/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11252697]

We’re all liberal here, right?

[Anonymous No.11252704]

wrong.

[Anonymous No.11252706]

liberal=high openness in the big five
alt-right is basically the backwoods liberals of the neo-cons

[Anonymous No.11252717]

>>11252697
Yes. Conservatives are incapable of science by definition.

[Anonymous No.11252726]

>>11252697
It's funny how I was a socialist at 15 and now just at 21 I'm a fascist and I'm in complete support of a dictatorship, hopefully like the Roman Empire, and the complete genocide of Greece and Germany.

[Anonymous No.11252734]

>>11252697
I'm an alt right conservative. I'm engineering tho, not a real scientist.

[Anonymous No.11252745]

>>11252697
There are only two sexes
Humans be divided into many races or subspecies
Women are irrational emotional impulsive creatures compared to men

The following statements are scientific but trigger liberals.

[Anonymous No.11252752]

>>11252726
>t.

[Anonymous No.11252784]

>>11252752
He looks like he could kill at least 2 Germans with the right training. If you are going to bully and mock him, I'll take him in so that he'll kill in my name.

[Anonymous No.11252796]

>>11252697
nah, i'm an technocratic accelerationist.

[Anonymous No.11252811]

>>11252796
same here, robo-fascism is based

[Anonymous No.11252812]

>being someone other than center left to center right
>meme ideologies
>fascists, commies, anarchists, accelerationists

[Anonymous No.11252816]

>>11252811
glad to hear i'm not alone here, fren.

[Anonymous No.11252822]

>>11252812
ok, boomer

[Anonymous No.11252827]

>>11252822
ok, NEET

[Anonymous No.11252832]

>>11252745
>There are only two sexes
There are two biological sexes but an indefinite number of genders. we can all agree on that
>Humans be divided into many races or subspecies
there are so many "ethnicities" that any label becomes meaningless. identifying with ethnicity "x" is socially constructed
Women are irrational emotional impulsive creatures compared to men
numbers of wars started by women: 0
numbers of wars started by men: all of them

[Anonymous No.11252833]

>>11252822

[Anonymous No.11252834]

>>11252827
why work? the system you set up punishes me through taxes that would pay for me if i were just lazing around.

[Anonymous No.11252842]

>>11252834
This election I'm going to vote in such a way that scum like you gets deprived of the largest amount of NEETbux

[Anonymous No.11252850]

>>11252832
>numbers of wars started by women: 0
>numbers of wars started by men: all of them
wrong, all wars are the result of women. if women weren't around there would be no wars. the entire concept of coward revolves around the protection of women.

[Anonymous No.11252853]

>>11252832
Why R U wrong?

[Anonymous No.11252858]

>>11252697
Define "liberal".

[Anonymous No.11252869]

>>11252796
YANGPILLED

[Anonymous No.11252882]

>>11252697
yes, right wing liberal, not leftist

[Anonymous No.11252897]

>>11252697
I wish I knew the tone of voice for this question.

[Anonymous No.11252923]

>>11252745
There is only sex: the male sex; women aren’t human

[s4ge No.11252930]

>>11252697
Go back to leftypol, you niggerfaggot

[Anonymous No.11252943]

>>11252923
So a women technically can't cheat since they can't have sex? How very liberating for them.

[Anonymous No.11253080]

>>11252697
>*libertarian
Because modern liberals have the same attitude towards science as fundamentalist christians.

[Anonymous No.11253090]

>>11252832
>le war is always bad and irrational maymay
>>>/kitchen/

[Anonymous No.11253110]

>>11253090
pill me on the war is good meme

[Anonymous No.11253114]

>>11253110
Most humans are trash
people die == good

[Anonymous No.11253119]

>>11253114
hard to argue with that, but don't good people die too while much of the trash survives? wouldn't a more systematic approach of exclusively taking out just the trash be more optimal?

[Anonymous No.11253120]

>>11252832
Ethnicity
Are you mentally retarded? How is Ethnicity the same as race?
>le war
Civilization still remains after war, but civilization is being destroyed by women.

[Anonymous No.11253121]

I am a far left liberal. Honestly, anyone who isn't at least a little progressive in some way is not capable of making it in science. You might be an undergrad or you might make it in engineering, but you're never going to last in academia. It's a requirement that you be infinitely open to all kinds of new, strange ideas, and you be ready to test them out to see whether they are true or false with a healthy (not obfuscating) level of skepticism.

[Anonymous No.11253127]

>>11253121
>progressives
>open to ideas
oh lol

[Anonymous No.11253139]

>>11252697
If by liberal, you mean politically left, then fuck no. At least not American Liberal. I'm open to new ideas, but I tend to follow data, and progressive bullshit is the opposite of Liberty.

[Anonymous No.11253153]

>>11253119
How would you select them?

[Anonymous No.11253155]

>>11252832
>There are two biological sexes but an indefinite number of genders
What the fuck is gender then?

[Anonymous No.11253160]

>>11253127
>C: I think we should kill minorities
>L: That's fucked up, I don't want to be friends with someone who thinks like that
>C: lmao so closed-minded, I would never unfriend someone just for disagreeing with my stance on genocide.
Liberals just have principles.

[Anonymous No.11253164]

>>11253155
It's a typo, he actually meant to write "ganders."

[Anonymous No.11253166]

>>11253153
intelligence, creativity, and cooperateability seem to be the key traits for stable advancing societies. then the question becomes how to measure, weigh them and/or factorize the traits then selecting an appropriate threshold is debatable.

[Anonymous No.11253173]

>>11253160
>things that never happened
it's more like:
>c: "i don't like the idea of welfare."
>p: "holy shit you're worse than hinter" *blocked*

[Anonymous No.11253176]

>>11252697
>2019
>being a political Euclidean
I seriously hope you guys don't do thism

[Anonymous No.11253179]

>>11253176
pill me on the political euclidean menace

[Anonymous No.11253182]

>>11253160
>C: there could be biological differences among human populations that evolved in isolation for thousands of years
>L: REEEEE RACISTZ NAZII KKK
>C: .......

[Anonymous No.11253183]

>>11253160
Is this an example from an article about straw man fallacies? Too unrealistic, you would never see a strawman this obvious in real life.

[Anonymous No.11253185]

>>11253179
Politics is too complicated to be measured by a simple left-right axis or even a 2D plane. Political views are not typically ordered like that.

[Anonymous No.11253186]

>>11253160
>liberal spouts his delusions and fantasies again
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/21/democrats-republicans-political-beliefs-national-survey-poll

[Anonymous No.11253190]

>>11253185
agreed

[Anonymous No.11253199]

>>11252726
that doesnt mean u've become wiser or smarter retard. it just means you've become jaded and edgier. you are basically living life in reverse. congratulations

[Anonymous No.11253253]

>>11253153
Make pointless wars and market the military super hard so all the brainlets join and go to die in some shithole.
It's working so far.

>>11253173
This has actually happened to me on a new Discord server I joined (run by a family member), except I was saying you shouldn't be worried about the alt-right since they're mostly a joke, and if you're concerned about their sudden visibility you should look at why their ideals have become attractive to some people. For that transgression ("maybe you're part of the problem") I was immediately called racist and blocked by one person while a few others dogpiled me and claimed literally everything I said was fallacious, racist and privileged. I never once said anything about race. The projection was fucking legendary.
These dumb fucks are why American liberalism is dead. You can only pull the "everything I don't like is racist" card so many times before it falls apart.

[Anonymous No.11253269]

>Taking a standard that primarily applies to retarded burgers with their bipartisan shit

[Anonymous No.11253288]

>>11253253
>brainlets join and go to die in some shithole
It seems that the military doesn't allow people below 84 iq, indeed to be a soldier you need to be above average in intelligence, conscientiousness and health.
I suppose that if your goal is to destroy the best of the breed, then this is quite efficient.

[Anonymous No.11253355]

>>11253127
i mean open to new, good ideas, not open to regression

[Anonymous No.11253359]

>>11253173
>>11253183
except it literally happens on 4chan constantly
you're new here i guess?

[Anonymous No.11253373]

>>11253355
define regression?