[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 164 KB, 1080x1266, 1559443855878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11287754 No.11287754 [Reply] [Original]

Reminder
1. Species don't exist
2. There are only 3 sciences: physics, chemistry, biology
3. IQ is based on psychology. Psychology is a pseudoscience, therefore IQ is also pseudoscience
4. All dietary sciences is pseudo science
5. All forensic sciences is pseudo science
6. Economics is not a science.

If you disagree with this, you need to recognize that you are wrong and I am right. Learn epistemology.

>> No.11287759

>>11287754
Define:
>1. Species don't exist
>2. There are only 3 sciences: physics, chemistry, biology
>3. IQ is based on psychology. Psychology is a pseudoscience, therefore IQ is also pseudoscience
>4. All dietary sciences is pseudo science
>5. All forensic sciences is pseudo science
>6. Economics is not a science.

>> No.11287770
File: 92 KB, 483x417, 1563391457107.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11287770

>defining axioms

>> No.11287814

>>11287754
>4. All dietary sciences is pseudo science
You contradict yourself, dietary science falls under biological science.
>5. Forensics is a logical discipline and falls under reverse engineering. Thus you are technically correct.

>> No.11287968

>>11287814
>dietary science falls under biological science
no it doesnt you retard. you honestly think diet science uses any biological sciences to prove anything?

>>11287814
NIST came out and said basically all forensic sciences has no basis in science.

>> No.11287971

>>11287754
>species don't exist
that wouldn't make the observations associated with different species less significant
>there are only 3 sciences
it doesn't really matter as long as people understand that natural science is science and nothing else is science
>iq is based on psychology
psychometrics
>psyche is pseudoscience
sure
>so iq is pseudoscience
the underlying idea is well intentioned and has substance to it, but iq is not science no.
>all dietary science is pseudoscience
the study of animal nutrition and metabolism is just physiology and that's not pseudoscience, but yes nutritional science is usually not physiology
>forensic science is a pseudoscience
its a soft science sharing similar status to paleontology and geology, its more of a science than CS or engineering but less than something like astronomy
>economics is not a science
yes

why make this thread?

>> No.11288014

>>11287754
Brainlet thread. Let die.

>> No.11288030

>>11287754
>Learn epistemology.
Lrn2science fgt pls

>> No.11288081

>>11287754
>Dumb communist makes dumb thread

>> No.11288127

>>11287971
Maslow's hierarchy of needs ofc

>> No.11288243
File: 432 KB, 2215x4000, e4832fe5d6d68f05572204f4935caf43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11288243

>>11287968
Yes. That is what...falling under biological science means...

>> No.11289154

>>11287754
Based and truly redpilled

>> No.11289191

>>11287754
Only degenerate smoothbrains who never had sex believe in IQ and MB tests

>> No.11289224
File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1568457325167.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11289224

>>11287754
>Another IQ thread

>> No.11289435

He's right you know