sum of positive integers is a NEGATIVE FRACTION

[Anonymous No.11204583]

This is why mathematicians are derided by engineers and those that work in the real world. What utter nonsense.

[Anonymous No.11204610]

>he doesn't know what Ramanujan summation is

[Anonymous No.11204618]

>>11204610
>He doesn't know that Ramanujan summation was invented by the celestial entity # three and not Ramanujan.

[Anonymous No.11204619]

>>11204583
that numberphile (((proof))) is sophistry

sum of any number of positive integers cannot be negative, nor can the sum of an infinite series consisting only of positive integers equal anything, only approach, and only positive infinity at that

[Anonymous No.11204628]

The worst part is that this fabricated method of addition is what they use in the Riemann hypothesis (also made by 3) which makes it harder for people to solve the problem because nobody can figure out what batshit insane methods they are using to add the numbers together!

The zeroes of the Riemann zeta function are completely arbitrary and also based on horseshit analytic additions that are not intuitive either, which makes it difficult to even understand what people want.

[Anonymous No.11204636]

>>11204610
Think I'll trust Euler over this pajeet. While physicists are discovering new particles and engineers keep pace with Moore's law, you drooling retards are sitting around masturbating over this crap.

[Anonymous No.11204643]

>>11204636

Math is based though and besides all of Ramanujan's work was made by his African celestial family entity.

[Anonymous No.11204646]

>>11204643
That is #3.
And there it is lol.

[Anonymous No.11204649]

>>11204583
Ah, but you see, there are no negative, nor rational, numbers in the natural numbers. So this is false.

[Anonymous No.11204651]

>>11204628
For a moment I thought this was a Tooker post. If you are not diagnozed, you should go to a psychiatrist to see how terminal your schizophrenia is.

[Anonymous No.11204653]

>>11204651
I went to a psychiatrist years ago and they said I don't have anything wrong with me. I think you're just a stupid cuck on the internet.

[Anonymous No.11204656]

>>11204653
Thanks for the 3.
>>11204651
Even Ramanujan believed this shit he is literally the one who said that a female celestial entity was giving him his problems and solutions. Shut up, what math equations have you discovered, you dumb ass hole fuck? I've never seen your equations.

[Anonymous No.11204658]

>>11204656
Thanks three for being nice to my posts now.
Thanks for the timestamp 3.

[Anonymous No.11204662]

>>11204651

Tooker is a real schizophrenic I am not.

I am just religious dude.

Scientists mix up religion with schizophrenia too often, be more tolerant my atheist poster.

[Anonymous No.11204668]

Ramanujan was assassinated by 3 as well.

[Anonymous No.11204670]

>>11204668

Thanks for the timestamp 3...

Lol.

[Anonymous No.11204676]

>>11204583
Sum of positive integers diverges to positive infinity. But zeta function of negative 1 is -1/12.

[Anonymous No.11204684]

>"Why, yes, I DO believe that the celestial entities are indeed real, what gave it away?"

[Anonymous No.11204686]

>>11204684

Thanks for the 4 lol.

[Anonymous No.11204755]

Yeah the proof is retarded based on set theory alone. Only one of the two can be true.

[Anonymous No.11204757]

>>11204686
your girlfriend does not exist

[Anonymous No.11204762]

>>11204757

Thanks for the timestamp 3 you soulless freak...

Keep repeating yourself and maybe you'll be right one of these days, just kidding you'll never be right and you never were right to doubt me.

[Anonymous No.11204778]

>>11204636
Euler worked with divergent series

[Anonymous No.11204788]

>>11204778
Yes, and he noted that the sum of this series is infinite

[Anonymous No.11204796]

>>11204583
Brainlet here. Can't a simple induction proof disprove this? I.e.
>1 + 2 -> pos int + pos int
>sum of two pos numbers is always pos
>sum of two ints is always int
>each next pos int in Z added still creates a pos int
>sum will never not be positive, never not be an int
I'm sure this can be stated in a more appropriately formal manner, but the logic is simple right?

[Anonymous No.11204800]

>>11204788
>He noted that the sum of a divergent series is infinite
Of course divergent series diverge and can be said to be “infinite” in that sense, brainlet, that doesn’t tell us anything about their regularization.

[Anonymous No.11204802]

>be me
>bcmb squeeb
>robots on 4chan talking about Ramadan math
>mfw

[Anonymous No.11204819]

>>11204796
This result, the -1/12, is about analytic continuation that only makes sense in the context of something called the Riemann Zeta function. Think of the result similar to "peeking under the hood" of numbers, but it shouldn't be treated as logically correct outside of the Riemann Zeta.

[Anonymous No.11204833]

>>11204800
>1/-1 > 1/0
Nah, this is just nonsense

[Anonymous No.11204842]

>>11204583
>This is why mathematicians are derided by engineers and those that work in the real world.
kek what? Who the fuck needs the approval of engiefags in the first place? They're some of the lowest tier scum among STEM, other than CS, and literally just leech their entire work of the theoretic sciences, then bitch and whine when their puny brains can't comprehend actually beautiful mathematics and logic.

[Anonymous No.11205193]

>>11204796
Induction doesn't extend well to infinite cases.

[~S/$\S~ No.11205203]

>>11204628
>difficult to even understand what people want.
That right there. I know what I want all the damn time and I'm fine with working with anything/anyone of any religion/race/retardation in order to help them get it as well.

However everytime I try to give them shit it's like they've never encountered someone who is willing to just SOLVE their problem without needing the fame/fortune. As soon as I get there though their brains melt and they can't seem to be able to actually honesty/directly describe THEIR problem.

Do people REALLY not think about themselves or how to optimize their time, or how to trim/reduce the people who are just time-leeches in their life?

[Anonymous No.11205204]

>>11204583
I've heard this being described as sort of a number trick that is not presented as it actually is

[Anonymous No.11205283]

>>11205204
The numberphile version relies on illegal manipulations of a divergent sum. Associativity and commutativity don't in general hold for divergent series.

[Anonymous No.11205297]

>>11204796
No, the statement is about an infinite sum, for which you need a metric, which is defined on the reals, which is an uncountable infinite set the members of which are sets, for which you usually take strong set theory axioms to write it down

[Anonymous No.11205298]

>>11204583
Reminder that Quantum Field Theory and String Theory depends on this voodoo mathematics

Yeah just a "renormalisation"

[Anonymous No.11205359]

>>11204842
I'm going to build a bridge over the math building so you troglodytes can dwell underneath