[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 163 KB, 1030x681, 20191020_184209.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11078591 No.11078591[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Well?

>> No.11078616

Well you fucked up the grammer dumbass tranny fagot.

>> No.11078626
File: 3.10 MB, 3664x2844, 1563897231340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11078626

>>11078616
lol its not my picture
Good job /sci/, truly a shining example of an intellectual board.

>> No.11078636

>>11078626
>tranny faggot
>/sci/
you're talking to a /pol/tard infidel

>> No.11078645

>>11078616
Well, you fucked up the grammar, dumb ass tranny faggot.

>> No.11078892

>>11078591
The scale will read 1kg. Since the files are flying, they aren't contributing to the jar's weight.

>> No.11078900
File: 43 KB, 666x666, 1427385730412.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11078900

what the fuck is the actual answer to this seriously ive had it

>> No.11078905
File: 21 KB, 618x894, 1568606522028.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11078905

>do objects which apply infinitesimally small pressure on another object contribute to that objects weight?

>> No.11078933

>>11078645
Do you care to explain what`s wrong with the grammar?

>> No.11078946

>>11078591
probably about 1.3 kg give or take depending on what the blue thing is

>> No.11079015

>>11078900
1.5kg bcos the scale measure how many force is excerted on ground, and fly flying dislocate air below which excers force on the scale, otherwise fly couldnt fly.

>> No.11079016

>>11078591
Is the top sealed?

>> No.11079019

>>11078905
>infinitesimally small pressure

>> No.11079047

The scale would fluctuate because of the relative motion of the flies, but average to 1.5.

>> No.11079072

>>11079047
yep

>> No.11079134

>>11079047
/thread

>> No.11079144

>>11079047
This

>> No.11079257

>>11079015
what if the jar was really big

>> No.11079364

>>11079257
ur mom still wouldnt fit

>> No.11079574

>>11078591
Refer to Archimedes density test for the answer.
Refer to first law of thermodynamics for the answer. Include mass is equal to energy to mitigate confusion.

>> No.11079575

>>11078626
this pic is so great

>> No.11079657

1.5kg if the lid is closed.

This is correct.

>> No.11079690

>>11079047
What if they died at the same time and were in freefall?

>> No.11079698

>>11079015
Not all of the force would be constantly exerted on the ground though, since the air could be turbulent and some would be exerted as pressure on the sides of the jar. Also, not all flies would be beating their wings in synchrony. So the true answer is probably somewhere near 1.5kg.

>> No.11079704

1.3 kg? The flies aren't weightless, but they aren't applying their full force on the jar either.

>> No.11080356

>>11078616
imagine being this new

>> No.11080377

>>11078591
Literally an episode of mythbusters >>11079047
was what was found, which makes sense because it's the 3rd law of motion. It's like saying what's the weight of a fish tank if the fish are swimming around? It weighs the same regardless of the motion of the objects inside the container.

>> No.11080389

So many faggots confusing mass and weight it's a tragedy.

>> No.11080402

>>11080389
Mass is isomorphic to weight in our day to day lives on earth. Don't be an autistic pedant.

>> No.11080422

>>11080402
It's not that easy in this problem, brainlet.

>> No.11080445

>>11079047
>>11079019
You really think the force flies put on air is going to put .5kg of force onto a jar? Totally retarded. The jar will only weigh 1.5kg if all the flies land onto the jar at the same time.

>> No.11080943

Okay, okay.
Imagine you were floating in the air above the scale, what would the scale read? It would read 0kg. Since weight is affected by gravity.
Same thing goes for the flies, they aren't contributing any weight to it if they're flying. The picture shows that the flies are indeed flying in the jar. The scale will read the weight of the jar, or 1kg give or take. The scale will only read something higher if the flies drop down and is pulled by gravity.
tl:dr version: Learn the difference between mass and weights damn it! This shit is like physics 101.

>> No.11080951

It measures:

1kg on Earth

>> No.11080955

>>11078591
i thought you died cunt

>> No.11080963

>>11080445
>>11080951
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0IGrSjcBZs

>> No.11081130

>>11078933
hes a flaming faggot but you did mispel fagot

>> No.11081135

>>11079015
>otherwise fly couldnt fly
youre claiming that force conservatively travels through air? are you stupid? This is very wrong. its 1kg with a negligible fluctuation (both due to it being a shitty walmart looking scale and the small periodic forces exerted by the moving media of air)

>> No.11081164

This is shit people can answer after taking a basic high school physics class. Why would closing the lid on the jar suddenly make the flies weight apply to the scale? Gravity is pushing the weight of the jar onto the scale but not the flies.

>> No.11081273

>>11081135
>youre claiming that force conservatively travels through air? are you stupid? This is very wrong.
Go back to your highschool and ask your physics teacher to slap you and tell you about newtons laws.

>> No.11081821

>>11080943
>you were floating in the air above the scale,
The jar is sealed. The scale shows the weight of the jar, flies, and contained air combined.

>> No.11081859
File: 46 KB, 500x611, 1541361223513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11081859

Time to settle this once and for all.

Imagine the jar in space, no gravity involved. The flies start at the bottom of the jar (remember, no gravity, they are suspended in air). Everything perfectly still. Then they start. If the air under their wings suddenly exerts a force on the jar, it will start moving and continue doing so even if the flies stop flapping their wings.
What does this tell you?

>> No.11081864

>>11079364

Spicy

>> No.11081867
File: 54 KB, 1030x681, drone_jar1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11081867

>>11078591
>Well?

>> No.11081874

>>11081867
I still feel like the answer should be marginally under 1.5, as some of the force from the (in this case, rotors) is dissipating or reflecting in other directions instead of pushing straight down on the scale. I'm a brainlet though

>> No.11081889

>>11080445
Fucking brainlet

>> No.11082481

>>11081874
Any horizontal vector on air would be opposing only a horizontal vector on the drone. The sum of the vertical vectors must be equal and opposite the force of gravity, and the vertical vectors would affect the bottom of the jar.

>> No.11082487
File: 80 KB, 400x354, how-stop-panic-attacks-step-step.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11082487

>>11078591
A POUND OF FILES?????
How horrifying!!!

>> No.11082496

oh boy this thread again. he answer is unabiguously 1.5 kg btw.
>>11081164
im sad this bait didn't catch any replies

>> No.11082499

https://youtu.be/aPdfV1h5wgk?t=128
why is the grass falling over
did it get heavy somehow
so weird

>> No.11082511

>>11078591
The scale reads || | | | /

>> No.11082515
File: 436 KB, 1080x1296, Spambot Bingo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11082515

>>11078591
BINGO!

>> No.11082669

>>11082511
>loss