Math is racist

[Anonymous No.11103462]

Checkmate bigots
https://youtu.be/W7IqkwVnw0U

[Anonymous No.11103467]

What you don't realize is that if you explain math correctly most people would understand it better. It's not like some people are just smarter than others by a lot, and if that's the case then I am smarter than most of you.

[Anonymous No.11103478]

>>11103462
I guess the rules of the universe are inherently racist then.

[Anonymous No.11103481]

>>11103462
She sounds like she actually has a point. The host talks and acts like a mouthbreather. You would probably agree with her too if he didn't cut her off and let her actually present her points.

[Anonymous No.11103487]

>>11103462
pretending to be a retard makes you a retard
pretending to agree with retards makes you a retard
pretending to seriously consider what retards say makes you a retard

stop it, op

[Anonymous No.11103493]

>>11103462
Niggers are dumb and can't learn mathematics.
Therefore mathematics is racist.

[Anonymous No.11103494]

>>11103462
Looks like /pol/ interviewed /sci/ but also got to edit the tape afterward. I can't tell if the host is dumb or very good at acting dumb.

[Anonymous No.11103499]

WE ARE ALL RACISTS
EVERYTHING IS RACIST

[Anonymous No.11103500]

>>11103462
Those evil whities used math to count the slaves and used math to see which slave worked harder than the others.

[Anonymous No.11103504]

>>11103462
i think her point boils down to "anything westerners/europeans/colonial americans ever did was racist". it sort of is a defensible argument, since for example the use of math at a high level was mostly something white people did, and that was part of their culture, and their culture was racist, so in theory math is a part of a racist culture.

the guy interviewing her is trying to use common sense to say "hey, no" because calling anything and everything white people did racist leads to things like "coffee is racist" or "electricity is racist" or "stoplights are racist". and i bet she would agree to all those things. because her stance is pretty ridiculous, but it might be defensible and even have a nugget of truth. it doesn't mean we should abolish stoplights though. just because stoplights are things that were popularized by white american culture makes them racist doesn't mean they are not a good innovation. and ironically, the stoplight was invented by a black guy. so i guess he was racist too and racism transcends race, it's just "white culture bad" at this point. you can say words like this and it's fine, because normies like to just spew bullshit and whatever, let normies be normies

[Anonymous No.11103506]

>>11103481
No it doesn't.
Let me steal a comment from the YouTube comments:
>Slaves were put into ships - ships are racist
>Ships were moved by air - air is racist
>Air has oxygen - oxygen is racist
>Breathing requires oxygen - oxygen is racist
Now, let me add a final step...
>PoC also respire, therefore they are also racist.
A tool cannot be racist, the person using said tool can be.

[Anonymous No.11103509]

>>11103504
Do you honestly think she is saying we should abolish math or are you constructing a strawman?

[Anonymous No.11103511]

>>11103499

[Anonymous No.11103514]

>>11103467
>It's not like some people are just smarter than others by a lot
thats absolutely the case, though.

[Anonymous No.11103515]

>>11103509
You do know that "decolonizing" math would basically mean taking back all those Fields medals, et cetera, right? It's a stupid idea, and from an even more stupid ideology.
Intersectional critical theory bullshit shouldn't be considered academic, it's retarded.

[Anonymous No.11103517]

>>11103509
no, i don't think she's saying that... all i can tell is that she is saying "sociology is a way of understanding the world, and so hear me out on my way of understanding the world" which humanities people can do. i didn't hear her prescribe anything. i would guess though, that her normative suggestions would be the typical "white straight cis-men need to really try super hard to walk on eggshells to make the entire world a safe space for everybody besides them, like don't ever speak your mind and don't ever try to outcompete others"

[Anonymous No.11103519]

>>11103515
Oh, so it's the strawman. Gotcha.

[Anonymous No.11103520]

>>11103515
>Intersectional critical theory bullshit shouldn't be considered academic, it's retarded.

Now you are being an anti-semite.

[Anonymous No.11103521]

>>11103517
>i didn't hear her prescribe anything.
She is supporting a policy change, because of her shitty worldview, you mong.

[Anonymous No.11103525]

>>11103517
>i would guess though
So what you are doing is projecting your fears onto someone who disagrees with you.

[Anonymous No.11103526]

>>11103519
You do know that's a thing right? The concept of "decolonization", which is what they apply this theory to. Unless, of course, you're just going to be disingenous.

[Anonymous No.11103527]

>>11103481
>The host talks and acts like a mouthbreather.

I agree. I think she is a complete idiot, but the host should've just sat there smirking smugly and let her say her thing first. Ironically he ended up making her look better

[Anonymous No.11103528]

>>11103521
>She is supporting a policy change
What change?

[Anonymous No.11103530]

>>11103525
You do know they LITERALLY mentioned she is active in support of the pointless, change, right? Or are you deaf aswell?

[Anonymous No.11103533]

>>11103528
What the video, moron. To start teaching critical theory as part of math, open your fucking ears.

[Anonymous No.11103535]

>>11103515
You do know that "decolonizing" math would basically mean taking back all those Fields medals, et cetera, right?

Except from Jewish winners ofc.

[Anonymous No.11103538]

>>11103535
It's great though, because it'll only confuse the subject more and mean less math majors, making the field less saturated.

[Anonymous No.11103543]

It is time for decolonizing science.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14

[Anonymous No.11103544]

>>11103462
>Sociology
Not math or science

[Anonymous No.11103548]

>>11103544
But it will affect the teaching of mathematics.

[Anonymous No.11103556]

>>11103462
>statistics is math
bruh
>>11103467
well most people should be able to be egineers at the least, it is the lowest IQ area in STEM
>>11103481
cringe and blue pilled
>>11103500
bruh cotton is racist you shouldn't wear it, or else you're racist.
>>11103504
weird cause so was progressivism and freeing the slaves a part of white culture. so it's racist to have freed the slaves and give them qual rights WTF you're such a bigot by not pressing black people.
literally liberal logic
oh shit being a liberal is racist.
>>11103520
based
>>11103548
guess she didn't finish her doctorate in applied arithmetic.
>>11103462
this is so antisemetic you fucking nazi

[Anonymous No.11103559]

>>11103556
>based!
>cringe!
>le upvotes and downvotes xD

[Anonymous No.11103562]

>>11103462
The problem with shit like this is that Fox are trying to make the left look stupid and there are like 500 philosophical discussions taking place at once while simultaneously being glossed over with a sense of "haha, see, look how dumb the left is"

[Anonymous No.11103563]

She looks (((suspicious)))

[Anonymous No.11103567]

>>11103562
But it is dumb, for instance, there are degrees in Warcraft (literally), just because you treat Warcraft academically doesn't make it suddenly a deep and meaningful field. Critical theory is the Warcraft degree of sociology, which is already one of most bottom-tier barrel-scraping barely "sciences".

[Anonymous No.11103570]

>>11103562
>>11103567
Not to mention, if your "logic" is as childish as:
>X tool was used for Y thing, therefore tool is Y concept
That's fucking dumb.

[Anonymous No.11103573]

>>11103567
Critical Theory is not critical and it is not a scientific theory. It is pseudoscience.

[Anonymous No.11103576]

>>11103559
what the fuck is an upvote?
>>11103567
thanks god I'm better than a scientists. I'm a mathematician.
>>11103570
by that same logic social justice is racist.

[Anonymous No.11103577]

>>11103570
You are falling for a strawman constructed in the video.

[Anonymous No.11103579]

>>11103577
Not him, but what strawman?

[Anonymous No.11103580]

>>11103573
Exactly.

>>11103577
>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/in-seattle-math-is-cultural-appropriation
>By next fall, leaders in the Seattle school district hope to implement a "K-12 Math Ethnic Studies Framework," which will explore how Western mathematics can "disenfranchise people and communities of color" and analyze "the ways in which ancient mathematical knowledge has been appropriated by Western culture."
No, I'm not, you're just being a moron.

[Anonymous No.11103581]

>>11103576
>thanks god I'm better than a scientists. I'm a mathematician.
thanks for the laugh

[Anonymous No.11103586]

>>11103579
>Is math racist?
That lower third was written by fox and the question is posed by a fox opinion host. Is that actually her position?

[Anonymous No.11103587]

>>11103577
>>11103580
To wit, when exactly did Western culture start? What is defined as Western culture? Because the majority of ancient mathematics is based upon math that was developed in the Mediterranean.

[Anonymous No.11103594]

>>11103586
She explicitly said that mathematics, aswell as everything tangentially related to "Western culture" is racist, which, by the way, makes no sense.
Since they deny "classifications of culture".
Their beliefs are so incredibly inconsistent.

[Anonymous No.11103595]

>>11103594
>Their beliefs are so incredibly inconsistent.

But since logic is racist...

[Anonymous No.11103597]

>>11103580
So again, you are quoting an opinion article not the standard itself.

[Anonymous No.11103601]

>>11103597
So again, you're not reading very well. Maybe get your classes.
The "K-12 Math Ethnic Studies Framework," which is definewd as "the ways in which ancient mathematical knowledge has been appropriated by Western culture."
These are quotes, you moron.

[Anonymous No.11103605]

>>11103563
how are poltards so bad at identifying jews? clearly she is some sort of muslim -- arab or persian or northern african. clearly not a jew

[Anonymous No.11103607]

>>11103587
It is only non-racist when the culture in question is either sub-Saharan or Jewish. Otherwise it is racist by definition.

[Anonymous No.11103609]

>>11103595
I like how people of non-European descent are using English to dicuss these things, that's cultural appropriation.

[Anonymous No.11103611]

>>11103609
Or using the internet, TV, electricity etc.

[Anonymous No.11103614]

>>11103607
Definitions are racist, because they're used to classify things, and classification was used during the slave trade.

[Anonymous No.11103616]

>>11103605
>DeLessio-Parson
What? Neither of her names sound Arabic, Persian or Northern African.

[Anonymous No.11103617]

>>11103594
>She explicitly said that mathematics, aswell as everything tangentially related to "Western culture" is racist
No she didn't.

[Anonymous No.11103622]

>>11103580
all of math was developed by the west, and I'm including the middle east.
there is so fucking such things as ancient math.
all societies had a primal understanding of counting and geometry.
what is ancient math??! I live in Seattle and I can't believe this shit has been going under my nose.
>>11103581
it's true. go back to the humanities department fag, and talk about your genders studies.
clearly mathematical sciences are safe as they are children of the field of mathematics.
>>11103595
yeah fuck making sense that shit is racist. lets all be like uncivilized people OONGA BOOGA
>>11103605
what do you think a jew is?
>>11103609
>>11103611
holy shit that's so fucking racist of them
>>11103614
racist is a classification, though...holy shit you're a fucking racist.

[Anonymous No.11103625]

>>11103617
Yes, she did. Listen to the video.

[Anonymous No.11103627]

>>11103614
>slave trade.

The Atlantic slave trade. Because the Arab slave trade was not racist. Only white people can be evil, goy.

[Anonymous No.11103626]

>>11103601
If that were the entire K-12 framework I would agree with you but it's a bullet point within a box within a table.

[Anonymous No.11103629]

>>11103616
maybe a quadroon south-indian then

[Anonymous No.11103631]

>>11103625
I did, multiple times, post a timestamp if you think you can manage.

[Anonymous No.11103633]

>>11103622
Everything is racist, because we all White, and therefore racists.

[Anonymous No.11103638]

>>11103629
>>11103616

She also says in this video that eating meat promotes toxic masculinity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir4Ltgj4o84

[Anonymous No.11103641]

>>11103631
You're a pedant, who likes to change goalposts.
In the whole video her argument is that the USAGE of the TOOL made it RACIST.
Therefore, mathematics, NOW, is racist.
Which doesn't make sense, because mathematics is a tool. Kinda like how you are a tool.

[Anonymous No.11103644]

>>11103638
Do you know what promotes toxic masculinity? Toxic liberalism.

[Anonymous No.11103646]

>>11103622
>go back to the humanities department
>implying

[Anonymous No.11103647]

>>11103641
You are probably arguing with a leftist. He probably thinks logic is toxic and racist.

[Anonymous No.11103648]

Can a mod please take this thread to >>>/pol/?

[Anonymous No.11103652]

>>11103641
You claimed
>>11103594
>She explicitly said
But you can't back that up. Who's moving goalposts.

[Anonymous No.11103653]

>>11103462
It's not making liberals money so yes to them it's bad

[Anonymous No.11103655]

>>11103629
>>11103638
ah, wait, i stand corrected. she claims to be a "white person":
https://soundcloud.com/user-646314829/anne-delessio-parson-interview
around 5:18

i guess the DeLessio genes are very swarthy italian, probably sicilian-mixed-with-everything stock, and she took after that side as opposed to getting the "Parson" genes to the point where she looks like some sort of north african. i stand corrected.

in any case, nothing points to her being a jew, espeically not her appearance

[Anonymous No.11103656]

>>11103647
Imagine actually trying to get someone to think a "timestamp", when the entire argument is the actual problem. That requires a special type of disingenuous pedant, the kind only found in so-called "the social sciences".

[Anonymous No.11103658]

>>11103647
Welcome to the strawman construction site. You can pick up a hard hat and gloves on the table over there.

[Anonymous No.11103662]

>>11103656
Imagine trying to claim someone explicitly said something and then having to walk back to "Oh, that's the impression she gives off."

[Anonymous No.11103664]

>>11103652
>I don't know what semantics is, the post.
No, you moron, you can explicitly state something when using synonyms and semantics. The only people who have problems with that are low-functioning autistics and classical morons. Which are you?

[Anonymous No.11103666]

>>11103638
>>11103462
what the fuck happened to her in 2 years? she hit the wall hard and aged like 15 years and lost all her joy

[Anonymous No.11103667]

>>11103633
yeah but non whites are racist for making whites.
>>11103646
you're just mad that my cock is hairier
I am a hairy swarthy man, like all mathematicians are and should be.
>>11103648
no this thread is math related

[Anonymous No.11103668]

>>11103662
I don't think you know what explicit means, it isn't the same as verbatim.

[Anonymous No.11103670]

>>11103664
ex·plic·it·ly
/ikˈsplisitlē/
Learn to pronounce
adverb
adverb: explicitly

in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.
"the essay should state explicitly how the facts support the thesis"

[Anonymous No.11103673]

>>11103670
See, not the same thing as verbatim. If you don't think semantics is clear, then you probably aren't a fan of rhetorics either.

[Anonymous No.11103674]

>>11103667
What are you studying in math rn, big hairy manly math anon?

[Anonymous No.11103675]

>>11103673
So if there is no room for confusion or doubt why do we disagree?

[Anonymous No.11103680]

>>11103633
Everything is racist, because we all White, and therefore racists.

[Anonymous No.11103684]

>>11103670
>>11103673
Actually, you know what, I'll break it down, just for you.
Was it clear? Clear enough that everyone else, apart from you, managed to understand the reasoning. Certainly when you take into account the published context.
Was it detailed? Yes, her argument was very "detailed", but flawed.
Therefore, by the definition you provided, it is EXPLICIT.
See, semantics is fun. But it certainly doesn't make for a strong argument.

>>11103675
Clarity is defined by whether the majority of people find it intelligible, clearly you're the only one in the thread who doesn't. Therefore, you aren't the majority.

[Anonymous No.11103687]

>>11103667
It is not at all. Not a single post here has been math related.

[Anonymous No.11103688]

>tfw no black bf

[Anonymous No.11103689]

>>11103674
arithmetic

[Anonymous No.11103690]

>>11103687
1+1=1 lots of 2

[Anonymous No.11103699]

>>11103689
So you aren't a math major. Got it.

[Anonymous No.11103700]

>>11103684
>clearly you're the only one in the thread who doesn't.
see >>11103481

[Anonymous No.11103702]

>>11103670
>>11103662

Are you a Jew?

[Anonymous No.11103705]

>>11103700
1) Prove that isn't you.
2) That still isn't a majority.
Try something else, you're still losing Cecil.

[Anonymous No.11103706]

>>11103462
JFC this is depressing. I thought I could find some safety, some relief...in numbers...

[Anonymous No.11103712]

>>11103706
>I thought I could find some safety, some relief...in numbers...

Not anymore. BLACKED.

[Anonymous No.11103718]

>>11103706
They must convert everything into a safe space, even neutrality, because by defintion, it is neither archetypally safe (a safe space) or archetypally unsafe (an unsafe space).

[Anonymous No.11103721]

>>11103705
Prove that a majority of the thread actually watched the whole video.

[Anonymous No.11103732]

>>11103699
>he doesn't know
fucking normie.

[Anonymous No.11103734]

>>11103721
Lmao, that isn't a requirement of understanding.
Ironic though, and hypocritical, coming from the:
>I don't shift goalposts, you do!
Literally what you're doing right now.
I know, how about you fulfill your arbitrary burden of proof, and prove that everyone misunderstands? Consider the following, the majority in the thread understand, the majority in the comments section of various context publications understand, et cetera. That's quite a large burden there, chap.
Now, let me watch you LARP the Sisyphus.

[Anonymous No.11103738]

>>11103732
>t. calls abstract algebra "arithmetic" for some autistic reason

[Anonymous No.11103739]

There is no such thing as """race""" we are all the same species but with region-specific gene expressions which amount to adaptations. Therefore there is no such thing as """racism""" either.
What we do have is some mouth-breathing assholes running around discriminating against and being violent against some members of our own *species* simply because they look or sound different from them, and since they're mouth-breathing morons and/or wilfully ignorant, the way they """handle""" the emotions they experience being presented with someone who is different from them, is to be rude, violent, and overall nasty to those people.
It's stupid, it's bullshit, it gives our entire *species* a bad reputation, it's *beneath* us as an allegedly sentient, civilized species, and it needs to STOP.

[Anonymous No.11103747]

>>11103734
>watching the video isn't a requirement to understand the video
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.11103753]

>>11103738
>calls algebra abstract for some pretentious reason
>>11103739
so we're all good at basket ball?

[Anonymous No.11103768]

>>11103721
>>11103734
>>11103747
Since you like definitions so much, let's play another game of semantics. I'll go first:
>Lmao, that isn't a requirement of understanding.
What is "understanding"?
>The ability to understand something; comprehension.
How do you know whether that comprehension is the "correct" one? What is "correct"?
>in agreement with the true facts or with what is generally accepted
What does "generally accepted" mean? That is reached upon by consensus. What is consensus? Agreement by the majority.
Oh look, you lost again!
Try again. You aren't smarter than me.

[Anonymous No.11103772]

>>11103462
Why...?
Sayōnara nakama...

[Anonymous No.11103779]

>>11103718
This was bound to happen sooner or later.

[Anonymous No.11103780]

>>11103768
Wow you really are good at philosophy too bad it isn't science or math.

[Anonymous No.11103781]

>>11103779
The inevitability of extremes.

[Anonymous No.11103782]

>>11103538
fewer

[Anonymous No.11103785]

imagine if this thread didnt exist and instead there was a thread that was about science or math

[Anonymous No.11103788]

>>11103780
Well, this is philosophy of science, therefore, it is pertaining to science.
>Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.
From the sticky.
Let's define "pertain":
>"to be connected with a particular subject, event, or situation"
Try again.

[Anonymous No.11103793]

So, let's say math is racist?

so what?

what are these retards going to do?

travel back in time and stop math from being invented by whites?

what are they gonna do?

change history books?

[Anonymous No.11103796]

>>11103785
>politics needs a containment bo-
Hm

[Anonymous No.11103798]

>>11103788
back in your cage

[Anonymous No.11103802]

>>11103793
>change history books

[Anonymous No.11103804]

>>11103798
Unironically, reading philosophy actually ruined my ability to have normal thoughts about stuff.
Try reading a normal book, about anything, when you constantly try to Derrida everything.

[Anonymous No.11103808]

>>11103804
That sounds terrible for you.

[Anonymous No.11103810]

>>11103808
You have no empathy!

[Anonymous No.11103815]

>>11103804
you sound like a fuckin retard

[Anonymous No.11103817]

>>11103706
That is very racist, goy. You should study the new math, decolonized math.

[Anonymous No.11103818]

>>11103802
so yeah, this is like the only conclusion I get.

>Math is white
>whites are racist

so what?
what will change if whites are racist?
math still was invented by whites.

[Anonymous No.11103820]

>>11103815
Exactly, philosophy is a bunch of guff about words, and I fell for the bait.

[Anonymous No.11103822]

>>11103820
Thanks for admitting you are a retard

[Anonymous No.11103824]

>>11103818
>what will change if whites are racist?
Nothing, that's how it already is.

[Anonymous No.11103825]

>>11103818
>math still was invented by whites.
I suppose the question to ask is:
Do you care if people know who invented it or not?

[Anonymous No.11103827]

>>11103822
Yeah, but the thing is, that makes you look even worse. You got beaten by a retard in a game of logic, that's fucking harsh.

[Anonymous No.11103830]

>>11103793
>change history books

[Anonymous No.11103833]

>>11103824
so seems is like a dead end argument.

modern math was basically invented by whites.

>>11103825
I'm not white but why the fuck should I think does it matter who contributes more to math.

99% of whites never contributed to math, and today most math has contributions by asians.

almost as retarded as claiming that music theory is racist because It was invented by whites.

[Anonymous No.11103835]

>>11103785
That would be racist.

[Anonymous No.11103837]

I wish it was legal to hunt autistics for sport.

[Anonymous No.11103840]

>>11103833
>Thinking music theory was invented by whites.
The only thing you got correct was that this is retarded.

[Anonymous No.11103843]

>>11103833
>99% of whites never contributed to math, and today most math has contributions by asians.
I think you should look up two things:
Fields medals by country:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_Fields_Medalists
Journal Rankings listed by H-index:
>https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?order=h&ord=desc
For information on the aims of the H-index:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index
As you'll see, it is still largely "West" dominated.

[Anonymous No.11103853]

>>11103840
harmony, counterpoint, bass and the score notation we use was developed by whites.

also scales.

>>11103843
I think it was more because of the historical development of philosophy that also helped developed math.

back then ideas moved too slowly because there wasn't massive technologies of comunication.

China and india had not an internet back then to update their knowledge with european archievements.

I think now that we now have internet and even african kids can watch MIT lectures, we'll see more progress from non westerners.

[Anonymous No.11103856]

>>11103853
>China and india had not an internet back then to update their knowledge with european archievements.
The funny thing is, China (and India to a certain, but lesser extent) actually started off with a head start in terms of advancement.
This is where the theory of a high-level equilibrium trap comes into play:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-level_equilibrium_trap
In brief:
>Elvin says that these factors in combination produced what he calls a "high-level equilibrium trap." He says that widespread technical progress results from some large disequilibrium between supply and demand in the economy, which prompts people to find creative new ways to address the difficulties produced by the change.
>The late imperial Chinese economy had reached an equilibrium point. It had become stable, efficient, and well organized. The rapidly growing population but slowly growing amount of agricultural land largely prevented any significant capital surplus from developing, as almost all production was required for basic sustenance.
>The growing population also provided a ready pool of cheap labor. The Chinese economy was enormous and well integrated. The dense and well-developed water trade networks yielded a relatively large amount of profit to the upper classes and alleviated local supply shortages. Thus, there was no incentive for further technical refinement, and technical progress stagnated.

[Anonymous No.11103857]

>>11103843
This is probably a sidebar but How does the H-index deal with the language barrier. You can't cite a paper you cant read right? If two papers say the same thing but one is in your language you will cite that one first.

[Anonymous No.11103860]

>>11103856
I think people in centuries ago didn't feel the need to develop technology.

people back then were comfortable and ideas spread slowly and some shit like windmills took centuries to spread.

Ancient greeks supposedly archieved some kind of advanced mechanical gear computers.

Ideas today spread at infinite speed.

[Anonymous No.11103861]

God I wish 4chan was just irrelevant, slightly racist and edgy not the cesspool of unaccomplished obsessed IQ tards it is now

[Anonymous No.11103864]

Ew fox news, no thanks

[Anonymous No.11103867]

>>11103861
There was a time when 4chan wasn't a cesspool of unaccomplished obsessed IQ tards?

[Anonymous No.11103868]

>>11103867
Pre-2015, /sci/ was actually a useful board then.

[Anonymous No.11103870]

>>11103864
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.11103875]

>>11103857
I understand what you're saying, and honestly, I'm not sure that it does.
That said, that's seems like an unlikely causality due to the population of China.
I would imagine that they have a significant number of scholars who could, and would cite L1 papers, unless, of course, this is a qualitative issue.

[Anonymous No.11103878]

>>11103860
Ideology is also implicated in the theory.
It goes along the lines of, Taoism promoted exploration of the universe as a spiritual objective, whereas, Confucianism placed that upon the individual, and what that individual can do for the collective.
When the shift from Taoism, to Confucianism came, it also shifted the societal focus away from discovery to maintenance.

[Anonymous No.11103883]

>>11103878
dunno about china but some schism of some muslims scholars was the reason muslims stagnated with science I remember.

dunno about africa but I think they were too far from getting ideas from europe.

amerindians and east asians were too isolated.

[Anonymous No.11103893]

>>11103883
Also the Sahara is quite the obstacle, and I doubt some Bedouin or Berber is going to spend his time learning some scholasticism, or later Renaissance humanism, just to go and cross the Sahara to teach.

[Anonymous No.11103895]

>>11103893
have u read germs, guns and steel?

[Anonymous No.11103897]

>>11103793
imagine if social scientists actually tried to create math instead of complaining about things they don't understand. I almost want to see the results

[Anonymous No.11103902]

>>11103895
I have, my main issue with the book is the premise that "it is all enviromental", to paraphrase.
Which is curious, considering the author has some background in biology, and I thought that he would have learnt that the interaction between the enviroment, and the genotype, is what results in phenotype.
Therefore, you cannot seperate one from the other.

[Anonymous No.11103925]

>>11103902
The author is also a leftist Jew.

[Anonymous No.11103932]

>>11103925
It's the phenotype that the ladies desire.

[Anonymous No.11103933]

>>11103925
>jews shit on a toilet
>toilets are part of the jew conspiracy

[Anonymous No.11103961]

>>11103932
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nJBF_H56Oc
ABSOLUTE
PHEℕOTYPE

[Anonymous No.11103964]

>>11103961
You don't see this meme much on /sci/ anymore, very sad.

[Anonymous No.11103972]

>>11103897
they probably would end up with 1+1=patriarchy

[Anonymous No.11103973]

>>11103972
1+1 assumes a binary of values, whereas, in this field, we see it as more of a... spectrum.

[Anonymous No.11103997]

>>11103897
>social scientists
Social science is being hijacked by biased social warriors rn. Don't put everyone together in the same pot.

[Anonymous No.11104007]

>>11103462
She's fucking disgusting. I'll fucking join SS just to clean this swamp. Science is for science and nothing else. Stop this propaganda bullshit rn!

[Anonymous No.11104020]

>>11103514
>>11103556
if you improve teaching then more people would be more useful

[Anonymous No.11104026]

>>11103997
>rn

For decades.

[Anonymous No.11104098]

Kenyan children don't recognize themselves in the mirror
>Tanya Broesch and her colleagues began by taking a simplified version of the mirror self-recognition test to Kenya, where they administered it to 82 children aged between 18 to 72 months. This version of the test involved a small, yellow post-it note rather than a red splodge, and children weren’t given the usual verbal prompts such as ‘who’s that in the mirror?’. Amazingly, just two of the children ‘passed’ the test by touching or removing the post-it note. The other eighty children ‘froze’ when they saw their reflection – that is they stared at themselves but didn’t react to the post-it note.

>Next, Broesch and her team took their test to Fiji, Saint Lucia, Grenada, Peru, Canada and the USA, where they tested 133 children aged between 36 to 55 months. The performance of the North American children was in line with past research, with 88 per cent of the US kids and 77 per cent of the Canadians ‘passing’ the test. Rates of passing in Saint Lucia (58 per cent), Peru (52 per cent) and Grenada (51 per cent) were significantly lower. In Fiji, none of the children ‘passed’ the test.
Mirrors are racist

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022022110381114

[Anonymous No.11104101]

>>11103462
>Math is racist
Nice, even more reasons to like math.

[Anonymous No.11104107]

>>11104098
I wonder why a lower percentage of Canadians would have passed than US. Their average IQ is lower, is that just because of their shit education or is it because they're a developing country?

[Anonymous No.11104112]

>>11104107
Canadians are barely human anglo detritus, americans are robust paneuropean mutts sailing on the warm winds of hybrid vigor and ambition.

[Anonymous No.11104122]

>>11104112

[Anonymous No.11104129]

>>11104112
Canada is like 50% British on the census data, not including the 33% Canadian which of about 90% are of british background

[Anonymous No.11104166]

>>11103462
>>11103563
>>11103629
>>11103655
Parson/Parsons is a typical jewish name, graruitous hyphenation is a common jewish habit, and she looks part Jewish.
>flattened nose, down at the tip
>"w face" cheekbones
>low, lined forehead
In fact she looks a lot like Stephen Miller from the Trump campaign.

[Anonymous No.11104441]

>>11103562
This is true

But you know if this girl talked on joe rogan for over 2 hours without being walked into saying something stupid, she would still say something stupid. And then if instead you brought on one of the academics that brainwashed her, they would say stupid shit artfully.

[Anonymous No.11104454]

>>11104441
>2 hours
tbqh it seems like she wouldn't last 1 minute, anywhere

[Anonymous No.11104458]

>>11103462
IT is though, math is inherently eurocentric. How would you feel if you where a black person that was enslaved by europeans, and then you are forced to use their language and symbols?

[Anonymous No.11104464]

>>11104458
I hope this is a troll post.

[Anonymous No.11104469]

>>11103793
>change history books
They cant but they can ignore some parts of history and fill it with memes.

[Anonymous No.11104478]

>>11104458
>then you are forced to use their language and symbols?
Do you honestly think that statement has any relevance for anybody that is alive today?

[Anonymous No.11104483]

>>11104020
at what? generating money for not me? fuck that. there should be less people.
>>11104458
My black blood line comes from legitimate kangz, spanish moors, who lived in the Americas.
I can never relate what it's like to be pathetic like a slave.
I don't feel the same struggle at all they are just lazy fucks.
My grandparents moved to the United States with little money and became business owners. they worked as a house keeper and a meat packer to generate the funds for their business.
Fuck these no work ethic ass niggas, they need the threat of a lashing to do anything.

[Anonymous No.11104688]

>>11104458
I would feel fucking grateful

[Anonymous No.11104699]

>>11103548
but that's wrong he's 38 you have to add the 20 too.

[Anonymous No.11104702]

>>11104688
My thought too. If I were black I'd be grateful my ancestors were enslaved and brought over to allow me the privilege to live in my captors superior society as opposed to eating dirt and being eaten by flys in Africa

[Anonymous No.11104705]

>>11103567
But Warcraft is one of the oldest fields of study on the planet? if an officer didn't have a rudimentary grasp or strategy and tactics or know who klausowitz was I'd be very worried

[Anonymous No.11104708]

>>11103627
but the atlanic slave trade was run by sephardic jews how can it be racist?

[Anonymous No.11104718]

>>11104688
>tfw a main pillar of your oh-so-deep philosophy is so fucking obvious that nobody except a strawman or possibly a redditor would possibly argue against it, and that joe rogan voices weekly while interviewing schizos about bigfoot
>tfw an entire philosophical tradition with hundreds of millions in grant money at stake is simply a motte-and-bailey scheme

[Anonymous No.11104721]

>>11104469
>change history books
>They cant
they keep changing them

do the chinese teach how twin towers really happened?

[Anonymous No.11104731]

>>11103520
that guys is a professor in texas, he hates postmodernism. he has a youtube channel thats pretty good.

[Anonymous No.11105022]

>>11104166
So she is from the tribe after all.

[Anonymous No.11105228]

>>11103462
How did these people even get their doctors degree? Is she saying she is an equity sufferer?

[Anonymous No.11105273]

>>11103462
It's like someone in 2050 made a comedy sketch about 2019 and it's spot on. She's in the outfit, using all the buzzwords...
>>11103481
You're right about the host, SJWs, UFOlogists whatver nut you have on yoru show it's not professional to smirk and refuse to let your host even explain.
>>11104458
As a black person maths isn't that bad, you do hear a lot about Arab/Chinese/Egyptian contributions and we are pretty much still using Arab number systems. Science is godawful racist by your metric though, All the planets are named after European mythology when you didn't have to be white to look up and see Venus, it's literally right there.

[Anonymous No.11105282]

>>11105273
they are more accurately described as indian numbers than arab,

[Anonymous No.11105283]

>>11105273
>Science is godawful racist by your metric though, All the planets are named after European mythology when you didn't have to be white to look up and see Venus, it's literally right there.
Correct. The planets should be named after figures from the universal religion, the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, whose creed knows no boundaries of race, color, or nation.

[Anonymous No.11105286]

>>11105282
But Indians are Aryans so it would politically incorrect to give them credit for anything.

[Anonymous No.11105295]

>>11105286
how does that make sense?

[Anonymous No.11105297]

>>11105282
Yeah. My point is maths at least retains contributions from other cultures as opposed to science which seems to have totally erased it. I mean Algebra is an arabic word after all.

[Anonymous No.11105352]

>>11105295
Indo-European achievements are always bad, goy.

[Anonymous No.11105358]

>>11103487
Posting furry pics makes you a degenerate

[Anonymous No.11106463]

>>11103506
that's what I thought too, but now STDs are sexist because women suffer more from them and at this point the words have lost all meaning that they used to have.
I still maintain actions are only morally bad if they have ill and harmful intentions, and the terms sexist and racist have left those conditions behind.

[Anonymous No.11106617]

>>11103462
If Math is really great a lot of the time,
And Math is racist,
Then, is Racism really great a lot of the time?

[Anonymous No.11107061]

G

[Anonymous No.11107070]

>>11104483
kek, fucking based

[Anonymous No.11107102]

>>11103973
Could be 1, could be 1000, and aaanything in between. And they're all equally as valuable and special.

[Anonymous No.11107616]

>>11103467
Not me though, because I am the smartest person of all time :^)

[Anonymous No.11107639]

>>11105358
And a retard too

[Anonymous No.11108378]

>>11103462
>people here unironically believe this person actually believes what she's saying
Selling outrage is par for the course for Fox, so they'll make up a liberal boogeyman every week or so and "debate" them

[Anonymous No.11108597]

>>11103462
she actually was making sense in the last minute when she brought up the topic of data manipulation and statistics.
>do you understand what statistics are?
>" uh-I thieeenkk I doohhh"

[Anonymous No.11108607]

>>11105352
does that mean we have to throw out 95% of all human progress?

[Anonymous No.11108609]

>>11105297
alchemy -> chemistry?
a lot of arabic words in astronomy too

[Anonymous No.11108849]

>>11103506
>A tool cannot be racist,
tell that to my ultra nigger detector 7000

[Anonymous No.11108904]

>>11108849
not all niggas are black
niggadom is a state of mind