/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11195520]

how do we take science back from sjw pc cucks?

[Anonymous No.11195533]

>>11195520
You win the culture War.

Oh, wait, you're a conservative.

You don't. Conservatives and reactinaries never conserved or rolled back anything in any meaningful way.

Get aromatized.

[Anonymous No.11196199]

It's very simple. If some idiot starts sperging about It'S unEThicAl KnoWlEdGe, keep doing the research anyway. And if you must be stealthy, trade papers on the black market. There are many who desire the forbidden knowledge once you have it.

[Anonymous No.11196209]

>>11195520
>we

[Anonymous No.11196216]

Convince the fags that suicide is the way. When most of the fag horde is cleared, research can be fixed.

[Anonymous No.11196218]

Only physics is science. Social scientists are just retards who can use excel

[Anonymous No.11196242]

>>11195520
give that this was published in 1997, I say we already lost it.

[Anonymous No.11196999]

>>11195533
Moral busibodies have been defeated in the past. It used to be the religious puritin retards dictating
their "morality" to everyone, now it's the neo-marxist intersectional feminist cultists. They too will fall. You can see how people are increasingly waking up to their disgusting hypocritical ideology.

[Anonymous No.11197006]

>Implying that everyone is not bisexual at heart.

[Anonymous No.11197018]

>>11196999
>They too will fall.
What disgusting hypocritical ideology cult will replace that one?

[Anonymous No.11197019]

>>11195520
Humilate and isolate sjws as nutjobs. Name the jew.

[Anonymous No.11197023]

>>11197018
Hard to say, probably one based on the conservative side of things.

[Anonymous No.11197094]

>>11195520
>faggotry is not a choice, it's innate
>don't conduct any research into the nature of homosexuality biggot
It's neither, it's a mental illness propagated by sexual abuse.

[Anonymous No.11197509]

>>11195533
>attitudes towards LGBT people have been plummeting amongst young people for years now

Nobody likes you, trannies.

[Anonymous No.11198177]

>>11196999
>Moral busibodies
You mean like all the Nazi cultists on 4chan that advocate book burning?

[El Arcón No.11198184]

>how?
Holocaust + nuclear war

[Anonymous No.11198188]

>>11198177
Acts 19:19

Multi eorum qui fuerant curiosa sectati contulerunt Libros et combuserunt coram omnibus.

[Anonymous No.11198190]

>>11195520
>how do i turn science into having my own biased viewpoints while pointing at a bogeyman that i made up

[Anonymous No.11198191]

>>11198184
where do I buy the merchandise, Tooker?

[Anonymous No.11198196]

>>11198177
>NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T BURN MY GAY BLACK INTERSECTIONAL SOCIOLOGY TEXTBOOKS!!!!! YOU'RE INFRINGING ON MY FREEDOMS!!

[Anonymous No.11198199]

>>11198196
>YOU'RE INFRINGING ON MY FREEDOMS!!
Well isn't it? You believe in personal freedom right?

[Anonymous No.11198203]

>>11198188
And? Your religion is shit.

[Anonymous No.11198212]

>>11195533
Pretty sure the collapse of Rome has been a pretty severe rollback on faggotry and proto feminism.

[Anonymous No.11198215]

>>11198199
lmao nope, freedom is a meme

[Anonymous No.11198217]

>>11198199
http://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_20061888_libertas.html

"From what has been said it follows that it is quite unlawful to demand, to defend, or to grant unconditional freedom of thought, of speech, or writing, or of worship, as if these were so many rights given by nature to man. For, if nature had really granted them, it would be lawful to refuse obedience to God, and there would be no restraint on human liberty. It likewise follows that freedom in these things may be tolerated wherever there is just cause, but only with such moderation as will prevent its degenerating into license and excess. And, where such liberties are in use, men should employ them in doing good, and should estimate them as the Church does; for liberty is to be regarded as legitimate in so far only as it affords greater facility for doing good, but no farther."

[Anonymous No.11198223]

>>11196199
truth always wins eventually

[Anonymous No.11198239]

>>11198223
When do we find out what really happened in germany?

[Anonymous No.11198245]

>>11195520
Wow that’s so true to want to understand something you have to hate it

[Anonymous No.11198258]

>>11198239
Maybe in 200 years. It’s so gay. I have no idea how much the Jews/Allies and the neo-Nazis are telling the truth or lying.
One side treats it as a religious article of faith and can only address what they term “denial” at the level of inferring motivation and characterising the curious person. The other is politically motivated to destroy the thought system based around the idea of this event and so have good reason to sew excessive amounts of doubt.
No doubt posting this will have people who buy into the propagandistic/religious narrative accusing me of being bad faith, stupid or naive. I’ll fully admit to not having researched the issue in sufficient depth to make any claims about the event itself.

[Anonymous No.11198259]

>>11198239
“Neo-Allies” might be a better term.

[Anonymous No.11198266]

>>11195520
By
>having sex
with them.
All women adopt the views of the person laying pipe in them, and I assume this applies to gayboys also.

[Anonymous No.11198272]

>>11195520
Have science be automated. AIs can perform science using pure data without human emotion.

[Anonymous No.11198501]

>>11198266
im a kissless virgin ehh

[Anonymous No.11198839]

>>11195533
Progressives never make progress :^)

[Anonymous No.11198862]

>>11198272
>mistakenly

[Anonymous No.11198926]

>>11198272
>AIs can perform science using pure data without human emotion.
You could have just said you don't understand what a training set is.

[Anonymous No.11198944]

>>11198926
>they put gorillas in the black people training set

[Anonymous No.11199048]

>>11195533
Prosperity creates faggotery as a byproduct, faggotery lowers prosperity, too much of it will kill prosperity, which in turn will kill faggotery. You like a stupid parasite that kills their host.

[Anonymous No.11199051]

>>11198944
>They had a training set specifically for black people instead of ignoring them and giving the model no clean data on blacks to work with

[Anonymous No.11199058]

>>11199051
>tfw they actually did that.

[Anonymous No.11199069]

They probably only gave it training data on people overall, without regards to race and it just so happened that due to skin color similarities it matched up black people to gorilla

[Anonymous No.11199126]

>>11195533

[Anonymous No.11199135]

>>11198926

human belief are also created from training set called reality

[El Arcón No.11199137]

>>11198191
My book (which is excellent):
https://www.amazon [doot] com/Weather-Vane-Gedalia-Gershon/dp/1723762806/
Some shirts and stuff:
https://teespring [doot] com/stores/jonathan-tooker

I don't know why you all don't buy my book. It is really good!

[Anonymous No.11199351]

>>11195520
If you don't see problems with brainless retards using a scalpel they don't understand as a hammer in idiotic, ideology driven way, then you have negative brain mass, sorry

Even this short bit should give you reasons why people worry about retards abusing science, if you can't understand 50 words maybe go back to elementary school

[Anonymous No.11199359]

>>11198839
The fact we're not sitting in caves shaking in fear of some imaginary, sky dwelling mzimu shows they made tons of progress, you retard. Maybe go back to stone age like other alt-righters to taste your ideology untainted by thse evul left wing stuff like actual thinking and not behaving like rabid animal?

[Anonymous No.11199386]

>>11199359
>claims scientific progress as an argument in his favor while defending objectively unscientific rhetoric
refusing to investigate something because the results might make you uncomfortable has more in common with the renaissance era catholic church than any scientific pursuit

[Anonymous No.11199392]

>>11198177
>h-h-hey the o-o-other s-s-s-side i-i-i-is j-j-j-just a-a-a-as b-b-b-bad
n o t a n a r g u m e n t

[Anonymous No.11199395]

>>11199359

then how come every university has one of these?

[Anonymous No.11199399]

>>11195520
>build high security science vaults holding small self sustainable populations and all scientific data that is not pollitically/socially biased
>wait for the outside world to collapse into barbarism
>reeducate primitive societies outside the vaults

[Anonymous No.11199406]

>>11198177
the books they burnt were mostly communist propaganda and porn

[Anonymous No.11199442]

>>11195520
I thought you guys wanted to avoid an echo chamber lol

[Anonymous No.11199543]

>>11199359
t. knows nothing about the history of humanity and scientific accomplishment.
The spread of religion was essential for the uplifting of mankind, as it gave large societies a unifying purpose without actually having any answers yet. Now having many of those answers we were seeking, religion is not as important. It is still important however, as many really stupid humans still exist. If you don't spoon feed dumb humans simple tautologies to explain their purpose to them, they'll make up their own. You don't want retards making their own religions. They'll fuck shit up. This how the alt right, incels, feminazis, and lgbtqwxyz++ retards all got their manifestos.

[Anonymous No.11199552]

>>11199543
I recall an anon saying that because islam is so prescriptive it is more suited to the less intelligent. and if australian aboriginals with their brain structure which favours memorisation and storage instead fluid thought they'd fit right into it.

[Anonymous No.11199631]

>>11195520
Anyone with half a brain knows so-called bio"ethicists" are full of shit

[Anonymous No.11199640]

>>11195520
Its not like finding out gays are simply gay due to nurture would change anything. People generally hate gays because they find them gross, I doubt finding a gay gene or not will change anything

[Anonymous No.11199776]

>>11198272
Your pic is cute but reflects brainlet-tier understanding of how AI are trained.
For example, the beauty contest AI is not deciding which models are more beautiful. It's actually just what human judges would decide.

I'm sure you won't read this being a /pol/tard but looking at pic related:
AI algorithms "determined" that black people need less medical care, even for the same disorder.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6464/447
>At a given risk score, Black patients are considerably sicker than White patients, as evidenced by signs of uncontrolled illnesses. Remedying this disparity would increase the percentage of Black patients receiving additional help from 17.7 to 46.5%.
>The bias arises because the algorithm predicts health care costs rather than illness, but unequal access to care means that we spend less money caring for Black patients than for White patients.
The algorithm noticed that for blacks we spend less money on health care, and concludes that they don't need care as early as whites (because otherwise, they would be getting it.... right?). When in reality blacks are actually at a higher risk for diabetes and hypertension.

[Anonymous No.11199808]

>>11198272
jesus christ, this dude is not familiar with comp sci even a little bit

tell me anon, how do these machines start to be able to tell what attractiveness is?
and that teen girl ai thing was literally just trolling, people purposefully went in and inserted "offensive" information into the machine to make it bigoted. kinda funny trolling desu, but absolutely dummy post and dummy pic

[Anonymous No.11200021]

>>11199808

It can use a statistical approach, feed it photos of people universally considered attractive, the machine learning algorithm can then trying to find common characteristics of these faces.

[Anonymous No.11200038]

>>11200021
who determines what is universally attractive?

and only feeding it "universal" 10/10s, although that doesn't even make sense, would do nothing. How does it know what a 6 looks like? You just expect it to try to find factors close to 10/10s and the more features they have near the ideal the higher score they have? that sounds like a terrible algorithm, and no one would ever publish that.

It makes no sense to only feed it the most attractive people as the only data set.

[Anonymous No.11200047]

>>11198177
>DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS BAD THING!!! LOOK OVER HERE INSTEAD!!! THIS HERE IS ALSO BAD!!
You're a fucking retard. Stop posting your asinine opinions please.

[Anonymous No.11200052]

>>11199640
biggest factor in homosexuality is neurodevelopment in the womb or later abuse and trauma

[Anonymous No.11200125]

>>11200038

obviously universal means most people think is beautiful, you can just do large scale surveys to pick the faces that most people, regardless of gender, race or age consider beautiful.

Once the machine learning algorithm finished generating a set of common characteristics you can feed it ugly faces to test its judgement

[Anonymous No.11200144]

>>11195520
Things are going to get unimaginably worse.
An education should not include an indoctrination. Leftists are insidious.

[Anonymous No.11200148]

>>11200125
this is some of the dumbest shit ive read in a long time.
are we really on a science board? this reads like something a 12 year old would write in their sci fi fan fic.

you dont know shit about AI or how data sets are trained, so don't talk about it.

[Anonymous No.11200154]

>>11200148

brainlet