Anyone into cognitive psychology?

[Cognitive psychology No.10945659]

More specifically, Sperber's relevance theory, stemming from Gricean pragmatics.
I need some help understanding a few questions regarding the Sperber and Wilson's Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1996).

P.S. I'm afraind this is not the best place in 4chan to make this request. That being the case, I'd be glad if you can suggest a better place to discuss this topic.

Thanks in advance.

[Anonymous No.10945681]

>>10945659
Fuck Sperger's relevance theory how do i into psychiatry

[Cognitive psychology No.10945686]

Having seen discussions on the view of psychology as non-scientific, I would also be willing to prove my point that cognitive psychology is in fact highly methodological and does sustain its status a scientific field.
As a token of reliability, I suppose you would probably relate to one of my views on a particular area of psychology, one that has been generally assumed as the whole of psychology, I accord with the view, still much argued among scholars of psychology, that understands the psychoanalytic approach to the human mind as not being sustainable on solid scientific ground.

[Anonymous No.10945692]

>>10945686
jesus fucking christ, if there were ever a reason to discard psychology it would be to never read pretentious endless word garble leading to fucking nothing ever. Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.10945696]

>/his/ - History & Humanities

[Cognitive psychology No.10945700]

>>10945681
What exactly do you mean by that?
Even though psychiatry and cognitive psychology do inevitably intersect in some theoretical aspects, psychiatry is a subfield of medicine.
Psychiatry deals with human behaviour and cognition on organic/physiological basis. That grants the field undisputed reliability.
Cognitive psychology, on the other hand deals with the expressions of the human brain in behaviors that prove to be comprehensive of all human beings. Differently from older (some will say 'classical') approaches to human psychology, when cognition is addressed, the methods must rely on, and be confirmed by neurological reality, under penalty of not being accepted in this specific community.

[Anonymous No.10945702]

>>10945700
NO, FUCK NO. I'M NOT EVEN GONNA DO IT. YOU'RE FUCKING WITH ME. GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR WORDS THAT LEAD TO NOTHING

[Cognitive psychology No.10945713]

>>10945692
Sorry if I bothered you, I just wanna talk about the topic. I assumed it would be OK to use that language, having seen people talking like that in some discusion in /sci/.
I understand you seeing me as pretentious, I would talk to average people like that. The thing is, I thought people would judge it normal here.
I can respond to your arrogance saying: I am not sure if it's not the general prejudice against psychology that made you react like that. Would be offended if it was about physics or maths? Not sure lol

[Cognitive psychology No.10945715]

>>10945702
Are you capable of discussing? It seems not

[Anonymous No.10945716]

>>10945713
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH MAKE IT STOP

[Anonymous No.10945718]

>>10945715
With short posts like that ya. I sure as fuck ain't dealing with your self-indulgent stream of faggotwords

[Cognitive psychology No.10945724]

>>10945696
Thank you a lot! It seems like you are the only one who could help me with what I came here for.
Not that impressed with the negative reaction of the rest of the anons. Losing their time opening a thread, opening a reply window, writing and sending it to something that they presumably reject.
Thanks to my background in psychology I can figure out what that means.
/sci/ and other boards are nice places to discuss a number of topics, but only the ones accepted by the status quo of the community. Here it proves to be a quite conservative-leaning one.

[Anonymous No.10945726]

>>10945724
HOLY FUCK NOBODY IS LISTENING GTFO TO /his/ OR /lit/

[Cognitive psychology No.10945727]

>>10945718
I though you could deal with that here, but fine.
What is your general impression on psychology?

[Anonymous No.10945729]

>>10945727
Eh i don't pay attention to the science of it outside of real-time emotional problem solving.

[Cognitive psychology No.10945759]

>>10945729
The thing is, Freud, Jung and all this guys that under the label of psychoanalysis, have spread an approach tha is non-scientifical, more philosophical maybe, not to say some of it can be seen as esotericism.
What I wanna say is: Something started in the 60's, with Grice, it didn't get that much attention then. Cognitive psychology, as we call it now, was better developed in the 80's and 90's, notably by Sperber. This relatively new approach to the human mind (the expressions of our brains that can actually be observed via our actions) uses scientific method with the same rigor as physics, chemistry, molecular biology, etc.
The problem is: until now people still think about psychology as the Freud-created psychoanalytic approach.

[Anonymous No.10945762]

daily reminder that psychology has never cured a single person

[Cognitive psychology No.10945787]

>>10945729
Hope it's not to big hof

[Cognitive psychology No.10945793]

>>10945762
Totally agree, assuming you are thinking about the common sense about psychology. That is Freud and psychoanalysis. Until recently that was indeed pretty much the only thing we had and what the majority of therapists followed.
I think it can be useful to read some of the previous posts, I explain that better in them!

[Cognitive psychology No.10945798]

>>10945759
This one may be enuff: >>10945759

[Anonymous No.10945988]

>>10945793
name 1 (one) person cured by modern psychology

[S. Vagus No.10945993]

>>10945659
>Anyone into communicating without having to tip-toe like a fucking retard/fag/potato around what the PRESUME to be trigger topics?

I have to find men for my wife to keep fucking, and my daughter is even worse.

[Anonymous No.10947017]

>>10945659
>Anyone into cognitive psychology?
off topic to your question but psychology was a great interest when I wanted to know how the brain functioned so I could try and use my brain most efficiently. Watched Jordan Peterson's physch vids and Joe rogan vids aftewards I felt the need to take math courses at community college. Currently wrapping up the calculus series.

>tl;dr : my post is a off topic diary entry

[Anonymous No.10947037]

>Psychology
>Psychiatry
not science or math
makes me angry i have to take a course of this bullshit for my major
useless pseudoscience

[Anonymous No.10947056]

>>10945993
This image is cringe as fuck, an hero.

[Anonymous No.10947082]

>>10945993
>>10947056
Still gave me an erection tho.

[Anonymous No.10947121]

>>10945993
$1 says a sweaty overweight white guy that watches BLACKED made this photo.

[Anonymous No.10949025]

>>10947121
Nah it was probably a joo.