[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 152 KB, 1880x649, Everyday-Equation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

THE PINNACLE OF HUMAN SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENT Anonymous Wed Jan 1 15:56:45 2020 No.11269774 [Reply] [Original]

In one formula.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 15:57:57 2020 No.11269778 Its not valid.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 15:58:17 2020 No.11269780 popsci

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:00:01 2020 No.11269786 >>11269780 >>11269778 >expecting the iq-lets on /sci/ to possibly understand what this is and represents. iShygddt

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:05:51 2020 No.11269806 The result I get is always "compiler error". Is that the intended result? What does it mean about the universe?

Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:06:54 2020 No.11269812

>>11269774
Wow what a bunch of nonsensical things over there. Man I dont know anything about those crazy numbers, man. Haha like what do the funny lil squiggles even do, hahaha?! Like what's up with some squiggles near the letters? Wow science men sure are a bunch of crazy fellas.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:11:10 2020 No.11269823 "other forces"

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:23:11 2020 No.11269847 >>11269786 It doesnt't represent anything other than some popsci author trying to "wow" physicslets with le epic convoluted formula for everything

Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:46:54 2020 No.11269894
File: 635 KB, 865x466, chrome_YaoWoHjevv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11269847
so wrong, you are!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNVQfWC_evg&t=1860s

Congrats on learning something new in 2020. This is not a popsci equation fella. Watch the video.

El Arcón Wed Jan 1 16:55:42 2020 No.11269911
File: 208 KB, 1005x408, TIMESAND___particles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>THE PINNACLE
Not really, IMO. That tells you how the particles interact with each other but it doesn't answer the more fundamental question of why we have the particles that we have. If anyone could figure that out, then that would be even above what you call the pinnacle, rendering that alleged pinnacle not a pinnacle but merely a very high achievement.

Pic from here:Quantum Structure
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1302.0037

30 Tooker Papers
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=08673880568874767256

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 16:58:36 2020 No.11269916 >>11269774 wow, theory of everything So what are all the physicists nowadays working in if we have all regular matter figured out?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:01:23 2020 No.11269921 >>11269894 >posts a popsci lecture to prove me wrong ?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:02:28 2020 No.11269924 >>11269916 next level of reality, watch the video in >>11269894

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:07:03 2020 No.11269932 >>11269921 >popsci this is not a michiu kiku or dr. denegro talk, this is a real physics/math guy talking about what they are really finding, uncovered and uncovering.

Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:09:46 2020 No.11269942

>>11269932
kiku and tyson are also real scientists. that doesn't make then not popularizers of sciences. same with stephen hawking. he was also a real life physicist, and yet his best selling book is pure popsci. your argument is nonsensical. the lecture you posted is popsci. if you have ever actually attended a lecture, you would know the difference.

Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:31:10 2020 No.11269992

>>11269942
if that's how you are qualifying popsci, then there is no point to argue. what I'm saying is he's not making any woo-woo outlandish predictions, he's explaining science, not popularizing it. That's the difference between him and others, like Jim Al-Khalili, specifically his talks on quantum biology.

What is, versus what if, is my criteria for "not popsci" vs popsci.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:32:17 2020 No.11269996 >>11269992 I mis-spoke there, I meant to say him and Jim Al-Khalili are not popsci, unlike others.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:33:43 2020 No.11269998 >>11269942 so what real lecture would you recommend then?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:51:00 2020 No.11270045 >>11269998 Tobias Osborne, Quantum Field Theory. Search it on YT.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:52:14 2020 No.11270049 >>11269998 Tobias Osborne, Quantum Field Theory. Search it on YT. Notice the difference?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 17:52:31 2020 No.11270050 >>11269774 What is "W"?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 18:05:08 2020 No.11270073 >>11270050 Waldo

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 18:16:28 2020 No.11270092 >>11270049 I'll let you know when i find and watch, currently watching Jim Baggott talk on why space may be quantum in nature, its filling in some pieces for me.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 20:47:05 2020 No.11270400 >>11270050 [math] \langle f \| e^{iHt} \| i \rangle [/math]

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 20:55:06 2020 No.11270417 >>11270400 >⟨f\|eiHt\|i⟩ what is this wizardry?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 21:04:15 2020 No.11270431 >>11269911 Well we can't even figure out what "we" means. Who are we? And what is time? If we knew that we'd be closer to the ultimate understanding.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 21:11:08 2020 No.11270444 >>11269774 why is physics so disgusting?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 21:19:06 2020 No.11270452 science has still yet to answer: What doth life?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 21:27:47 2020 No.11270463 File: 17 KB, 480x360, wumbo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11269774 But what does the W stand for?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 22:29:47 2020 No.11270570 >>11269774 Just putting together some formulas doesn't equal the ToE

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 23:14:23 2020 No.11270644 >>11270463 Work

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 1 23:39:11 2020 No.11270687 File: 108 KB, 640x590, 1569453944444.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >it's an integral! it must be true!

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 00:35:20 2020 No.11270756 >>11270417 is just \langle f \| e^{iHt} \| i \rangle

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 00:39:25 2020 No.11270766 >>11270644 Honestly,

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 00:40:46 2020 No.11270768 >>11270644 Have you tried setting it to wumbo?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 01:22:38 2020 No.11270826 >>11269911 >Thinking there's more than one fundamental particle. You know better than that. They're all configurations stacking more and more of that one true single fundamental.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 01:24:15 2020 No.11270828 >>11269806 Dilate

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 01:31:31 2020 No.11270843 >>11269774 Lmao imagine wasting your life with physics.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 01:44:57 2020 No.11270855 >>11270050 >>11270463 not sure why W was chosen; most textbooks use Z. Sometimes W for an effective action, but in this case it doesn't make sense. It's called a partition function.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 01:58:51 2020 No.11270866 >>11270417 That's what W is >>11270050 [math] W = \langle f \| e^{iHt} \| i \rangle [/math]

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 05:41:11 2020 No.11271070 >>11269774 Good luck getting the "g" part of your path integral to actually mean anything useful

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 05:42:56 2020 No.11271071 >>11270855 Like you said this is terrible notation because W is often used for the connected partition function, i.e. the effective action

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 16:12:42 2020 No.11272330 >>11270463 its just an equation balance variable, doesn't it essentially mean 0?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 2 19:35:34 2020 No.11272756 >>11269774 >THE PINNACLE OF HUMAN THEORY FOR GRANT MONEY fixed

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 3 04:46:11 2020 No.11273781 >>11269774 And what does this function give for answer?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 3 04:54:21 2020 No.11273794 >>11269774 >pinnacle >lambda cutoff

>>	<negarestanipoopoo> !gDrA1n2Fhc Fri Jan 3 06:22:51 2020 No.11273913 >>11270092 if it has differential equations and algebraic geometry its not pop sci

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 3 06:27:42 2020 No.11273919 >>11269774 Set the equation to equal 0, like the net total energy of the universe...

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 3 15:13:47 2020 No.11274768 >>11269774 lmao Imagine wasting your Life living it >>11270843

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 3 15:18:34 2020 No.11274775 >>11273919 >like the net total energy of the universe I hope you are just trolling

Anonymous Fri Jan 3 20:07:00 2020 No.11275402

>>11269932
It may be a good talk, but it's still exactly what popsci is. Somebody trying to explain quantum theory results to people who have not studied any of the required physics or math. An effort to bring across science, to laymen, in a way that makes it interesting and gives them something to learn. That's the definition of popsci.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 4 07:50:55 2020 No.11276446 >>11269894 I didn't watch your pop-sci video, but I'm just posting to say David Tong is legit. He publishes actual papers and also writes good lecture notes on a lot of topics

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 4 08:10:17 2020 No.11276471 >>11269774 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXJvxEHSv5E Based

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 4 08:12:02 2020 No.11276475 >>11269774 >dat i placement I kekked

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 4 08:15:14 2020 No.11276478 >>11269847 >convoluted It's literally the condensed version. >>11269778 This, just because it is valid does not mean that it is complete. >>11269916 See >>11269823 >>11276475 >dat i I fucking lolled.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]