[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 4 KB, 296x199, Line-Drawing-Wittgenstein-in-Heritage-1984-p-87.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11280093 No.11280093 [Reply] [Original]

A common contention is that the scope of our scientific understanding is minimal when compared to the whole of all things. It has been theorized that there are things that we cannot sense, talk about, or possibly cannot truly understand with our current scientific, mathematical, and philosophical methodology. Where do you draw a boundary, if there is one? At which point do you dismiss a theory or idea? Do you use your own standard, or do you borrow from others?

>> No.11280260

This is why you could literally have 400 IQ and I'd still consider you dumb as fuck. Get dabbed on by my retarded brain smartfags.

>> No.11280375

Why are people with high IQ so dumb?

>> No.11280382

>>11280093
>It has been theorized that there are things that we cannot sense, talk about, or possibly cannot truly understand with our current scientific, mathematical, and philosophical methodology.

Prove it or fuck off. Science is about constructing models with predictive power, not babbling about invisible fairies.