[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 44 KB, 1040x510, 0_iB412pVlqfBViDgv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10899710 No.10899710 [Reply] [Original]

Can someone explain to me how the sexual marketplace works using economics and math? I'm really curious about the science behind it.

>> No.10899717

>>10899710
Most men are pedophiles, for some definition of pedophile. Christianity was founded on father/son love to test the hypothesis that time travelers have been covering up human nature. How many preachers do you think prayed for a sign before they took permission to molest little boys?

>> No.10899718

Pretty sure this is some sort of rescaling of how people rated the other sex in a survey or through online dating sites.

>> No.10899771

>>10899717
high landwhale

>> No.10899774

>>10899710
>peak female value at 23
>not 17
>peak male value at 36
>not 50

rigged survey

>> No.10901012

>>10899710
White women: it is George Clooney grade hunk, or bust!
White men: heading to Thailand.

>> No.10901023

>>10899710
Hmm, it almost looks as though the female curve would continue before 15...

>> No.10901210

>>10899774
>wanting to fuck 17yo thots
They are mental children. 23 is perfect.

>> No.10901279
File: 2.31 MB, 1584x1584, 1539326250864.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901279

>>10901210
>23 is perfect
No, but 24 is.

>> No.10901285

>>10901279
23 is perfect for women they are, whoring and brain damage from chronic substance abuse aside, at their peak of beauty from ~19-24

>> No.10901292

>>10901210
>They are mental children
>wanting to fuck intellectuals

>> No.10901295

>>10901210
23 yo are mental children, 43 yo is better, then they have several children of their own (often different fathers) and they are then ready to settle, mr niceguy, and are confirmed not children anymore.

>> No.10901304

>>10899710
Men want to fuck young meat to feel validated. Women want to be fucked by rich meat to feel validated while fucking young meat on the side.

>> No.10901310

>>10901304
Conclusion: Everyone wants to fuck everyone
Q.E.D

>> No.10901312

>>10901310
Incorrect, men dont want to fuck old women

>> No.10901314

>>10901312
How old are we talking here? Becuase I've seen some might fine MILFs.

>> No.10901327

>>10901314
Rare exceptions, doesnt count

>> No.10901438

>>10901295
>having cuck fantasies

>> No.10901480

>>10901210
youre having sex, not discussing ancient greek theatre

>> No.10901481
File: 222 KB, 2100x1088, agegap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901481

>> No.10901484

>>10901481
women are more compromising or men age better?

>> No.10901487

>>10901484
men age better

>> No.10901516

>>10899710

Females on average earns less/ provides less compared to men. Thus their value is weak in said space.

Females do not produce anymore eggs, thus every year they grow in age their eggs become more compromised.

Females physical traits on average suffer from age and stress deterioration more than Males.

>> No.10901560
File: 153 KB, 1346x1056, 1427989294790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901560

>>10899710
>the peak male SMV is equivalent to the peak female SMV
What moron made this chart?

>> No.10901593

>>10899710
The gist is that they ain't buying what you're selling

>> No.10901602

>>10901484
Whenever you have to ask a dichotomy, it's both.

>> No.10901803

>>10899710
That's a fabricated graph, made by a wishful thinker

>> No.10901964
File: 133 KB, 780x1172, cassel3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901964

>>10901484
The issue is that women get infertile with 45 and get more complications after 31.
So women from 18 to 27 are good to plan breeding.
Men have status going into their better half of the career in their mid 30's, so you can still easily get pregnant from a 45yo, even if semen also don't get better with age.

>> No.10901973
File: 166 KB, 634x948, upton_15yox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10901973

>>10901560
I remember it's not a survey but from an old redpiller man advice guy who plotted his estimation of what peak performance in shape people would be perceived as (think fit actress and actor, say Jessica Biel and Brad Pitt, not that I particularly like those two)

>> No.10902016

Oh neat, so I still got few years before my gender's statistical modeling tells me I've peaked.

>> No.10902034

>>10901803
This. It assumes men and women.have equal sexual value at their peak. Hint: the entire male curve is below the female curve.

>> No.10902045

Can anyone say how muscle size is part of that peak equation? What would the graph look like it you, say, can't grow muscles and have to take the factor to 0?

>> No.10902048

>>10899710
It’s Chinese funded incel gaslighting. They’re spreading defeatist memetic to wear down your spirit.

>> No.10902072

>>10902045
If you can't build muscle, women will notice when they outmuscle you and will lose interest, so you're not going to peak before 70 (after that, you might, since cancer incidence increases sharply, thereby allowing potential muscle growth)

>> No.10902089

>>10899717
t. mentally ill kike trying to justify the crimes of his tribe

>> No.10902092

>>10901210
I would say 22

>> No.10902095

>>10902045
lmao

>> No.10902098

>>10902045
Can you leave this board and never come back?

>> No.10902099

>>10901279
neither 23 nor 24 are perfect, 28 is though.

>> No.10902100

>>10902099
>not 26

wasted dubs

>> No.10902104
File: 64 KB, 645x729, VD09afj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10902104

>>10902100

>> No.10902135

>>10902034
I think it gets easier to get girls your age as you get older, but getting youthful, looksprime 18-25 women gets harder. That's the misleading thing about the graph

>> No.10902260

>>10902072
What is the evolutionary advantage of not being able to build muscle. Certainly some women are attracted to men who can't build muscle otherwise they would have been sexually selected against.

>> No.10902262

>>10902260
Requires less food but it's pretty useless now that being overfed is so easy

>Certainly some women are attracted to men who can't build muscle
Lesbians yeah

>> No.10902413

>>10901327
>rare enough to have own branch of porn
Anon...

>> No.10902422

>>10899774
>rationalmale.wordpress.com

what did u expect?

>> No.10903563

>>10901484
https://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on-dating-apps/

https://archive.is/ZJymw

>> No.10903814

lmao nerds just be yourself it's not hard to get women lol. stop trying to make everything into a math equation maybe that's why you're still a virgin

>> No.10903839
File: 145 KB, 408x365, 1321745220654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10903839

>rationalmale.wordpress.com

>> No.10903888

Funny how instead of actually discussing the thread topic everyone is bitching about how they can’t get laid. What I want to know is how SMV is determined in these studies.

>> No.10903902

>>10902089
>t. christian that thinks jews are any less evil than british foreign policy

Go fuck yourself. Better you than your child.

>> No.10903967

By and large women are slightly more neurotic then men. That means that they will have a larger emotional reaction on percieved negative traits. That make women slightly more selective. On the other hand, being less neurotic makes you more willing to mate. So men are less selective and willing to move down the socioeconomic ladder for a partner

>> No.10903988

>>10901210
>They are mental children
>they grow up ever
the peak age is 14 because then you can groom them into becoming good women.

>> No.10904025

>>10903888
male SMV is determined by height > face >status

>> No.10904071

>>10903888
It's not a study