/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11194774]

Hey nerds, /sp/ tourist here can you please tell me if zero is an odd or an even number or if it's the absence of value therefore neither?
Cheers doods, love you x

[Anonymous No.11194778]

not a number you gimp

[Anonymous No.11194779]

>>11194774
based. we really need to know guys. we're idiots.

[Anonymous No.11194780]

>>11194774
It’s not a number, so it is niether even or odd.

[Anonymous No.11194783]

>>11194778
Thank you for confirming my suspicions everyone on /sp/ is retarded except me

[Anonymous No.11194784]

>>11194774
0=2

[Anonymous No.11194785]

>>11194780
This is so wrong.

[Anonymous No.11194791]

>>11194774
0 is even, an even number has odd numbers on both sides of it on the number line. 0 has -1 on the left and 1 on the right. both odd numbers. QED 0 is even

[Anonymous No.11194816]

Even number

[Anonymous No.11194817]

>>11194774
even because it's divisible by 2

[Anonymous No.11194820]

>>11194774
zero is a concept it does not exist

[Anonymous No.11194826]

>>11194778
>>11194780
>>11194783
Literal retards, 0 is even.

[Anonymous No.11194828]

>>11194785
wrong you want to know why zero is a circle? A circle represents the whole, the "beginning" and "end", except there is a no way to find out where the beginning and end is on a circle because there isn't one, it is an infinite cycle

[Anonymous No.11194830]

>>11194826
Literal retard zero doesn't exist you fucking donkey

[Anonymous No.11194834]

>>11194830
Yeah. Like you’ve got zero testosterone.

[Anonymous No.11194836]

Get the fuck out tourists. You dont know shit about anything. Leave.

[Anonymous No.11194837]

>>11194834
like you get zero pussy

[Anonymous No.11194843]

>>11194837
>Letting women define your value system

[Anonymous No.11194845]

>>11194843
>doesn't even know zero doesn't exist
>opinion on everything discarded as having no merit as it comes from the mind of a simpleton

[Anonymous No.11194869]

It’s impossible for zero to be even or odd just because of the idea of zero. Even or odd is all about dividing by two, but you can’t really divide zero conceptually. Algebraicly you get zero, but it’s impossible to split nothing into different groups of nothing. You just get zero, more nothing.

[Anonymous No.11194870]

>>11194836
why do you think we're fucking asking here, salty faggot?

[Anonymous No.11194878]

>>11194870
go back to cte land

[Anonymous No.11194888]

Numbers are used to count things and this is impossible without a signifier for 0, either for an absence of anything or to make multiples of 10.
It's weird because it's the opposite end of infinity.
Only autists don't regard it as a number (yes your math teacher is likely an autist)

[Anonymous No.11194903]

>>11194888
A number represents value, there is no such value as zero in this reality, you only perceive an absence of value from a materialist standpoint because you can have "zero" computers, or zero apples. But what is a computer made of?

Steel, gold, silicone, etc etc when you destroy the computer those things are not gone, only what you made out of them, you didn't make a zero value out of it because that is impossible, first law of thermodynamics you didn't destroy it you only transformed it. Everything in this reality is made from the aether, there is never "zero" aether it can only be transformed into other objects you perceive as matter in the 3rd dimension. Only a materialist fool thinks zero is a number and not a material concept for convenience in accounting.

[Anonymous No.11194937]

If zero is nether positive nor negative, then how could you expect it to be even or odd?

[Anonymous No.11194939]

>>11194903
So zero is neither odd nor even?

[Anonymous No.11194942]

>>11194903
>implying numbers other than zero are anything more than materialist concepts as well

[Anonymous No.11194945]

>>11194939
No because it It doesn't exist, it can only appear to exist conceptually, it is not a real value outside of human perception

[Anonymous No.11194947]

>>11194942
>not understanding what value is after it was explained in detail
Stop eating crayons

[Anonymous No.11194950]

>>11194945
That means /sp/ was right, I think.

[Anonymous No.11194952]

>>11194945
Well I take that back, it doesn't need human perception, it only needs 3 dimensions and the perception of something in that dimension to appear to exist.

[Anonymous No.11194959]

the tldr is [first law of thermodynamics + (E=mc2} = no such thing as zero]

[Anonymous No.11195017]

>>11194903
>>11194945
> he thinks numbers exist

[Anonymous No.11195030]

>>11195017
I said numbers represent value, value exists you absolute mong incapable of reading compression on an elementary level

[Anonymous No.11195583]

>>11194774
Most people in this thread are wrong.
An even number is a number which can be written as 2*n where n is an integer.
An odd number is likewise a number which can be written as 2*n-1 where n is an integer.
2*0 = 0, and 0 is an integer, therefore it is even.
Let us see if it is odd as well:
2n-1 = 0
2n = 1
n = 1/2
1/2 is NOT an integer, therefore the number 0 is strictly even.

[Anonymous No.11195598]

>>11195583
hey idiot try and refute this then >>11194959

pro tip: you can't jack ass

[Anonymous No.11195612]

>>11195583
Based and retarded

[Anonymous No.11196190]

>>11195598
>>11194959
samefag here with a diagram for the simpletons

[Anonymous No.11196192]

Even numbers are defined by the generating function of [math]{2x:x\in \mathbb{Z}\}[/math]

[Anonymous No.11196195]

>>11196192
Missed a backslash
[math]\{2x:x\in \mathbb{Z}\}[/math]

[Anonymous No.11196214]

>>11194820
>zero is a concept it does not exist

Neither does one. Neither does any number. For example:

>>11196190
How many mountains in this picture? How many waters?

[Anonymous No.11196224]

You have a herd of 20 sheep. You sell 10, you now have 10 sheep. 9 of your remaining sheep are killed by wolves, you now have only 1 sheep. This sheep dies of old age, how many sheep do you have?
The idea that 0 isn't a number is parroted by pseuds who literally don't think about it at even a surface level.

[Anonymous No.11196231]

>>11196214
>Neither does one.
wrong

>Neither does any number. For example:

Well you bring up an interesting point since the all is "1" then one is the only real number in a way from the ultimate perspective, but that one can be and has been subsided infinite times so ultimately this is a psued argument. There are only 9 numbers that can be combined into infinite fractals

[Anonymous No.11196234]

>>11196224
>The idea that 0 isn't a number is parroted by pseuds who literally don't think about it at even a surface level.

Says the psued that loves to "hear" himself speak but too dumb to listen to others "speak" (ie read the thread first). You have been proven wrong conclusively psued

[Anonymous No.11196241]

>>11196234
All I've seen is low IQ shitflinging, the only people making points agree with me. Go back to watching niggers kick balloons or whatever it is you retards do.

[Anonymous No.11196243]

>>11196231
>"1" then one is the only real number
It's not real, it's a+bi

[Anonymous No.11196245]

thread stinks of highschoolers trying to sound smart. christ this board really is for the dogs these days.

[Anonymous No.11196247]

>>11196245
this

[Anonymous No.11196250]

>>11194845
>zero doesn’t exist
>is perfectly capable of typing it out on his keyboard

[Anonymous No.11196255]

>>11196241
>All I've seen is low IQ shitflinging
>other ape tier droolers agree with me who cares you have proven me wrong conclusively I can't understand it therefore I will just pretend like it doesn't matter

Because you are too stupid to understand anything above your psued simple perspctive

[Anonymous No.11196256]

>>11196231

Zero is a number and it is even. Any other answer is psudo-intellectual crap from people who want to waste time rather than doing anything useful.

Also, 0≠0

>>11196231
All numbers are ideas that exist in the human mind. They are useful tools, but should not be seen as an end in and of themselves.

[Anonymous No.11196259]

>>11196250
You win stupidest post of the thread award congratulations. Anime is also real because your favorite hentai artist drew it, imbecile

[Anonymous No.11196262]

>>11196255
This post is so ironic it's ferromegnetic

[Anonymous No.11196265]

>>11196256
Sorry I have proven zero doesn't exist beyond any doubt I won't argue with you. Also shapes and distances exist which are values and I already covered this.

Reread the thread and take the time try to understand it or don't w/e

[Anonymous No.11196270]

>>11194869
> it is all about dividing by two, but you can’t really divide 1.1 conceptually. Algebraicly you get 0.55, but it’s impossible to split 1.1 into different elements of the Rationals. You just get 0.55 more element of the Rationals.

[Anonymous No.11196271]

>>11196250
>>11196259
kek

[Anonymous No.11196273]

>>11196259
You win dumbest newfag for not spotting bait

[Anonymous No.11196275]

Correct answers:

>>11194791
>>11194816
>>11194817
>>11194826
>>11194888
>>11195583
>>11196195
>>11196245

[Anonymous No.11196277]

Zero is a number and it's real, it's the number of times OP has had sex

[Anonymous No.11196278]

>>11196265
>Sorry I have proven zero doesn't exist

You don't know what "proof" means. Just being stubborn isn't proof.

[Anonymous No.11196282]

>>11196278
Just because you are not knowledgeable or smart enough to understand something doesn't mean it wasn't proven you wet brained donkey. Why are you on this board you trying to infect people with your stupidity?

[Anonymous No.11196283]

By definition, zero is a real number because it's a member of the reals.

[Anonymous No.11196288]

>>11196282

What is one minus one?

[Anonymous No.11196290]

When anyone in this thread can refute this
>>11194959
>>11196190

Then post your proofs, til then stfu you hacks

[Anonymous No.11196294]

>>11194947
>explained in detail
>absence of things doesn’t exist in reality
are you retarded dude? does the number pi not exist because you don’t see pi apples right in front of you?
Besides, the absence of stuff is very real. An Eigenstate of a particle has literally 0 probability density of other states. They are really not there thus 0.

[Anonymous No.11196295]

>>11196294
>Eigenstate
Do you really expect this retard to understand that? He's just going to use the fact that he doesn't know what that is as some kind of refutation

[Anonymous No.11196296]

>>11195030
if values exist then the value 0 does aswell

[Anonymous No.11196299]

>>11196295
i have 0 pieces of chocolate in my mouth. it’s sad but true.

[Anonymous No.11196302]

>>11196294
>>11196290
>>11196295

Waiting .... you will never refute this because you can't because you are no smart enough to even understand it not to mention it is conclusive which you are also not smart enough to understand

[Anonymous No.11196303]

The thing about /sp/ is that they're all so retarded it's impossible to distinguish masterful shitposting from actual idiocy, and this thread is an excellent case study of this phenomenon.

[Anonymous No.11196309]

>>11196302
if zero can't exist then I do have money right? Because the absence of it clearly is not possible.

[Anonymous No.11196314]

>>11196309
Waiting ....

[Anonymous No.11196315]

>>11194959
first law of td states temperature and thermal equilibrium exists. Irrellevant for the existence of 0.
e=mc^2 is first of all incomplete, and if I measure vacuum with no particle, what is its rest mass?

[Anonymous No.11196318]

>>11196314
yes you have atleast one dollar, cool fact really

[Anonymous No.11196319]

>>11196315

[Anonymous No.11196326]

>>11196315
got my thermodynamic laws confused. 2nd point is still valid

[Anonymous No.11196330]

>>11196315
Let me explain i really simple for the cheap seats (though I already have in detail as well in this thread) since even a diagram for children couldn't work for you.

The first law of thermodynamics states energy never ceases to exist it inly changes form. Since all matter is energy (e=mc2) then that mans the matter is never gone, there is never a zero value in this reality because we are in closed system where the energy simply transforms into other things it is never "gone" never at a "zero" value, it can't be, it is impossible child. Therefore zero is only a concept that is useful in the illusory "reality" you perceive, it is not real, it can't be, it is only a CONCEPT. The lesson is over child, go do your homework now and stop arguing about things you cannot understand

[Anonymous No.11196336]

>>11196330
>The first law of thermodynamics states energy never ceases to exist it inly changes form.

It DOESN'T say that energy has to be evenly distributed. That the universe as a whole has mass does not mean that parts of it can't be empty. The vacuum exists. Also, zero as a difference between two energy states is the GOAL of thermodynamics - heat tends towards equilibrium.

In an electrical circuit, if both sides have the same voltage potential, then no power will flow. Zero equals equality.

And finally, I asked this before and you ignored it:

What is one minus one.

If this question takes you paragraphs to explain, that doesn't mean that you are smart.

[Anonymous No.11196338]

This is a really pedantic point but time symmetry breaks down over long periods so energy conservation isn't absolute

[Anonymous No.11196339]

What is one minus one?

Being unable to answer this does not make you smart.

[Anonymous No.11196340]

>>11196336
bye simpleton

[Anonymous No.11196367]

>>11196338
>a law isn't absolute
>it is called law specifically because it is absolute

spotted the psued

[Anonymous No.11196375]

>>11196367
It was considered a law, and over any practical length of time it can be thought to be absolute, but it's not actually absolute.

[Anonymous No.11196378]

>>11196340

> Responds to argument with nothing but name calling.

This is the closest you'll get to an admission of defeat on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.11196388]

>>11196378
don’t call it admission of defeat, if you you can’t defend your standpoint, your intuition was wrong and you learned something.

[Anonymous No.11196395]

>>11196338
>time symmetry breaks down over long periods
off topic, so sage
but how/why?
I get the time symmetry is not valid if the universal constants change over time, but are there measurements for that or is there another mechanism?

[Anonymous No.11196396]

>>11196395
Explaining it is genuinely beyond my understanding at this point, but it has to do with inflation IIRC.

[Anonymous No.11196433]

>>11194774
Questions like this are stupid because the answer just depends on how you define "even" and also how you define "zero". You can construct mathematical systems that say zero is even or zero is undefined. It doesn't matter as long as you are consistent. It's just semantic pedantry, not an actual mathematical question

[Anonymous No.11196468]

>>11194780
>>11194783
>>11194820
>>11194828
>>11194830
>>11194845
>>11194869
>>11194888
>>11194903
>>11194945
>>11194952
>>11196231
>>11196234
Fuck all of you insolent children. Learn some math. Oh, and get the fuck off my board.

[Anonymous No.11196530]

>>11196231
>vortex ”””””math”””””
>>>/x/

[Anonymous No.11196546]

>>11196468
>look at this hypothetical used in the 3rd dimension because he doesn't have the knowledge or intellect to understand things from a higher perspective more abstract than his tiny mind can process


>Still no one who can ever refute this >>11196190

Nah you get off my board you ape tier hack

[Anonymous No.11196560]

>>11196468
Let me make it so simple any mentally retarded imbecile off the street can understand. When you can post proof that you find a way to destroy energy you come back to this thread and let us all know, then I will stop calling you and the rest of these donkeys imbeciles. Because then you will have proven you can actually have a zero value.

[Anonymous No.11196574]

>>11196468
I'll even make it MORE simple for you dummies. Show me one time ANYTHING ever came form nothing. Are you seriously putting forth the idea that "something" can ever come "nothing". Because if you are, you are stupider than I thought as you can't even use elementary logic.

[Anonymous No.11196618]

>this thread

[Anonymous No.11196620]

>>11194774
assuming you are actually interested in the answer here's an argument for you.

we say a number n is even if it had the form 2k = n when k is an integer.

However it will help if we generalize the the term "even" to properly agree with our intention of the term. Now we can generalize this and say a similar statement about numbers realating to 3 or 5 or 7... etc. letting p be a prime number you can say a number is "even" with respect to p if there exists some k such that pk = n.

if you allow k to include 0 then for any p there exists a k such that n is 0. this statments since when k = 0 then for any p we have p0 = 0.

in this sense 0 is "even" with respect to 2 but also "even" with respect to any number.

>>11194774

[Anonymous No.11196623]

>>11196468
>>11196530

[Anonymous No.11196652]

>>11196623
anon wins, get off his board psueds

[Anonymous No.11196662]

>>11196623
Based potato

[Anonymous No.11196773]

>>11196618
It's four plus the empty set, I thought you'd know this

[Anonymous No.11196798]

LSU /_ GEAUX TIGERS BAW

[Anonymous No.11196808]

0 has yet to be formally defined in mathematics. We take it for granted because it makes our equations work.

[Anonymous No.11196810]

>>11196245
lol

[Anonymous No.11196816]

>>11196808
This post sounds like it was written by a college kid who passed his calc 1 class with a B+ and thinks he's hot shit. You are absolutely wrong and to make it worse you're arrogant.

[Anonymous No.11196820]

>not being exclusively interested in a function's behavior on [0,1]

[Anonymous No.11196821]

>>11196816
you sound like you're being trolled

[Anonymous No.11196824]

0 = virginity it's there but you can't do anything with it

[Anonymous No.11196825]

>>11196821
I can't even tell anymore on this site man

[Anonymous No.11196826]

>>11196468
Autism

[Anonymous No.11196828]

If zero ain't a number how come I get zero pussy?

[Anonymous No.11196831]

If 0 is real why can't I divide by it? Checkmate atheists.

[Anonymous No.11196834]

>>11196825
just assume you are

[Anonymous No.11196845]

>>11194774
even.
if an odd number is defined by an integer, n, such that 2n+1 is odd, then does there exist an integer n such that 2n+1 = 0?
NO. the only real number that is sufficient is -1/2 a rational number.
thus 0, which is divisible by 2, is even.
probably. I dunno, I'll asl your mom tonight when I fuck her with my cock. I'm literally e^x in that bitch.
>>11196468
based pianist.

[Anonymous No.11196847]

>>11196808
NIHIGGGA i'll fuck your mom

[Anonymous No.11196852]

>>11196831
What does the word number... even mean?

[Anonymous No.11196862]

>>11196852
a mathematical object

[Anonymous No.11196870]

>>11196862
How do we market the word to the ignorant masses?

[Anonymous No.11196883]

>>11196870
fuck you and your greasy fucking hands.
I will not have a pop sci invasion of mathematics, god dammit.
bad enough engineers think they are masters at math because they read GEB and took calc 3 in college.
Math doesn't and shouldn't exit its pure state EVER.

[Anonymous No.11196890]

even and odd numbers alternate, and 0 is divisible by 2 to produce an integer. Its even

[Anonymous No.11196893]

>>11196883
based autist

my mom was thinking out loud in numbers over thanksgiving it almost gave me a heart attack

[Anonymous No.11196897]

what's the most complicated phenomenon that hinges on the evenness of 0?

[Anonymous No.11196901]

>>11196890
if the real numbers doesn't include a number that is both even and odd at the same time doesn't that mean it has a hole?
>>11196897
your mom

[Anonymous No.11196903]

>>11196883
uWu salty desu

[Anonymous No.11196913]

>>11196901
>the real numbers doesn't include a number that is both even and odd at the same time doesn't that mean it has a hole?
by what principle?

[Anonymous No.11196980]

In theory zero is even. But in practical reality it isn’t even or odd.

[Anonymous No.11197066]

>>11196980
>But in practical reality it isn’t even or odd.
If zero wasn't even, then math wouldn't work. In actual, mathematical reality, zero is both even and odd at the same time. In fact it is both the most odd and the most even number, just like how it's the most rational number.

[Anonymous No.11197076]

>>11197066

[Anonymous No.11197122]

>>11197076
Wrong board. Numerology belongs on >>>/x/.
>inb4 something about Tesla, Rodin coils, and free energy.

[Anonymous No.11197143]

>>11196620
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.11197148]

>>11197122
>being too much a brainlet to understand simple math

this is the code to the entire matrix you pompous hack fool

[Anonymous No.11197569]

>>11197148
it's just addition

[Anonymous No.11197831]

>>11194820
>zero is a concept it does not exist
It is a number (counting up or down from it; doing math operations which result in it)
It is a concept (in computer science zero represents 'false', non-zero 'true'; it's one or the other; there is no 'maybe'...)

[Anonymous No.11197836]

>>11197569
And yet you can't understand it.

[Anonymous No.11197843]

>>11194945
>No because it It doesn't exist...
You're confusing 'null' with zero. They are mutually exclusive.

[Anonymous No.11197858]

>>11196831
>If 0 is real why can't I divide by it?
Because you flunked 1st grade math, muh niggah.

[Anonymous No.11197863]

>>11194945
>No because it It doesn't exist...
You're confusing zero with 'null.' They are mutually exclusive.

[Anonymous No.11197916]

I think people are forgetting it’s just your opinion. Zero could be even, odd, both, or neither. There isn’t one right answer.

[Anonymous No.11197928]

>>11196468
>Zero is even because Peano says so!
How very unscientific of you.

[Anonymous No.11197951]

>>11194774
0 is even and it's pretty easy to understand why.
Take any integer and stack up that many pancakes into two stacks, alternating stacks for each pancake. So, left, right, left, right, left, right, etc.
If you run out of pancakes and your stacks are the same height, you had an even number of pancakes.
If you run out and one stack is one pancake higher than the other, the initial number of pancakes was odd.
If you run out and one stack is a fractional number of pancakes higher than the other, you didn't have an integer number of pancakes to begin with.
If you run out of pancakes and wind up with any other scenario, i.e. one stack is two or more pancakes higher than the other or you have more than two stacks, then you did it wrong, try again dumbass.
If you don't run out of pancakes, then your number is the cardinality of an infinite set, and therefore not actually a number.
If you run out of pancakes and your stacks are the same height, but they're not the same width (or they are the same width but they're wider than when you started) then you forgot to cook your batter.
Now try this with the integer 0. That is, start with 0 pancakes.
You've now run out of pancakes before you've even begun sorting them into stacks.
Compare the height of your two empty stacks of pancakes.
Since they're both empty, they're the same height (empty).
Therefore, 0 is even, QED.

[Anonymous No.11197952]

ZERO IS NOT A NUMBER AND NEITHER IS ONE

[Anonymous No.11198047]

[Anonymous No.11198096]

>>11194774
hhmm

[Anonymous No.11198097]

Thanks for convincing me it's time to leave this board.

[Anonymous No.11198120]

>>11197928
math isn't a science, it's its own group from philosophy.
The "scientific method" generally isn't relevant. Say what you want to, but prove it is how mathematicians go.
Axioms are the basis of the structure of a mathematical universe, they are required to be true.
>HUUUR DDUUURR MATH IS JSUT DOGMATIC BULLSHIT AND MADE UP. IT'S NOT EVEN REAL
>now let me use it, inappropriately, in my own dogmatic way to generate shitty models and then blame math when it goes wrong.
>HUURR DURR APPLICATION ISN'T DOGMATIC I SWEAR
>hurr durr i ama science boy but don't understand philosophy or what science even means.
>philosophy is GGGAAYAYA

[Anonymous No.11198346]

>>11196623
if nothing != something then it is elementary logic that something != nothing as anon said, are there people on this board that honestly can't understand this

[Anonymous No.11198363]

>>11198120
math is also an abstract concept and not always applicable to reality, you can lie with number just as you can with words.I know you thought you were clever with your post but you weren't you just showed how ignorant you are once again.

“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” - Nikola Tesla

[Anonymous No.11198435]

>>11197863
uh no anon good boy points for CS weigh in though

[Anonymous No.11198437]

>>11197831
none of this is relevant to this conversation anon

[Anonymous No.11198560]

>>11198435
>uh no anon...
My, what a convincing counterargument!
Thank you for demonstrating your expertise and sharing your in-depth knowledge of the subject. I'm sure everyone has benefited.

[Anonymous No.11198580]

>>11198437
>none of this is relevant...
Sure. None of it is relevant to the strange reality YOU live in. But, then again, few geniuses are recognized in their time, am I right? Certainly, you fall into this category. Yes, I'm certain of it.

Nonetheless, the denizens of /sci/ thank you for bestowing your brilliance in the matter. Certainly, all mathematicians will benefit from this astounding discovery, and your unrivaled lucidity in communicating it will not go unrecognized...

[Anonymous No.11198587]

>>11198437
>none of this is relevant...
Sure. None of it is relevant to the strange reality YOU live in. But, then again, few geniuses are recognized in their time, am I right? Certainly, you fall into this category. Yes, I'm certain of it.

Nonetheless, the denizens of /sci/ thank you for bestowing your brilliance in the matter. Certainly, all mathematicians will benefit from this astounding discovery, and your unrivaled lucidity in communicating it will not go unnoticed...

[Anonymous No.11198591]

>>11198047
Based and CS pilled

[Anonymous No.11198628]

>>11197952
>ZERO IS NOT A NUMBER AND NEITHER IS ONE

Don't tell me... and the Earth is flat, too?

[Anonymous No.11198656]

>>11198047
Whoever wrote this must be new to programming.

1. Code does not define a RANGE of values to be entered, then tests and flags if number is outside of said range (i.e. "Enter an integer between 0 and 100:").

2. Code makes assumption that zero is even from the outset. There is no algorithm performing a test. Instead, it is a long, awkward 'if' statement.

You're not showing off. You're showing us you don't know what you're doing yet...

[Anonymous No.11198657]

>>11198560
>Thank you for demonstrating your expertise and sharing your in-depth knowledge of the subject.

Yah I did anon I am the poster in this thread that actually knows what they are talking about and posted all the evidence unlike you.

>>11198587
butthurt cope, indeed I did do those things, I gave the equation none of you understood that was obvious once you do and none of you can ever "solve" because there is no solution because there is no such value period. Stay mad psued

[Anonymous No.11198664]

>>11198657
You're just some antagonist little twit looking to stir up some nonsensical shit for your own amusement.

So, what happened? Teacher gave you a zero on your last math test and you're trying to argue that zeroes don't exist?

GTFO, loser...

[Anonymous No.11198666]

>>11198657
You're just some antagonistic little twit looking to stir up some nonsensical shit for your own amusement.

So, what happened? Teacher gave you a zero on your last math test and you're trying to argue that zeroes don't exist?

GTFO, loser...

[Anonymous No.11198672]

>>11198666
seething brainlet cope, salty desu yummy

[Anonymous No.11198680]

>>11198591
>Based and CS pilled
Kek. Hardly...

[Anonymous No.11198697]

>>11196275
>Correct answers:
>>>11194791
>>>11194816
>>>11194817
>>>11194826
>>>11194888
>>>11195583
>>>11196195
>>>11196245

"Correct" becuz they're all shitposted by the same mischievous, antagonist OP...

Like I said, GTFO !

[Anonymous No.11198764]

>>11198697

[Anonymous No.11198776]

>>11196245
fucking literally this.
half these niggas don't know what a proof is.
>>11198363
>Nikola Tesla
HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHHA
can you please reproduce this post?

[Anonymous No.11198860]

>>11198776
>HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHHA

>says a literal retard psued monkey who can't use simple logic

Do you think anyone finds you credible desu? They are laughing at you not with you

[Anonymous No.11198863]

>>11198047
learn to use a switch nigga

[Anonymous No.11199007]

>>11198363
Lmao >>11197122 called it. You don’t have special insider knowledge about the “structure of reality” because you know about some arbitrary integer sequence, you’re a pseud that cannot into actual mathematics. Next you’ll start talking about how we’re all just too simple minded to understand your profound sequence. You don’t belong here, you’re lost.

[Anonymous No.11199025]

>>11198047

Number entered: 102

Result: "Your number is odd!"

Boss: "You're fired."

[Anonymous No.11199097]

>>11199007
>moronic person says moronic things

imagine my shock, how novel

[Anonymous No.11199988]

>>11198697
Nice b8

[Anonymous No.11200364]

>>11194888
>Numbers are used to count things and this is impossible without a signifier for 0
Simply incorrect.

[Anonymous No.11200650]

>>11200364
nice argument

[Anonymous No.11200975]

>>11196468

[Anonymous No.11201032]

>>11196433
Y'know, I remember seeing a maths journal where every single paper, every last one, used different definitions of even and odd. Every single one. None of them used a universal definition of even and odd defined from their first year of study. Absolutely not a one of them. They all were the living definition of hacks trying to write their own version of perfectly functional number theory.

[Anonymous No.11201036]

>>11196560
Retard, show me the plank that has length i and then try describe quantum mechanics without complex valued functions.