[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 879 KB, 628x882, 333.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11221350 No.11221350[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

"Prove that wrong; protip: you can't."

>> No.11221420

>>11221350
Learnt to use “objectivity”, Ameritard.

>> No.11221504

>>11221420
>[Not a specific criticism].

>> No.11222010

..

>> No.11222019

>>11221350
What if something is so bad it's good for some people and just bad for others. huh?

>> No.11222029

>>11221350
Prove entertainment quality is of objectivity.

>> No.11222039

>>11222019
>>11222029
"Why aren't those people orgasming?"

>> No.11222040 [DELETED] 
File: 393 KB, 1000x1070, 2jBTrxje24zcY.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11222040

>>11221350

>> No.11222062

>>11221350
Well, it is objective whether or not an individual enjoys something. But people find 'horseshoe theory' swing around on something so bad it is novel in its level of being horrendous. This shock value of being so bad it mesmerizes you is another objective phenomenon.

However, quality is a broad assessment, not always falling uniquely into 'bad and good'. It can be a lot more outside of that single axis.

>> No.11222288 [DELETED] 

>>11222062
>However, quality is a broad assessment, not always falling uniquely into 'bad and good'.
"Obviously. .. But technically, superior options existing (even potentially) 'binarily' puts those at the forefront.

>> No.11222293

>>11222062
>However, quality is a broad assessment, not always falling uniquely into 'bad and good'.
"Obviously. .. But technically, superior options existing (even potentially) 'binarily' puts those at the forefront."