.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:38 2020 No.11313866 >>11313843 Definitely their A team, they're not tripping all over their words like the other hosts. Based John Aspergers.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:24:58 2020 No.11313867 I am a space expert with over 200 hours in Kerbal Space Program and I have never used an emergency escape system in any of my spacecraft, I feel this is merely a waste of resources and added weight.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:25:18 2020 No.11313868 >>11313867 You killed millions of kerbals.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:25:37 2020 No.11313869 >>11313862 Are you making an acronym with all that caps?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:25:40 2020 No.11313870 >>11313865 At least one person, me.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:26:08 2020 No.11313871 File: 62 KB, 538x445, 1494054768997.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] dubs for scrub. trips for complete loss of module.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:26:13 2020 No.11313872 >>11313867 Just add more chutes and heat shields lol

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:26:19 2020 No.11313873 >>11313867 well humans are bitches so

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:26:40 2020 No.11313874 File: 704 KB, 245x230, 1541986122661.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:26:58 2020 No.11313876 >>11313867 Humans are much more valuable than Kerbals.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:27:01 2020 No.11313877 >>11313873 Humans are replaceable.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:27:14 2020 No.11313879 >>11313867 You should apply for a job with the Ghanian space programme.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:28:24 2020 No.11313881 >>11313867 >200 hours Meh Play without saving. My first Mun landing was before I learned you can save in this game

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:28:36 2020 No.11313884 Test will fail. Issues will be identified after the flight that will delay the crew mission.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:28:42 2020 No.11313885 The launch cat better be on time today.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:28:54 2020 No.11313886 We get it, Falcon 9. You vape.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:29:12 2020 No.11313887 >@elonmusk >Dragon high altitude, supersonic abort test is a risky mission, as it’s pushing the envelope in so many ways What did he mean by this?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:29:16 2020 No.11313888 File: 18 KB, 445x156, SpaceX.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's an old tweet but

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:29:38 2020 No.11313889 >>11313881 Yeah I landed on Mun easily and was like 'oh, that was kind of cool' then discovered its supposed to be hard or something

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:29:47 2020 No.11313890 File: 116 KB, 1280x720, jibril2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 30 sec

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:29:51 2020 No.11313891 GO FOR LAUNCH

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:30:01 2020 No.11313892 File: 1.67 MB, 333x281, 1562879718461.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:30:09 2020 No.11313893 >>11313888 really makes you think

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:30:22 2020 No.11313895 GO

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:30:23 2020 No.11313896 File: 497 KB, 533x468, 1553438292756.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] LIFTOFF

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:31:44 2020 No.11313899 File: 41 KB, 400x300, 1410621775222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:31:52 2020 No.11313900 HOLY SHIT

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:31:54 2020 No.11313901 >exploded SpaceX BTFO

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:28 2020 No.11313903 File: 1.71 MB, 695x392, 1485024906338.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] beautifull

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:36 2020 No.11313905 File: 90 KB, 1731x969, boom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] BOOM

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:49 2020 No.11313907 wait it wasn't supposed to go boom boom?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:50 2020 No.11313906 >>11313901 time to shitpost on /pol/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:50 2020 No.11313908 File: 198 KB, 551x551, RIP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] F

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:51 2020 No.11313909 W-was that Falcon 9 supposed to blow up?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:32:52 2020 No.11313910 Press F to pay respects to F9

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:33:09 2020 No.11313911 >>11313905 Looks like some alien weapon from a sci-fi movie

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:33:27 2020 No.11313912 >>11313910 F

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:33:55 2020 No.11313913 File: 474 KB, 1000x1400, 1569556213134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Nice explosion

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:33:56 2020 No.11313915 >>11313909 both SpaceX and NASA said in a press conf they couldn't predict what exactly would happen.

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:34:02 2020 No.11313916
File: 230 KB, 600x410, 1417698299696.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11313905
>>11313908
RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD RSD

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:34:11 2020 No.11313917 >>11313907 >>11313909 Do you faggots even listen. In-flight ABORT test, it's testing an abort scenario. So yes, it was supposed to explode.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:34:45 2020 No.11313919 File: 16 KB, 369x305, 1302688136907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313829 Hello good explosion

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:34:58 2020 No.11313920 guys.. is falcon 9 going to be OK? guys?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:08 2020 No.11313921 File: 216 KB, 458x402, 1472819062361.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:15 2020 No.11313922 >>11313829 yas

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:19 2020 No.11313923 >>11313908 BASED. Press S to spit on F9.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:24 2020 No.11313924 IT WAS CLOUDY

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:45 2020 No.11313925 File: 69 KB, 1732x489, shoot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313905

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:54 2020 No.11313926 >>11313920 Boeing won.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:35:59 2020 No.11313927 ISS ASTRONAUT LAUNCH IN 2020 WE ARE BACK IN SPACE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:06 2020 No.11313928 Thus far NORMINAL lads

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:08 2020 No.11313929 File: 153 KB, 620x349, all_might_thumbs_up.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] MAIN CHUTTES DEPLOYED

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:14 2020 No.11313931 File: 681 KB, 1051x1080, 1524012264033.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313920 That'll buff right out.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:47 2020 No.11313932 File: 91 KB, 1719x482, shoot2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313925

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:53 2020 No.11313934 >Flawless parachutes Boeing BTFO

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:36:55 2020 No.11313935 File: 558 KB, 800x531, starliner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] NOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS CANNOT BE HAPPENING! I'M IN CHARGE HERE!!! IT WAS /MYTURN/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:37:02 2020 No.11313936 USA USA USA

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:37:19 2020 No.11313937 >>11313917 I mean, couldn't you perform an abort test without asploding a rocket?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:37:33 2020 No.11313938 File: 979 KB, 897x453, 1541538048565.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] sayonara, booster-san...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:37:53 2020 No.11313939 File: 166 KB, 646x700, geen_wojack_01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >CC is finally paying off

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:38:04 2020 No.11313940 >>11313935 CRASHING THIS LEGACY

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:38:06 2020 No.11313941 F soyuz

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:38:07 2020 No.11313942 >>11313935 >THIS GIRLROCKET CAN

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:01 2020 No.11313943 >>11313937 If it wasn't F9, the rocket would be junk anyhow. As it was, this was its fifth launch, so F.

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:03 2020 No.11313944

>>11313937
You could I guess, but they wanted to test during the maximum G force load the rocket would experience to prove it could abort at even the worst time. Also remember this booster has already completed 4 missions, so it's not that much of a waster.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:17 2020 No.11313945 In the Everyday astronaut stream the booster reentered and there was a sonic boom and a black plume where the booster fell lol

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:44 2020 No.11313947 SPACEXMASTERRACE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:51 2020 No.11313949 >>11313940 WITH NO SURVIVORS

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:52 2020 No.11313948 >Nooo you're supposed to certify with paperwork and simulations not actual hardware launch tests. This is now how we do things here at NASA

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:39:57 2020 No.11313950 >>11313868 to save billions (in development costs)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:00 2020 No.11313951 Those chutes bouncing were top comfy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:05 2020 No.11313952 >>11313937 >I mean, couldn't you perform an abort test without asploding a rocket? Sure anon, but why would you?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:24 2020 No.11313953 Splashdown was bit early, was that due to winds or model calculation error(NOOO YOU HAVE TO DO 100 TEST AGAIN)?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:31 2020 No.11313954 >>11313949 timestamp?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:33 2020 No.11313955 IT SUNK

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:44 2020 No.11313956 Local news; >nasa rocket made by tesla owner elon musk explodes mid-flight

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:54 2020 No.11313957 >>11313953 ASTRONAUTS ARE ALL DEAD ITS OVER FOR ELON

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:40:57 2020 No.11313958 >>11313954 https://twitter.com/DJSnM/status/1218920119608328192

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:19 2020 No.11313960 >>11313932 >>11313925 Is that footage from a satellite on the right? If so, that's fucking cool.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:29 2020 No.11313961 >>11313868 TO SAVE BILLIONS

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:32 2020 No.11313963 File: 1.02 MB, 596x596, girls_last_dance.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Do we dance now?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:47 2020 No.11313964 File: 267 KB, 1898x976, Screen Shot 2020-01-19 at 10.41.28 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313945

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:50 2020 No.11313965 Was Elon secretly in the capsule all along, lads?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:53 2020 No.11313966 >>11313935 Starliner doesn't even need such test it's that well made and designed. Destructive tests are for when you don't know what you are doing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:41:55 2020 No.11313967 >>11313960 That's from the actual capsule that they tested.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:42:05 2020 No.11313968 Absolutely glorious, Musk is truly the savior. Thank you immigration!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:42:18 2020 No.11313970 >>11313960 From a plane

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:42:59 2020 No.11313972 >>11313960 It's from their chase plane. https://flightaware.com/live/flight/NASA928

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:09 2020 No.11313974 So will NASA hold a press conf in the next few hours I guess?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:11 2020 No.11313975 >>11313966 >this is your engineer brain on math

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:14 2020 No.11313976 File: 506 KB, 1080x1257, elon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] PROBLEM BOEING?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:23 2020 No.11313977 >>11313966 >Starliner doesn't even need such test And yet it couldn't get to the iss

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:39 2020 No.11313978 File: 432 KB, 2448x1836, kerbal-iyDHvZg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] And this, boys and girls, is why you need a fairing on your rocket.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:43:45 2020 No.11313979 File: 310 KB, 1280x792, 0F1D02A5-7F16-405D-AD35-E978B70FAA2A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313960 No, it’s footage from a high-altitude chase plane. https://www.wired.com/2012/09/air-force-universal-translator/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:44:09 2020 No.11313981 >@ULA: SpaceX rocket EXPLODES - Sad! Launch streak reset to ZERO >@ULA: SpaceX rocket EXPLODES - Sad! Launch streak reset to ZERO >@ULA: SpaceX rocket EXPLODES - Sad! Launch streak reset to ZERO

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:44:23 2020 No.11313982 >Boeing snipers missed their shot OH NO OH NO OH NO. Boeing on suicide watch.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:44:40 2020 No.11313983 >>11313979 Looks cool.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:45:11 2020 No.11313984 Everyday Astronaut replaying different angles: https://youtu.be/VrPq8vC7C4E

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:45:21 2020 No.11313986 >>11313966 >Destructive tests are for when you don't know what you are doing. So you're saying Boeing needs to hire some aircraft designers? They seem to be fans of MAXimum destructive testing in that market.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:45:47 2020 No.11313987 >>11313979 The paint job makes one engine look bigger than the other.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:45:47 2020 No.11313988 File: 56 KB, 198x176, 1335928456426.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reminder that if the last Dragon didn't kops itself during that last test this would have been the first Dragon to take people to the ISS.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:46:42 2020 No.11313990 >>11313982 PLAN B INITIATE OPERATION PAPERWORK

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:46:44 2020 No.11313991 >>11313979 >>11313983 I think this is a British airframe believe it or not. Bristol? Can't remember the name

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:46:51 2020 No.11313992 We need congressional hearings IMMEDIATELY to address SpaceX' complete disregard for the ENVIRONMENT. They just exploded a DANGEROUS rocket over the ocean. What has been the impact on our wildlife? This is UNACCEPTABLE.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:47:11 2020 No.11313994 >>11313981 so true cant believe people celebrating a falcon BLOWING UP MID FLIGHT thats just very SAD >>11313982 can't blame them anon they only simulated the snipe ahead of time they didn't actually have cost-plus budget to test first

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:47:14 2020 No.11313995 The idea that spaceX has build a working reusable rocket+reusable reentry capsule for less money then what boeing has pumped in starliner alone is mind boggling.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:48:42 2020 No.11313999 >>11313995 Military industrial complex.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:48:42 2020 No.11314000 cyka blyat

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:48:49 2020 No.11314001 File: 3.18 MB, 5100x3300, senate launch system.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11313995 SLS + Orion is now $44B...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:48:55 2020 No.11314002 >>11313979 Yeah I'm a retard it's a Canberra. Wired get through that whole article without mentioning its fucking BRITISH

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:49:47 2020 No.11314005

>>11313995
Getting rid of explicit pork was a mistake. In the old days if a powerful Senator or Rep wanted to pump some money into their district/state for reelection they could just work out an agreement to do it for something low skill and harmless and useful, like some bridges or basic metal work or whatever. Now after all the "anti pork" efforts, well they still want to pump money in of course, but they have to try to do it via programs that are actually critically important to get right like space or military.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:50:08 2020 No.11314006 >>11313992 It's fine, they'll just tow it outside the environment.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:50:18 2020 No.11314007 >>11313999 *Military industrial congressional complex. He tried to warn us but we didn't listen.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:51:19 2020 No.11314008 >>11313974 I think they said 11:30 AM EST for the press conference.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:51:21 2020 No.11314009 Crewed flight in january 2021 after all the paperwork and data analysis is done.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:52:08 2020 No.11314012 Damn those are some nice tracking shots

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:52:10 2020 No.11314013 >>11313995 But Starliner is far more reusable than Crew Dragon???

>>	Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun Sun Jan 19 10:52:20 2020 No.11314014 >>11314001 D-DELET THIS YOU FANBOY

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:52:28 2020 No.11314015 >>11313974 About 11:30 EST. It will be on the nasa channel if you have it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:53:10 2020 No.11314016 >>11314013 ..Shelby?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:53:57 2020 No.11314020 >>11314009 Crewed flight end of this year. hopefully. >>11314013 it is? Crew dragon is a smaller, more simply design with less things to break or need replacment if i remember correct.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:54:12 2020 No.11314022 No US astronaut would launch on a rocket that explodes on the way to orbit. I think we can all agree that SLS will be the way of the future.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:55:03 2020 No.11314027 File: 1008 KB, 1280x720, 1218920119608328192-[00.00.000-00.21.760].webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Boom.webm

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:55:04 2020 No.11314026 >>11314020 >Crewed flight end of this year. Why do you think it'll take that long?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:55:15 2020 No.11314028 >>11314015 >>11313974 NASA TV is on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:55:18 2020 No.11314029 >>11314013 >>11314016 And also capable of landing our American Astronauts safely back on American Soil instead of dropping them out in the open ocean like its the 60's again.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:55:38 2020 No.11314030 File: 150 KB, 1099x720, 982011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314013 >But Starliner is far more reusable than Crew Dragon??? For a mere $35 million more per seat too!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:56:01 2020 No.11314031 >>11314027 >Elon-senpai did I not do a good job for you? Why would you do this to m-

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:56:37 2020 No.11314032 >>11314001 So roughly $44B better than """Space""" X's firecrackers

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:56:45 2020 No.11314033 >>11314026 >Why do you think it'll take that long? because the US gov needs more time to give boeing a chance of catching up to spaceX.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:02 2020 No.11314035 >>11314029 >Parachutes failing Oh they will land alright..

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:14 2020 No.11314036 >>11314031 >>11314027 Kinda looks like the RSO might have just detonated it manually

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:25 2020 No.11314038 >>11313982 They obviously hit the rocket. The early landing was to deliberately thrown their aim off for a second shot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:38 2020 No.11314039 Base SpaceX doing the bare minimum to give NASA an obsolete minimal spit ball crew and still dabbing all over Old Space while continuing to devote primary resources to a space bus that will cruise on by the astronauts while carrying real space farers.

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:42 2020 No.11314040
File: 221 KB, 1024x683, 5CEDD854-E1DA-45C7-B281-B5A8852E7FE2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11314020
>it is?

Yep, it can be reused 10 times, Dragon 2 will be reused 5 times and only in the cargo configuration. Boeing are already refurbishing the OFT capsule for their second crew mission.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:57:51 2020 No.11314042 >>11314036 INSIDE JOB

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:58:20 2020 No.11314044 >>11314001 >left - exploded 0 times perfect safety record 100% sucess rate >right multiple failure and explosions most recent one mere minutes ago.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:58:35 2020 No.11314046 >>11314042 >ULA insider at NASA attempted to throw debris at the Dragon capsule to damage its parachutes

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:58:47 2020 No.11314048 >>11314036 Nah, it was going like Mach 2-3, top opened up like a big air scoop. Things go real bad real quick when that happens, surprising it lasted even seconds.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:59:25 2020 No.11314051 >>11314044 0% success rate. It hasn't flown therefore it hasn't succeeded yet. 0% failure rate is what you were searching for.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:59:28 2020 No.11314052 >>11314040 Get that piece of shit out of here.

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:59:34 2020 No.11314053
File: 96 KB, 1082x739, D4oUoMrWAAAvVgB.jpg_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11314009
>>11314009
>paperwork
SpaceX has now passed all the tests. And they didn't have minor oopsies like NTO clouds, or chutes that didn't open, or failing to reach the correct orbit.
At this point, any delays are entirely NASA's fault. SpaceX will be ready to launch in February.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 10:59:56 2020 No.11314054 >>11314040 well, they are so cheap compared to starliner that it stil more logical to use dragon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:00:15 2020 No.11314057 >>11314036 >tfw even without the payload the Falcon was still trying it's best to reach space and then land safely, but got murdered by Elon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:00:21 2020 No.11314058 >>11314040 That doesn't mean much if it costs twice as much

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:00:38 2020 No.11314059 >Hmm sorry sweetie, you're going to have to delay your launch until ULA catches up. We treat all American launchers equally here at NASA.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:00:43 2020 No.11314060 >>11314053 NASA says DM2 might be early march https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/01/17/pending-test-outcomes-nasa-says-spacex-could-launch-astronauts-in-early-march/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:01:39 2020 No.11314063 >>11314057 >You have my respects, Falcon 9. I hope they remember you one day.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:01:47 2020 No.11314064 >>11314060 So that means Starliner confirmed for February?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:01:50 2020 No.11314065 >>11313888 Instagram is worth more than SpaceX.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:02:26 2020 No.11314066 >>11314027 >I CAN STILL MAKE IT! I CAN STILL MAKE IT! ELOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:02:39 2020 No.11314067 >>11314057 This is the most likely scenario.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:02:47 2020 No.11314068 File: 25 KB, 223x240, mutta-head.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314035 I really have to find that episode of Space Brothers now.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:02:49 2020 No.11314069 If you are sad about Falcon 9, remember this. No one is ever really gone.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:02:59 2020 No.11314070 Do you think we will get more views of the explosion? On board footage hopefully?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:03:20 2020 No.11314072 >>11314060 waiting for NASA to schedule Boeing's crew flight for february, regardless of the failure to reach orbit :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:03:22 2020 No.11314073 >>11314027 why did he do it, bros?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:03:38 2020 No.11314074 >>11314070 Love to see it from Dragon's POV

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:03:49 2020 No.11314078 >>11314066 They expect one of us in the wreckage brother.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:04:20 2020 No.11314080 >>11314070 I would think they would have a lot of cameras for tests.

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:04:29 2020 No.11314081

>>11314059
>@elonmusk: Announcing today Starship is ready to go and we're cancelling Crew Dragon.
>We've been on an incredible journey together with @nasa and wish them only the best with their exclusive use of the SLS and @boeing.
>With telescopes we should be able to see you from the moon and beyond!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:04:34 2020 No.11314082 >>11314070 knowing spacex, yes we will

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:04:37 2020 No.11314083 >>11314070 For the explosion; no because of cloud cover.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:04:41 2020 No.11314085 File: 36 KB, 720x720, 1388690753939.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314027 Why is it still flying in one piece afterwards?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:05:13 2020 No.11314087 >>11314081 >NOOOO GET THE FAA TO CANCEL THEIR LICENSES

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:05:13 2020 No.11314088 File: 221 KB, 1079x1521, 1553835408231.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314066 Truly tragic

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:05:16 2020 No.11314089 >BILLIONAIRE DISCOVERS NEW WAY TO DISPOSE OF CARBON FIBER COMPOSITE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:05:52 2020 No.11314091 File: 49 KB, 1280x720, laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314073 For the lulz

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:06:14 2020 No.11314092 >>11314085 it's dead, Jim.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:06:27 2020 No.11314093 >>11314085 Thats the second stage. The first stage is what exploded. The capsule was on top of the second stage before the launch abort

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:06:45 2020 No.11314095

>>11314085
They just shut off the engines; the capsule sees this, aborts and does its thing.

The stage itself is now flying without engine power to steer, an unaerodynamic shape, it starts to careen, aerodynamic forces at mach 5-6 break/buckle a tank, kaboom.
It takes a few seconds for that to happen, though. No bombs were triggered.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:08:04 2020 No.11314097 Elon can't keep getting away with it

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:10:20 2020 No.11314104 Seems like they're having the USCV crew (Vic and Mike) instead of the DM-2 crew (Bob and Doug) for the upcoming press conference.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:11:28 2020 No.11314106 File: 122 KB, 483x509, Wan_Hu_large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] So when the crew flight?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:11:30 2020 No.11314107 >>11314104 Weird...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:11:34 2020 No.11314108 Is the press conference going to be streamed?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:11:43 2020 No.11314109 >Post yfw Elon walks into the press conference and calls Boeing the N word on NASA TV

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:12:02 2020 No.11314112 >>11314095 Does drag from the dragon affect Stage1, thus couldn't experience pressures for disassembly until S1 is out of dragons wake.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:12:15 2020 No.11314113 >>11314095 Well, of course, what else would you expect when the front falls off?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:12:20 2020 No.11314114 >>11314104 I thought those guys were going to go up on Starliner. Am I mistaken or did they swap them?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:12:32 2020 No.11314116 >>11314108 Yes, on NASA TV like every previous conference...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:13:22 2020 No.11314118 >>11314108 Yes, here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg&feature=emb_title

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:13:35 2020 No.11314119 File: 382 KB, 2048x1243, EC0F6431-2C75-4522-B7C1-C20DCB8DE757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314114

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:14:13 2020 No.11314121 >>11314108 >>11314118 15 more minutes till press conference.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:14:27 2020 No.11314122 >>11314107 I'm taking it as NASA being confident of DM2 happening soon (March) so they can get USCV-1 in May/June to join Expedition 63. So better show off the crew now.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:14:56 2020 No.11314124 >BREAKING NEWS: New allegations that Falcon 9 committed sexual assault against victim years ago, according to anonymous sources familiar with Falcon 9's thinking >Public outcry to cancel and deplatform Falcon 9 immediately

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:15:22 2020 No.11314126 >>11314119 Based SpaceX. Fuck w*men.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:15:28 2020 No.11314127 >>11314095 >They just shut off the engines; the capsule sees this, aborts and does its thing. But what if the rocket just fucking explodes mid air without throttling back? Would the crew dragon escape too?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:15:35 2020 No.11314130 >>11314116 Jeez I only asked

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:16:15 2020 No.11314131 >>11314121 >>11314118 >>11314108 >@JimBridenstine >@ElonMusk >@Kathy Lueders >@VicGlover >@Astro_illini Those are the participants. Jim/Elon gonna speak on this test.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:16:17 2020 No.11314132 >>11314127 This can't happen

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:16:43 2020 No.11314133 >>11314124 Kek

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:16:43 2020 No.11314134 File: 85 KB, 1024x713, Elon-Musk-and-Grimes-1024x713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314097 >be elon >make rockets, electric cars and creampie your goth wife daily with the purpose of reproduction. a god.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:17:48 2020 No.11314136 >>11314119 how can space x get even more based?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:17:55 2020 No.11314137 File: 1.16 MB, 1655x2480, 3534534534.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] S2 survived

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:18:11 2020 No.11314138 >>11314134 don't forget he has already bred (or cloned) sons to continue the Musk techno-dynasty

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:18:54 2020 No.11314141 >>11314109 I can't believe Elon would call Boeing n'wahs

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:19:11 2020 No.11314143 >>11314127 If something explodes the engines are shutting down, regardless of what the computer says.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:19:20 2020 No.11314144 >>11314136 >SpaceX reaches ISS first >Crew captures and returns US flag >Elon plants that flag on Mars >SLS still in development

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:20:02 2020 No.11314145

>>11314127
>But what if the rocket just fucking explodes mid air without throttling back?
A liquid rocket in mid air running on non-hypergolics doesn't "just explode", fuel has to actually mix and combust. There will be a delay even in the worst case, and the computers monitoring everything react it millisecond level. Engines would get scram shutdown in any anomaly, or obviously would "shut down" regardless if they aren't getting more fuel.

So yeah, it'd get away just fine regardless.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:20:15 2020 No.11314146 >>11314137 I wonder if it's an actual S2 it'll explode like B1046.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:20:22 2020 No.11314147 >>11314137 >I am forgotten

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:20:51 2020 No.11314148

>>11314127
>>11314132
yes, it would. There is some really good overlay of the exploding falcon on the pad with the dragon pad abort test - I can only find the example with music - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9kovJ5SyjM

Part of the abort command is shutting down all engine power anyway, so this is a very likely abort way.
You can also compare it to CRS-7, where something similar happened; a tank exploded / unzipped, without shutting down the engines. There the dragon survived without abort system (!)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:20:52 2020 No.11314149 Reminder, Starlink launches tomorrow as well. SpaceX is BUSY.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:21:41 2020 No.11314153 >>11314146 It believe it was just a mass simulator

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:22:01 2020 No.11314155 >>11314149 Nice, do we know the train's orbit yet?

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:22:17 2020 No.11314156

Reminder that I know someone who knows someone that knows Elon. Can anyone beat that? The story I heard is that my friend asked her why she was interested in him, whereupon she said nothing and merely held out her hand, which sported a truly massive rock

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:22:17 2020 No.11314157 >>11314127 Only way such rocket spontaneously explodes is if someone put explosives on it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:22:40 2020 No.11314159 >SpaceX hangar in KSC is full of reused F9s >The other boosters saw today's F9 leave for the pad >Our brother is coming back, right guys..? Guys?

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:23:02 2020 No.11314162

>>11314153
>>11314146
it exploded when it hit the water.
It was fueled with lox and RP-1, so no mass simulator; it also carries the avionics for ascent. The only part that wasnt "real" about it was the engine, which was replaced by a block of metal with the same weight distribution ( a mass simulator) - all the rest, piping, COPV, fuel / oxidezer were real.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:23:14 2020 No.11314163 >>11314119 Why does spacex get stuck with a basketball American

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:23:30 2020 No.11314164 >>11314157 >rockets are literally fuelled with liquid explosives

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:24:02 2020 No.11314166 >>11314163 >Alright Elon. We have to pass this diversity requirement. Are you going for the black man or the woman?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:24:02 2020 No.11314167 >>11314162 >>11314153 the engine was a mass simulator

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:25:32 2020 No.11314171 >>11314146 >>11314153 DasValdez got a clip of the second stage exploding when it hit the water, there was also a huge plume of smoke that rose after. this tells me it was either not a dummy, or part of the first stage still attached.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:25:40 2020 No.11314172 >>11314164 The air is explosive I don't see it explode all the time.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:26:11 2020 No.11314176 >>11314118 5 min

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:26:18 2020 No.11314177 File: 184 KB, 1080x1080, 1546066660482.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 5 minutes to press conf https://youtu.be/21X5lGlDOfg

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:26:45 2020 No.11314179 >>11314166 is there a diversity simulator we can use instead? maybe a block of concrete with a bra or something?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:27:17 2020 No.11314180 >>11314159 'From time to time they shoot a healthy dog, just to keep the others on their toes'

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:27:29 2020 No.11314181 >>11314163 don't diss Vic Glover he's a cool dude

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:28:37 2020 No.11314184 >>11314166 It’s NASA’s decision who flies on which vehicle, the only exemption being that Boeing get to fly one of their test pilots on their first crew flight.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:28:56 2020 No.11314185 >>11314179 Kek. And an afro wig, and a fleshlight

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:29:35 2020 No.11314190 >>11314166 If that was the case then it was a good choice

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:32:40 2020 No.11314199 File: 193 KB, 2048x1365, EOqCismX0AEBbOf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] dope lets hope this the last we see of it

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:34:52 2020 No.11314204 File: 31 KB, 500x500, 1579162946030.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] HAAAAAAAAAAARK WHERE IS THE PRESS CONFERENCE!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:35:27 2020 No.11314206 >>11314204 Boeing is using it for their certification meeting. Sorry :^)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:36:38 2020 No.11314212 >Elon's rocket blew up in today's test and here's why that's a bad thing. >Top 10 reasons why we should be worried about SpaceX >SpaceX is undermining our space industry. This is problematic.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:36:43 2020 No.11314213 File: 279 KB, 2071x1100, eox8y91vfrb41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314199

Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:36:46 2020 No.11314214

>>11314162
Would a Raptor on board possibly cause the S2 to explode in midair? I wanna know why S1 exploded the way it did. S2 clearly survived and only exploded during splashdown. It's weird S1 exploded first in mid air when S2 should also experiencing the same forces. Only having a Raptor would differentiate them.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:37:38 2020 No.11314218 >>11314213 Iconic.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:38:19 2020 No.11314219 >>11314214 >Raptor Merlin?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:40:05 2020 No.11314221 File: 408 KB, 1050x616, Ain'tGoing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314212 I fully expect this from the retarded media desu

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:40:06 2020 No.11314222 >>11314219 No,the clever girl type.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:40:23 2020 No.11314223 >>11314212 >SpaceX rocket BLEW UP during launch, crew capsule splashed into the ocean with NO live astronauts

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:41:23 2020 No.11314225 >>11309382 fucking chills man, i thought the crew module was fucked

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:41:28 2020 No.11314226 >>11314219 Yeah Merlin. Sorry. Was looking at Starship updates before this had them switched.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:41:32 2020 No.11314227 >>11314214 >>11314219 No, S2 is for it's length more sturdy compared to to S1, which has more bending moments. Also, S1 carries both its own weight as well as the S2, while S2 only 'carries' itself, if that makes sense.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:41:34 2020 No.11314228 >>11314223 >WATCH: Elon Musk DESTROYS Falcon 9 with FACTS and LOGIC

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:43:01 2020 No.11314231 >>11314214 I don't know if not having a real engine means it didn't have any TEB, but that would make a difference

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:46:20 2020 No.11314243 >Still no stream after 15 minutes it was supposed to stream. What a debacle. For NASA that is. Today has been a good day for SpaceX. Boeing. Nasa. Roscosmos. All on suicide watch.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:46:21 2020 No.11314244 >>11309413 yeah! I feel the same way about the one Falcon 9 launch where an engine did fail in flight, but the mission still succeeded in bringing Dragon to the ISS, proving their engine-out scenario.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:47:20 2020 No.11314246 >>11314243 >roscosmos >on suicide watch it's on life support

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:47:37 2020 No.11314247 NASA is late, what a surprise

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:47:43 2020 No.11314248 >>11314227 That makes sense. I had thought having the TEA-TEB of the Merlins would contribute to a mid air fireball of both stages.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:48:32 2020 No.11314252 >>11314243 Probably waiting on all the key people. Elon/Jim being the main

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:48:44 2020 No.11314254 >>11314121 Where the fuck is it?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:49:28 2020 No.11314258 >>11314243 I guarantee the press conference was prepared for the abort test to be a failure instead SpaceX was successful so we're not going to talk about it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:49:43 2020 No.11314259 Elon and Jim has entered the press room. NASA where is your livestream.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:50:02 2020 No.11314260 >>11314252 Elon's too busy fucking Grimes to attend press conferences but forgot to tell NASA that

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:50:22 2020 No.11314262 >>11314212 >>11314213 > 'Today's Falcon 9 explosion represents a heteronormative, ejaculatory violation of the purity of the feminine stratosphere, and reminds us of all that is problematic about white patriarchal power structures'

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:50:59 2020 No.11314266 What will estronaut ask today?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:51:24 2020 No.11314268 >>11314259 What stream are you watching?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:51:53 2020 No.11314269 ITS' LIVE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:51:53 2020 No.11314270 >musk time

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:51:56 2020 No.11314271 PRESSER STARTING

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:52:12 2020 No.11314274 LIVE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:52:34 2020 No.11314275 It's starting. But the only one I can see is John Kraus's live twitter thingy. Nothing from NASA.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:52:56 2020 No.11314278 AMERICAN ASTRONAUTS AMERICAN ROCKETS AMERICAN SOIL

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:53:19 2020 No.11314279 >It's a Jim has to undermine SpaceX to try to not make Boeing look so bad episode

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:53:54 2020 No.11314281 MORE PARACHUTE TESTS, ELON ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:54:00 2020 No.11314282 >>11314275 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:54:11 2020 No.11314284 >>11314279 This

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:54:42 2020 No.11314288 Musk going bald again?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:55:39 2020 No.11314292 >I'm going to say the N word ELON NO

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:56:14 2020 No.11314296 LOOK AT THE COWS HAHAHA

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:56:16 2020 No.11314297 Is Elon autistic?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:56:36 2020 No.11314298 and um... ...yeah

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:56:47 2020 No.11314299 >>11314288 >Picture perfect >F9 explodes DAMAGE CONTROL ENGAGED

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:57:10 2020 No.11314302 I too am fired up

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:57:25 2020 No.11314303 >>11314297 First time hearing him?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:57:49 2020 No.11314304 >>11314298 >..This is boring. Can I go back to Texas building my Starship?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:57:57 2020 No.11314305 File: 51 KB, 1280x592, Boeing Madras.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314221

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:58:18 2020 No.11314306 >>11314297 always amused when people realize for the first time how autistic elon is in his livestreams.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:58:34 2020 No.11314308 Who are these randoms speaking

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:58:43 2020 No.11314310 >>11314303 Yup

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 11:58:50 2020 No.11314312 >Astronauts sweating profusely after seeing that massive fireball

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:00:24 2020 No.11314317 AUTISM

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:01:25 2020 No.11314322 >That's March 2021, sweetie. You forgot for us here at NASA.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:02:05 2020 No.11314326 >>11314308 Kathy Lueders is the CCDev manager, the two guys are the first mission crew, not the first test crew.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:03:01 2020 No.11314331 Musk stuttering is always heartwarming.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:03:39 2020 No.11314334 >>11314326 >the two guys are the first mission crew So like death row inmates waiting for the lethal injection? Gotcha

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:04:04 2020 No.11314336 >>11314331 I like when he pauses mid sentence and goes on a brainstorming session internally while everyone else waits.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:04:49 2020 No.11314338 This has been a pretty cool day anons, even if as a bong I have to live vicariously through US exploits

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:05:22 2020 No.11314341 >We need Boeing because SpaceX is going to fail one day and kill of dozens of astronauts.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:05:27 2020 No.11314342 Jim right now: BOEING FIX YOUR SHIT

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:06:08 2020 No.11314348 >>11314312 Everyone knew stage one was gonna pop.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:06:19 2020 No.11314350 >>11314336 The nice thing is you know he's actually thinking as opposed to just pressing play on the memorised statements

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:06:22 2020 No.11314351 >>11314342 Gladly for $1 billion more, sign here.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:06:35 2020 No.11314353 >>11314338 youre in the anglosphere, our achievements are shared brother

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:06:41 2020 No.11314354 >Crew need additional training for ISS duties ROTATION CONFIRMED

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:07:29 2020 No.11314360 >>11314354 >We need 6 months training on how to use the ISS toilet Elon >Delay your launch while Boeing goes first

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:08:03 2020 No.11314362 >>11314360 Using the COLBERT ain't easy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:08:21 2020 No.11314363 >we need starliner agreed, but we also need Soyuz and Dreamchaser

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:08:51 2020 No.11314366 >>11314363 >That's where you're wrong Jim. We have Falcon 9 AND Starship.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:09:19 2020 No.11314371 >>11314351 I'm sure Boeing is happy to sell them CST-200 Can't Sustain Trajectory 2.0 for a minimum $5bn

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:09:22 2020 No.11314373 >>11314366 And whatever the fuck bald book man calls his capsule these days.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:10:19 2020 No.11314378 >designs in the past >starliner escape engines are discarded after every launch shots fired

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:10:32 2020 No.11314379 fairing catching boats for crew dragon

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:11:30 2020 No.11314385 >>11314379 >We're going to need 12 months of testing for falcon catching the Dragon, Elon. A minimum of 20 successful tests.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:11:36 2020 No.11314386 >>11314379 Big if true

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:12:04 2020 No.11314388 Elon is considering catching Dragons. Welp, the fairing catch crew just got more pressure piled on them.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:12:24 2020 No.11314389 lmao throwing shade like that come on jimbo

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:12:32 2020 No.11314390 >ACTUALLY ELON, you are not Boeing. Don't forget about Belong, folks.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:13:32 2020 No.11314397 >>11314389 Jim DESTROYS Elon with FACTS and LOGIC

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:13:34 2020 No.11314398 >This spacecraft knows exactly where it is in space Unlike certain other spacecraft...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:14:28 2020 No.11314403 >Catastrophic failure >I'm sure we will have setbacks going forwards

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:14:38 2020 No.11314404 >Chinese boats roaming the ocean to find remains of the F9 engines

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:14:46 2020 No.11314405 >>11314379 Considering their success rate catching the fairing when using a steerable parawing I'm doubtful of their chances with a standard parachute

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:15:07 2020 No.11314407 File: 364 KB, 564x1086, 1414792772949.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How does it feel knowing there's only a year of Jimposting left?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:15:39 2020 No.11314408 >>11314404 Why? F9 engines are 'trash' now, they work but they're old technology. China wants a Raptor or BE-4

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:15:39 2020 No.11314409 No Customers oh no

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:16:15 2020 No.11314411 >>11314404 Why? Their long march LOX/RP-1 engines aren't any worse.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:16:51 2020 No.11314413 >Hmm sweetie, you need to finish your parachute tests before you can go launching astronauts

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:16:52 2020 No.11314414 >>11314405 The trajectory should be more stable for the capsule than for a fairing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:17:14 2020 No.11314415 File: 349 KB, 1272x1920, 3E60BCA3-65D2-4869-BCDD-87A1916B056A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314408 China already has their own staged-combustion rocket engines...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:17:57 2020 No.11314418 >Fuck your parachute tests NASA, I'm adjusting the code to propulsively land the Dragon on the pad

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:19:12 2020 No.11314420 >>11314404 Source?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:19:24 2020 No.11314421 >And now we are going to the phones for questions, here's anon from /sci/ >What's this rambling anon? Do you have a question?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:19:41 2020 No.11314422 will they have to do more launches to test parachutes, or can they do it using other methods

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:19:58 2020 No.11314423 >An UNPRECEDENTED amount of parachute tests

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:20:01 2020 No.11314424 >>11314411 >>11314415 their TWR is absolute garbage

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:20:24 2020 No.11314425 >>11314422 They drop the capsule from high altitude cargo plane flights.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:20:24 2020 No.11314426 NASA lady doesn't sound too impressed to be doing more parachute tests.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:20:55 2020 No.11314430 >>11314425 ah cool thanks, so not to bad then

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:21:00 2020 No.11314431 >>11314422 They have dropped from a helicopter to test chutes in the past I believe.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:21:01 2020 No.11314432 >>11314422 They just drop it out of a plane I believe

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:22:06 2020 No.11314437 Elon can't even get his units right. Can't trust SpaceX to launch US astronauts.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:22:42 2020 No.11314439 >>11314424 I’ve seen no TWR data regarding them and they seem to be doing a fine job powering 3, soon to be 4 launch vehicles.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:22:42 2020 No.11314440 >>11314424 They sent shit to the moon with them, they're good enough.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:22:47 2020 No.11314441 >>11314432 >>11314431 Cool thanks guys

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:04 2020 No.11314442 >NASA and Airborne sweating when Elon wants to make Starship without chutes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:04 2020 No.11314443 How many parachute tests we need to make sure starliner flies first?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:45 2020 No.11314446 >>11314443 How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:50 2020 No.11314447 >>11314437 dummy crew in the capsule have been liquified from the impact, is what the word on the street is.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:54 2020 No.11314448 >>11314443 >Tests Boeing only needs paperwork.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:23:57 2020 No.11314449 >>11314437 >Oops Elon looks like you had a catastrophic unit conversion error- we’re gonna need more parachute tests

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:25:14 2020 No.11314453 You can tell Elon really enjoys blowing things up on purpose whenever he gets a chance.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:25:18 2020 No.11314454 >>11314449 An unprecedented amount of extra testing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:26:11 2020 No.11314456 >>11314449 >>11314454 Extensive detailed and thoroughly reviewed testing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:27:01 2020 No.11314458 File: 177 KB, 269x683, when the rocket blows just right.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314453

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:27:19 2020 No.11314459 >>11314424 first stage engine mass isn't significant

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:27:23 2020 No.11314460 >>11314448 NASA has to pay them for it though like in the safety review.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:28:02 2020 No.11314462 >>11314456 Followed by a round of testing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:30:53 2020 No.11314466 SOYUZ BTFO HOW WILL RUSSIA EVER RECOVER?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:31:56 2020 No.11314467 >Russians made their Soyuz abort with massive G's because they saw how horrible things can go with the N2

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:32:09 2020 No.11314468 >>11314466 >HOW WILL RUSSIA EVER RECOVER? Russia never built anything for comfort, they'll manage.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:33:04 2020 No.11314471 >>11314456 >>11314454 >>11314462 Of course before these tests we will need to thoroughly certify them by experimentation of the system in a real world environment.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:33:31 2020 No.11314473 I need a picture of Elon wearing the helmet right now

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:33:40 2020 No.11314474 What's the per launch cost of the two systems?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:34:05 2020 No.11314476 Well there it is, dumbest question in the history of humanity. Of course you test your toys.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:35:12 2020 No.11314482 >soistronaut

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:35:49 2020 No.11314485 ELON JUST SHOT ESTRONAUT

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:36:24 2020 No.11314489 time for estronaut

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:36:25 2020 No.11314490 >>11314485 what'd he use

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:36:36 2020 No.11314491 >>11314476 Tradition and simulations are enough. Such is the wisdom of the Ancients.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:39:05 2020 No.11314502 Damn even the NASA admin can't tell the difference between a kilometer and a mile. Our space program is DEAD

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:39:59 2020 No.11314507 >>11314502 It's about time you join the rest of us in using non-retarded standards.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:40:20 2020 No.11314510 >>11314502 >not using the kilomiliiinch

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:42:15 2020 No.11314521 >>11314490 boring company branded ar-15 with grenade launcher attachment

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:42:17 2020 No.11314522 >>11313991 Ask >>>/n/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:42:49 2020 No.11314526 >>11314350 Difference between introverts and extroverts. They have to think things through before saying.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:43:45 2020 No.11314532 >>11314521 that was a "flare launcher", it's 37mm instead of 40mm so you don't need to pay the ATF the tax stamp

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:44:15 2020 No.11314534 >>11313991 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_B-57_Canberra WB-57 to be exact.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:45:59 2020 No.11314545 >>11314031 >They expect one of us in the wreckage.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:48:02 2020 No.11314557 >>11314532 i still have much to learn, it seems

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:50:39 2020 No.11314566 File: 121 KB, 500x582, 1574018503021.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11314532

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:52:15 2020 No.11314573 >>11314566 Does the ATF jurisdiction include Mars?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 12:58:05 2020 No.11314595 >>11314534 Britain used to be way up there at aircraft design at one point, makes me proud that a slide-rule era design is still so well suited for its role

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 13:07:30 2020 No.11314616 Thanks for tuning in everyone; next F9 launch is Starlink-3 in a couple days.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 19 13:08:07 2020 No.11314620 >>11314595 It's definitely aesthetic.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]