/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10996470]

Hello /sci/, can anyone formulate a mathematical/logical proof as to why liking girls is gay?

[Anonymous No.10996482]

>>10996470
Transitive property.

You like girls.
Girls like dicks.
Therefore, You like dicks.
Faggot.

[Anonymous No.10996495]

>>10996482
Write it more formally, I would also like a mathematical proof pls

[Anonymous No.10996991]

>>10996495
Theorem 1.2.4:
Liking girls is gay.

Proof:
Let U be a Grothendieck-Universe that contains the set of all humans and the set of all dicks. By Proposition 1.1.14 the liking-relation defines a preorder on U. Now by a famous lemma in homological algebra every girl likes dicks. See [VAG] for a proof. Now let p be a person that likes girls. Now (assuming the axiom of binarity) p is either male or female. The latter case is trivial by definition 1.0.1. So we may assume w.l.o.g. that p is male. Since p likes girls and girls like dicks, by transitivity p likes dicks. Because p is male, it follows that p is gay by definition 1.0.1.
This finishes the proof.

[Anonymous No.10997005]

>>10996991
Provide links to definitions and propositions please.

[Anonymous No.10997029]

>>10997005
it is an exerpt from
Introduction to algebraic gender studies, by S. Lang (2002)

[Anonymous No.10997060]

>>10996470
left as an exercise to the reader

[Anonymous No.10997065]

>>10996470
You don't have any point in perspective of momentary perception of commutative properties therefore your argument is invalid.

You are being driven into oppression coma by statistical data that are no longer even actual.

You think, that everybody can be in some strange perspective of your sick choice.

That's wrong.

[Anonymous No.10997086]

>>10996470
Because sexdolls > biocunts

[Anonymous No.10997176]

>>10996991
>lesbians don't exist
You proved existence, but not "uniqueness". There are girls out there who do not like dicks.

[Anonymous No.10997183]

Don't mind me i'm just testing if LaTeX works on /sci/

$/nu$ male

[Anonymous No.10997342]

>>10997065
What are you talking about retard? I don’t like males or females because liking either is gay

[Anonymous No.10997643]

>>10997176
that was the trivial case brainlet

[Anonymous No.10997646]

>>10996991
well done anon

[Anonymous No.10997724]

Male human has penis.
Female human has vagina.
Male human inserts penis into vagina.
Pleasure derived from the act of penis into vagina stimulates the male human.
Male human act has stimulated the male human.
Male human is therefore, a homosexual.

[Anonymous No.10997754]

>>10996470
Let M be a male. If M likes girls there exists female F such that M likes F. By the Tranner Theorem, there exists T such that T is equivalent to F in the sense of looks. Now consider the following construction:

Place M looking at F. He is aroused. Then, in an instant, replace F with T. M is still aroused. M has been aroused by a male. Therefore M is gay.

[Anonymous No.10997903]

>>10997754
>Then, in an instant,
this is a little fragile anon. in order to do this, there must exist a homomorphism between F and T

[Anonymous No.10998813]

[Anonymous No.10998816]

[Anonymous No.10998825]

>>10996470
It’s not
But jacking off is full homo,
A guys hand is making you cum. That is pretty gay.
Let:
p = male gets you off
q = you are gay
1. If p then q
2. P
Therefore q

[Anonymous No.10998934]

>>10996470
During development in the womb, the baby is by default female. If a Y chromosome is present, it begins to morph into more masculine traits. The clitoris extends to become the head of the penis.

Think of that next time you eat a girl out you're basically sucking a tiny dick, homo.

[Anonymous No.10999375]

>>10997903
It's a formal construction. Obviously the laws of physics prevent us from switching F with T instantly, but mathematically all straight men are gay.

[Anonymous No.10999674]

>>10998934
>Think of that next time you eat a girl out
I-i'll make sure to think of that anon