/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11265782]

If a Fields medalist can't understand IUT, what hope do the rest of us have?

[El Arcón No.11265795]

What is Peter's opinion on whether or not RH is an unsolved problem?

[Anonymous No.11265828]

if mochizuki can't fool a fields medalist how can he fool /sci/

[Anonymous No.11266282]

>In May 2018, Scholze and Stix wrote a 10-page report, updated in September 2018, detailing the (previously identified) gap in Corollary 3.12 in the proof, describing it as "so severe that in [their] opinion small modifications will not rescue the proof strategy", and that Mochizuki's preprint cannot claim a proof of abc.[11] They make a number of simplifications of IUTT, some drastic and not all of which Mochizuki considers valid, and insist on the distinction he does not make between 'abstract and concrete "pilot objects"'.
vs
>In July and October 2018, Mochizuki wrote 8- and 5-page reactions to the May and September versions of the Scholze and Jakob Stix report, maintaining that the gap is the result of their simplifications, and that there is no gap in his theory.

Mochizuki used fucking weird concepts and languages, defying all norms in mathematics as far as I can tell. It's either like he cannot formulate his thought process into normal mathematical language, or he's trying to deliberately confuse readers.
I'll go with this Anon >>11265828

[Anonymous No.11266354]

>be on /sci/ five years ago
>interuniversal teichmuller memes
>go do a phd in pure math
>come back to /sci/
>interuniversal teichmuller memes
jesus christ lads, its 2020.

[Anonymous No.11266362]

>>11266354
what was your PhD in maths for?

[Anonymous No.11266368]

>>11266362
cock studies

[Anonymous No.11266371]

>>11266354
IUT is the meme that keeps on giving. The SS stuff is pretty new. I can even remember reading it when it was fresh off the press as I was having dinner with my girlfriend. Good times.

[Anonymous No.11266374]

>>11266362
Multiple digits divisions, something well beyond the grasp of your tiny brain.

[Anonymous No.11266438]

>>11266354
yup 4chan is dead, autists insist way too much in the same old memes to burst their autistic dopaminergic pathways, they really cant get tired of old jokes.

[Anonymous No.11266453]

>>11266354
The meeting including Nobel prize carriers that OP is talking happened last year, their reports were recent enough.
Do you suffer from autism?

[Anonymous No.11266745]

>>11266362

Transgender mathematics: bottomlogical applications of topological integrations.

[Anonymous No.11266907]

the abc conjecture has been solved. SS are a bunch of arrogant pompus ass holes. Three good mathematicians vouch for its validity. Why should I believe SS? Because they have some stupid fields medal? Fuck them.

[Anonymous No.11267337]

>>11266453
>Nobel prize carriers

[Anonymous No.11267834]

>>11266282
Mochizuki`s reaction is also full of borderline insults and disrespect towards scholze/stix. that made him the winner for /sci/ and a jerk for the rest of the world.

[Anonymous No.11268319]

>>11267337
*Fields medalists

[Anonymous No.11268333]

>>11267834
>ah mayba ah you not so stoopid you understand frobenioid bukkake

[Anonymous No.11268337]

>>11268333
why are all trips on this board such utter shitposts?

[Anonymous No.11268374]

>>11265795
Wasn't it solved by Sir Michael Atiyah in A.D. 2019

[Anonymous No.11268378]

>>11268374
I would like a mathfag to explain what Atiyah did and why it was wrong, if possible.
When I heard about it I immediately thought "oh this 92 year old is going senile and thinks he solved a hard problem in two pages of work."

[Anonymous No.11268473]

>>11268333
Mochizuki lived in the US basically from childhood to his PhD, his English is pretty much your typical east coast American accent. Just FYI.