[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 82 KB, 624x357, 614EA412-0073-401E-88A0-08355EA7F0B6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11258643 No.11258643[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What is the minimum IQ somebody needs to have for you to consider them to be a person? Or do you believe that brainlets are people too?

>> No.11258655

No minimum IQ, but I think a minimum age makes sense. Somewhere between 10 and 20 years old.

>> No.11258663

>>11258643
I think what it requires is the ability to empathize. So this anon >>11258655 is right about minimum age. I would also consider those with severe mental disabilities that make them unable to understand others not people.

Being a person requires an individual identity.

>> No.11258670

>>11258643
120

>> No.11258671

110

>> No.11258676

>>11258663
I think people below 90 IQ are not worth empathizing with, though. A pig has an identity and can empathize, but that doesn’t mean it’s worth empathy and respect, or that it has a claim to natural rights.

>> No.11258688

>>11258676
>A pig has an identity and can empathize
No it doesn't.

>> No.11258692

>>11258688
>t. person in denial about eating sentient life forms

>> No.11258696

>>11258692
I never said pigs weren't sentient.

>> No.11258701

90. Truth be told even slightly below average people can be decent contributors to society. Anyone below that should be used as slave labor because they're too stupid to care or do anything about it anyways.

>> No.11258703

Brainlets are people too, but tards are not. 115.

>> No.11258712

>>11258643
I believe that IQposters need to go back. There are enough people with high IQ who have contributed nothing for this thread to be moot.

>> No.11258741

>>11258643
All sentient beings are people.

>> No.11258744

>>11258643
wheres the pepe iq frog

>> No.11258745

>>11258643

anyone stupid enough to believe IQ is a valid metric of anything isn't intelligent enough to be a person.

>> No.11258749

>>11258643
This post reeks of extreme depression and pseudo intellectualism. You desperately crave to demean others and be “above” them because of your personal failings. Go to church or something.

>> No.11258768
File: 139 KB, 1169x993, 1469405720068.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11258768

This entire thread was designed to be divisive and cause discord.
Even the OP pic looks like it was taken from a propaganda website. It's literally professional trolling not for plain fun but for disruptive/destructive purposes.

>>11258749
>This post reeks of extreme depression and pseudo intellectualism
it reeks of psy-op

>> No.11258783

>>11258768
OP here, honored that you’d call me a professional.

>> No.11258808

>>11258676
Do you empathize with pigs often?

>> No.11258815

>implying natural rights exist

>> No.11258832

>>11258643
"Person" just means human or individual, so this is asking what minimum IQ do you need to be a homo sapien. It makes no sense. A particular IQ is not required.
If you're using clownworld definitions invented to justify abortion, or legal definitions, then this is the wrong board.


Putting an article in front of "person" necessitates you're using definition 1.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/person

>> No.11258851

>>11258832
>using Websters to fortify your nonexistent argument
I choose definition 5 so you're wrong anyways.

>> No.11258881

>>11258643
any iq below mine. (and mine is highest in the world)

>> No.11258924
File: 502 KB, 1600x1200, bsr philopsphers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11258924

>> No.11259041

>>11258832
>Putting an article in front of "person" necessitates you're using definition 1.
It appears you are a person with an IQ lower than any given in this thread. Let's see how this plays out with definition 5. In your own words you're saying

"What is the minimum IQ somebody needs to be a [personality of a human being] "

I didnt know a certain IQ threshold causes a physical human body to transmogrify out of physical existence into an intangible human personality. Strange conept.

>> No.11259044

>>11258851
>>11259041
Meant for this post

>> No.11259952
File: 44 KB, 720x695, 4wuh2ph9jfa21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11259952

>>11258643
61

>> No.11259960

>>11258643
1 point higher than whatever OPs has would be an acceptable threshold for me.

>> No.11259976

>>11258655
So the OP is not allowed to post here

>> No.11260001

>>11258643
Not science or math
>>>/pol/