/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11271445]

What's the evolutionary reason behind this?

[Anonymous No.11271466]

women = dumb

[Anonymous No.11271468]

>>11271445
Most men are idiots and all women are idiots.

[Anonymous No.11271477]

Chad only

[Anonymous No.11271479]

[Anonymous No.11271483]

>>11271445
Should've posted the full image
>>11271466
>>11271468
Hahahahah upboated :DDD lolll

[Anonymous No.11271487]

[Anonymous No.11271495]

>>11271487
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.11271500]

>>11271495
>>>reddit

[Anonymous No.11271501]

[Anonymous No.11271504]

[Anonymous No.11271508]

simps ruined everything

[Anonymous No.11271515]

[Anonymous No.11271517]

[Anonymous No.11271524]

[Anonymous No.11271530]

[Anonymous No.11271532]

[Anonymous No.11271538]

[Anonymous No.11271549]

[Anonymous No.11271554]

Reminder that r/dataisbeautiful banned posting of tinder stats because it was too blackpilling

[Anonymous No.11271556]

[Anonymous No.11271557]

because it's true. for every 100 10/10 women there is 1 10/10 man

[Anonymous No.11271564]

>>11271557
Ratings are social constructs. They're not objective. The only objectively true and observable fact is that modern women have much higher standards than men, and are hypergamous.

[Anonymous No.11271566]

[Anonymous No.11271569]

Fact: ugly/low status males are INVISIBLE to women. This leads to a skewed perception of attractiveness.

[Anonymous No.11271570]

>>11271445
Online dating is like satanism, raves and shale oil in that it exists solely to facilitate mating between fat, ugly and stupid people.

[Anonymous No.11271601]

>>11271564
think to yourself dude, how often do you see a super beautiful girl vs how often do you see a super handsome guy

[Anonymous No.11271610]

>>11271601
Honestly, they're about equally rare for me. I certainly wouldn't say super handsome guys are rarer though (maybe even more common).

[Anonymous No.11271622]

>>11271445
Humans reproduce via sexual selection. While male humans would pretty much mate with any female human, female humans only mate with male humans who display the most impressive traits. The problem is, it's rather difficult for males to impress females online rather than in real life.

[Anonymous No.11271881]

>>11271479
how are you supposed to score personality when you only see some pictures and maybe text?

[Anonymous No.11271889]

>>11271564
Harry could have done a lot better to be honest with you, what shitty deal did he get to be landed with her?

[Anonymous No.11271904]

>>11271610
>I certainly wouldn't say super handsome guys are rarer though (maybe even more common).
You're lying to adhere to your argument

[Anonymous No.11271908]

>>11271622
the only /sci/entific answer here.
before christian dysgenic cuckery, women only reproduced with intelligent and able men but they stayed loyal to the men that they reproduced because they were his property and they viewed themselves as his property.
now we have this shitty mix of christian humanism, American liberalism and primitive instincts (the shittiest of each era) which results in women who are very selective but they destroy all this potential by not raising their child properly and giving him/her FAS by being an alcoholic whore

[Anonymous No.11271915]

>>11271479
People who look good have a better personality, it's expected.

[Anonymous No.11271919]

>>11271908
>him/her FAS by being an alcoholic whore

probably the real reason behind the popularity of billie elish

[Anonymous No.11271922]

>>11271549
first pic is good, second pic has him with an uncomfortable expression and weird hair, last two pics are too tryhard

[Anonymous No.11271925]

>>11271569
ugly women are also invisible to most men, except for the occasional drunk degenerate

[Anonymous No.11271928]

*hidden*

[Anonymous No.11271930]

>>11271445
A statistic provided by "OKCUPID" or whatever tells nothing about humanity.

A very specific kind of people use it in a very specific way. Not suitable sample to assert anything about humans, biology, or the planet.

[Anonymous No.11271940]

>>11271925
yes, but ugly invisible women are like the 10th percentile for women, whereas that number is at least 4x higher for men

[Anonymous No.11271942]

>>11271445
Echo chambers have allowed roasties to do whatever the hell it is they want. I've been in a dozen relationships by now and I've stopped caring for women entirely. I don't even take them serious anymore and outright ignore their worthless comments. Women are, by all intents and purposes, worthless and maybe 1 in 100 is worth having a conversation with. Most suck massive in bed and simply lack the motivation/experience to understand how to move, and the ones who are decent are those you'd never want to be in a relationship with.

Roasties have been going through life being told by friend and online communities to "be themselves", but that, unfortunately, has resulted in them simply not knowing their own place anymore. This sounds like a massive /pol/cel stance, but the reason why men engage in relationships with women is and will always be for them to "stand in the kitchen". They are the ones who are supposed to create the family he comes home to. Even in modern relationships that have the female puruse a job. Modern women just delay this process forever, and the echo-chambers they frequent, as well as the availability of online communities, always makes them search for something better. To +1 the person they currently have, even if it's no more than a 1% increase. Finding the right partner has always been a pissing contest, but modern connectivity has made it so much fucking worse. Nowadays people actually KNOW someone better is out there and they KNOW there's a way to connect. Problem is: They are too deluded to realise those people don't want anything to do with them.

[Anonymous No.11271954]

>>11271549
This guy looks like a creep. If your profile pics don't show you with other people (doing fun stuff), then you're raising one of the biggest red flags.

[Anonymous No.11271956]

>>11271930
It does.
Human attractiveness is on a normal distribution but somehow women can't see it but men can.
Women think 80% of men are below average. Let that sink in. They don't understand what average means or something.

[Anonymous No.11271959]

Women are socialized to take better care of themselves, which is why they appear more attractive in general. Just look up the kind of routines, money, even surgery that women go through for the sake of beauty.

The average man does little other than keeping their head/facial hair trimmed and showering every now and again.

[Anonymous No.11271964]

>>11271956
Aren't females just deluded on looks?

They truly believe beauty comes in a bottle.

[Anonymous No.11271966]

>>11271956
>human attractiveness is on a normal distribution
How do you measure human attractiveness? You cannot put it on any distribution unless you can measure it. Let's discuss this revolutionary mechanism first, before jumping that much further.

>women think 80% of men are below average
This isnt true. You will find zero sources to back this claim up. Im waiting. Hit me. Show me the source which says this. You will not find any. Come on. Link the source.

[Anonymous No.11271971]

>>11271908
Oddly enough old christianity actually selected eugenically for higher intelligence...
it got "reformed" and now we're in our current mess

[Anonymous No.11271991]

>>11271954
two/three of his pictures are taken by some other guy

[Anonymous No.11271997]

>>11271483
The full image where it shows women still message the men they rate unattractive and men only message the women who are far above average? Or does that not fit your angry incel agenda?

[Anonymous No.11271998]

>>11271954
>This guy looks like a creep. If your profile pics don't show you with other people (doing fun stuff), then you're raising one of the biggest red flags.
>creep
>red flag
Spoken like a true woman. Also thanks for confirming the obvious. Womxn dislike loners not because of them being lonely but because they may pose a security threat to the safe environment they need for their reproduction.

[Anonymous No.11272012]

women on the pill have different mate preferences to women not on the pill
strippers on the pill make less money than those not on the pill
strippers make more money during the peak fertility of their menstrual cycle than during other stages.

[Anonymous No.11272014]

>>11271966
Not that guy, but you seem to be retarded.
>How do you measure human attractiveness? You cannot put it on any distribution unless you can measure it. Let's discuss this revolutionary mechanism first, before jumping that much further.
Anything that you can observe, can be measured directly or indirectly somehow. For example using statistics of likes and swipes, which allow you to create a distribution model. The linked article uses
>youattractiveness%=16.8*ln(like%)+52.3

>This isnt true. You will find zero sources to back this claim up. Im waiting. Hit me. Show me the source which says this. You will not find any. Come on. Link the source.
Yeah, wrong too. This experiment points in the same direction, as all experiments of this type do.
>https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a

[Anonymous No.11272022]

>>11272014
Ah a non-scientist. Carry on with your non-theorems. The only thing you CAN produce will be something like this

"In the year X, for sets of people Y, there was these Z actions, which, given the interpretation A, can be religiously believed to imply B."

Good theorem.

[Anonymous No.11272028]

>>11272022
Don't try to bullshit people into believing you're a "scientist". You've never seen an actual university from the inside.

[Anonymous No.11272033]

>>11272028
Off-topic. Guess I win the argument, then. Kudos. ~

[Anonymous No.11272038]

>>11272012
>strippers make more money during the peak fertility of their menstrual cycle than during other stages.
fascinating, cause in a sense they actually want to mate with their customers. heh

[Anonymous No.11272039]

>>11271997
delete this

[Anonymous No.11272053]

>>11272022
You come across as childish and petulant, and you failed to point what was even wrong with the post. Also you seem to think in terms of "scientists" and "non-scientists", but it's wrong to imply that either demographic always does X right or reaches the truth, or the other way around. First throw away your bias and expectations, and then use your own brain instead of blindly taking or rejecting things based on authority.
>>11272033
And you also think in terms of 'Internet arguments'. Grow up.

[Anonymous No.11272056]

>>11271954
wow, risk averse. conformist. pack animals.
>>11271998
I think most women prefer guys who are not loners because when prospecting for guys they're not just prospecting for the guy himself, but for the guy's entire friends group. As far as she's concerned the guy is just a small part of a larger package.

[Anonymous No.11272059]

>>11272038
it's possibly also pheromones, or other potentially subconscious clues that the male brain is detecting and responding to her higher fertile state by them being more interested in giving her money.

[Anonymous No.11272060]

>>11272056
Funny how the first thing they would do is keeping them apart from that child circle.

[Anonymous No.11272062]

>>11271445
Anyway you won't find me on these apps. If I have to demean myself in this way "to pass on my genes" then fuckit lol.

[Anonymous No.11272089]

>>11272062
There's an old saying "The odds are good but the goods are odd".

[Anonymous No.11272092]

>>11271445
Women only want the best genes cause they have a higher stake in the reproductive process

Modern civilization has forced them at times to pair with their looks match in order to incentivize the lower 80% to contribute to society, but the upper 20% of men are what they really want.

Remember, women want your GENES. Even if you improve yourself, everyone can still easily see your underlying genetic quality. That's why self-improvement is a meme. That's why the lower 80% should opt out of society and let it burn.

[Anonymous No.11272096]

>>11271445
Imagine the utopia we'd have if only the top 20% of people were allowed to live

[Anonymous No.11272105]

>>11272096
How do you define the top 20%?

[Anonymous No.11272124]

>>11272092
This is wrong on many levels but I'm not gonna bother to explain why

[Anonymous No.11272125]

>>11271445
Muscles should determine reproductive fitness, a woman would rather breed with an angel face who cant life up a twig than a muscular dude with a plain face, this is why women are reproductively defective.

[Anonymous No.11272127]

>>11271556
>Actually rejecting Chads
Hypergamy needs to be listed as the most dangerous mental illness on earth.

[Anonymous No.11272133]

>>11271971
Christianity is monogamous and its intelligent scholars were all celibate.....

[Anonymous No.11272137]

Men's only purpose is to breed with as many women as possible. Women's duty is to be selective with their mates so their offspring is the strongest.

[Anonymous No.11272168]

>>11271445
modern women are spoiled retards. imagine a woman with a crush on let's say brad pitt, if he showed at her door and asked her out she would turn him down and wouldn't be able to say why

[Anonymous No.11272172]

>>11272137
*of their offspring has the best face
Fixed that for you, there are forums of muscular men who dont have Chad level faces bitching about women backstabbing them for handsome guys who arent as muscular as them. Heck simply being muscular no longer guarantees vagina like it used to, only having a handsome face or horse dick guarantees vagina.

[Anonymous No.11272174]

>>11271477
>less than a third of men
>i'm still part of that stat
Feels bad man

[Anonymous No.11272182]

>>11272172
this anon is right, sexual selecton/=selecting for fitness. men do similar things when they control selection for mates

[Anonymous No.11272188]

>>11272182
Face doesnt indicate fitness, you have any idea how many schizos have handsome faces?

[Anonymous No.11272196]

>>11272188
yes I know, learn to reread confusing posts before replying like a retard.

[Anonymous No.11272203]

>>11271997
>The full image where it shows women still message the men they rate unattractive and men only message the women who are far above average?
They message them to boost their ego, or because they want beta orbiters, or because they want money for their nudes. If you've ever been on tinder, and look average/below-average, you know what I'm saying is true.

[Anonymous No.11272227]

>>11272188
historically it did back when poor nutrition and heavy disease burden were the norm and anyone who looked hot generally had better genes.

[Anonymous No.11272238]

>>11272133
yet it generated these thinkers in the first place and continued to do so, these thinkers were a product of the eugenic selection of the strongly christian upper middle class where the most successful had the greatest reproductive success.

[Anonymous No.11272241]

>>11272125
I wish this had happened, I would be able to build muscle

[Anonymous No.11272242]

>>11272227
Nutrition has jack to do with face, you never saw a cutiepie in the slums before?

[Anonymous No.11272246]

>>11272203
>people actually use tinder for dating
Its a app to find fuck buddies and thats it.

[Anonymous No.11272248]

>>11271445
It's efficient. Women as the sexual selectors and men as the workers allows women to pick men eugenically.

>>11271908
Now that's a bit unfair. One man one woman lessens the conflict of society. Monogamy isn't a problem. Sexual liberation is the problem in fact since people don't breed at all in their youth and only do so when they're old and wasted. The most stable and eugenic society would be monogamy where the best couples reproduced the most.

[Anonymous No.11272250]

>>11272203
>for their nudes
seriously it feels like every girl nowadays does or has done some form of pornography

[Anonymous No.11272256]

>>11272124
It's not wrong. "Self-improvement" really involves uncovering hidden good genes or faking better ones.

[Anonymous No.11272257]

>>11272248
>pick men eugenically
Yes handsome face, big dong and criminal record is peak eugenics.

[Anonymous No.11272258]

>>11272227
Threshold, hot people have never had higher fitness. No correlation with offspring number or survival, not a valid measure of fitness. Much of the pleb caste in many in societies has higher fitness than the nobility. Fitness/=strong, handsome, smart it means capable of surviving to reproductive age, outbreeding other populations and in turn producing offspring that repeat the same cycle more effectively than other populations’ offspring. Sexual selection is sometimes fitness promoting but in many cases veers off into literal muh dick muffuga autism from both sexes for thousands of years.
>>11272238
Not eugenic necessarily, also european populations aren’t higher fitness, and never have been, than many assorted groups throughout eurasia and the americas.

[Anonymous No.11272267]

>>11272137
>Men's only purpose is to breed with as many women as possible
No it's to produce as many grandchildren as possible, in an environment where children require nurturing to adulthood it's in their best interest to concentrate on one family group and give them as much support as possible, if your policy is to fuck as many females as possible but all your subsequesnt kids die before reproducing then evolution is against you

[Anonymous No.11272269]

>>11272257
Unironically yes. Those traits imply health and good genes.

[Anonymous No.11272270]

>>11271940
if only we could remove their makeup somehow and then the playing field would really be leveled

[Anonymous No.11272272]

>>11272242
if she's in the slums and still hot then she must have some ghood genes keeping her alive

[Anonymous No.11272280]

>>11272269
No they don’t at all.

[Anonymous No.11272283]

>>11272269
Big dong maybe, criminal record means a high chance of being cancer to society, and handsome face has no correlation with reproductive fitness.
>>11272272
Why in the shit do you think good face=good genes. A face has no effect on surviving in the wild its all about physical strength, flexibility, and endurance. Female mammals are sane they choose males based on how powerful they are not because their face is so cute teehee like retarded human women.

[Anonymous No.11272287]

>>11272258
Ok anon here are two women, one is horrifically scarred by disease, which one will you choose?

[Anonymous No.11272293]

>>11272287
This is about face.

[Anonymous No.11272305]

>>11272283
anon don't be an idiot
we're looking at extremely old fast heuristics to pick out the best mate or reject bad mates from a population

>>11272293
and the face is the most visible region of exposed skin, if it's riddled with warts or the jaw is deformed from poor nutrition or there's a lack fat rounding out the curves your first instinct will be to reject them and pick the better looking mate.

[Anonymous No.11272319]

>>11272305
Higher test men care more about the body of a woman than her face.
>jaw deformed from poor nutrition
No jew deformed from genetics. Again face shouldnt matter in the slightest only physical power because thats how primates always breed in the wild biggest and strongest always fucks.

[Anonymous No.11272320]

>>11272305
>we’re looking at extremely old heuristics
right which aren’t indicators of fitness because sexual selection doesn’t select for fitness it selects for sexual attractiveness, retard. Learn what fitness is before making these posts. Pock marks are an indicator of low fitness, a crooked nose or slightly asymmetrical eyes are not, thus in one quick analysis your heuristics are obviously not selecting for fitness, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11272332]

>>11272320
>>11272319
I'm assuming you're one guy here.
Evolution doesn't care we're stuck with the heuristics.
poor nutrition affects facial development such as dental crowding

[Anonymous No.11272338]

>>11272332
Show proof or shut up, most hideous people are the way they are due to genetic not muh poor nutrition. You are thinking like a woman you think a plain face=hideous most poor people have plain facial aesthetics but are not hideous. Besides this is women we are talking about maybe if this was a homosexual male doing the selecting your reasoning makes sense, but women are retarded stupid animals who only care about pleasure so the only thing on their mind when they choose male is vagina tingles not this bullshit about bad face means bad genes nope all they care is vagina tingles, his face makes my pussy tingle, his big dick makes my pussy tingle, and his criminal record gets me so wet thats the only real thoughts in a woman's brain you fool. This mental illness even affects homosexual women who care more about face than the developness of a woman's body. A big tittied plain Jane can be cucked by an angel face stick figure in lesbian relationships.

[Anonymous No.11272342]

>>11272338
go back to r9k you loser

[Anonymous No.11272344]

>>11272342
Confirmed woman, get the fuck off this board you irrational subhuman.

[Anonymous No.11272345]

>>11272338
>women are retarded stupid animals
so basically you're saying they're even more reliant on the heuristics.

[Anonymous No.11272349]

>>11272345
The point is the only thing on their brain when it comes to seletinc mates is monkey noises followed by moaning. Women cant even explain why the fuck they like criminals.

[Anonymous No.11272364]

>>11272344
gas yourself you pathetic piece of trash

[Anonymous No.11272365]

>>11271954

[Anonymous No.11272370]

>>11272364
Meanwhile Mike I had 30 prior arrest is prime breeding material right you stupid monkey? Hope he breaks your jaw.

[Anonymous No.11272373]

>>11272332
you're so fucking stupid. this >>11272338
is not me, we aren't using similar diction or style of argument you fucking nigger.

[Anonymous No.11272388]

>>11272280
>>11272283
chad face is a result of higher testosterone and hgh which could mean better nutrition, health and immunity (testosterone suppresses the immune system).
big dong is high pre natal testosterone and activation of SRY gene (good sperm)
criminal records is a result of evolutionary psychology which makes women prefer dominant men (the only one that isn't objective out of these three)

[Anonymous No.11272398]

males have a dual-strategy mating.

They want to fuck as many women as possible and spread their seed the furthest, while simultaneously choosing just one woman to invest in full time. Males can afford to do this because sex is a low investment affair for them. The high-investment offspring has much better survival chances, but the low-investment offspring still help spread his genes.

Women meanwhile are very particular about the man they want, because she's going to be raising that child for several decades. He has to be the right one. I suspect they will find that women with poor father relationships flip a switch in their brain that cause them to pursue low-investment relationships, because such women have lower survival odds if they don't have an active male protector.

Although it seems like women have higher standards, I bet you'll find that men are actually even more choosy when it comes to the woman they want to spend their life with. Instead of asking men "who looks hot" ask them who they want to marry. You will get very different responses

[Anonymous No.11272414]

>>11272388
>chad face is a result of higher test
I can almost guarantee that the highest test males look like uruk-hai not chad
>hgh
how do you even know that? post at least one study with a large sample size where they've demonstrated a relationship between hgh and facial attractiveness
>better health and immunity
there is literally no evidence for this, attractive people don't live longer than other subpopulations.
>big dong is high pre natal test and activation of SRY
post studies or explain mechanism that would relate this to longevity and fecundity for me
>criminal records is evo psyche dominant males
the dominant males control the arbitration of resources and violence, women select for this less than they do facial attractiveness and the men who control these rights are generally the leaders of the community not chad and not criminals.

[Anonymous No.11272423]

>>11272388
>not even as handsome as the love of my life
i got so lucky, bros

[Anonymous No.11272429]

>>11271445
The ones gatekeeping reproduction select only the best candidates. The reason is pretty obvious

[Anonymous No.11272439]

>>11272398
>ask them who they want to marry

no man in his right mind wants to marry nowadays

[Anonymous No.11272467]

>>11272388
>chad face is a result of higher testosterone and hgh which could mean better nutrition, health and immunity (testosterone suppresses the immune system).
Nice broscience, most black males have very high test yet only a few blacks have Chad level facial aesthetics, and dont get me started on wild animals with more test than humans like Neanderthals or chimps.

[Anonymous No.11272494]

>>11272429
the best candidates, such as jeremy meeks

[Anonymous No.11272497]

>>11271445
Fuck off with your incel General

[Anonymous No.11272546]

>>11272439
Everyone wants to marry incel. You either want to marry Asuka or Rei.

[Anonymous No.11272548]

>>11272497
ad hominem

[Anonymous No.11272560]

>>11272022
>"In the year X, for sets of people Y, there was these Z actions, which, given the interpretation A, can be religiously believed to imply B."

By this logic, every experiment ever done is bullshit and we know nothing.

Apparently you do know something though. But you are much smarter than every researcher in human history, so there is that of course.

[Anonymous No.11272569]

>>11272497
Hoes mad

[Anonymous No.11272570]

>>11271570
Surprised it took this long to find an anon with his head screwed on right. OP find a sample indicative of the whole population

[Anonymous No.11272573]

>>11272546
>You either want to marry Asuka or Rei.

gtfo weeb

[Anonymous No.11272593]

>>11272570
imagine continuously shifting the goalposts and asking for more data to avoid admitting the obvious: women have a basic instinct towards hypergamy clearly stemming from evolution and rational self interest. it has pernicious social effects but women are still going to follow it like anyone else follows their self interest despite it harming others. u can admit women aren't perfect man

[Anonymous No.11272608]

>>11272573
you're posting on an anime website

[Anonymous No.11272614]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTchioiHM0U
how do you guys feel about this?

[Anonymous No.11272626]

>>11272614
too long didnt watch

[Anonymous No.11272629]

>>11272593
Right, avoiding admitting the obvious, the obvious being that which you gave an okcupid graph to ‘prove’

[Anonymous No.11272668]

>>11271538
She isn't all that great herself but she has a point what sort of no-life spends his time doing free Wikipedia edits? Only thing more pathetic than that would be cleaning up shitposts made on anonymous imageboards for zero financial gain.

[Anonymous No.11272673]

>>11271538
lmao she literally looks like she could be his sister

[Anonymous No.11272684]

>>11271445
Hypergamy. Because the female has to invest a lot of resources when getting pregnant is evolutionarily good for her to ensure the best mate she can get, so selectiveness is dominant. A man can nut and go and he still has offspring so he doesnt need to be selective, just fuck a lot of women. It also explains the chad/slut "double standard". So don´t blame it on women, but on genes

[Anonymous No.11272687]

>>11271445

The average woman want's more than she can reasonably have and eventually settles with what's readily available when reality tells her to go fuck herself.

Personally as I guy I couldn't give a rats ass. Over several billion available females in the world and just like my education/job if I have move to another place to get what I want I will do it. Let the smoothbrain on OKcupid duke it out.

[Anonymous No.11272689]

>>11272684
Why are black men much less monogamous than Asian men?

[Anonymous No.11272692]

>>11271501
6´ KEK TIME TO ROPE BAGELCELS

[Anonymous No.11272699]

>>11272687
>Over several billion available females in the world and just like my education/job if I have move to another place to get what I want I will do it.
Are you saying you're moving to india/china/africa/middle east/wherever that's poor for a woman?
enjoy your golddigger i guess

[Anonymous No.11272708]

>>11272614
What is that Herodotus story about the bracelets at around 20-25?

[Anonymous No.11272711]

>>11272699

It's not about standards getting lowered, it's about understanding there's a bigger mating pool than on some meme site or a singular country.

>enjoy your golddigger i guess

Are you implying I wouldn't be dealing with the high probability of a golddigger if I stayed in my own country?

[Anonymous No.11272723]

>>11272711
>it's about understanding there's a bigger mating pool than on some meme site or a singular country
Other countries also have men you know? Unless you live an a small town or village your chances of meeting a woman you haven't before are almost identical to your chances on the other side of the world.

>Are you implying I wouldn't be dealing with the high probability of a golddigger if I stayed in my own country?
no, I'm saying the probabilyty will be EVEN HIGHER

[Anonymous No.11272750]

>>11272370
>Meanwhile Mike I had 30 prior arrest is prime breeding material

[Anonymous No.11272760]

>>11272723

>Other countries also have men you know?

Yup, just like the country I live in. Competition will exist regardless of if I stay or go. So it doesn't matter either way might as well see what out there.

>no, I'm saying the probabilyty will be EVEN HIGHER

So it's a no win situation then right? Got it. So no point on worrying about it.

[Anonymous No.11272763]

>>11271445
Polygamy

[Anonymous No.11272796]

>>11271554
>15 sexual partners
Is this some medium chad's stats?

[Anonymous No.11272797]

>>11271564
It's called makeup and shaving buttfuck

[Anonymous No.11272800]

>>11272174
>self-reporting

[Anonymous No.11272967]

Have sex Jesus fucking christ. It's not that hard.

[Anonymous No.11272972]

>>11272699
Enjoy killing yourself brainlet loser.

[Anonymous No.11272983]

>>11272760
The guy is a miserable retard ricel, you have the right idea, you live on a globe not a island. If you're White you have the world of women to choose from, you could marry in to a wealthy asian family that wants her kid to be smarter and better looking then asian men.

[Anonymous No.11273011]

>>11272967
>women are useful for much more than just sex!
>why aren't you chasing sex?!?! you HAVE to be chasing sex and fulfilling our wishes!
this is the ultimate proof women can't stand on their own

[Anonymous No.11273015]

>>11272967
>It's not that hard.
if that's the case why do so many men have trouble with it?

[Anonymous No.11273208]

>>11271557
Only because men have low standards, men naturally are far more beautiful than women.

[Anonymous No.11273211]

>>11272270
Right. I can't believe this scam is socially acceptable, probably the biggest contributor to the screwed up dating scene today.

[Anonymous No.11273338]

[Anonymous No.11273367]

>>11273015
Cuz they're not lifting which up to fifty years ago was built into surviving. And because feminism told men to think more so instead of just doing the normal trying to fuck they friendzone themselves and do bunch of other dumb shit and become neurotic and even miss tons of opportunities because they try to be good to one woman who is really more like every other woman than not.

I was actually good looking and social enough in high school but I didn't get laid because I was hoping to like build a longterm relationship with someone and of course it didn't work and my self esteem sucked and banging dumb shots doesn't do much but ultimately it is better than nothing and what I ended up doing.

But also women can now technically survive on their own so that doesn't help either

[Anonymous No.11273508]

>>11273011
This. Theres a lot of women in this thread, all showing a fundamental inability to put themselves into shoes of someone whose life was not on easy mode.

[Anonymous No.11273630]

>>11272269
Criminal record has to be the worst trait a man could have, it strongly correlates with low iq, low self control, low wealth, low life esperancy and low social standing.

[Anonymous No.11273668]

>>11272124
Nice refutation

[Anonymous No.11273674]

>>11272238
Those thinkers were not generated because of Christianity, but in spite of Christianity. The hierarchical stratification of medieval Europe was not uniquely Christian or even uniquely European. Societies, Christian or Pagan, have traditionally been constructed in this fashion:
1. Sacerdocy (Clergy / Priests / Thinkers /Philosophers / Theologians / Wizards)
2. Regality (Nobility / Warrior Aristocracy / Kings / Princes / Knights)
3. Mercantility (Merchants / Artisans / Bourgeois / Burghers)
4. Vulgarity (Commoners / Laborers / Peasants / Foot soldiers)

Pic related. Even in far flung India (founded by Aryans), the same pattern of social stratification survives to this day (albeit heavily diluted by modernity).

[Anonymous No.11273700]

Weird how rarely people in this threads mention modern contraception. Of course woman are going to whore around more if there isnt risk of pregnancy after every sexual act

[Anonymous No.11273728]

>>11273700
contraception is for the niggers

[Anonymous No.11273902]

>>11271445
To prevent shitty genes like your from passing to next generation

[Anonymous No.11273904]

>>11271997
Because the men actually have personality to make up for ugliness

[Anonymous No.11273908]

>>11271501
LMAO fucking manlets get rekt

[Anonymous No.11273940]

>>11273674
someone explain to me why the caste/class system was pushed out?

[Anonymous No.11273948]

>>11271501
>Tfw 5'7"
Brutal

[Anonymous No.11273952]

>>11271468
based and genderpilled

[Anonymous No.11273957]

>>11271997
>messaging means anything

You have obviously never used dating apps. It's full of women merely seeking attention and fooling around with desperate horny men who they don't plan to meet.

[Anonymous No.11274010]

>>11273940
so the kikes could get the top spots

[Anonymous No.11274062]

>>11271524
Correct solution is to ride the cock carousel and phone him when you are in your thirties, only for him to tell you he already has a wife and kids

[Anonymous No.11274074]

>>11271570
This, online dating is a huge obstacle, better off dating the people you know and care about

[Anonymous No.11274075]

>>11271904

[Anonymous No.11274146]

>>11274062
cringe

[Anonymous No.11274226]

>>11271956
You missed the point. The people who use OKcupid are not usually attractive.

[Anonymous No.11274254]

>>11271554
Go back.

[Anonymous No.11274277]

>>11274226
The distribution for women is normal though.

[Anonymous No.11274317]

>>11273011
who are you quoting

[Anonymous No.11274323]

>>11273700

Except that's actually that's not the problem here. The structure of this conversation would be entirely different if the women in question put out for everyone. But they don't, they are going after a narrow spectrum of men and that's how you're getting shit like incels and mgtow.

[Anonymous No.11274349]

>>11271501
Ideal Male Profile:
I'm under 6' and hate my family for it. I eat dogs for dinner and I can't grow a beard because of low testosterone. I hate traveling and music and have never been in a relationship because women are bitches. I have my car parked in a gym parking lot, it's where I sleep. They let me shower there occasionally.

[Anonymous No.11274467]

>>11272684
*Facial hypergamy
We have been over this, they dont give a shit about anything except your face. Women dont care about the future of their offspring as they tend to fancy men who would kill their children for fun(psychopaths or dark triads).

[Anonymous No.11274473]

>>11274349
There are Chadfishs with just gibberish in their description that still get hundreds of replies meaning women truely dont care about anything EXCEPT looks.

[Anonymous No.11274482]

>>11273674
Are there examples from other non indo european cultures?

[Anonymous No.11274492]

>>11274349
Kek

[Anonymous No.11274557]

>>11272092
>Even if you improve yourself, everyone can still easily see your underlying genetic quality. That's why self-improvement is a meme.
Disagree with this. The ability and will to self-improve is part of your genetic traits, and a positive one because it increases the chance of survival and prosperity. So if a women sees someone who works hard to better himself, she will be attracted to them precisely because the genes of such a man is highly valuable.