[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 2 KB, 270x187, JCTI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Most reliable IQ test online Anonymous Tue Nov 12 02:05:49 2019 No.11138911 [Reply] [Original]

https://web.archive.org/web/20180701142825/http://www.cerebrals.org/jcti/index.html

Average the max and low score and add 7 points for the final result. Example: 130 max and 120 min=125+7=132 = your range is Between 127-137 with 95% confidence.

*The 7 points added are due to the webarchive version lacking the adaptive feature the original one had, so the scores here are deflated.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 02:47:12 2019 No.11138959 File: 98 KB, 583x482, daerht QI rehtona.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11138911 <

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 03:38:05 2019 No.11139036 >>11138911 *Correction:Add 5 points for your overall score

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 10:49:29 2019 No.11139590 you can find raven's standard/advanced progressive matrices on the internet

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 13:16:49 2019 No.11139913 >tfw got 129 thought i was 140 my whole life.. fuark

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 13:32:18 2019 No.11139972 >>11139913 this is a spatial test and lacks the verbal section and others if you had drawn more rather than read so much as a kid youdve done better

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 13:48:35 2019 No.11140004 >>11139972 i thought i was relatively good at math, that's why i held the notion for such a long time feels like my dreams of becoming a worthy mathematician have been crushed..

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 14:48:16 2019 No.11140133 >>11138911 how do you know it's reliable

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 14:51:37 2019 No.11140136 >>11140004 Stop coping. Just do more math.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 15:13:38 2019 No.11140195 >>11140136 how is it coping it's true that the higher your iq, the better you can understand abstract concepts which is the key to new/profound discoveries in math or even just creating work that is worthwhile in this day and age

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 15:46:57 2019 No.11140259 Brainlet here: How am I supposed to solve it when there are 5 images? Between which one is the relation? Is that also part of the test?

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 16:55:32 2019 No.11140454 >>11140195 You're leaning on not being good enough to start with, to justify your lack of virtue. No one thinks they're good enough. Everyone wishes for that little extra, and only then would they have tried. Truth is you're lazy, and in coping.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 17:13:45 2019 No.11140524 File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548672444364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >another IQ thread

Anonymous Tue Nov 12 19:06:25 2019 No.11140934

>>11140004
Spatial ability isn't all there is to math. I've seen some studies show a stronger link with working memory. Anecdotal evidence, but I've always tested extremely high verbal and moderately high spatial. I suck at writing but can do math just fine.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 20:20:41 2019 No.11141144 >>11140454 cope

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 20:53:33 2019 No.11141241 >>11138911 131, I skipped like 12 questions though because it was taking so fucking long.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 20:54:28 2019 No.11141245 >>11141144 I prefer to shoot for the stars and land on the moon rather than wonder what could have been.

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 21:06:24 2019 No.11141274 >>11140259 Yes, it's hard test. There's more than 90% correlation between the score here and the WISC V

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 21:10:40 2019 No.11141286 >>11141274 Sorry it's the WAIS-III Matrix and it's 89% correlation. So it likely your score in an actual IQ test will fall between your RIX score (the min and max score you get after finishing this test).

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 22:04:03 2019 No.11141388 >>11138911 wrong its this, https://lambda-del-rey.firebaseapp.com/

>>	Anonymous Tue Nov 12 22:23:31 2019 No.11141434 >>11141388 I got 87 which I don't think is right But I only answered 15/30 questions before time ran out

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 01:47:56 2019 No.11142157 >>11141388 shit test

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 01:49:17 2019 No.11142164 >>11139972 Verbal IQ is cope

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 02:40:57 2019 No.11142265 >>11141388 I score 116 on every other test consistently. This test says 95. Pretty sure the test isn't right chief.

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 03:33:34 2019 No.11142346 >>11141388 Got 26/30 - 120 Usually get 130-140 on others

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:17:25 2019 No.11142559 >>11142346 How much you got on JCTI?

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:20:27 2019 No.11142564 >>11138911 how many questions are there

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:33:01 2019 No.11142574 I think Proofs are a far better IQ test desu

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:43:43 2019 No.11142585 just got 123.. Whole life i thought i would be at least 100 or under.

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:44:59 2019 No.11142589

>>11140934
I think mathematics involves 3 things: spatial sense, number sense, and language sense. All of these, except spatial (idk), can fail to develop correctly. There are some people incapable of arithmetic but good at higher mathematics. I think this is because higher mathematics is more about language sense than number sense, in the cases where number sense has failed to develop correctly. It's no that they're incapable of comprehending arithmetic, they just lack the number sense to do it easily and naturally.

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 06:48:07 2019 No.11142593 >>11142564 50 i think

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 07:02:00 2019 No.11142604

>>11141274
No I think you misunderstood my question: I was asking if there is a proper method to decide between which images I am supposed to find a relation and I missed where it said it or if determining between which images the relation holds true is is part of the test.
Example: usually, in raven matrixes tests, even mensa one, you can read them in any direction and the relation still holds true between all members.

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 08:52:41 2019 No.11142713 File: 26 KB, 483x564, good boy points.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] considerting I'm uni dropout and I've blind guesed some questions (mostly tumblingsquare ones) because I'm tired after work I think it's ok

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 09:44:49 2019 No.11142781 All I see is a white screen chief

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 09:48:02 2019 No.11142785 >>11138911 how many questions are there? i dont feel like doing 50 fuckin untimed iq questions

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 09:51:54 2019 No.11142793 >>11142604 that's part of the iq test, this is why this one is accurate. gotta give your best theory to every q

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 09:55:45 2019 No.11142800

>>11142604
part of iq is being able to tune out red herrings, its not "find as many connections as possible to every little thing", sometimes it's being able to sift out extraneous details and know what you can ignore. similar to reading large complex programs

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 10:41:20 2019 No.11142883 >>11142800 aight nigga

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 10:42:18 2019 No.11142887

>>11142800
>part of iq is being able to tune out red herrings, its not "find as many connections as possible to every little thing", sometimes it's being able to sift out extraneous details and know what you can ignore. similar to reading large complex programs
yeah maybe, but shit like this is VERY RARELY part of any test, so it isnt even logicall to assume there are red herrings in a test like this one without prior notice

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 11:22:27 2019 No.11142982

>>11142887
>so it isnt even logicall to assume there are red herrings
its not particularly logical to assume anything here, maybe every single one does make perfect sense by some logic i have no idea. but a high iq person would know their limitations and make a best guess rather than get flustered and insecure about not knowing an answer and quit halfway through (not saying that's what you're doing but i mean in general)

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 11:47:35 2019 No.11143045 >>11142982 oh I wasnt even the same anon, I was just stating my opinion about red herrings in tests

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 13:11:06 2019 No.11143216

>>11142982
Oh no I didn't quit, I was just thinking that maybe there was a prefixed "direction" in which to search realtions as in the raven matrixes and I missed the sticky since I had some trouble accessing the test. Because sometimes you can find a relation between all four, sometimes you find "coupled" different relations and I get a little stunted deciding which one the last figure is supposed to hold and with which previous one.

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 16:25:41 2019 No.11143623 File: 29 KB, 480x475, oscar-wilde-would-be-proud-of.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 16:32:18 2019 No.11143643

>>11138911
>>11141388
>>11139913
>>11140259
>>11140524
>>11141241
>>11142346
>>11142585
>>11142800
IQ is pseudoscience, you absolute morons. The only thing IQ explains is how well you can complete IQ tests.
https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f131c101ba39

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 16:33:53 2019 No.11143646 >>11143643 >IQ is pseudoscience, you absolute morons. The only thing IQ explains is how well you can complete IQ tests. massive cope. iq is strongly correlated with better outcomes, dilate retard

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 16:34:42 2019 No.11143648 File: 103 KB, 1071x387, 1573680877721.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11143646 Taleb already debunked this, imebcile.

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 17:06:33 2019 No.11143753 >>11143643 cope

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 21:16:28 2019 No.11144541 File: 12 KB, 501x432, 2019-11-14.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11138911 >add 5 to the max and min >my IQ is between 142 and 152 well shit

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 21:29:37 2019 No.11144572 >>11143643 Cope. https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Roe.aspx The top tier scientists have on average IQ in the top 0.8%. >>11144541 Did you take official IQ test ?

Anonymous Wed Nov 13 21:39:17 2019 No.11144590
File: 72 KB, 602x150, nobel prize.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11144572
I'm actually surprised by the relatively low spatial ability here, even nobel prize theoretical physicists had on average only 130 spatial IQ (reduce 16 points to convert to stanford-binet 1986 scores).

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 21:40:03 2019 No.11144593 >>11144541 how did you answer the Qs with the large boxes? Like 2 large 1 small and then 2 large and so on

>>	Anonymous Wed Nov 13 21:46:08 2019 No.11144603 >>11139972 >muh verbal >if you didn't memorize a dictionary as a kid, you're dumb

>>	Anonymous Thu Nov 14 04:20:45 2019 No.11145463 >>11143623 what's you score

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]