/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 18 KB, 300x300, Frog-meme-font-b-pepe-b-font-Soft-TPU-Cover-for-Samsung-Galaxy-A20-A30-Phone.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:33:09 2019 No.11150977 [Reply] [Original]

How can infinity = -1/12 if 1-1+1-1+1... doesn't actually equal 1/2? It's either 1 or 0, and extending it to infinity doesn't magically make it 1/2, it makes it either 1 or 0, but you don't know because you are making it invalid by extending a sequence to a point which doesn't even fucking exist in the first place. Extending to infinity is the same as saying 1-1+1 or 1-1 you don't know which point it will end on but it's still either 1 or 0.

You dumb fucks,

apparently I saw some guy use this as "evidence" that 1+2+3+4 = -1/12 but that's nonsense lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:33:52 2019 No.11150980 I thought math people were "smart" but you extend 1-1+1 to infinity (a point that doesn't exist) and arbitrarily call it 1/2? Fucking idiots.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:36:16 2019 No.11150983 >>11150977 dumb frogposter

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:36:59 2019 No.11150988

Oh, it has only two possible values, it's either 1 if it's an odd number in the sequence or 0 if it's even.

Ok, but when is it ONE FUCKING HALF?

MATH GUY: OH JUST WHEN I EXTEND IT TO A POINT WHICH DOESN'T EXIST THAT IS NEITHER ODD NOR EVEN BECAUSE IT DOESN'T FUCKING EXIST SO I JUST PRETEND LIKE IT'S 1/2 NOW!

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:37:44 2019 No.11150989

>>11150977
How can 1x1 equal one? If one times one equals one that means that two is of no value because one times itself has no effect. One times one equals two because the square root of four is two, so what's the square root of two? Should be one, but we're told its two, and that cannot be.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:38:06 2019 No.11150994

>>11150983
Sequence A has two possible values, 1 if it's an odd number in the sequence, or 0 if it's an even number, at what point will this sequence equal 0.5?

Oh that's right, at "I don't know" because infinity is "i don't know" in terms of value because it has no value.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:39:30 2019 No.11151000

>>11150989
No, what I said in the OP makes sense but what you said is wrong for this reason:

1x1 means "One occurrence of the value 1."
And 1x2 means "One occurrence of the value 2."

So 5x1 is five one dollar bills or 5 dollars.
1x1 is one dollar.
3x5 is 3 five dollar bills or fifteen dollars

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:40:02 2019 No.11151002 >>11150994 don't care fuck you and your frog

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:41:22 2019 No.11151007 >>11151002 >and your frog Are you talking about pepe or my girlfriend? Don't talk about her that way.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:42:18 2019 No.11151008 >>11151000 >3x5 is 3 five dollar bills or fifteen dollars the peak of /sci folks the turd actually thought that was a contribution worth writing

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:44:10 2019 No.11151013

>>11151008
Because somebody ELSE on here actually thought that 1x1 doesn't equal 1.

the difference is that he said something stupid, i said something correct and explained his issue, and you just pointed at me for saying something too simple because you are fucking nuts!!! Your post had 0 value.

The kid who thought 1x1 =/= at least had a valid question and I answered it for him.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:44:26 2019 No.11151014 >>11151007 >pepe or my girlfriend 'frog' is one and the same for you huh. how unsurprising

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:45:49 2019 No.11151018 >>11151013 your fields medal is in the mail

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:46:14 2019 No.11151021 >>11151007 Do you kiss her pepe when you have sex with her?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:46:30 2019 No.11151023 >>11151014 What a crappy post, one day you will look back at how stupid you sound lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:46:57 2019 No.11151025 >>11151023 ribbit

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:47:43 2019 No.11151027

>>11151021

Something familiar about this post.

>>11151018

Stop acting as if /sci/ is supposed to be some groundbreaking research center, it's just a bunch of fucking dipshits like you and then the occasional math thread made by me because you are too busy positing off topic crap and stroking your stupid ego.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:48:01 2019 No.11151028 >>11151000 What you said is wrong for the following reasons: No mathematician says 1-1+1-1+1... = 1/2 No mathematician says 1+2+3+4 = -1/12

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:50:07 2019 No.11151035 >>11151028 No, they say that it analytically extends to be -1/12 but it's still invalid because 1-1+1 does not analytically extend to be 1/2.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:51:26 2019 No.11151038 >>11151027r >not counting with fingers & toes is groundbreaking research center How's the weather in Alabama? Any sign of the sharpie storm yet?

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:54:08 2019 No.11151044

>>11151038

You are pretending to be stupid on purpose aren't you? I'll illustrate what you just said and then you will say "I didn't say that" and then cry.

Anyways, I told you that you're expectations of sci are too high and that I am at least posting on topic until you came in here and started posting off topic shitposts and then you misinterpreted such a straight forward post as saying that I was claiming this thread was super advanced when I never said that you just added it from out of your ass into my mouth and then you made some dumb joke about alabama when you are mentally impaired and it shows by your posts thus far.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 00:56:32 2019 No.11151050 File: 45 KB, 440x489, 1542421219625.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] BLELLO

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:00:53 2019 No.11151065 >>11151044 idk what you're crying about You're the one talking about groundbreaking research centers Don't write infantile bs if you don't want to see it quoted later on

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:02:12 2019 No.11151068 >>11151065 I wrote that you are expecting sci to be a groundbreaking research center because this thread wasn't good enough for you. And I was write in retro spect. You are still failing to understand anything because you suck.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:02:53 2019 No.11151071 >>11151068 >>11151038

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:04:06 2019 No.11151074 >>11151035 Wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation_of_Grandi%27s_series

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:06:32 2019 No.11151079 File: 40 KB, 192x144, ygnabb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11151068 you're gonna need a thicker hide

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:06:57 2019 No.11151081 >>11151071 Are you brain damaged? >>11151074 I read through that and it's still not any different.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:07:58 2019 No.11151084 >>11151071 >>11151074 >>11151079 there's something familiar about this post.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:10:36 2019 No.11151092 >>11151081 >I read through that and it's still not any different. Any different from what?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:12:17 2019 No.11151094 >>11151092 From the point I'm making

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:17:05 2019 No.11151104 >>11151081 nah, can easily count beyond Alabama

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:18:12 2019 No.11151110 >>11151104 I have counted to infinity before, have you? No. Get rekt scrub lol.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:19:31 2019 No.11151113
File: 85 KB, 348x336, threads.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151104
What I'm saying to you is why are you treating my thread any different from these threads?

What's so special about this one to waste your attention and waste my time with your stupid incoherent babble and insults? Lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:21:47 2019 No.11151118 >>11151094 ;)

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:23:35 2019 No.11151121 >>11151094 The point you're making is that "1-1+1 does not analytically extend to be 1/2." This is trivially false since the analytic continuation of the sum from n=1 to inf of (-1)^(n-1)/n^x yields 1/2 at x=0.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:25:19 2019 No.11151125 >>11151121 Close but not quite.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:27:12 2019 No.11151129 >>11151121 You are right I did say that but you still aren't getting the point I was making lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:29:00 2019 No.11151134 >>11151129 and not understanding the point makes you wrong

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:32:24 2019 No.11151142 >>11151125 >>11151129 Your point was wrong.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:33:21 2019 No.11151144 >>11151142 To you. I know why it was too. But don't make me walk you through the thread again like I had to do with that other guy.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:34:55 2019 No.11151148

>>11150977
Everyone knows that 1 + 2 + 3 + ... =/= -1/12 and that 1 - 1 + 1 - ... =/= 1/2 because those aren't convergent sums. However, there are methods to find values to those sums that would be valid for convergent sums that have practical applications and if you can't see that you're a mongoloid

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:35:35 2019 No.11151150 [DELETED]

>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1 in 100 posts.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44 odds of 1 in 100 posts.

>>11151071
Thanks for the 71 odds of 1 in 100 posts.

>>11151074
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.

>>11151079
Thanks for the 79 odds of 1 in 100 posts.

>>11151084
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.

>>11151094
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1 in 100 posts.

>>11151134
Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11151144
Thanks for the timestamp 21 odds of 1 in 60 posts.

Thanks for the 44 odds of 1 in 100 posts.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:35:38 2019 No.11151152 >>11151144 Please walk me through the thread instead of making vague, pathetic objections.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:39:11 2019 No.11151158

>>11151152
>vague pathetic objections

Original premise of thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

Original statement of thread: Infinity cannot equal -1/12 because 1-1+1... does not equal 1/2. Directly plays on evidence from the video too. The original claim in the OP is not wrong in that it notes the flaws in the video and it's logically correct, since you also agree infinity =/= -1/12.

Now, when I made this post >>11151035 I was talking from the position I put myself in, in the OP, here is the hard part for you to understand, but I was making a valid statement with incorrect information on purpose and I don't even believe in it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:45:14 2019 No.11151172 >>11151152 And don't give yourself too much gratification when reading through my post and thinking to yourself it's a bad defense on my part because you'd still be wrong.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:47:32 2019 No.11151178

>>11151158
You misinterpreted the video, this led to your incorrect assumption that the Cesaro summation is an equality. Then you agreed with that correction but said the conclusion still doesn't make sense because the summation of Grandi's series is not a result of analytic continuation. But that's wrong too, as I showed.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:49:00 2019 No.11151180 [DELETED]

>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151178
You're still not getting the point of the thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:49:06 2019 No.11151182 >>11151150 Please translate into non-autistic

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:50:10 2019 No.11151184 >>11151180 >>11151150 Please translate into non-autistic

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:51:39 2019 No.11151187 [DELETED]

File: 21 KB, 501x683, stats.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151184
Uh oh...

>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>11151184
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/23317491/#23318103

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:51:55 2019 No.11151190 >>11151180 I just got it, the point of the thread is to make a fool of yourself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:52:56 2019 No.11151195 >>11151190 No. The point of the thread is to make a fool of you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:53:35 2019 No.11151198 >>11151195 Then it's backfired.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:53:58 2019 No.11151199 >>11151110 >I have counted to infinity aka running out of toes in AL

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:55:01 2019 No.11151202 >>11151113 cope

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:55:21 2019 No.11151204 >>11151198 Not quite because you still don't understand. I can clearly understand and explain your points to you and you would agree that I'm right but not vice versa.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:56:23 2019 No.11151208 [DELETED]

File: 267 KB, 1312x1080, i was.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151204
Uh oh...

>>11151204
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:57:45 2019 No.11151209 >>11151204 [hand waving intensifies]

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:58:39 2019 No.11151210 File: 11 KB, 299x168, frog posters.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11151209

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:58:40 2019 No.11151212 >>11151204 Then do it already.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:58:50 2019 No.11151214 File: 720 KB, 350x200, runqvist.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11151208

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 01:59:42 2019 No.11151215 [DELETED]

File: 478 KB, 3360x2392, Prediction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:02:41 2019 No.11151221

>>11151212
Just say yes or no, 1-1+1... etc does analytically extend to 1/2 but it does not equal 1/2 without analytical extension and you also believe that I was claiming otherwise and most importantly you also believe that I was wrong and you were right, which is wrong.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:03:44 2019 No.11151222
File: 142 KB, 1366x768, flat earth revival.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151221
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:04:46 2019 No.11151224
File: 62 KB, 1366x768, again.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151222
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:05:49 2019 No.11151226
File: 519 KB, 1308x1296, RussiaSaudiArabiaBritain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151224
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:07:45 2019 No.11151230 >>11151215 >>11151222 >>11151224 >>11151226 [fapping intensifies]

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:09:42 2019 No.11151234 >>11151230 https://desuarchive.org/int/thread/114124146

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:10:43 2019 No.11151235
File: 5 KB, 225x225, 1573885590732s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151234
Ahem. Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts (20%) but it's only been 4 posts since the last 4 even so.
>>11151224 (You)
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:12:35 2019 No.11151242 >>11151235 >>11151230

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:13:09 2019 No.11151243 >>11151242 >>11151234

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:15:34 2019 No.11151248 File: 1.66 MB, 880x1368, start2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:16:36 2019 No.11151251

>>11151248
Uhhh ahem...
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 20% of posts that is 1 in 5 posts. The thread only has 71 posts in it total right now.

>>11151234
Ahem. Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts (20%) but it's only been 4 posts since the last 4 even so.
>>11151224 (You)
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:17:59 2019 No.11151253 File: 294 KB, 920x958, genius.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:19:26 2019 No.11151255 >>11151251 >>11151230

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:19:44 2019 No.11151256 File: 584 KB, 1366x1532, accurate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:21:01 2019 No.11151259
File: 6 KB, 233x216, ojak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11151255
Stop fapping to my posts and then telling me about it.
I don't fucking want to know.
>>11151256
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
>>11151248 (You)
Uhhh ahem...
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 20% of posts that is 1 in 5 posts. The thread only has 71 posts in it total right now.

>>11151234
Ahem. Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts (20%) but it's only been 4 posts since the last 4 even so.
>>11151224 (You)
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:22:02 2019 No.11151262 >>11151256 so it's -1/12?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:22:22 2019 No.11151263 File: 15 KB, 762x180, french quarter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:23:05 2019 No.11151266 >>11151259 >>11151230

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:23:37 2019 No.11151269 >>11151262 So you're telling me if I earn a dollar for each time I earn a dollar I would end up with -1/12 dollars in debt?

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:28:44 2019 No.11151278

So it's settled then.

It's been *proven* in this very thread that if I earn a dollar and spend a dollar each day for infinity days I will end up with 50 cents.

And it's also been *proven* that if I earn one dollar for each dollar I earn I will earn a total of -1/12ths of a dollar in debt.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:29:46 2019 No.11151280

>>11151278
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 1 in 60 posts (but it hasn't been 60 posts since the last one, making this STATISTICALLY UNLIKELY COUNTING FROM THE PREDETERMINED NUMBERS OF 4, 21, 71, 79, 97, 171, AND 203) THEREFORE:

Odds of 1.67%.

>>11151256 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
>>11151248 (You) (You)
Uhhh ahem...
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 20% of posts that is 1 in 5 posts. The thread only has 71 posts in it total right now.

>>11151234
Ahem. Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts (20%) but it's only been 4 posts since the last 4 even so.
>>11151224 (You)
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:30:47 2019 No.11151282 Lol.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:35:21 2019 No.11151292 Well thanks for joining the thread everybody... In the end I was right no surprise. Lol.

Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:36:40 2019 No.11151295

>>11151292
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1 in 60 posts again 1.67% of posts.
>>11151278 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 1 in 60 posts (but it hasn't been 60 posts since the last one, making this STATISTICALLY UNLIKELY COUNTING FROM THE PREDETERMINED NUMBERS OF 4, 21, 71, 79, 97, 171, AND 203) THEREFORE:

Odds of 1.67%.

>>11151256 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
>>11151248 (You) (You) (You)
Uhhh ahem...
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 20% of posts that is 1 in 5 posts. The thread only has 71 posts in it total right now.

>>11151234
Ahem. Thanks for the 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts (20%) but it's only been 4 posts since the last 4 even so.
>>11151224 (You)
Thanks for the 4 odds of occurring = 1 in 5 posts or sometimes called 20%.
>>11151222 (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts aka 1.67% chance of occurring.
>>11151221 (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the 21 odds of 1% of posts on 4chan on /sci/ on .net on /org on .org
>>11151214
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% of posts again.
>>11151204 (You) (You) (You) (You) (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 21 again
Odds of 0.167% again.
Thanks for the 4 again.
Odds of 20% again.
>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 02:42:28 2019 No.11151303 >>11151295 >>11151280 >>11151230

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 16 13:35:54 2019 No.11152240 >>11151303 [dreaming of californians intensifies] Just kidding my dream today was about a candy shop or something. It was nothing special.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]