[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 104 KB, 784x616, Screen Shot 2020-01-07 at 3.47.27 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284306 No.11284306 [Reply] [Original]

How the fuck does this topology BS have any real world practical applications?

designing handcuffs for mr. fantastic?

>> No.11284308
File: 205 KB, 880x1148, Screen Shot 2020-01-07 at 3.57.48 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284308

>> No.11284316

How do you even solve this?

>> No.11284320

>>11284316
don't imagine it as infinitely elastic rubber, but as clay with rules

you can move or 'glide' each junction point along the surface freely

>> No.11284327

>>11284320
And still, how do you solve it? I've been trying it in my head for a while, couldn't get anywhere.

>> No.11284329

>>11284306
This is impossible

>> No.11284333

>>11284327
>>11284329
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8qwqGjOlSE#t=3m

3 min

>> No.11284334

>>11284333
I miss PBS Infinite Series...

>> No.11284335

https://www.wikifeet.com/Kelsey_Houston-Edwards

of course it exists

https://www.wikifeet.com/Vi_Hart

>> No.11284341
File: 33 KB, 600x600, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284341

>>11284333
If you inflate the main loop even more you get a ball

>> No.11284344

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aUdKimSCJI

here's one without need for infinite elasticity

I've had this puzzle for years, thought it was a troll toy.

>> No.11284722

>>11284334
I miss the qt

>> No.11284793

>>11284333
sorry, still can't visualize how the hell does the bottom loop disappear at 3m14s

>> No.11284819

>>11284333
How can the ring connecting the two linked rings just be changed into a ball? Didn't she explain that a ring and a ball are topologically speaking fundamentally different? The end result lacks the connecting ring! Doesn't the first picture have torus 3 instead of torus 2? It has three ring shapes! Help me understand please.

>> No.11284821

>>11284819
genus* not torus

>> No.11284836

>>11284819
Anon, there's nothing wrong with mixing up isotopy.
But they're clearly homeomorphic, are you retarded?

>> No.11284838

>>11284819
Yeah exactly. They break their own rules. What a bunch of nigger nonsense.

>> No.11284843

>>11284836
That didn't help me understand at all

>> No.11284849
File: 155 KB, 713x1480, solution.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284849

>>11284819
I made a different solution

>>11284838
kek brainlet

>> No.11284854

>>11284849
bravissimo

>> No.11284855

>>11284849
i see now, thank you

>> No.11284866
File: 123 KB, 804x1740, solution2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284866

>>11284308

>> No.11284870

>>11284866
>the two loops obviously aren't homotopic, but you can still do this
i thought i understood topology wtf

>> No.11284882

So is this actually what people are working on when they say topology?

Is math ever actually hard or just hard to understand for the uninitiated?

>> No.11284893

>>11284882
math is hard to internalize and put into practice

>> No.11284897
File: 204 KB, 827x1229, solution3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284897

>>11284308

>> No.11284901

>>11284882
you have to do months of point set topology before you get to see pretty pictures

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqJ3LLJV5zQ

>> No.11284922

>>11284849
+5 internets

>> No.11284941
File: 453 KB, 1920x1080, 1574721454997.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284941

>>11284849
>how sci kisses their date

>> No.11284961
File: 2.02 MB, 1352x2435, 20200107_091857-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11284961

I think... I'll just leave this here

>> No.11285035

>>11284882
you're wrong to begin with, this is nothing like what topologists do.

>> No.11285059

>>11284870
How are they not homotopic?

>> No.11285061

>>11284941
>sci
>two girls
Factually incorrect.

>> No.11285114

>>11284849
>kek brainlet
You didn't prove me wrong.

>> No.11285225

>>11284793
think about it as of you did it with your body
your main body inflates, subsuming your arms into your now round body. You basically are a ball with two hands now.
Then you pull your hands into your body as well so that only your fingers poke out of it
and then you basically move the base of your right thumb through the space between your left index and thumb

>> No.11285316

>>11284306
I actually attended a talk where some theoretical chemist discovered how to produce a carbon framework with negative curvature using topology.

>> No.11285340

>>11284849
good post

>> No.11285645

>>11284819
>Doesn't the first picture have torus 3 instead of torus 2?
No, it was always genus 2.

>> No.11285662

>>11285059
how would they be?

>> No.11285699

>>11284866
Would it be permitted to move the right loop inside through the left one in last phase?

>> No.11285707

>>11285699
Nevermind kek thats what you did

>> No.11285820

>>11285662
The shape is basically just one loop with another loop hanging off of it. You can squeeze the other loop inside the first. Nbd

>> No.11285868

>>11285061
there are tons of girls (male) on sci

>> No.11285880

>>11284333
i want to stretch the morphology of that thigh gap

>> No.11285902

>>11284819
My guess, having never taken a class, is in topography you get to play with surface area and volume as much as you want, so long as the surface area does not break nor weld(?) with other parts.
At this point I agree, what in the fuck than is the real world application of these mind games. Like yeah, we can all break rules and get 1+1=3

Tho I can see the logic applications of boiling everything down to basic shapes, like a coffee mug is just a toroid. Toroids might share similar manufacturing tricks.

>> No.11285988
File: 118 KB, 719x949, IMG_20200107_222433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11285988

>>11284306

>> No.11286017

>>11284849
How do you get from 5 to 6? You're on the inner loop in 5 but then magically are on the outer loop in 6

>> No.11286033

>>11286017
Pay attention to the blue line. The point where it attaches is just sliding down.

>> No.11286053

>>11284306
It hilariously doesn't. I took a few classes on algebraic topology as a student. The professors admitted multiple times that "most" topology has no practical application at all and probably never will, and I gather that this was a fairly normal perspective in the field.
Study math for math's sake. Everything else is trivial.
>>11285902
>topography
You mean topology?

>> No.11286059

>>11284849
This is an actually good post right here. I actually feel like I learned something. Good job.

>> No.11286065

>>11285902
No see the point of this is that even when you break some of these rules, it's impossible to create a contradiction, so you can't "prove anything" with this. The biggest advantage, I think, of doing this activities is to provide a deeper theoretical background for analysis and expand the way we think about analysis.

>> No.11286094

>>11285820
oh, no, you misunderstand what loops i meant. i meant the curves embedded on the surface.
of course, this only works when the surface is embedded in R^3 which is why it happens to begin with. it's still strange seeming but whatever.

>> No.11286096

>>11286053
your professor was wrong, topology is extremely relevant to a number of applications. biology in terms of protein folding, topological data analysis for stats and data science, etc. to be fair these are relatively new applications.

>> No.11286102

>>11286096
Maybe it's being used more practically now. That's a good thing then.

>> No.11286445

>>11286102

No. Application of pure mathematics is almost never good.

>> No.11286460

>>11286445
Why?

>> No.11286473
File: 27 KB, 315x499, 41G9xolWZ5L._SX313_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11286473

>>11284306

>> No.11286808

>>11286460
>>11286102
It is a good thing, the other guy is a schizo. But it wasn't bad before, none of the applications could ever have existed had we not, say, properly developed different homology theories in isolation. Or had we not looked at polynomial invariants of knots without thinking about what they might be used for. This stuff was all very abstract and it was important.
>>11286445
Incorrect. Never post again.

>> No.11286822

>>11284849

yeah, I'm thinking this is based

>> No.11286883

>>11284308
it's useful for CAD software.

>> No.11286900

>>11285988
based solution too

>> No.11287219

>>11284306
How old are you?

>> No.11287316

>>11286808
>Incorrect. Never post again.
You're talking to G. H. Hardy, loser.

>> No.11287344

>>11286808
Its correct now

>> No.11287725

Can someone unironically explain what the fuck this is and how it is useful?

>> No.11287752

>>11287725
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology

>> No.11287767
File: 54 KB, 660x400, B25CC55F-7C9A-4DBD-B0FD-B79DB0C26E47.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11287767

Is it possible for there to be a material that works completely topologically under SATP?