[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 65 KB, 1068x601, 9D540CF6-611C-477B-BED0-A3141DD4B369.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11292965 No.11292965 [Reply] [Original]

>“Why yes, I do only solve PDEs numerically, analytic methods are a waste of time, how could you tell?”

How do you respond /sci/?

>> No.11292969
File: 368 KB, 640x480, 1577845501186.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11292969

>How do you respond /sci/?

>> No.11292971

>>11292965
>numerically
>>>/g/

>> No.11292975
File: 254 KB, 785x1000, 3664CC59-D95C-4147-8FEA-E5C55BD93881.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11292975

>>11292971
>bro I promise we can find an analytical solution look if I wave my hands here we can reduce it to an ODE hahaha!!!!

>> No.11293157

>>11292965
sure, typical approximations (e.g. FEM) work for routine applications of PDEs such as in aerodynamics and electronics, but any relevant advances go hand in hand with new points of view which can only happen by working directly on theory. mathematicians (or at least, very math-literate physicists) are behind all the flashy new techniques that keep appearing. anyhow, you're most likely a dumb undergrad without any experience in a firm that works with those models

>> No.11293297

>>11292965
I suck his dick