/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.11179073]

Lamarckian evolution in action: the more beautiful your thoughts are, the more beautiful you will be on the outside.

[Anonymous No.11179078]

>>11179073
cope. the more attractive you are, the easier life you will have and thus having nicer thoughts.

[Anonymous No.11179097]

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamafacialplasticsurgery/article-abstract/2737367
>Findings This survey study of 145 lay participants who rated photographs of 24 men before and after facial cosmetic surgery demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in perceptions of attractiveness, likeability, social skills, and trustworthiness.
hmmmmmmmmm
I think what they're trying to say is that if you're lonely, you should shower more.

[Anonymous No.11179113]

>>11179097
What if they wanted more man to spend money on plastic surgeries, ware they informed on which is before and which is after?

[Anonymous No.11179126]

>>11179073

I think this woman would be a kind and loving mother to the dozen child I would make with her.

[Anonymous No.11179129]

>>11179073
This is actually the halo effect. The nicer you look, the nicer the thoughts other people have about you, and thus the better a person they perceive you to be. Fuck humanity.

[OP No.11179138]

>>11179129
Obviously, but thanks for pointing this out. I was being ironic.

[Anonymous No.11179142]

Another truth bomb from OKCupid.

[Anonymous No.11179150]

>>11179142
one from tinder

[Anonymous No.11179155]

>>11179150
That's a good one.

[Anonymous No.11179161]

>>11179150
one more from tinder

[Anonymous No.11179165]

>>11179150
THE SAME PICK UP LINE

[Anonymous No.11179173]

I would not want people to get depressed over this. I just want incels-in-denial (simps) to stop being delusional and keep exacerbating the problem by showing them the realities of dating.

[Anonymous No.11179174]

[Anonymous No.11179176]

[Anonymous No.11179220]

>>11179073
based as fuck

[Anonymous No.11179231]

>>11179073
That's what you got out of that graph?

[Anonymous No.11179237]

>>11179174
>There is always better
That's not untrue

[Anonymous No.11179269]

>>11179150
Wow, that's, like, not fake at all.

[Anonymous No.11179292]

>>11179269
It's easy to replicate the experiment if you care.

[Anonymous No.11179490]

>>11179176
He literally stumbled up to her and started touching her without speaking, then ran away.

[Anonymous No.11179593]

>>11179126
i think she already had a dozen children with a dozen latinos

[Anonymous No.11179598]

Attractiveness is correlated with g, because the brain accounts for 84% of the genome. A mutation causing poor physical appearance is going to correlate well with mutations of the mind.

[Anonymous No.11179601]

>>11179598
horseshit, kanazawa. you crank psychologist, learn what halo effect is.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415372/

[Anonymous No.11179605]

>>11179601
I'll look into this, but it better be compelling.

[Anonymous No.11179629]

is there an opposite of halo effect? below avg looking people to me seem more trustworthy and more interesting, in my mind they've usually had to develop other positive attributes than just looks to get by

[Anonymous No.11179647]

>>11179629
it's still halo effect. some call the other end the devil effect, but it's the same spectrum.

[Anonymous No.11179687]

>>11179647
devil/horn effect is attributing bad things based on someone's unattractiveness, what I mean is attributing good things based on someone's unattractiveness

[Anonymous No.11179693]

>>11179687
Compensation bias. "If they're bad in one thing, that must mean they're good in something else."

[Anonymous No.11179700]

>>11179142
Reminder they removed the entire article from their blog to try and hide the truth and prevent the beta uprising.

[Anonymous No.11179716]

>>11179700
is it really that scandalous that most women don't think most men are good looking? men don't generally invest in their looks at all (because women don't value it that much) and yet somehow almost everyone gets laid

[Anonymous No.11179719]

>>11179716
>somehow almost everyone gets laid
Why is like 1/3 of males between the age 18 and 30 virgins?

[Anonymous No.11179720]

>>11179716
>somehow almost everyone gets laid

[Anonymous No.11179725]

>>11179719
do you live in japan?

[Anonymous No.11179729]

>>11179725
No, in Japan it's way worse.

[Anonymous No.11179740]

>>11179729
so where do you get the 1/3 number from? only thing I can find is 1/8 by the age of 26 from n = 16k uk study

[Anonymous No.11179744]

>>11179740
Anon has the wrong study in mind. It's 1/3rd of men in the 18 to 30 category have been celibate for the past year. Which is crazy high, compared to previous generations, 2 to 3 times what it used to be in previous studies.

[Anonymous No.11179746]

>>11179740
There is a chart circulating online from a news article and I think it's from around 2016 that showed 28%. It's 2019 now so I assume the number is easily over 33% now.

[Anonymous No.11179750]

>>11179725
U.S.
28% of males have no sex but only 18% of females have no sex? What the hell is going on? Are women having sex with seniors?

[Anonymous No.11179751]

>>11179744
alright makes more sense, surely the women's numbers have risen as well? (in the context of this thread)

[Anonymous No.11179754]

>>11179746
>>11179750
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/

[Anonymous No.11179760]

[Anonymous No.11179769]

>>11179750
The men that do have sex have more sex with more women.

[Anonymous No.11179854]

>>11179769
data?

[Anonymous No.11179857]

>>11179593

Nah, she is not fat enough to attract the latinos

[Anonymous No.11179875]

>>11179854
It's literally right here >>11179750

The only two possible explanations for that data is either because men that do have sex have, on average, more sex, or that the women in the age bracket are having sex with a different age bracket. And that last one seems very unlikely.

[Anonymous No.11179892]

>>11179875
why would it be unlikely that a significant part of the diffence is because a lot of women are having sex with older men? that happens quite a bit I think

[Anonymous No.11179897]

>>11179892
Because the separation is a new trend, and what you describe is not. Apps like Tinder allowing a shrinking group of highly desirable men to have an increasingly large share of sex, however, is a new trend, and its appearance fits with when the data separates.

[Anonymous No.11179903]

>>11179897
good point

more of the desirable men are probably older tho which would be a big cumulative effect

[Anonymous No.11179913]

>>11179897
Maybe it's not so well rated woman, who refuse not so well rated man.

[Anonymous No.11180462]

>>11179700
>>11179716

It would be a hard blow to the dating scene or even kill the dating scene if most men knew.

[Anonymous No.11180539]

>>11179269
Not him, as I believe the experiment.
But I'm really curious if I could pull it off in a more "conservative-but-degenerate" country.

[Anonymous No.11180571]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ll499TkHzM

[Anonymous No.11180578]

>>11179073
xD

[Anonymous No.11180662]

>>11179875
>And that last one seems very unlikely.
good argument, very /sci/

[Anonymous No.11180724]

>>11180571
The undeniable blackpill. I'm glad Jeremy Meeks exist. I heard in one interview he was even getting money and donations from people in Japan. Like wtf!