[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 83 KB, 1024x917, 1558598222123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How does gravity work? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jqQ-_Zh7kQ Anonymous Mon Sep 9 08:22:34 2019 No.10958449 [Reply] [Original]

I thought Joe Rogan was controlled opposition, but he obviously bushwhacked black science man with that question and called him out for getting defensive. This is the kind of guerrilla ideological warfare that can let the cat out of the bag. It won't be long now before these questions are answered, whether at the expense of public figures like Tyson, or not. The zoomers are too woke for these standard approved narrative responses. The comment section is completely full of basedboys taking the piss.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 08:23:59 2019 No.10958458 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jqQ-_Zh7kQ

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 08:26:03 2019 No.10958461 File: 10 KB, 275x183, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] large scale gradients in the guiding wavefunction planets and suns are particles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hopd-gKB1Xc&list=PLY_m4mvOUGdd3vf6Fn8NgOqyYs72Yt_3Z

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 08:28:35 2019 No.10958472 >>10958449 Go to school and find out how gravity works.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 09:05:10 2019 No.10958550 File: 267 KB, 1280x720, 1562580822062.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10958461 What is the guiding wavefunction? I ain't clickin' that shit nigger

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 09:08:21 2019 No.10958556 >>10958550 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie%E2%80%93Bohm_theory#Overview

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 09:19:20 2019 No.10958575 >>10958556 I ain't clicking that shit nigger. I am already expertly familiar with the popular interpretations of quantum mechanics. I will not be directed to a wikipedia article or a youtube video.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 09:49:23 2019 No.10958616
File: 108 KB, 600x600, 1555891331136.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10958449
Paraphrased
>joe: okay but WHY does gravity work the way it does
>bsm: science doesnt tell you why, you fuckin retard, it just describes. we have such an accurate mathematical description of gravity that we can engineer a virtual hole-in-one from 1,000,000 miles away. asking why ad infinitum is useless, unreasonable, and also not science
BSM was right. Has a frogposter ever said anything of value?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 09:56:04 2019 No.10958634 >>10958616 Why is good though. Even if we dont know, just say so.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:02:11 2019 No.10958646

>>10958634
>why is good
Not for scientists, no. Why is for philosophers and not for people who want to tackle big, practical issues. If you want to ask "Okay but why lol" for ever and ever (which is possible to do, you will never reach base truth like a small child, major in the humanities.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:04:36 2019 No.10958650

>>10958646
...never reach base truth) ****

I will add: it isn't sufficient to just say "we don't know" to a why question either. Because the actual methodology of science is not equipped to answer "why". We will never, ever know "why" in terms of science.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:04:49 2019 No.10958652

>>10958634
That comes off incorrectly to the public who just loves taking shit out of context.
BSM is barely a scientist, but he is effective at communicating to the masses. Dumb people need dumb answers, so BSM and thr like try to simplify it as much as possible to minimize misunderstandings. Ironically this is why most people have a terrible model of the world, but its also why many projects have funding so its really a double edged sword

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:08:31 2019 No.10958663 >>10958646 >>10958650 Based retard

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:11:37 2019 No.10958677

>>10958646
I think your missing my point. Im not simply talking about base truths in a philosophical sense, but statistics and probability. If a certain phenomia seems to hold true, but we dont know why, should we create a going theory on its particulars to at least predict how these functions would work in a different environment? When we get down to theoreticals, everything is just a probability, and once it holds true within the 99.999 percentile we say its practicaly true. And once things are practicaly true we try ti find maximes that explain their occurrences to the best of our ability.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:14:36 2019 No.10958689

>>10958677
>should we create a going theory on its particulars to at least predict how these functions would work in a different environment?
Only if it leads to a theory that more accurately describes nature than the current theory.
>>10958663
Feel free to explain how I am wrong

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:32:17 2019 No.10958720

>>10958689
Joe didn't ask why gravity works, retard. He even clarified that in the interview, he wanted to know how it works. If he wasn't relying entirely on layman's terms to appeal to a mostly retarded audience, he would have said, "What is the mechanism that causes the phenomenon of gravitation?"
To which there is no possible way that BSM could have responded the way that he did. This is an obvious use of classic misdirection. To take advantage of the ignorance of the audience to completely distort and misrepresent the question asked, to reduce a question of mechanics to a question of philosophy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 10:36:31 2019 No.10958726 >>10958720 >"What is the mechanism that causes the phenomenon of gravitation?" But BSM did answer that. The answer is curved space-time

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:07:20 2019 No.10958798 >>10958726 How is spacetime curved by the presence of mass/energy?

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:07:27 2019 No.10958799 [DELETED]

>>10958461
>>10958449
Gravity is made of the forces that God relates in the Quran. Some time in the future we will know. These forces are created by the heavy objects

Quran Chapter 51 The scattering Winds

51:1By those scattering dispersing. And those carrying a load. And those sailing with ease. And those apportioning matter.

This chapter have 360 words. Relating to the influences of gravity from all directions. Shifting time, like a fractal. In a smaller frame to a larger frame

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:09:32 2019 No.10958805 >>10958798 We do not yet have a theory of this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:09:35 2019 No.10958806 Warped spacetime. Your mass is constantly falling.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:09:59 2019 No.10958808 >>10958799 I don't take riddles as an answer. Please unpost this schizophrenic shit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:13:17 2019 No.10958814 File: 14 KB, 300x168, 1566565762587.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10958805 Speak for yourself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:15:06 2019 No.10958824 >>10958814 Feel free to share your theory and also the experimental evidence that shows it is more accurate than GR.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:17:25 2019 No.10958831 File: 310 KB, 427x576, 1567112752536.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10958824 Why not exactly as accurate?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:22:13 2019 No.10958843 >>10958831 Okay, feel free to share.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:28:19 2019 No.10958857 >>10958843 Maybe I will, maybe I wont. What's in it for me?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:28:52 2019 No.10958861 >>10958857 >whats in it for me To support your own argument

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:29:50 2019 No.10958863 >>10958861 What argument would that be?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:30:54 2019 No.10958866 >>10958863 Suggesting that you have a theory of gravity that explains exactly how mass contorts spacetime.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:34:39 2019 No.10958873 >>10958866 Does that constitute an argument?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:35:37 2019 No.10958874 >>10958873 It constitutes a claim, now support it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:37:19 2019 No.10958877 >>10958874 Why should I do that?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:42:29 2019 No.10958890 >>10958877 Because you made the claim. For people to believe that you have a groundbreaking theory explaining exactly how gravity works, you have to share that theory and demonstrate it.

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:44:31 2019 No.10958897

>>10958616
Science is for explaining phenomena like gravity. Math is used to describe and predict future behavior. The people we call scientists are merely mathematicians who are incapable offering a rational explanation for anything. It's just embarrassing at this point.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:46:58 2019 No.10958903 >>10958897 >t. neither a mathematician or a scientist

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 11:48:22 2019 No.10958907

>>10958890
I have already set my plan in motion. There is no stopping it, now. My theory will be widely known as the theory of everything, because it is so elegant and so intuitive that a child could understand it. I have divined the solution to the great cosmic mystery, and the applications are limitless. Soon I will flood the market with thermonuclear fusion generators and there isn't a god damn thing anyone can do to stop me. It's checkmate and game over.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 12:40:19 2019 No.10959023 lmao i spat my water out with that passive aggressive bald statement

Anonymous Mon Sep 9 12:46:41 2019 No.10959040

>>10958449

Jesus Christ, that was like getting teeth pulled. Just to get a simple admission after 8 minutes of waffle, of "we dont know".

The real question here is why do so may academics and scientist have to beat around the bush endlessly before they admit that there are clear limits on current knowledge and understanding. Like they going to get crucified if they dont somehow try to avoid the central question for as long as possible.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 12:55:48 2019 No.10959075 >>10959040 >academics and scientist NDG is neither of these things. He exists solely to make actual science stupid and appealing enough for the average retard to consume.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 14:42:39 2019 No.10959335 File: 59 KB, 991x552, neiltwitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 17:05:45 2019 No.10959644 File: 44 KB, 800x450, magnets_c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] FUCKING GRAVITY HOW DOES IT WORK AND I DON'T WANNA TALK TO A SCIENTIST YOU'LL MOTHERFUGGERS LYING 'N MAKEING ME PISSED

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 17:11:46 2019 No.10959667 >>10959335 that was amusing though, based science man

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 9 17:16:48 2019 No.10959683 >>10959335 That’d funny tho Imagine the little bacteria pilgrims landing in alien environments

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]