[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

# /sci/ - Science & Math

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 77 KB, 1600x900, wojak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>be me
>goes on /sci/
>thinks he can get better by looking at posts.

 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 19:38:05 2019 No.11164625 File: 214 KB, 500x350, 1152120635023.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 19:39:51 2019 No.11164626 >>11164599don't tell yourself you're bad at it, you'll throw away any courage you'll actually need to sit down and think about a problem.
 >> Anonymus Wed Nov 20 20:03:48 2019 No.11164690 >>11164626Thanks Anon
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 20:07:02 2019 No.11164699 >>11164625it doesn't line up perfectly but you can't really tell at that resolution, it's just the normal infinite chocolate trick
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 20:34:32 2019 No.11164756 File: 157 KB, 609x1000, 1896_Alfred-Pierre_Agache_-_The_Sword.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11164599solve a double integral for me this should be trivial. my five year old son can do it simply by knowing algebra and memorizing the method. literally engineer tier shit. if a five year old, who I selectively breed with the smartest women I could find, can do it I am sure you can do it.
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 20:37:09 2019 No.11164760 File: 79 KB, 411x766, 1567977459692.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11164756pretty good, here's your (You)
 >> Anonymus Wed Nov 20 20:54:23 2019 No.11164781 >>11164756Thanks Anon
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 22:23:09 2019 No.11164991 C is not equals to C
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 22:27:19 2019 No.11164997 >>11164599time to start doing proofs. All you need is an interest.
 >> Anonymous Wed Nov 20 22:42:03 2019 No.11165013 File: 126 KB, 1131x622, math majors on suicide watch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] If you want to embarrass a mathsmatician, just show them this
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 12:33:30 2019 No.11166208 >>11164599I did the same thingRealize if you really wanna learn math or if it's just an aesthetic thing to youIm much happier after I just started learning shit instead of going here
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 12:48:45 2019 No.11166237 >>11164599there are some good book recommendations that /sci/ gives. hang in there, OP
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 13:15:25 2019 No.11166284 >>11165013I Am Crying
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 13:47:45 2019 No.11166335 >>11165013wtf!
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 18:44:28 2019 No.11166794 >>11164997I started reading the Book of Proof because I found it in the sticky 2 weeks ago and a week later I read a thread here where the consensus was that the exercises are for brainlets. So I thought: fantastic! As an econ dropout this will work out great. And so far, I'm loving it :3
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:10:47 2019 No.11166829 File: 106 KB, 800x750, 1543963751899.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11165013If alpha is bottom right angle, we can apply basic trigonometric rules to get$i = 0\sin{\alpha}$ , or $\sin{\alpha} = \frac{i}{0}$$1 = 0\cos{\alpha}$ , or $\cos{\alpha} = \frac{1}{0}$And if we accept that $y * \frac{x}{y} = x$ also applies to $y = 0$ for the sake of the memes, then you get a perfectly normal functioning triangle and every other right triangle and trigonometric identity holds, like for an example the law of cosines:$c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab\cos{\gamma}$$0^2 = i^2 + 1^2 - 2i \cos{\frac{\pi}{2}}$$0 = 0$$a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc\cos{\alpha}$$i^2 = 1^2 + 0^2 - 2 * 0*\frac{1}{0}$ (you lose commutativity here)$-1 = -1$$c\sin{\alpha} = a\sin{\gamma}$$i = i$etc
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:17:32 2019 No.11166832 >>11166829Good job you proved 0=0 with a wall of text
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:19:05 2019 No.11166833 >>11166829That does not explain why a right triangle with two non zero sides has a third side of length zero
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:21:43 2019 No.11166837 >>111668290 sin a does not equal i tho its0
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:24:23 2019 No.11166844 >>11166833>two non zero sidesone of the legs has a real part of 0, so for the purposes of length it is nonzero.
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:25:25 2019 No.11166845 >>11166844*NOT nonzero, is what i meant
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 19:26:34 2019 No.11166847 >>11166845So what is the length of the hypotenuse
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 20:13:43 2019 No.11166932 >>11166847don't worry about it
 >> Anonymous Thu Nov 21 23:04:32 2019 No.11167292 >>11166829>>11166832>>11166833>>11166837the complex plane represents "magnitudes" of i, so in that image, it should have been the sqrt(2) length, because i does not imply its actual length in real life. There is nothing that is i long, it just doesn't exist, but there are things that are 1i long, which indeed do have value to mathematicians, engineers, physicists, etc.
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 06:01:14 2019 No.11167972
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 08:31:10 2019 No.11168131 File: 71 KB, 950x529, 1568522066018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report] >>11165013>>11166829Am I the only one who finds it fascinating when this board discusses simple concepts but tries to take an entirely new approach, almost as if it is dipping into the realm of schizophrenia real fast and pulls back a second later with the result? I find it fascinating because no other place does this and everything else in the world is focused on telescoping precision, rigorously following the mainstream scientific rules and doubling down on what is established so far, or what I have internalized in my personal model as "low learning rate" if we equalize this to a neural network, whereas /sci/ has a high learning rate - it has a high chance to come up with completely disconnected shit but on the other hand a very small portion of that disconnected shit will be legitimate insights that are the result of the high learning rate trying to unstuck us from the faulty local minimum that society was telescoping into for infinite precision. Like for an example this autistic triangle, what if the whole notion of enforcing the Euclidean norm, something that anyone knowing basic highschool math is aware of, is actually faulty and we can in fact have imaginary lengths? Of course every single professor would reflexively tell you to stop spouting schizo bullshit and to follow the rules established by academia, but was following these same rules the path that led us to canonizing the usage of negative numbers under a root, something that 100% of academia would laugh in your face for attempting to do in the 16th century? This is the precise thing that I mean to say with low/high learning rate, a low rate is great for going into problems for precision but what if the minimum we're going towards is actually the local one and not the true global one? In that case, the only way out is "delusional" high learning rate that re-examines and challenges the very basics of the established dogma.
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 14:14:52 2019 No.11168764 >>1116475610/10
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 14:23:04 2019 No.11168780 >>11167972Please learn what a metric is.
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 17:41:57 2019 No.11169216 >>11168131You have to wade through a lot of schizos sending you random bullshit they think is serious insight before you find a Ramanujan.
 >> Anonymous Fri Nov 22 19:37:06 2019 No.11169481 >>11164599Just keep at it. I read a lot of chemistry blogs; In the beginning, I knew next to none of the terms but I picked up on them. Some of the blogs are still way above my head but I'm more familiar with the term now than before.
 >> DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk Fri Nov 22 19:39:29 2019 No.11169485 >>11164599>lookyou fool. you have to ANALyze them
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 09:37:34 2019 No.11170643   >>11168131>Am I the only one whoYes, snowflake. Also, there are better ways to search for local minima.
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 09:39:13 2019 No.11170647 >>11168131>Am I the only one whoYes, snowflake. Also, there are better ways to search for global minima.
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 09:45:10 2019 No.11170650 >>11170643>>11170647>SnowflakeCuckservative Nazi language, back to /Pol/ you go.
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 09:59:31 2019 No.11170668 >>11170650>if I don't like something it must be /pol/Go back to wherever you came from.
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 10:03:08 2019 No.11170678 >>111645990 = +1 -1
 >> Anonymous Sat Nov 23 10:21:29 2019 No.11170706 >>11170668Came here from reeddit, you guys are a bunch of jokes. To think you allow Nazi behavior, you're no different that the Nazis on pol and Facebook.
>>