Steam turbine lol

[Anonymous No.11193060]

IDC how cheap it currently is there current design is amazingly inefficient. Steam turbines were implemented in the 1800's. I haven't figured it out yet, but there has to be a better way to harness the energy of a reaction, than just capturing the heat which is the waste of the reaction. Meanwhile the internal combustion engine utilizes the reaction and diffuses the heat.

[Anonymous No.11193099]

>>11193060
There's supercritical CO2, but it has its own problems.

[Anonymous No.11193352]

>build big strong cylindrical chamber
>drill hole top, and put automated lid
>insert plate from the bottom toward the top of the cylinder and make sure it goes in nice and tight, but isn't jammed
>drop atomic bomb from hole and close lid
>detonation of the atomic bomb inside the closed chamber pushes down the "floor plate"

Now it's just a matter of connecting that floor plate to some sort of mechanism to convert that vertical motion into whatever you need and some minor technicalities related to repeating the cycle.

[Anonymous No.11193418]

>>11193060
Steam-fags got literally centuries to improve this this technology, they failed. Now solar is cheaper and steam age is finally over.