[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.01 MB, 3800x2385, CRITICAL_THEORY.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302189 No.11302189[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How scientific is critical theory? Is it psued? Asking for a friend

>> No.11302215
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302215

>>11302189
It's technoscience so it belongs on >>>/g/

>> No.11302227
File: 211 KB, 467x348, 1474298659252.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302227

>>11302189
>The lengths anti-semites will go to avoid cognitive dissonance

>> No.11302293
File: 51 KB, 500x498, wat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302293

>>11302215

>> No.11302353

>>11302215
Holy shit this is by far the most retarded thing I've ever read

>> No.11302368

>>11302189
Not scientific whatsoever. You can delete your thread now.

>> No.11302380

Critical theory is as valid as any other soft science theory, but critical race theory is charlatanism. Even the name was deliberate in order to ride coattails, it was originally called racial realism. Not even joking.

>>11302353
I take it you haven't clicked OP's picture.

>> No.11302398

>>11302380
OP's picture is much less crazy than "feminist technoscience." It at least addresses real issues, even if it does string them together into a mass jewish conspiracy

>> No.11302473

>>11302398
That feminist technoscience is full of bloviation, wishful thinking and unwarranted self-importance, but the OP pic lists several "real issues" which aren't even real, let alone issues. It's literally psychotic.

>> No.11302519

>>11302473
Not saying OP's pic isn't crazy, but it's connections drawn from reality at least. The feminist crap is just pure delusional fantasy.

>> No.11302770

>>11302189
>How scientific is critical theory?
You'll often find critical theorist attacking a lot of common sense beliefs about science. It's not really a "science" at all and it's intellectual marxist predecessors firmly rejected the label of science.

>> No.11302799

>>11302227
>>11302368
>>11302519
>Straw man arguments

>> No.11302827
File: 175 KB, 720x1102, 0a417aeb-74dc-4acf-9abd-f795d6f1aa2d_full.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302827

>>11302189
By the way, you should read the texts yourself and figure out what these people were talking about instead of saving brainlet infantile charts.

>> No.11303166

>>11302380
>>11302398
So you have actually investigated this in depth? No? I thought not so then stfu psueds. I prefer to call people that don't know wtf they are talking abut "crazy" not those that do.

>> No.11303374
File: 40 KB, 300x300, hoxha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11303374

It is 100% revisionist

>> No.11303645
File: 106 KB, 346x430, soyjoker.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11303645

>critical theory