[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 159 KB, 395x431, Schrodinger.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11259537 No.11259537 [Reply] [Original]

https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/watch/4vDnuzDBb4tqRZq

>> No.11259621

>>11259537
Summarise his findings, I'm not watching shit

>> No.11259645

>>11259621
no, fuck off then I am not your personal tutor why would you think I care wtf you do jackass

>> No.11259647

you made a shit thread, OP
>>>/x/

>> No.11259687

>>11259537
Radin is a known crackpot. Why would anyone who considers themselves a sane person watch the crap?

>> No.11259692

>>11259647
this

>> No.11259699

>>11259645
The point of a thread is to try and communicate what interests you enough to get others to engage with you. You have failed

>> No.11259719

>videos.utahgunexchange.com

is this the newest freeze peach™ alternative to youtube?

>> No.11260392

big nothing burger until independent experiments run

>> No.11260408
File: 405 KB, 1200x797, IT'S BEAUTIFUL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11260408

>>11259699
lol it was fun to watch OP thanks for being a retard

>> No.11260435

>>11259621
just watched it all
its essentially the double slit experiment with a twist, instead of actually measuring which slit the electron went through, you instead imagine the electron going through a slit in your head and the wave function would change as if the slits in the experiment were being monitored for electrons. He ran this experiment many many times and noticed an effect of roughly 1% on the wave function but it was apparently statistically significant (5 sigma). With this he concluded that somehow consciously imagining things affects wave functions

>> No.11260450

>>11260435
What if I accidentally imagine it backwards. Like say I accidentally imagine they systen from the top, but the electron imagines it from the bottom, so when I say "left" it actually goes right from my point of view

>> No.11260457

>>11260435
>you instead imagine
>he ran this experiment many many times
So he ran a thought experiment more than once and derived statistics from that? You do realize how nonsensical that is, right?

>> No.11260465

>>11260457
obviously not on one person and had control too
he basically just wanted to prove that running the thought experiment or not affected the outcome of the frequency distribution
but yeah imo there must be some mistake, statistical or not, in the experiment because it just doesn't make any sense