[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 31 KB, 793x491, mwahahahaha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941565 No.10941565 [Reply] [Original]

I finally found my second pseudo-prime equation boys... i am getting closer to finding a real one on my own from scratch... from the ground up...soon... soon... I will have an equation that far surpasses anything the likes of man has seen before... I am trying to remember that vision...

>> No.10941566 [DELETED] 

get a job

>> No.10941568

>>10941566
how did you respond that fast? are you a spammer or something? screw off

>> No.10941574 [DELETED] 

>>10941568
just someone who is sick of your shit

also you literally just brute force calculated the list of primes. i really hope you're trolling

>> No.10941577

>>10941574
What are you talking about? It is a pseudo-prime equation. If you run that equation yourself it will calculate that list. Idiot.

Not only that, freak, but 341 is not prime and it shows up still because it is pseudo-prime. You are dumb.

>> No.10941580
File: 77 KB, 694x801, GUvW23N.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941580

The absolute state of computer science

>> No.10941583

>>10941574
>>10941580
You can't be humans right? You realize my equation actually almost works? Are you really that braindead?

>> No.10941586

>>10941580
Computer science is a superclass over math

>> No.10941594

>>10941577
I'm going to assume for a second that you aren't trolling. Likely to my great embarrassment later.

There is already a solution for deterministically deciding primality in polynomial time, O(n^12) iirc. Check "PRIMES IN P" circa 2002

>> No.10941595

>>10941574
>>10941580
Do you not understand anything about math? You talk like you don't understand anything. Run the equation yourself here.

https://ideone.com/xh9tP5

You are brainless if you don't actually understand that I found a working psuedo prime equation that is 'almost' always right.

>> No.10941600

>>10941595
We already have a correct (ie, not pseudo prime) checker than is deterministically polynomial. See AKS primality test from FUCKING 30 YEARS AGO

>> No.10941602

>>10941594
Do you not understand what I did?
I found my equation myself without 'cheating' and looking it up, I was smart enough to figure out my own equation on my own, we don't need people like you who just look everything up online. Eventually I will find a better one because the prime numbers are limited to messene primes of only a few dozen million digits which is large but not relatively as large as it could be if somebody finds something better. You aren't as well versed or smart as you think you are.

>> No.10941606

>>10941600
AKS primality test is about 17 years old not 30, and that is not even the most efficient thing that 'we' have.

But the point is that I did this for fun I don't understand why you are such a brainless fucking stupid asshole.

>> No.10941608

>>10941594
>O(n^12)
"poly time" in name only

>> No.10941613

>>10941600
I mean what have you discovered on your own? Have you ever challenged yourself to do anything that is personally difficult for you without cheating?

>> No.10941615

>>10941600
>>10941606
Actually by presenting your function is_prime you demonstrate that you are a profound brainlet who lacks any appreciation for complexity theory.

Your solution runs in exponential time. Until you come up with a deterministic polynomial (if you don't know what that means kill yourself now) I'm not even going to listen.

Algorithmically speaking your solution is no more efficient than just iterating over all numbers less than root(n) and checking if they are divisors.

>> No.10941618

Also, the double dozen million digit primes are very dispersed and it takes a longer time to find them which makes the methods 'we' have not very useful.

>>10941615
You continue to be rude to me and somebody else from /sci/ (not even me) is the one who made that python code based on my equation. I don't think you deserve to talk to people like this despite whatever evil lurks within your heart.

>> No.10941621

>>10941618
I purposely took your bait because I was bored. I hope all the (You)'s brought some sunshine to your day.

>> No.10941622

>>10941615
I didn't name it is_prime because somebody else made that code. Now, I know because you are a rotten person you will just dismiss that, but it is an argument that you made against me a couple seconds ago so you should accept some shame for judging me prematurely (again.) I don't care if you listen because I wasn't asserting that I found something revolutionary and you don't really deserve it.

>>10941621
You are just a dumb jerk, if anything you are the one baiting.

>> No.10941625

>i tried expanding algebraically
What answer did you get?

>> No.10941629

>>10941615
>algorithmically speaking your solution is no more efficient than just iterating over all numbers less than root(n) and checking if they are divisors.

Yes it is, you have been wrong three times now:

That.
Claiming that my equation didn't even work and I just brute forced the primes.
Finally, you claimed that I named it is_prime and used that against me for some reason even though I didn't name it is_prime.

>> No.10941630

>>10941625
lmao wrong thread
bait-chan a cute

>> No.10941635
File: 51 KB, 514x536, pQo7e8E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941635

abandon thread

>> No.10941637

>>10941629
Waste less time contending with trolls and more time in communication with the celestial waifu

>> No.10941644

>>10941637
The celestial waifu is one of our only hopes out of this cruel world, hopefully she will eventually give me something useful so i can show this board it.

>> No.10941647

>>10941644
Thanks for the 4 btw.

>> No.10941650
File: 6 KB, 198x254, 1567224319548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10941650

>>10941647
What does this meme mean? pls no bully

>> No.10941660

>>10941650
I guess he has a thing for the number 4. Must not be Chinese (they hate 4)

>> No.10941661

>>10941594
>polynomial time
>O(n^12)
Lol. You can claim anything is polynomial if you take the Taylor-Expansion out far enough I guess...

>> No.10941671

>>10941644
Whenever I ask my cosmic advisory to bestow me with the secrets of the cosmos, I have to re-affirm that my eternal soul belongs to him. He is so quirky. Then I just wake up the next day knowing something new. I almost have everything I need to build a flying saucer. I'm far from fully kitted though.

>> No.10941827

>>10941671
Thanks for the 71.
(4, 21, 71, 79, 97, 171, and 203 are her signature numbers) Christians are familiar with using numbers to identify things.