Why hasn't /sci/ still been able to solve this?

[Anonymous No.11306405]

[Anonymous No.11306407]

>>11306405
>I love Kurisu!

[Anonymous No.11306483]

>>11306405
1/4

[Anonymous No.11306484]

>>11306405
50-50 either you're right or you're wrong

[Anonymous No.11306598]

Choice = 25%, Chance = 50%
Choice = 50%, Chance = 25%
Choice = 0%, Chance = 25%

None.

[Anonymous No.11306603]

>>11306598
Then... It's 0%? Wouldn't that make the chance 25% though?

[Anonymous No.11306617]

>>11306603
It's a paradox. If you choose C (0%), you are correct. However, that then makes your chances of being right 25%, not C.
No answer is valid.

[Anonymous No.11306619]

>>11306405
Clamped and vaccinated.

[Anonymous No.11306666]

They're all correct as long as you can reasonably explain why you'd choose that answer and there's always a reasonable explanation for each. Just choose one at random and justify it.

[Anonymous No.11306667]

>>11306666
Based satan

[Anonymous No.11306699]

Let Co be the even you picked the correct answer
And A, B, C, and D be you randomly selected A, B, C, and D respectively.

P(Co) = P(A).P(Co|A) + P(B).P(Co|B) + P(C).P(Co|C) + P(D).P(Co|D)

P(A) = P(B) = P(C) = P(D) =1/4.


P(Co|A) = 1/2 because there are two equally probable states. You probably think it's 1/4, but that's not the PROBABILITY of you being right, that is the answer that corresponds to A.

P(Co) = 4*(0.25*0.5)
The probability of randomly selecting the correct answer is 50%.

[Anonymous No.11306705]

>>11306405
is this a statistic problem or probability problem

[Anonymous No.11306710]

>>11306705
It's a paradox, it's a degeneracy problem.
>I'm lying right now
You can say stuff that makes no sense, but it's just a wrong predicate, no right answer.

[Anonymous No.11306717]

>>11306699
But if we assume the answers that corresponds to the letters as the chance of you being correct.

I.e. P(Co|A) = 1/4.

That would be (0.25*0.25)*2 + (0.25*0.5)

Then, the answer would be 0.25

So, it depends on how you want to look at it.

[Anonymous No.11306782]

[Anonymous No.11306822]

>>11306782
No such process exists.
Without (3.) You can only ever have a power of 2 many l's.
With (3.) you can only ever have a power of 2 many l's minus a multiple of 3.

[Anonymous No.11306825]

>>11306782
do rule 2 like 3 times, M with 8 i, do rule 3 and get MiiUiii do rule 2, MiiUiiiiiUiii, do rule 3, MiiUiiUUiii, do rule 4, MiiUiiii, do rule 3, MiiUUi, rule 4, Miii, now you got 3 is, this was the goal the entire time because now you can use rule 3 to make it MU, I WILL NEVER FAIL YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEMS BECAUSE I INDEED SHOULD BE ABLE TO SOLVE THEN

[Anonymous No.11306832]

>>11306825
>do rule 3, MiiUiiUUiii, do rule 4, MiiUiiii
you dropped an i there, friend

[Anonymous No.11306836]

>>11306825
>MiiUiiUUiii, do rule 4, MiiUiiii
Does 7 = 6?

[Anonymous No.11307311]

>>11306405
It is 0% because it is literally impossible to get a correct answer. Even if you answer 0% you are wrong because that changes it to 25%

[Anonymous No.11307316]

>>11306405
I need to know how many of the answers are correct first

[Anonymous No.11307572]

>smol brain
>guessed B randomly
>found out it was B
>i got the 50%

[Anonymous No.11307637]

>>11306405
What the fuck is even the question? It's a non-question. There is no "correct" "answer".

[Anonymous No.11307638]

>>11306699 and >>11306717
>this is how your brain degenerates on math

[Anonymous No.11309015]

>>11306405
None of the answers are correct. Sci is retarded not being able to figure this out.

[Anonymous No.11309041]

>>11306405
That’s funny
1/4 is the first answer you would chose, but since 1/4 is two given answers it’s really 50% chance of guessing 1/4 but the 50% chance occurs only 1/4 but the chances of picking 1/4 is 50% but 50% only occurs 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4 but 1/4 occurs 50% but 50% occurs 1/4

[Anonymous No.11309045]

>>11306405
Suppose we ask this question infinitely many times. There is a 0% chance that any single person is correct, but 100% chance that at least one is correct.
This could also be extrapolated from the common law of poopabilities: the answer is either right or wrong, 50/50. An interesting result emerges when we correlate across multidimensional psychosocietal performance indicators such as luck and wealth where the person is more believed - and thus more likely - to be right when we increase either parameter. Given this, it is likely there is only one person capable of answering this question, but the chances of them being in any one group the surveyor finds is nil. Ipso facto, 50% is good enough. C final answer.