[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 255 KB, 1241x1626, 06B58807-D13C-40DE-87CB-31A985B33EA4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115615 No.11115615 [Reply] [Original]

Honestly point a flaw in his equations

>protip you can’t

>> No.11115616
File: 232 KB, 1241x1613, 4DFD90E6-B1E3-494A-95D8-0BD9438C3586.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115616

>>11115615

>> No.11115617
File: 378 KB, 1241x1503, 6B5B5F2B-DDE0-4CFE-92A2-7B6EAEC2FD25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115617

>>11115616

>> No.11115618
File: 155 KB, 1400x1000, bf3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115618

post is hidden

>> No.11115620
File: 399 KB, 1241x1511, F9E65B7A-7440-4913-B5DB-622E1320E5B9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115620

>>11115617

>> No.11115659

>>11115615
He doesn't believe in time being a cube.

>> No.11115682
File: 17 KB, 900x450, 1564474346299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11115682

>> No.11115759

>>11115659
I’m sorry what?

>> No.11115980

>>11115615
This is what happens when you finally get off the weed and start trying to learn again and it temporarily turns you into a pseud. I guarantee you this guy is cringing hard every day thinking about this shit.
>t. 420 blaze it since the 8th grade, finally have a math degree a few years later than I should have.

>> No.11115991

>>11115615
>>11115616
>>11115617
>>11115620
Holy shit, that has got to be one of the most retarded pieces of drivel I have ever had the displeasure of reading.

>> No.11116021

>>11115991

Just turn your brain off, if something, is something based only on something it equals to something.
It's an "Unbalanced equation" only if something is always equal to something.

>> No.11116023

>>11116021
Based Retarded op whose science whose most advanced scientific study was high school chemistry

>> No.11116049

>>11116023
Not op, not defending this math,you're right about my education BUT I agree it's retarded to always define something as 1 number. The axioms of what defines a 1 is entirely based on semantics that are relative in some if not all defined systems, r right?

>> No.11116057

There's a flaw right there at the end where it says 2=3. But really, looks like he distributed addition over multiplication. Integers don't do that

>> No.11116100

>>11115615
>schizo ramblings
>too long to be a troll
The flaw is in front of the paper.

>> No.11116130

>>11115615
>dashon howard
yeah that's not a /pol/tard larp

>> No.11117142

>>11115615
There's an error 3 lines in already.
>because we have 2 (1)s on one side of the equation and 1 (1) on the other side

There's one on both, that's literally what "1 x 1" means.

You have a single (1).
Just how "2 x 2" means you have two (2)s.

This retard just doesn't understand the notation he's using.

>> No.11117166

He's still the best Rhodey