[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 33 KB, 512x384, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11078382 No.11078382 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.11079702
File: 285 KB, 600x526, Space-Is-Hard-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11079702

>>11078382

>> No.11079706
File: 451 KB, 600x660, Space-Is-Hard-2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11079706

>> No.11079714

>>11078382
Until I looked into this and realized it meant space travel, I thought it was referencing the literal surface of space.

>> No.11079739

>>11078382
I hate that line. It's so defeatist and uninspiring.

>> No.11079782

>>11079714
sounded like a cs paper to me

>> No.11079784

>>11079706
>>11079702
Kek

>> No.11079797

>>11079784
>ha ha le pen0r amirite?
go back >>>/r/eddit

>> No.11080007

>>11078382
Kaneda... What do you see?

>> No.11080174
File: 224 KB, 1500x1346, data--design--may--challenger-deep_502918cb00ff0_w1500.png.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11080174

>>11078382
Space is easy as fuck. Challenger Deep is fucking hard. Space is only 1atm of pressure difference. Challenger Deep is over 1,000atm of pressure difference.

>> No.11080264

>>11080174
>Challenger Deep is fucking hard.
It's just expensive. You've got to lathe those things out of solid pieces of metal and play with exotic atmospheres that increase time in decompression.

>> No.11081251

>>11079739
We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard

>> No.11081270

>>11080174
When going deep you don't care about weight beyond being slightly buoyant which can easily be done with a low density incompressible fluid like diesel in thin walled tanks.
Space is hard because you care about weight a lot.

>> No.11081280

>>11081270
>Space is hard because you care about weight a lot.
Only because most launchers are anemic but expensive. If much more payload could be sent to space for less cash, then there would be less concern for mass savings.

>> No.11081467

>>11081280
To get that extra payload up you still need a light launch vehicle unless you are talking about something like Orion.

>> No.11081500
File: 14 KB, 260x194, 1570206472749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11081500

>>11080174
> 7 hours is 9x longer than 8.5 hours

>> No.11081504

>>11081500
Time at the bottom was 9 time longer, not total mission time.

>> No.11081506
File: 8 KB, 346x250, 1570322886575.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11081506

>>11081504
Ty