CO2 Questions

[Anonymous No.11157783]

How does the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration effect the atmospheric (and alveolar) CO2 partial pressure?
How much would CO2 concentrations have to rise for us to expect to see measurable physiological effects?
What effects do elevated carbonic acid levels in the mother's blood have on embryonic/fetal development?

[Anonymous No.11159385]

bump

[Anonymous No.11159581]

>>11157783
>effect
The absolute state of this board

[Anonymous No.11159588]

UWU

[Anonymous No.11159594]

Humans can't breathe without a certain amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and we live, much, much to the level of death via CO2 starvation than we do the level of death via CO2 suffocation. If the current CO2 level were to drop by about 75% then people would start to die from being in a near constant state of hyperventilation, while the CO2 would have to increase about 25000% before people would start to suffocate

[Anonymous No.11159689]

>>11159594
>Humans can't breathe without a certain amount of CO2 in the atmosphere
Sounds like bullshit. Is it?

[Anonymous No.11159691]

>>11159594
>some crap that has literally nothing to do with the questions

[Anonymous No.11159717]

>>11159581
>>>/lit/
There ya go buddy hopefully u find what you're looking for

[Anonymous No.11159782]

>>11159689
Read up on how hyperventilation occurs, humans can't survive long in atmosphere which contains no CO2 and the current CO2 content of our atmosphere is near the all time low on the geologic time scale.

[Anonymous No.11159800]

>>11159594
>Humans can't breathe without a certain amount of CO2 in the atmosphere

Simply a lie. Humans require only oxygen to breath, and usually an inert gas to keep the oxygen levels below toxic.
Kys for troll posting.

[Anonymous No.11160248]

>>11159782
CO2 levels have been under 300 ppm for approximately 20 million years.
Human brain size has evolved (see pic in next post) approximately in the past 2-10 million years (depending on what arbitrary starting point you want to use).

The implication of your comment, that preindustrial CO2 levels are somehow dangerous in any way, given these facts, is nonsense on the face of it.

[Anonymous No.11160252]

>>11159782
>>11160248

[Anonymous No.11160359]

>>11160252
>Nonexistent source

[Anonymous No.11160368]

>>11160359
>doesn't know how to google basic anthropological information

[Anonymous No.11160479]

>>11159689
Judging by the brainlet's response, you were right on calling bullshit.

[Anonymous No.11160482]

>>11160479
It's the same retard boomer who shills CO2 in every thread. He slightly changed his argument because he keeps getting btfo.