DARK MATTER BTFO

[Anonymous No.11281690]

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-evidence-key-assumption-discovery-dark.html
>When the luminosity evolution of SN is properly taken into account, the team found that the evidence for the existence of dark energy simply goes away (see Figure 1).
>"Quoting Carl Sagan, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but I am not sure we have such extraordinary evidence for dark energy. Our result illustrates that dark energy from SN cosmology, which led to the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics, might be an artifact of a fragile and false assumption."

[Anonymous No.11281697]

You're already mixing dark matter with dark energy, two totally unrelated topics.
I won't even bother reading anything more.

[Anonymous No.11281716]

>>11281697
it was just a dumb typo, my fucking bad

[Anonymous No.11281726]

>>11281690
They write like total faggots, as if dark energy was something already deemed existent by some. But yeah, cool. We MAY be able to finally let it rest.

[Anonymous No.11281729]

[Anonymous No.11281730]

>>11281690
Ah yes only took a better part of two decades for people to realize that siphoning grants is easy with bogus claims and catchy names.

[Anonymous No.11281732]

>>11281690
>The Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 was divided, one half awarded to Saul Perlmutter, the other half jointly to Brian P. Schmidt and Adam G. Riess "for the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the Universe through observations of distant supernovae."
Their conclusion is totally off and attacks strawmen arguments. Assholes.

[Anonymous No.11281741]

>>11281697
we got amateurs at 12 o clock, check your safety!