[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 42 KB, 220x330, 1576888556292.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257653 No.11257653[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

IQ is real prove me wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=13&v=UBc7qBS1Ujo&feature=emb_title

>> No.11257657
File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548810236506.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257657

>another IQ thread

>> No.11257658
File: 236 KB, 210x260, 1573520968960.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257658

>>11257657
> T. 80 IQ

>> No.11257675

>>11257653
>almost 3 hours of that whiny nasal voice
TL:DW?

>> No.11257681
File: 224 KB, 625x910, 1569498090673.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257681

>>11257675

The video is essentially piecing together the book "The Bell Curve" in an easy to digest format for normies. In the book these 2 scientists bring together a solid argument for IQ and its predictors while being unbiased as possible.

I didn't want to post about the book becasue:

1) you have to buy/download it
B. more easy to consume for the retards who;
B1} are too lazy to look up the studies themselves
Bii] cant understand scientific language and stats

>> No.11257689
File: 768 KB, 804x5890, The Persistence of Cognitive Inequality Reflections on Arthur Jensen’s “Not Unreasonable Hypothesis”.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257689

>>11257675
Three hours of trying to convince you to not believe your lying eyes.
Read this for a better overview.
https://humanvarieties.org/2019/12/22/the-persistence-of-cognitive-inequality-reflections-on-arthur-jensens-not-unreasonable-hypothesis-after-fifty-years/
Or read the original Jensen artice that came out in 1969 that basically laid down the guantlet and said "Everything you try to do to close the achievement gap is going to be a miserable failure.":
https://arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/How-Much-Can-We-Boost-IQ-and-Scholastic-Achievement-OCR.pdf

>> No.11257701

>>11257689

How ever you want to explain IQ you cant dispute its predictive power. A simple test where people score higher than the average proves that you will have a more successful life than a person who scores lower than the average. If you couldn't otherwise replicate the test over the span of decades with some degree of accuracy then it would be illegitimate. But, this isn't the case and most who dispute this are retard marxist anthropologists

>> No.11257717

>>11257681
Are you trying to gaslight people? The video is some basedboy trying to "debunk" the bell curve.

>> No.11257720

>>11257658
>t. Newfag

>> No.11257721

>>11257653
For every single study out there a link between IQ and any success trait can only be found up until 100 points. Beyond that there's just noise.

>> No.11257725

>>11257717
heads i win tails you loose

>> No.11257726

>>11257701
That's not how it works though. Beyond the average a higher IQ really does not show its benefits in replicable studies.

>> No.11257732

>>11257726
source or you have no argument

>> No.11257733
File: 303 KB, 846x3650, IQ the social origins of inventors.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257733

>>11257721
Having a high IQ is exponentially beneficial in getting a patent.

>> No.11257739
File: 111 KB, 1242x1008, obesity and iq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257739

>>11257726
>>11257721
Not true for obesity.

>> No.11257743
File: 361 KB, 1034x3234, IQ and criminal behaviour.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11257743

>>11257726
>>11257721
Pretty damn linear for criminal behaviour (or at least getting caught).

>> No.11257769

>>11257726

Show me a meta analysis of what you're talking about.

in return here are some studies that might show you the light:

J.B. Carroll (1993) Human Cognitive Abilities, New York: Cambridge Press University Press

Duncat, et al. "A neural basis for general intelligence.: Science, 289, 2000. pp. 457-460

"Test takers have done a good job of creating reliable IQ tests (Gregory, 2007)

"The region most often involved in various IQ tasks is the prefrontal cortex." (Duncan, et al., 2000)

in Lubinski et, al. (2006) it was described that students who scored high on the SAT had a much better life in 25-35 years than their peers.Most would go on to become: a doctor, engineer, mathematicians etc.

"Adopted children's overall intelligence is more similar to that of their biological parents than to that of their adoptive parents." (Munsinger, 1975)

Alcohol, drugs and viral infections in a pregnant woman can seriously lower her child's overall intelligence." (Jacobson & Jacobson, 2000; Ruff, 1999; Steinhausen & Spohr, 1998)

>> No.11257790

>>11257769
look up what Taleb said on twitter lol

>> No.11257791

>>11257739
So, IQ is a function of SES.

>> No.11257798

>>11257790
>twitter source

did you graduate high school?