[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 8 KB, 591x303, iq_bell_curve.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127064 No.1127064 [Reply] [Original]

Where does /sci/ stand ?

>> No.1127075

Third quartile.

>> No.1127080
File: 127 KB, 419x600, 1266171338100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127080

>>1127075

>> No.1127096

Stop making these thrrads

On /sci/ almost everyone is on third tile and some on fourth

And we all know it isnt the truth.

I land just before the third tile, im smarter than 3,5% of the population...

>> No.1127102

>>1127096
3,5% is smarter than me. Damn typo

embarrassing :(

>> No.1127109 [DELETED] 

>>1127061

tesdt[www]wdin[.]epic[anon]cucudmber[talk]carrot[.]ddog[se]ludlz1faab56e0ba12061065b38591b7c1dda

>> No.1127112 [DELETED] 

>>1127060

tesdt[www]wdin[.]epic[anon]cucudmber[talk]carrot[.]ddog[se]ludlz999a655d04cb304d2da8c04adb1a231a

>> No.1127118

>>1127102
No wonder.

>> No.1127139 [DELETED] 

>>1127060

tesdt[www]wdin[.]epic[anon]cucudmber[talk]carrot[.]ddog[se]ludlzd5f57c8fc35d314311f21df9517e5322

>> No.1127144

142.

>> No.1127154

not sure.

i assume i'm smarter than at least some of the population, based on conversations i've had with regular jackoffs

>> No.1127169

>>1127096
>>1127102
lol'd

>> No.1127193

Stop making these threads.

Why don't you make a more valid thread; by asking what type of intelligence you excel in according to gardner or even triarchic theory?

IQ is falling out of favour; it doesn't tax enough of hte intellect, and it is extremely culutrally biased.

It is useful only for idenitifying giftedness in western children; particularly given that many "IQ testing kits" for children involve culturally specific items like scissors.

172 IQ. However, the products of my lifetime are extremely small. IQ means fuck all it is analogous with e-penis.

Fuck your shit, /sci/

>> No.1127198 [DELETED] 

>>1127064
>implying 68+14 is 95%

>> No.1127200

>>1127064
>2% is twice the size of 0.1%

Wat?

>> No.1127204

>>1127198
>implying 68+28 isnt equal to 96%

That bell curve is in the lowest quartile

>> No.1127216

>>1127204
>>1127200
>>1127198
The fuck is this shit

>> No.1127218

>>1127193
>hte intellect
>culutrally
>overuse and misuse of semicolons
>172 IQ.
Suuuure.

>> No.1127235

>>1127218
The use of semicolons was correct.

Furthermore, if you have taken an IQ test you will know that grammar and spelling are not parts of it.

>> No.1127236

>>1127218
Doesn't that prove his point that IQ doesn't measure a person's intelligence? You dumb fuck.

>> No.1127246

132

>> No.1127251

>>1127218
>Implying mechanical accuracy has anything to do with whatever it is that IQ has to do with.

>> No.1127253

>>1127235
>doesn't know how to use semicolons

>by asking what type of intelligence you excel in according to gardner or even triarchic theory?

>> No.1127288

167

>> No.1127292

about 155

>> No.1127297

>>1127064

~110

>> No.1127305

In an IQ thread /sci/ either lies, or relies on some free online 'IQ' test to prop up their ego.

None of it is true. None of it.

>> No.1127312

>>1127253
That wasn't me who said that. Regarding my use of semicolons, I think you will find that you are mistaken.

Justify your stance of my misuse. I have used semicolons to relate two seperate statements into a single sentence.

>> No.1127309

>>1127193

Hey, fuck you! I'm the only one on w3 that uses semicolons! Moreover your usage was inappropriate!

>> No.1127319

ITT: Lying anons are patently pathetic!

>> No.1127325

>>1127312
He already did. He pointed out that little bit you wrote because it's a sentence fragment.

>> No.1127327

200, and I am so pretentious that I am going to sage this thread because my intelligence surpasses all of yours.

>> No.1127335

>>1127327
Forgot your sage buddy.

>> No.1127338

>>1127312
The first semicolon was inappropriate.
The latter two were fine.

NB: I rule both ur grandma's arses

>> No.1127446

>>1127338
>The first semicolon was inappropriate.

Yes, in hindsight I agree.

>> No.1127491
File: 69 KB, 320x240, hovind-8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127491

>MY AYQ IS OVAR 160 POYNTZ

>> No.1127495

133 (average) test results from 130 to 135. Also OP is a fag.

>> No.1127515

HEY GUYS I JUST TOOK THE TEST AND SCORED 432, IS THAT PRETTY HIGH?

>> No.1127524

My IQ is roughly 75.

>> No.1127525

I have 73 IQ

>> No.1127541

My IQ is one.

IQ Tests are dumb.

>> No.1127546
File: 116 KB, 994x823, yep, femanon btw..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127546

just found a test.
There you go faggot.

>> No.1127569

>>1127546

retard

>> No.1127600

>>1127546
Pics pl0x.

>> No.1127602

According to a chart I found that correlates IQ with ACT score, my IQ is 2 SD above the mean.

>> No.1127606

Dude! The guy that made that bell-curve belongs on the left side. The percentages adds up to 100.2%.

That said, I'm among the 0.1% extra percantages on the right side.

>> No.1127608

>>1127600
I'd rather not. This isn't /b/.

>> No.1127611

You now realize you don't know what the term "intelligence" actually means.

>> No.1127619

>>1127193

I beat you lol, i have 181

>> No.1127645
File: 22 KB, 640x480, 1275572440668.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127645

>three pathetic threads on the pathetic psychologist definition of intelligence on /sci/ frontpage

>> No.1127648

>>1127606

is that a joke? the tenths place only really matters on either end.

>> No.1127650
File: 69 KB, 328x448, Carl_Sagan_Planetary_Society.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127650

170.
That's me.

>> No.1127659 [DELETED] 

>>1127645 implying IQ isn't the single most concrete idea in all of spychology

>> No.1127662

>>1127645 implying IQ isn't the single most concrete idea in all of psychology

>> No.1127670

>>1127662
>implying it is
>implying you're, ummm, retarded

>> No.1127674

>>1127608
MSN ?