>Women thought that the men looked healthier with a tattoo

[Anonymous No.11058345]

>https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/attraction-evolved/201702/are-women-more-attracted-men-tattoos
>Women thought that the men looked healthier with a tattoo, which supports the biologists’ theory
c.f.:
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23315899
>Association of tattooing and hepatitis C virus infection: a multicenter case-control study
>CONCLUSION: Tattooing is associated with HCV infection, even among those without traditional HCV risk factors such as IDU and blood transfusion prior to 1992.
Why are women allowed to vote, again?

[Anonymous No.11058349]

>inb4 this thread turns into a shitstorm of whiteknights and roasties

[Anonymous No.11058355]

>>11058345
Because tattoos look fucking dope.

[Anonymous No.11058356]

Who cares?

[Anonymous No.11058357]

>>11058345
You know (((why))).

[Anonymous No.11058394]

>>11058345
Tattoos are a sign of Chaddity, just accept that women ate smarter than you, dumb incel.

[Anonymous No.11058560]

>>11058345
Psychology today is a shit site, it is as professional in matters of psychology as vice or the Huffington post.

[Anonymous No.11058662]

>>11058345
>Psychology
lol.
>PsychologyToday
LOL!
>Evolutionary Psychology
Holy fucking shit, my sides.

Also OP is an incel.
>However, tattoos didn’t make a man look more or less attractive. Women thought tattooed men would be worse partners and fathers than men without tattoos, perhaps because tattoos signal impulsiveness and a propensity for risk-taking — hardly the characteristics most women prioritize in a long-term partner.

[Anonymous No.11059386]

>>11058345
>wah I don't like women or tattoos
>better post about it on the maths and science board

[Anonymous No.11059480]

>this thread

[Anonymous No.11059485]

>>11059480
Why do some many Proud Boys have tats then?

[Anonymous No.11059489]

It's because of the image perpetuated in media of tattoos being sexy on men, not because it signals a "strong immune system"

[Anonymous No.11059508]

>>11059485
>implying I'm affiliated with them
Just fucking give up. Tattoos are effectively permanent versions of the shit kids do when they draw on themselves. It's a sign that says "Hey look at me, I'm a degenerate".
Only legit reasons for tattoos are:
>religious reasons
>deeply engrained tribe culture
>small gang signs
Literally only the legit reasons.

[Anonymous No.11059539]

>>11058345
women's attraction isn't logical. sexual selection is overfitting of a fitness landscape. women are more likely to go after men who will be harmful to them and their children, dark triad traits.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012245
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691930042X

for the longest time i was against islam since i am an antitheist but i think it's our only realistic hope at this point.

[Anonymous No.11059549]

The worm is turning, slowly men who dont have tattoos are becoming the valuable

[Anonymous No.11059554]

>>11059508
So, who exactly do you represent?

[Anonymous No.11059559]

>>11059539
Everyone should convert to Islam to fight back against the "regressive left".

[Anonymous No.11059563]

>>11059559
inshallah

[Anonymous No.11059631]

>>11059563
Mashallah! Subhanallah!

[Anonymous No.11059672]

>>11058345
It's the conspicuous consumption theory of evolutionary biology, like with peacock feathers. Animals that can afford to waste resources on pointless shit that's highly visible, catches attention, and doesn't resemble the symptoms of infectious disease end up getting selected for as an honest indicator of mate quality.

[Anonymous No.11059677]

>>11059672
Those who waste their money don't stay rich for long.

[Anonymous No.11059687]

>>11059677
How would you even verify that? Do you have a list of items you can classify as waste?

[Anonymous No.11059693]

>>11059677
>>11059687
Also would need to know how much spending on "waste" would qualify for this theory or not e.g. if you buy one nice car you're good but two nice cars you're a waster? Or is it just one nice car over $X? Or does it need to be a percentage of your current income? Or a percentage of your net worth? etc.

[Anonymous No.11059707]

>>11059687
>>11059693
Ask any millionaire and billionaire. Buffet and Zuckerberg drive a 40kish cars for a reason. Wasting your money on frivolous things like tattoos especially is a surefire way to stay poor. Hence why tattoos are so much more common in the lower classes.

[Anonymous No.11059711]

>>11059707
>Ask
Nope. Try again with actual data.

[Anonymous No.11059716]

>>11059707
>Source: An anecdote about the facebook guy's car
Please leave here and don't come back.

[Anonymous No.11059736]

>>11059711
look at lottery winners going bankrupt for instance. they win big bucks and it's gone.
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.91.4.778

[Anonymous No.11059743]

>>11058345
>Another incel thread

[Anonymous No.11059752]

>>11059508
>My opinion is fact

[Anonymous No.11059757]

>>11059707

[Anonymous No.11059761]

>>11059559
>in scare quotes
>progressives can't be regressive, it's in the name!
hello comrade

[Anonymous No.11059768]

>>11058345
https://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/5060732/data/new-document-data.pdf
>Tattooing was popular among men who had not finished secondary school, tradesmen, and women who did not live with their partners, whereas men and women who had completed postsecondary education were less likely to have a tattoo. Similar findings relating to education attainment were also reported in the U.S. national study (19).

women are retarded

[Anonymous No.11059777]

>>11059768
>t. Incel

[Anonymous No.11059778]

>>11059777
nope, i've had several gfs over the years.

[Anonymous No.11059780]

>>11059778
Citation needed.

[Anonymous No.11059788]

>>11059780
citation needed that you're not a beta boy cuck-tier incel. i've seen inceldom manifest in two ways, the first is hatred of women but the other is a sort of weird putting women on a pedestal and subconscious self-hatred cuckoldry which you have on full display.

[Anonymous No.11059790]

>>11058345
teardrop tattoos turn me on i cant help it

[Anonymous No.11059791]

>>11059790

[Anonymous No.11059809]

>>11059788
>Trying to steal the meme

Incel lol

[Anonymous No.11059811]

>>11059809
>no argument
cuck-tier incel lol. go buy more belle delphine's bathwater.

[Anonymous No.11059816]

>>11059811
>p-please honor me with an argument daddy

Incel l0l

[Anonymous No.11059820]

>>11059816
>implying you even have an argument
cuck basedboi, go slurp more jamal's and chad's cum from your oneitis. at least you'll get to touch her.

[Anonymous No.11059821]

>>11059820
fucking word filter. s o y

[Anonymous No.11059827]

>>11059820
>Argue with me ;-;

I don’t argue with incels l0l

[Anonymous No.11059833]

>>11059827
pathetic, just goes to show what a weak cuckold you are. scared of the incel boogeyman.

[Anonymous No.11059834]

>>11059833
Incel l0l

[Anonymous No.11059839]

>>11059834
permavrigin who puts women on a pedestal lol

[Anonymous No.11059842]

>>11059839
Why even bother? You know you’re an incel. You have nothing to offer the world. Kill yourself.

Only incels say that “women are retarded”.

[Anonymous No.11059843]

>>11059791
I know, I know :(

[Anonymous No.11059847]

>>11059842
i know i'm not an incel, i've had several gfs who have shown me how retarded women are hence i say it. i have a lot to offer hence why i'm in the position i am but stay mad. stay a worthless cuck who will buy belle delphines bathwater in hopes she will touch you. she won't

[Anonymous No.11059849]

>>11059847
>Incel weekly tries to steal insults

Every time.

[Anonymous No.11059855]

>>11059849
>cuck has no arguments
every time.

[Anonymous No.11059860]

>>11059855
Why must everything be an argument to pseudointellectual children? There is no argument to have.

[Anonymous No.11059861]

>>11059860
>pseudointellectual children
describes you to a t.

[Anonymous No.11059864]

>>11059861
Nah. I’m not the one trying to turn everything into an argument. That’s you.

There is no argument. There can’t be one. There’s nothing to argue about.

Grow up

[Anonymous No.11059870]

>>11059864
>There’s nothing to argue about.
ok good to know we agree that you're a retarded cuck-tier incel and women are retarded then.

[Anonymous No.11059874]

>>11059508
It's a sign that says "Hey look at me, I'm a degenerate".
Why?

[Anonymous No.11059877]

>>11058345
Women's idea of "healthy" = aggressive.

[Anonymous No.11059880]

>>11059870
>Trying this hard

All right I’ll pity you

> retarded cuck-tier incel

Weak insults thrown out as defense mechanism

> and women are retarded then.

Potential argument. Someone is medically classified as “retarded” if they have an IQ below 70, so please cite a source for your claim that women, on average, have IQs below 70. If you can’t, you’ve lost the argument you wanted so badly, so I’d get searching.

[Anonymous No.11059891]

>>11059880
>Weak insults thrown out as defense mechanism
you fucking started it, pot.

>Someone is medically classified as “retarded” if they have an IQ below 70, so please cite a source for your claim that women, on average, have IQs below 70. If you can’t, you’ve lost the argument you wanted so badly, so I’d get searching.
being this autistic, lmao. when i said retarded i meant they exhibit behaviors that are self-defeating and stupid.

[Anonymous No.11059901]

>>11059891
>being this autistic, lmao. when i said retarded i meant they exhibit behaviors that are self-defeating and stupid.

Prove that women on average exhibit behaviors that are “self-defeating and stupid” and that they do so to a greater extent than the average man, unless you’d like to change your statement to “Humans do things that are self-defeating and stupid”.

[Anonymous No.11059918]

>>11059901
>Prove that women on average exhibit behaviors that are “self-defeating and stupid”
i did. if their goal is safety and child rearing they shouldn't be attracted to dark triad traits and men with tattoos which they are.

>and that they do so to a greater extent than the average man, unless you’d like to change your statement to “Humans do things that are self-defeating and stupid”.
onus is on you. i only made the argument that women are retarded and demonstrated it sufficiently so i can say it. it's up to you to prove that men are just as retarded till then all we can say is women are retarded.

[Anonymous No.11059936]

>>11059918
> i did.

Nope.

> if their goal is safety and child rearing they shouldn't be attracted to dark triad traits and men with tattoos which they are.

The article, and the study the article is citing, that OP is citing asserts that women did NOT find men with tattoos more attractive, and actually considered them worse potential partners for child rearing.

Read before you shitpost.

[Anonymous No.11059945]

>>11059936
did you miss the part about dt? they are attracted to that. see:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913012245
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691930042X

also women are more attracted to masculinity which has to do with the tattoos. so while they may say they don't think of them as long term partners in a self survey they will go for them more often.

[Anonymous No.11059959]

>>11059945
>women r dum cus they r atrakted to the most masculine men and not palid 120 pound goblins like me

Go read about evolution or something

[Anonymous No.11059977]

>>11059959
even evolutionarily dt is stupid. a kind, caring, strong guy is a better provider than an equally strong dt guy. because dt is perceived as more masculine is the idiocy here. if it was to do with muscle and strength all i'd say is that they're retarded for being stuck in the past, as now the greatest asset is intelligence clearly. back then it just helped.

[Anonymous No.11059991]

>>11059977
>even evolutionarily dt is stupid.

They have more kids with more women because women find them more attractive, so they are superior in an evolutionary sense.

Man up I guess

[Anonymous No.11059998]

>>11059991
>They have more kids with more women because women find them more attractive, so they are superior in an evolutionary sense.
stupid argument. if women found the non-dt guys more attractive that would be the case too and the kids would have a higher likelihood of survival. so yeah women are retarded.

[Anonymous No.11060008]

Local woman discovers one weird trick to determine if someone has hepatitis just by looking at them

[Anonymous No.11060016]

>>11060008
And she fucked him raw anyway.

[Anonymous No.11060281]

>>11058560
>>11058662
Here's the original study:
>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691631087X
They took photos of shirtless, tattooed men, photoshopped tats onto them, and the tat-shopped pics were rated as healthier by women.

[Anonymous No.11060351]

>being a degenerate
>needing pop-psychology "researchers" to defend your degeneracy
lmao

[Anonymous No.11060520]

>>11059711
This is the problem with the original study as well. They simply ask who's attractive, or ask who they want to sleep with etc.

Women have essentially no idea what they ultimately go for, because it's mostly up to the guy. The only way to accurately link tattoos (or whatever) to mating success would be to observe it, not ask women what they believe they would do, in theory.

And ofc tattooed men are observed to be massive fucking slayers, unsurprisingly.

I had a conversation with a girl a number of years ago. She was telling me that she doesn't like men with tattoos, finds it unattractive. At length, I was able to extract from her that, to her absolute surprise, she could think of only one partner of hers (from 30 or so) who did NOT have significant tattoos.

Women (maybe people) haven't the foggiest idea what types they end up going for. Given that women select and green-light every sexual encounter, what they go for is synonymous with what they like.

For men, not so, because they may forever be accepting sub-like women since they can't get what they like.

Always be thinking this - what do women actually RESPOND TO. Got to ask the the right questions. Not what does she like, not what does she want, not what does she say she prefers on a questionaire - only ever "what actually gets to fuck her".

[Anonymous No.11060612]

>>11060520
>I had a conversation with a girl a number of years ago. She was telling me that she doesn't like men with tattoos, finds it unattractive. At length, I was able to extract from her that, to her absolute surprise, she could think of only one partner of hers (from 30 or so) who did NOT have significant tattoos.
>30 or so
It's astounding how many sexual partners women amass, and how quickly they do it.

[Anonymous No.11060624]

>>11060612
Doesn't seem much to me, but then I'm on 149 myself and I didn't start until my 20s.

Women could fuck 100 men per day or as many as their schedule and motivation allowed. If they live(d) among sexually aggressive men then they will have a high number of partners if they want to, and the stigma against that - while still present - is less than in the past.

I would think something very wrong and strange with a modern girl who hasn't had 20++ dicks, as it speaks of a social deviance and lack of popularity.

Any man with less than 100 by 22 is not worthy of life. I was on 2 by that age, lol.

[Anonymous No.11060707]

>>11060624
>t. degenerate westerner

[Anonymous No.11060716]

>>11060707
Spotted the incel.

More sex is good. Cry more

[Anonymous No.11060726]

>>11060716
>Thinking this whole thing is a race
Look man, you can rail as many empty-eyed women as you want, but you'll never find fulfillment this way.

[Anonymous No.11060824]

>>11060726
Yep, I started "slaying" to try and make up for crucial missed social/romantic experiences in my teens, but it doesn't work at all.

Im well into my 30's now and with absolutely no sign of a gf or wife, my looks fading rapidly as well.

Slaying is something men need to do or at least be able to do, but when young and then move on. It's my inability to reliably accomplish it and my various anxieties and mental blocks with women that drive me to keep trying.