so since /sci/ is autistic with IQ, I'm going to talking about this peculiar website

[Anonymous No.10989488]

I scored a 127 pic related, let discuss about this website
www.myiqtested.com
this website tests
>memory
>logic
>spatial relations
>creativity, and more...
is this score valid?
I have a doctorate in physics.

[Anonymous No.10989738]

epic fail
stopped right there at step #1
do they not know how to display unicode characters?

[Anonymous No.10989743]

>>10989488
>I have a doctorate in physics
>I believe IQ might be valid
This proves that you don't need to be intelligent to get a doctorate in physics.

[Anonymous No.10989761]

>>10989743
t. pseudointellectual with no degree

[Anonymous No.10989838]

>>10989743
Who are these anti IQ tards? They never know the first thing about what IQ actually is anyways.

[Anonymous No.10989847]

>>10989761
I have a PhD in Psychology.

[Anonymous No.10989850]

>>10989847
Let me guess, you may have taken like 2 classes on psychometrics several years ago and are mostly going off of opinion.

[Anonymous No.10989854]

>>10989743
>>I believe IQ might be valid
OP never said this.
>>10989847
A psychologist is the only person who has any use for IQ. Anybody else who cares about IQ is a pseudointellectual. Learning about IQ won't make you any smarter and only turns people complacent (see: the average 4chan pseud and anyone who brags about being in mensa).

[Anonymous No.10989855]

>>10989850
IQ is pseudoscience because intelligence doesn't exist. All that exists is evolutionary fitness and that can only be determined by seeing who lives and makes children and who dies.

[Anonymous No.10989857]

>>10989488
how am I going to match symbols if half of them don't display

[Anonymous No.10989858]

>>10989847
nice LARP
why would you distance yourself from the only thing psychology has ever done that's reputable

[Anonymous No.10989876]

>>10989855
IQ isn't about "intelligence", its about the principle component of performance on tests that predicts things like SES, academic achivement, and crime. It is explicitly NOT predicated on whatever philosophical definition of "intelligence" one may have. It is science precisely because "intelligence" doesn't exist as a scientific concept, only IQ EXISTS AS A SCIENTIFIC CONCEPT

[Anonymous No.10989886]

>>10989488
it's about what I got on the WAIS also with the higher spacial / logic with the verbal shit holding my score down. can you score higher on these things, my left should be 99 if those numbers mean percentiles (wais score)

[Anonymous No.10989887]

meh it is too fucking fast
and i didn't do the logic like who is older than who, fuck that.
would you be allowed to use pen and paper for that? oh that line drawing interface to cut squares into pieces is fucking horrible. especially on a laptop.

[Anonymous No.10989890]

>>10989855
>phenotype doesn't exist
read mitchell heisman's sucide note retard
only holons exist

[Anonymous No.10989893]

>>10989886
>creativity 0
kek.

[Anonymous No.10989898]

>>10989893
my visual memory being lacking was identified on the WAIS as well, but it really doesn't help the memory question at the beginning of the test is fucking broken.. got all the symbols that weren't broken correct
>>10989887
really? I had time left over on every section except that one with the missing digits / repeating letters, got to the last couple and it switched pages

[Anonymous No.10989901]

>>10989893
what kind of questions measure creativity?

[Anonymous No.10989903]

>>10989893
where the fuck did it test creativity anyways?

[Anonymous No.10989905]

here's my big five

[Anonymous No.10989907]

>>10989901
not a clue.. maybe it just assumed i'm chinese

[Anonymous No.10989920]

>>10989905
imagine if you were given a chance to distribute these factors more evenly with 100 "points" being the absolute total. would you take away from your intellect to add some agreeableness?

[Anonymous No.10989939]

>>10989903
>>10989901

>>10989893
how do you 0

[Anonymous No.10989940]

>>10989920
Absolutely. :(

[Anonymous No.10989945]

>>10989939
english not the first language maybe?

[Anonymous No.10989965]

>>10989847
I'm guessing you chose psychology for a reason

[Anonymous No.10989988]

>>10989945
lol.. it is my first language. pretty sure I got at least 3 of those right, maybe I spelled them wrong? that was the most challenging section for me though.. I always have trouble finding my words

[Anonymous No.10990005]

>>10989488
Columbia

[Anonymous No.10990056]

>>10989876
>Intelligence quotient is not about intelligence
The cope has reached a fever pitch at this point

[Anonymous No.10990247]

>>10989838
>Who
Literal low IQ tards say it isn't real to cope.
or
Leftist blank slate sociopolitical agenda.

[Anonymous No.10990295]

>>10989988
>trouble finding my words
by that I meant I have trouble expressing my thoughts, ideas and what I mean using my words. fucking sucks, ever think 'oh, I should have said this' ? that's me in every situation of my life always, most of the time I hope people either can read my mind or know what I was trying to convey through reading my autism (they can't)

[Anonymous No.10990449]

>>10989738
kek, got that too. Kept going and got 134. I was playing runescape on 3 accounts while doing it. Scored 134. English is also not my first language. Raven matrices puts me between 135-145.

[Anonymous No.10990585]

I did a Mensa entrance exam and got 155 overall.

I quit the test at 62% done after it told me that one of my answers was wrong when it wasn't (just a different way of reaching the solution - it was the question where you have to cut shapes up. My slices made the same shapes but the computer was too dumb to recognise that and said it was wrong).

Having a big brain just makes me hate myself more when I fail because I have no excuse.

[Anonymous No.10990816]

>>10990585
isn't this one ambiguous right here in this test?
i'd say O is a vowel which is more important than the shapes.

[Anonymous No.10990818]

>>10990816
I noticed that one too. I thought it was because O was the only letter that was closed.

So it's ambiguous in 3 directions. What a shitty test.

[Anonymous No.10990929]

In case you wondered where this is from: http://www.talkingelectronics.com/projects/IQ%20Test/IQ%20Test.pdf
Stolen from an old Cambridge IQ test pretty much as is and no credit is given. Nice. You can check the answers and re-take the test and post your 160 IQ result in another thread to impress fellow thinkers.

[Anonymous No.10990933]

>another iq thread

[Anonymous No.10991000]

>>10989939
North m8

[Anonymous No.10991006]

>first problem
>symbols don't fucking display properly
>7th problem where you have to draw the lines on the square
>if you fuck up and press "clear box" the shit glitches and you can't draw lines again
>mfw I only got to answer two before the glitch fucked me over and I couldn't answer the rest

Welp whatever bullshit score I get on this shit site it won't reflect my IQ, that's for sure.
The only thing I confirmed is that the site's creators have a very low IQ.

[Anonymous No.10991011]

>>10990816
Was literally gonna make a post about this retarded shit until I got to the drawing lines problem and the site fucked me over.
I'm done with this shit test.

[Anonymous No.10991718]

>>10990816
it says visual designs.. it's not ambiguous at all, what does a vowel or a consonant have to do with a visual design?

question 7 is apparently a literal brainlet filter. kek.
>>10991006
you have to finish the line to clear it
>>10990585
you can cut it up anyway you want, it's just checking whether the final shapes match.
>>10991011
kek

[Anonymous No.10993183]

>>10991718
>you have to finish the line to clear it
No you don't.
After you clear the line the program will only let you draw lines outside the box you fucking brainlet. Having that line will make the whole thing wrong. Try it for yourself faggot

[Anonymous No.10993357]

>>10990247
>>10989838
same brainlet

[Anonymous No.10993388]

Thought I'd do the test at an exhausted state after exercise (did some HIIT, it's close to a runners' high right now IMO), and honestly expected to score sub 100 now because I was doing so bad on some of the exercises (for example I ran out of time at the 3rd or 4th number sequence because I didn't have the time limit in mind at all and overall felt like slowpoke). Do actual IQ tests also have such narrow time limits? Seems stressful

Physics PhD student too if that matters, thankfully the test tells me I suck at anything numeral even though I'd say that's where my strength is irl :^)

[Anonymous No.10993557]

score 156 and english is not even my first language. Test is obviously BS, you can tell by the fact that the guy didnt even bother to built his shitty site properly to display the characters you're supposed to memorize.