/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10986243]

>tfw Homo sapiens are a brainlet human species

[Anonymous No.10986247]

Modern humans probably have the same brain size. Brain folds to increase surface area.

[Anonymous No.10986252]

>>10986243
No denisovan skulls have been found.

[Anonymous No.10986254]

>>10986243
Who cares when you have an ass like that?

[Anonymous No.10986255]

Yeah, well who rekt the neanderthal and denisovan bitches? Oh yeah we did

[Anonymous No.10986256]

[Anonymous No.10986269]

Nah, brains become more efficient and smaller just like our mobilephones

[Anonymous No.10986276]

>>10986256
Why’d you include a Freddy Mercury skull?

[Anonymous No.10986282]

>>10986243
why do our top teeth jut out farther than the bottom teeth? it doesn't appear to on the other skulls

[Anonymous No.10986290]

>>10986282
This has to do with a diet that was lacking in seeds and difficult to chew plants. Maybe this human are a lot of meat or cooked food. It is a lack of development from childhood underbite. I hope someone calls me a retard and explains better.

[Anonymous No.10986295]

>>10986290
i normally jut out my lower jaw a little on purpose because i think it looks better. makes my jawline look more defined

[Anonymous No.10986302]

>>10986295
Opposite for me. Can't get my jaw back far enough to make my teeth go where they should. What people call a "weak chin" is a better chin for fighting. My jaw looks "strong" but a good punch would send my teeth flying.

[Anonymous No.10986314]

>>10986302
i'm a pussy that never fights so i never worry about that. i'm like severely underweight, i wouldn't be able to fight anyone who wasn't at least half my size

[Anonymous No.10986404]

>>10986282
Because that's literally how you bite, if they aligned perfectly it would be difficult to bite anything. Picture yourself eating an apple, first you dig your front teeth in and then you come up with your bottom row, now align your teeth and try biting an apple, it would be difficult if not impossible to even take a bite.

As to why the other skulls aren't that way, I think it's to do with the shape of their jaws, their jaws already slope downwards so if they went to take a bite their bottom row of teeth would pull down and out of the way allowing their top teeth to dig in first, so effectively it's the same.

[Anonymous No.10986799]

>>10986247
>Brain folds to increase surface area.
why do brain folds increase brain power? why is only the surface area important when you lose volume that way? weird.

[Anonymous No.10986938]

>>10986243
It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it

[Anonymous No.10986972]

>>10986799
brain is an electrical device increasing m^2/m^3 optimizes efficiency

[Anonymous No.10986982]

>>10986314
You’re cute

[Anonymous No.10986983]

chinese/mongols/koreans/iniuts all have very large brains due to their higher neanderthal dna admixture.
maybe we can use that to increase human brain size through genetic engineering?

[Anonymous No.10986995]

>>10986243
Denisovans weren't larger, were they?

[Anonymous No.10987003]

>>10986282
Our ancestors had big ass jaws for cracking nuts and chewing vegitation.
As hominid ancestors developed their diets were less and less tough, so big jaws weren't as necessary to have, unfortunately there are just a few too many teeth than can comfortably fit in the modern human head which is why so many people have fucked up grills and wisdom teeth that grow in sideways.
Since modern humans became modern humans by cooking meat and veg our jaws are a bit atrophied to boot.

[Anonymous No.10987099]

>>10986983
didnt chinks breed with denisovans

[Anonymous No.10987142]

Larger brain doesn't immediately imply larger intelligence. We are definitely smarter than whales and elephants. Neanderthals were likely dumber because their larger body sizes likely required their brains to divert more resources towards body maintenance.

[Anonymous No.10987149]

>>10987142
Yes it does. Modern humans are dumb as shit.

>We are definitely smarter than whales and elephants
This is just patently false.

>Neanderthals were likely dumber because their larger body sizes likely required their brains to divert more resources towards body maintenance.
Nice excuses.

Modern humans are simply dumb as shit and it shows in literally everything.

[Anonymous No.10987154]

>>10986255
>well who rekt the neanderthal and denisovan bitches?
we didn't exactly rekt them entirely, we kinda fucked them and absorbed them into our damn DNA.
remember we were compatible enough for us to interbreed...

[Anonymous No.10987161]

>>10986243
anon, who the FUCK do you think is flying UFOs over your house? who the FUCK do you think built the pyramids, or the perfectly fitted megastructures of Peru and Turkey?

I'll tell you who. Denisovans. Neanderthals. They are the silent guardians and ancient aliens of our world.

[Anonymous No.10987179]

>>10987142
but white people usually have Neanderthal admixture and we all know scientifically that white people have higher IQ
therefore Neanderthal DNA must be at least part of the reason
also we know that Neanderthal had complex societies before homosapiens did.

[Anonymous No.10987190]

>>10987149
>This is just patently false.

[Anonymous No.10987206]

>>10987179
wonder what would had happened if we humans died out but neanderthals and denisovan proliferated in europe and asia.
would they also fantasize about us and what would we be as a species? would they be asking the same questions as us?.

[Anonymous No.10987212]

>>10986995
As far as I know. There's only a finger bone.

[Anonymous No.10987215]

>>10987206
they'd obviously be out colonizing space already and be too busy worrying about getting the construction of their blackhole power plant finished.

[Anonymous No.10987217]

>>10987161
Well they're doing a shit job.

[Anonymous No.10987227]

>>10987179
All non-African humans have some neanderthal DNA. Including Asians, Arabs, Australian aborigines, Native Americans, Pacific islanders, Papua New Guinea, etc.

[Anonymous No.10987230]

>>10987215
don't forget they would have gone all out in eugenics and improve their species.
they would probably even start to create life in other places.

[Anonymous No.10987235]

>>10987227
I believe that jews are descendants of a group of rogue denisovans.

[Anonymous No.10987336]

>>10987206
>would they also fantasize about us and what would we be as a species? would they be asking the same questions as us?
They probably will find us moe as fuck
Maybe they would actually find us attractive too as we will have neoteny from their perspective
I mean the most handsome neanderthal you would see is a literal muscular ron pearlman
Most of us would look harmless and even weak

[Anonymous No.10987343]

>>10987142
>We are definitely smarter than whales
Are you sure about that? Whales don't have the physical capability to use tools, that doesn't necessarily mean they are less intelligent. They may even communicate in language.

[Anonymous No.10988143]

Bump

[Anonymous No.10989096]

>>10987161
Actually, that's Boskop man. A species only known by some fragments of their skulls.

[Anonymous No.10989110]

>>10986243
Their brains had far fewer wrinkles. More wrinkles = more processing power.

[Anonymous No.10989200]

>>10989096
Homo Capensis is more likely. The skull isn't so large but still larger than a human. It's possible that Caesar's father was one of them.

[Anonymous No.10989217]

>>10986295
Kek I do the same thing

[Anonymous No.10989574]

>>10989200
>Caesar's father was one of them.
julius caesar or the zeppeli one?

[Anonymous No.10989591]

>>10989574
Oh I got it wrong. Homo Capensis was the name they gave to the Boskop man. In any case, pic is vague evidence that Caesar was a hybrid.

[Anonymous No.10989597]

>>10989591
and pic

[Anonymous No.10989602]

>>10986799
The cerebral cortex isn't a ball-like volume, but a sheet. More folds allows more of the sheet to be packed into the skull.

[Anonymous No.10989624]

>>10989597
ayyy lmao

[Anonymous No.10989668]

>>10987142
Asians have the largest brain and the highest IQ of all humans. So larger brains in humans = "larger" intelligence.

[Anonymous No.10989697]

>>10986302
Overbite jaw =/= square jaw. Learn the difference.

[Anonymous No.10989715]

>>10989697
I don't think I'll learn much from you. Knock yourself out.

[Anonymous No.10989744]

Most of that extra volume in N and D skulls is allocated in the occipital lobe which seems to be far less important when contributing to intelligence than say, the frontal lobe, which is relatively larger in modern humans

[Anonymous No.10989750]

>>10986243
More cranial space does not equal more brain matter. If that were true, we would be ruled by whales.

[Anonymous No.10989758]

>>10986256
witten is no homo tho

[Anonymous No.10989817]

What is the IQ of this bird?

[Anonymous No.10989863]

>>10989668
>largest brain.
IQ? Whatever. But brain? How many legitimate sources? I see a bunch of theese peeps and skull goes straight up from the neck in the back. Am I coincidentally witnessing a rare sample?

[Anonymous No.10989877]

>>10989863
Look up the papers of the race researchers that have been all been excluded from scientific academy due to the political/taboo nature of the subject.

[Anonymous No.10989881]

>>10989877
Give a dummy a hint.

[Anonymous No.10989906]

>>10986252
this, also they were meter-tall hobbit people

[Anonymous No.10989910]

>>10989668

Actually the Inuits have the largest cranial capacity estimated at 1440cm while East Asians are 1425cm. Despite that size they have contributed less to Academia than those of African diaspora.

>>10989877

Not him but you're full of shit. Even by race researchers standards you're still off.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188690900347X

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Brain-Size-as-an-Explanation-of-National-Differences-in-IQ-Longevity-and-Other-Life-History-Variables-2010-by-John-Philippe-Rushton.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi72Znx-eDkAhXEnOAKHcIqA5EQFjAEegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw1zyxrZBLd4p_92hf-GNgmb

[Anonymous No.10989922]

>>10989910
>cranial capacity
>1440cm
Holy shit their head diameter is 1440 cm?

[Anonymous No.10989927]

>>10989910
>https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Brain-Size-as-an-Explanation-of-National-Differences-in-IQ-Longevity-and-Other-Life-History-Variables-2010-by-John-Philippe-Rushton.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi72Znx-eDkAhXEnOAKHcIqA5EQFjAEegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw1zyxrZBLd4p_92hf-GNgmb
Am him. You refer to the only study i found within the margin for error nearly 200 years ago. This isn't what my eyes have seen. Convince me I'm wrong.

[Anonymous No.10990728]

>>10986243
Earlier examples of Homo Sapiens also tend to be larger brained than their descendants, by a significant amount. Also, that "Denisovan" is just a scaled up Neanderthal skull.
>>10989863
Asians are brachycephalic. They tend to have very wide braincases rather than long.
>>10987154
The percentages of admixture in Sapiens are pretty damn low if we consider that we arrived in their territory, in which they were established, as hunter gatherers. How low the percentages are is actually pretty surprising, with models suggesting that interbreeding must have been extremely infrequent to match up with what we see. It's also believed that some of their testicle related genes would cause infertility in male hybrids.

We could not have fucked Neanderthals and Denisovans out of existence because we didn't fuck them anywhere near enough for that.

[Anonymous No.10990848]

>>10986314
0. stay out of trouble
1. gain mass
2. get pepper spray
pick all

[Anonymous No.10991001]

>>10990728
>It's also believed that some of their testicle related genes would cause infertility in male hybrids.
I doubt all of them and female hybrids must have been okay then.
it would explain why the majority of europeans have neanderthal DNA, they inherited it from female hybrids.
ergo we did fuck them to extinction in a way and live in those europeans.

[Anonymous No.10991049]

big brains still occur in modern humans, notice cuvier the biologist/naturalist has a brain weight of 1830g larger than a neanderthal.

[Anonymous No.10991054]

>>10991049
plus my brain is pretty big and I have a neurodegenerative disease, look at my corpus callosum it is highly abnormal, a normal corpus callosum should be around7cm^2 in cross section I got 10cm

[Anonymous No.10991065]

heres my corpus callosum, 10cm^2 in cross section

[Anonymous No.10991208]

>>10989877
>>10989910
>>10990728

https://policytensor.com/2018/08/10/cranial-capacity-of-real-and-imagined-races-of-man/

Im thinking asians have a tighter range and it is larger variance of whites that make numbers seem smaller on average. What i see here really disagrees with my common experience. I'm near San Francisco and see plenty of each. Ubiquitous Asians don't appear to have larger skulls than typical gringos. It isn't a fun thing to google

[Anonymous No.10991356]

>>10991001
Asians have a little more Neanderthal actually, but you missed the main point. The amount of Neanderthal DNA we have is extremely minor. You're looking at 2% Neanderthal DNA and are thinking "Oh damn, we must have been fucking them so much they're extinct!" The reality is, 2% is dreadfully low. To be only 2% means that Homo Sapiens rarely produced offspring with Neanderthals. It would be much higher if we fucked them into extinction.

Surprisingly little fucking happened. Scientists look at these numbers and wonder "Why didn't they fuck more than this, why is there so little?". Of course, there's also signs of natural selection against their DNA, due to the aforementioned fertility issues.

In short, it's more believable that we killed most and fucked a few than fucked most and killed a few.

[Anonymous No.10991855]

>>10986252
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/sep/19/scientists-use-fossilised-finger-bone-dna-to-rebuild-ancient-denisovan-human

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/09/dna-reveals-first-look-enigmatic-human-relative/

[Anonymous No.10991914]

>>10991855
Still no skull. Just an educated guess based on their DNA. Pretty fucking cool, but OP's still a faggot for posting a scaled up Neanderthal.

[Anonymous No.10992045]

>>10991356
>Asians have a little more Neanderthal actually

I read this here but think it is old news. Personally, I have 3.5 percent and japanese wife is unremarkable. Its all greek to me.

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/1000-genomes-introgression-among-populations-2012.html

[Anonymous No.10992136]

>>10992045
New studies come out all the time. More recent studies, which I don't think have been overturned yet, found East Asians to have 20% more Neanderthal DNA than Europeans on average. So, 2.2% on average vs. 2%. These are averages, of course.

But in general, those percentages lead to the same conclusion. Reproduction did occur between the populations, but surprisingly infrequently. If we simply absorbed them into the population through sex and genetic swamping, we'd have way higher percentages.

Though because I've gone on this tangent, I'm wondering how this compares to genetic introgression in other families, like bears. I guess I'll go look that up.

[Anonymous No.10992211]

>>10992136
can we make this percentages higher?
we do selective breeding and slowly rise up neanderthal genes
would that work?

[Anonymous No.10992246]

>>10992211
You could, sure. Not everyone has the same Neanderthal genes. From what I recall, about 20% of the complete Neanderthal genome still exists, scattered around the population. Natural selection appears to have weeded out quite a few, and plenty of those that remain also have deleterious effects in humans. Increased risk of depression is thought to be one.

So, hypothetically, breeding a 20% Neanderthal is possible, but that's the leftover 20%. The shit that the selection pressures on Homo Sapiens didn't scrub completely from out genome.

[Anonymous No.10992366]

>>10992136
Oh, by the way. While finding clear percentages is a little harder with bears species, probably not as exciting to people, it seems roughly comparable.

[Anonymous No.10992386]

>>10991208
>

>Im thinking asians have a tighter range and it is larger variance of whites that make numbers seem smaller on average. What i see here really disagrees with my common experience. I'm near San Francisco and see plenty of each. Ubiquitous Asians don't appear to have larger skulls than typical gringos. It isn't a fun thing to google

Maybe it's actually that having a smaller head gives you more folds and makes you even smarter

[Anonymous No.10992537]

>>10992386
Asians literally have wider, shorter, braincases than Europeans. There are more directions to grow than back.

[Anonymous No.10992542]

>>10986295
I do this too, thinking about getting plastic surgery fix my severe lack of chin and jaw.

[Anonymous No.10992619]

>>10992542
>thinking about getting plastic surgery fix my severe lack of chin and jaw.
remember this, genetically you still lack chin and jaw.
if you have children, they won't get a proper jaw and chin.

[Anonymous No.10992624]

>>10992619
just get your child prastic srugery too arr rook arrike if arr get same prastic surgeon me Doctor Chang me do good job verrry good

[Anonymous No.10992697]

>>10992136
Why is this considered a small amount? The grandparents of your grandparents have as much in common with you.

[Anonymous No.10992703]

>>10992136
Adding that there may be more in common but we cannot see the difference in dna if it is so similar. It was only a decade ago that this shit was revealed.

[Anonymous No.10992907]

>>10992697
That's not quite true. Your grandparents' grandparents are Homo Sapiens, after all. Certain traits are common to the genepool, and that ratio won't change too much without new blood or selective pressure. If Early Eurasians bred often with Neanderthals, to the point of "absorbing" them, you would expect a good deal more than 2% or even 5% Neanderthal genes. More than 10%, even. There hasn't been enough further migration into Eurasia from non-carriers that the population would have diluted it down to 2%.

Anyhow, a paper on the subject of Neanderthals.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047076

[Anonymous No.10992916]

>>10992907
Another paper that looks at it a little different, referenced in the first I linked.

https://www.pnas.org/content/108/37/15129/
>We find that observed low levels of Neanderthal ancestry in Eurasians are compatible with a very low rate of interbreeding (<2%), potentially attributable to a very strong avoidance of interspecific matings, a low fitness of hybrids, or both. These results suggesting the presence of very effective barriers to gene flow between the two species are robust to uncertainties about the exact demography of the Paleolithic populations, and they are also found to be compatible with the observed lack of mtDNA introgression.
But basically, if you know what the fuck you're looking at, Neanderthal DNA presence is low as fuck.

[Anonymous No.10992928]

>>10992916
Important points.
>Moreover, the very low level of Neanderthal ancestry observed in Eurasians (1.9–3.1%) (2) is somehow surprising, because one would expect to see massive levels of Neanderthal introgression into modern humans if admixture was not strongly prevented during the range expansion of modern humans out of Africa (3, 15).
Don't fall for clickbait headlines about fucking species extinct and how we're all super Neanderthal. Seriously, there's evidence of extreme selection against Neanderthal testicle genes, which suggests hybrids were like fucking Ligers with the males being infertile.

[Anonymous No.10992953]

>>10992916
2011, 2012. Go back a little more and i was getting the dunce chair for calling bullshit when teacher says we didn't interbreed. It was only 2008 when svante came out with this. 2012 admits we don't know shit in conclusion. 2011 states that we have as much as 3 percent when my DNA test in 2018 says 3.9 and others here claim more. I don't hate things for being old, quite the opposite. But we are just scratching the surface here. Didn't even know denisovans existed until recently. Exciting times.

[Anonymous No.10992960]

>>10992928
I understand that their population was very low. I don't know how we know that. I understand the Neanderthal jizz was a one way street. Maybe just not so many opportunities but 1 in 77 generations seems like impossible odds. No click bate for me. I watch all those carta and max plank videos on YouTube while sleeping. Can't understand half of it.

[Anonymous No.10993006]

>>10992953
4% is still pretty fucking low. You'd expect at least 20% from "Fucking them into extinction and genetically absorbing them".
>>10992960
Both are just theories based on the evidence. It's a fact that our Neanderthal DNA is pretty low, considering how population expansion works. These are theories trying to work out why it's so low. Models with more frequent or successful reproduction expand the projected genetic introgression by a lot.

[Anonymous No.10993064]

>>10986243
Dat occipital lobe...did Denisovans have better vision, perhaps even having 4 cones instead of our trichromatic mutation

[Anonymous No.10993469]

>>10993064
yes but probably was rare.
there is a woman who is tetrachromatic.

[Anonymous No.10993697]

>>10993064
That's a Neanderthal Skull that someone labeled as a "Denisovan" in their picture because they were a fucking retard. I think it's from some cryptozoology site originally. If we had an identified Denisovan skull laying around somewhere, it'd be widely publicized.

[Anonymous No.10993770]

>>10993006
>You'd expect
Agreed.

[Anonymous No.10993773]

>>10993064
Affirming pic is fake.

[Anonymous No.10993800]

>>10993773
Yeah, just another Neanderthal skull, but depicted at a larger scale.
>>10993770
I've actually been looking up how much DNA is left over from other immigration waves. Quite a lot tends to be present from each, so Neanderthal DNA is definitely oddly low. if we assume we were fucking them all the time. Especially since our ranges overlapped for 100,000 years.

[Anonymous No.10994017]

>>10993800
Is skin color an independent adaptation for modern humans. I hate to be obvious but it takes some doing to get the black out. no racist. You obviously know more about it. If I understand correctly, a lot of our Neanderthal inheritance isn't the same among us. Suggest more isolated incidents and not routine occurrence?

[Anonymous No.10994080]

>>10994017
>Is skin color an independent adaptation for modern humans.
I think most mutations for light skin that we have developed in Sapiens, but there are a few from Neanderthals. I'd need to look into it more to tell you the specifics. Off the top of my head, the markers we use for estimating color in Sapiens predict that Neanderthals were mostly black. Which either means they were either quite a lot darker than the modern European, or they had different genes for reducing pigment that we didn't inherit.

Should be noted, studies suggest Europeans only became as light as they are about six thousand years ago. Blue eyes are a little older, 10,000 from what I remember. Neanderthals seem like they may have had more to do with straight hair than light skin, but I'll need to look at the latest papers.
>I hate to be obvious but it takes some doing to get the black out
It's important to note that Africans actually have quite some diversity in pigment genes. Some have mutated to get even darker, some to be lighter, so there were already depigmentation genes to select for and concentrate from the African population.
>Suggest more isolated incidents and not routine occurrence?
Pretty much. There are enough Neanderthal genes to be significant, but not enough for introgression to be routine.

[Anonymous No.10994122]

>>10994080
Oh, a comparison that might be interesting, though it's hard to find the numbers, but your average brown bear has around 2% percent cave bear ancestry and 2% percent polar bear ancestry, and they are much more distantly related than we are to Neanderthals.

[Anonymous No.10994877]

>>10994122
>bear
Always get a kick out of the visual similarities in russian and Alaskan brars and trees. Interesting subject to me but wouldn't know where to begin to learn. I'm reading "The Gene" right now but it's for dummies. Probably right up my alley. Hope you're around to school me next time I see one of these threads pop up.

[Anonymous No.10994887]

>>10994122
>>10994877

https://outdoors360.com/hunter-kills-extremely-rare-grizzly-polar-bear-hybrid/

Heard more than a couple stories like this but never hear the final testing results.

[Anonymous No.10995399]

>>10989668
Hence why the average iq of asian is in the 90s at best. While for pure European countries the average in Scandinavia was 115. Now the fact Europeans have created basically every invention.Then there is the fact Europeans had the first civilizations in Asia and taught them about the wheel the bronze age until brainlet asians overpopulated them.

Cope harder asians can only copy what Genius Whites/Europeans create.

[Anonymous No.10995489]

>>10994887
Yeah, they interbreed. One population of brown bear is actually 5-10% polar bear. Interbreeding between species is just a thing that happens.
>https://www.pnas.org/content/109/36/E2382
>>10994877
A lot of this shit gets published on various sites in articles, so I mostly just vaguely recall something I saw before and google a few terms I remember. If you have an interest in the subject, it's not too hard to get a rough outline.

Anyhow, it's been posted here, and spread over the news, but there's been some DNA based studies to work out the differences in how Denisovan bones grew compared to Sapiens and Neanderthals. They claim 85% accuracy, if I remember. Cool shit, but probably only gives us a vague impression. Seems they had pretty wide heads.
>https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)30954-7

[Anonymous No.10995497]

>>10995489
A painting based on the predicted skull of the teen Denisovan girl.

[Anonymous No.10995505]

>>10995497
The cavebear DNA thing. It keeps saying I'm posting spam when I link directly to the paper.
>https://phys.org/news/2018-08-ancient-extinct-cave-dna-modern.html
And here's a sketched over sculpture of the estimated girl. Might as well post something potentially 85% accurate in a thread that started with a fake.

[Anonymous No.10995546]

>>10995399
ULTRACOPE lmao
Most east asian nations score higher than average, higher than mostly white countries, even when only considering white people.
In countries with considerable amounts of asians and whites its the same, for example asian americans score higher than white americans. This is not new, we've known for a long time now.
You can ignore science and agree with boomers as much as you want on /pol/, but this is /sci/. if you have no interest in actual stats and science why are you here ?

>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.10995683]

>>10995399
>>10995546
Maybe you guys should duke it out. There may or may not be fishy data as your average car wash or sweat shop asian may not be scrutinized by academic research. Of course, the ones who made it here in the US due to shrewd acumen will be noteworthy. Doesn't mean that everyone seeking asylum is on the same level. Idk. I know some pretty god damned stupid asias and a few smart ones. The smart ones are trained to be smart. Anecdotal blah blah.. FIGHT!

[Anonymous No.10995698]

>>10986799
more surface area = more area for connections to form

[Anonymous No.10995711]

I hope, in the far future, individuals will have the ability to transfer their living nervous system into a seperate vessel, like a dense-boned, 7 foot denisovan or neanderthal body.

[Anonymous No.10995725]

>>10992960
Watching some history channel junk right now. Says that Neanderthal practiced ceremonial burying of the dead before "we" did. Interesting. I wonder if "we" took a leaf out of their book.

[Anonymous No.10995728]

>>10992928
>>10995725
Sorry, I did (Me) instead of (You). You've done quite enough. I'm just sharing.

[Anonymous No.10995880]

>>10995725
The fossil record and its interpretations are constantly changing and quite incomplete, so I'll just say it's hard to tell. It's a solid "maybe", as we could find evidence that overturns or further supports that conclusion, or evidence that would have may not have survived the ages. I very much doubt we've found every grave there ever was. We haven't even found every hominid species yet. A new one was discovered just this year.

[Anonymous No.10995889]

>>10989750
uh no
cant make fire
cant hold anything
no binocular vision
cant weld easily under water ../
to busy fucking each others blowholes

[Anonymous No.10995902]

>>10995880
This. They're playing with an incomplete puzzle with lots of missing pieces, many of which may belong to a different puzzle, or not be pieces at all. They have very little idea what they're actually doing.

[Anonymous No.10995904]

>>10987235
Do you have any evidence supporting this particular belief?

[Anonymous No.10995915]

>>10989591
>>10989597
I've got another one.
>Jack Ma

[Anonymous No.10996106]

>>10989597
What's this reconstruction based on? It looks nothing like the ancient statues of Caesar.

[Anonymous No.10996116]

>>10995399
If Scandinavians are so smart, why are they so irrelevant in world politics and history?

[Anonymous No.10996172]

>>10995399
Asians score the highest on average and northern Europe was basically the last place to be civilized. They were so uncivilized that they become a separate caste in Asia (Kshatrias) and apparently Asians attempted to exterminate them multiple times because they saw no other way to deal with their reckless violence. Scandinavia was still a backwater with nothing important when the rest of the wrold was more or less fully civilized.

[Anonymous No.10996178]

>>10995399
(East) Asians score the highest on average and Europe was basically the last place to be civilized. They were so uncivilized that they become a separate caste in Asia (Kshatrias) and apparently Asians attempted to exterminate them multiple times because they saw no other way to deal with their reckless violence. Europeans might have RUINED the bronze age civilization, it is known to have been exterminated by foreign forces of uncivilized people. Scandinavia was still a backwater with nothing important when the rest of the world was more or less fully civilized.

[Anonymous No.10996195]

>>10996178
? Are Indians considered Asians?

[Anonymous No.10996214]

>>10995904
>Do you have any evidence supporting this particular belief?
their skeletons and skull shape.
jews ancestors probably interbreed with denisovans or neanderthals a long time ago, enough so that jews became their own ethnicity.
just compare ashkenazi jews with neanderthals and you will see a resemblance.

[Anonymous No.10996227]

>>10996214
just pay attention to their skulls.
then compare those faces with jews and you'll see something.

[Anonymous No.10996246]

>>10996214
Denisovans = Devas; collectivist, peaceful
Neanderthals = Asuras; individualist, violent

Jews and north Asians = predominantly denisovan admixture.

Europeans = predominantly Neanderthal admixture.

[Anonymous No.10996265]

>>10986247
Citation needed.

[Anonymous No.10996308]

>>10996178
>>10996214
>Khazars
>Kshatriyas
No?

[Anonymous No.10996353]

>>10996308
dunno.
neanderthals were adapted to cold enviroment.
jews are more like desert dwellers.

[Anonymous No.10996360]

>>10996246
>Denisovans = Devas; collectivist, peaceful
>Neanderthals = Asuras; individualist, violent
>Jews and north Asians = predominantly denisovan admixture.
>Europeans = predominantly Neanderthal admixture.
lets see where neanderthals lived and where denisovans were found.
maybe we can figure something out.

[Anonymous No.10996418]

>>10996308
>>10996353
>>10996360
Think of jew jews, not aryan admixed zionist jews.

[Anonymous No.10996422]

[Anonymous No.10996426]

[Anonymous No.10996449]

>>10996422
>>10996426
Can you do the boobs now?

[Anonymous No.10996455]

>>10996422
>>10996426
you're absolutely retarded if you believe in biological race

[Anonymous No.10996466]

>>10996455
You are denying reality if you don't believe race and intelligence are genetic

[Anonymous No.10996472]

>>10996455

[Anonymous No.10996479]

>>10996466
Subspecies don’t exist. Neither do species.

[Anonymous No.10996483]

>>10996479
nice b8

[Anonymous No.10996490]

>>10996479
>Subspecies don’t exist. Neither do species.
t. subhuman

[Anonymous No.10996499]

>>10996418
>Think of jew jews, not aryan admixed zionist jews.
Like This?

[Anonymous No.10998371]

How many Neanderthals In your DNAs Anon?

[Anonymous No.10999162]

>>10998371
6%
I am unusual in that regard and also have a negative rhesus.

[Anonymous No.10999168]

>>10996418

[Anonymous No.10999201]

>>10995497
>>10995505
she looks kinda pretty to me.
is that normal? she is a primitive beast and yet I find her endearing.

[Anonymous No.10999217]

>>10999168
Oh boy here we go with the schizo /pol/ pseudoanthropology

Cite a genome comparison study or fuck off

[Anonymous No.10999220]

>>10987227
Not quite true, Australian aborigines are in the same boat as sub Saharans when it comes to Neanderthal DNA

[Anonymous No.10999224]

>>10993006
Maybe the Neanderthal population was about 2:100 ratio of the homo population

[Anonymous No.10999225]

>>10999162
That takes the cake.

[Anonymous No.10999286]

>>10996466
>humans developed different styles of thinking and behavioral tendencies due to adapting separately from one another
Source?

[Anonymous No.10999437]

>>10999201
Keep in mind that reconstructions are imperfect. The same skull can get reconstructed in a wide variety of ways depending on the biases of the artist.
>>10999220
I'm pretty sure Aborigines have neanderthal DNA at about the same ratio as everyone else.
>>10999224
Could be, I haven't studied their projected population numbers, but that's pretty weird by itself.

[Anonymous No.11000326]

>>10998371
3.9

[Anonymous No.11000342]

>>10986247
unironic smooth brains?

[Anonymous No.11000348]

>>10989597
ayyyee lmaonus

[Anonymous No.11000450]

>>10996479
This wouldn't be the first time leftists denied darwinian evolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism