/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10978023]

Tell me why getting energy from trash and solar energy isn't a better idea than muh nuclear garbage power?

>Cheaper as fuck than nuclear
>Doesn't cost trillions to make
>Cheap african shitholes can afford it
>You don't need to be plugged like a good goy to the nuclear net controlled by the chosen people
>Don't fuck up entire countries if something goes wrong
>There's enough energy from the sun and trash to provide energy to all humans

nuclear may work in theory, but is too expensive unlike getting the energy from trash and solar.

[Anonymous No.10978028]

>>10978023
The 1% can't get their oversized kickbacks from it.

[Anonymous No.10978029]

>>10978023
Tip: you are more likely to get a genuine response if you arent a dumb frog poster

[Anonymous No.10978046]

>WtE and solar are cheaper than nuclear?
Who told you that? Nuclear produces way more kWh per euro cent than both solar and WtE

[Anonymous No.10978049]

>>10978046
10% of all solar energy that hits the earth daily could produce more energy than what humans need in hundreds of years.

retard.

[Anonymous No.10978061]

>>10978046
Source?

[Anonymous No.10978149]

>>10978023
It is, but /sci/ shills nuclear because physicsfags think nuclear is cool. Also most of the fags here know shit about biomass.

[Anonymous No.10978168]

>>10978149
>nuclear is cool
Wrong. We shill nuclear because we're bored waiting for fusion.

[Anonymous No.10978175]

>>10978029
So much this.

I'll humor you anyways.

[Anonymous No.10978565]

>>10978023
If you think about it, getting energy from waste is retarded. It would be much more efficient to reduce waste in the first place.