/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10867607]

>it's over

[Anonymous No.10867609]

>>10867607
Who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.10867613]

>Working for NASA
What a waste of a brain

[Anonymous No.10867617]

>>10867609
His clamped and vaccinated brain.

[Anonymous No.10867618]

>>10867613
she actually is a postdoc in the physics department of harvard now

[Anonymous No.10867648]

>>10867607

yes. any institution hiring her or being associated with her will lose their reputation in 10-15 years when people realize the fraud that is working with/under/for women

[Anonymous No.10867675]

Girls are actually better at physics. They are superior at the abstract thought processes necessary in modern physics.

[Anonymous No.10867687]

by new Einstein do they mean overrated jewish hack? also how overused is the term "new Einstein"

[Anonymous No.10867698]

>>10867607

Too much hype. She is 26. When Einstein was 26 he'd published 4 revolutionary papers. Sure, we've burned through the low-hanging fruit by now but one or two papers does not an Einstein make.

Far better to be a very clever MIT student than not-an-Einstein, as she states.

"I am just a grad student. I have so much to learn. I do not deserve the attention."

[Anonymous No.10867765]

>>10867648
>my micropenis frustrates me

[Anonymous No.10867789]

>>10867607
/pol/ was right

[Anonymous No.10867799]

Who would win in a battle between her and Jacob Barnett?

[Anonymous No.10867813]

>>10867799
Barnett has higher IQ than Einstein and Pasterski is touted as being the new Einstein.

[Anonymous No.10867839]

>>10867765
What a bizarre thing to write. Can you imagine having a micropenis? I don't think frustrating is even the right word.

Your phallus would be pretty much useless as far as its most proper purpose. Without being able to penetrate, a man could never be a man to a woman. No matter what he did.

These are strange times when people casually say this stuff.

[Anonymous No.10867845]

>>10867617
What is clamping?

[Anonymous No.10867848]

>>10867675
Males are better at abstract thinking

[Anonymous No.10867864]

>>10867607
What has she contributed so far? Does anyone know? Legit curious.

[Anonymous No.10867870]

>>10867845
During one of my trips through Afghanistan, we lost our corkscrew and had to live on food and water for several days.

[Anonymous No.10867875]

>>10867864
I don't know, maybe you should try to google it.

[Anonymous No.10867881]

>>10867845

>>10867748

[Anonymous No.10867888]

Modern education was designed for women by women in the department of education. It was then teached by women for women in primary and high school. They now are better at most school subjects than men.

[Anonymous No.10867889]

>>10867881
Does this cause autism?

[Anonymous No.10867906]

>>10867889
It potentiates it.

[Anonymous No.10867908]

>>10867888

>teached

Nice way to emphasize your point.

[Anonymous No.10867909]

Schizo being called a "new Schizo". Why, it absolutely checks out.

[Anonymous No.10867919]

>>10867888
Women actually do better than men because estrogens are potent antioxidants and strongly downregulate neuronal apoptosis, they also have intact blood brain barriers much earlier. This means any toxic insult to the body of a male child is often far more damaging.

This goes for everything from vaccines, to garbage food, to RF from wireless devices and fluorescent lights. The lattermost of which causes literal neurogeneration, brain damage, visible on macroscopic histological analysis. LEDs are worse though.

[Anonymous No.10867972]

>>10867919
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.10867983]

>>10867972
I feel despair and fatigue. This has to end soon.

These are verifiable facts. Every single bit of it. What is wrong with you people?

[Anonymous No.10867994]

>>10867919
Sources?

[Anonymous No.10868014]

>>10867994
Look at this post:
>>10867972

And imagine that, for years. And years. And years. Sorry, but look it up yourself. I'm here to tell you the truth, if I want to write a scientific paper that can stand without me I'll do that instead. I've learned my lesson with wasting time on degenerate cunts in shithole places, ie, everywhere.

[Anonymous No.10868023]

>>10868014
How are you in front of a computer if RF is so bad? Even if you are not using a wireless connection, all computers emit some radiation. In fact you might stop using any electrical devices, since very few are free of EM noise, if any.

[Anonymous No.10868028]

Is she smart enough to point out the "women in STEM" meme is an op to trick women into doing a career they won't enjoy to increase the supply of STEM labor and drive down the salaries of people in that sector?
>but some women do enjoy it.
Yes, the ones that don't need a "women in STEM" meme to go into it. It's not enough for the people that want to reduce labor costs, though, hence the meme.

[Anonymous No.10868039]

>>10868023
>if RF is so bad?
>if
>could may might
No, there is no "if". It is. Period. End of the fucking story of the latest chapter of mediocrity and pathetic failure in the horror story that is man's history. I've had enough.

>>10867451

How about you just research it yourself. Index.txt has a list of 1600+ papers. There you go, that goes for the rest of you. Including you braindead schizos living in the deepest delusion imaginable. Once the rest of you are up to speed, make it clear what these people are. Your silence is your CONSENT.

[Anonymous No.10868042]

>>10868039
Then stop using electrical devices, faggot. If what you say is true you are already "consenting" and commiting suicide.
But of course for you it is conveniently restricted to avoiding fucking WiFi, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.10868052]

>>10868042
Computer is shielded. I only use incandescent lights. I'd like an E-field attenuating screen for the monitor, but I have it back a ways. The real problem is dirty electricity. Turn off the breaker when feasible. Now the roads are filled with radar, LiDar, and intense LEDs which burn your eyes out.

If you people pulled your head out of your ass this would all be much easier. This is not a battle an individual can win.

[Anonymous No.10868085]

>>10868052
You're going to have to battle that battle alone. Because it's not factual. It has to be proven by studies with EMPIRICAL evidence to be factual that it's bad for people. Like people dying earlier and earlier. But it's the opposite, isn't it?

But because your bullshit is hypothetical and theoretical, that kind of empirical evidence isn't coming because it's bullshit. There's radiation everywhere. It's the AMOUNT of radiation which can be harmful. Like with anything else too, like too much water. But people die of other illnesses before that kind of radiation would be even a theoretical problem. Time is a factor too.

Your attitude shows that YOUR head is in so far in your ass, I'm afraid you will never get it out from there if you don't try harder. You're not even trying to do that. You think your right because you're special little snowflake and more intelligent than everyone else. But you're just confusing hypotheticals and theoreticals with actual empirical evidence which is ALWAYS more factual and better than those. Everything is possible. But not probable. Some things are basically impossible in the real world even if they are theoretically or hypothetically possible.
t. different

[Anonymous No.10868092]

>>10868085
You won't read the data. You're a time sink.

Conversation is over. Sorry you wrote three paragraphs, I only read the first one and skimmed the rest before I hit post. How's it feel kiddo, when people won't read? Duuuhhhh, I'm a zombie masquerading as real person duuhhhh, waste time on me uuuhhhh.....
:^)

[Anonymous No.10868131]

>>10868092
cope

[Anonymous No.10868138]

>>10867607
Its not her fault some trashy garbage article took her intelligence as an opportunity for "muh epic feminism win"
>>10867698

[Anonymous No.10868141]

>>10867618
Thank god if she is actually that smart. Imagine knowing so little about academia that you and youre readers think nasa is peak scientific work on par with what einstein did...

[Anonymous No.10868223]

>>10867607
So physicists, where in heck is my transporter like in star trek. Solve the transport problem. You have had Einstien/Rosen portals in the maths and quantum theory even proves infinite probability means transport to anywhere. Where is my damn spaceship. You are all slackers.

[Anonymous No.10868227]

>>10868141
yeah. I mean NASA only used NEWTONS 300 year old physics to get to the moon and back. The Einstien stuff is a refinement, a correction miniscule for practical purposes. I have only seen gen rel used for two things, GPS and red shift for stars. For everything else, its just all fizzle and no sausage

[Anonymous No.10868244]

>>10867687
>mean overrated jewish hack
Loving /pol/'s butthurt cope.

[Anonymous No.10868254]

>>10868244
/pol/ will be banned soon. some msm is thinking its the cause of all mass shootings. wheras, we all know who really did them, samulemus hydeus.

[Anonymous No.10868427]

>>10868244
I don't get it

[Anonymous No.10868453]

>>10867607
The "new Einstein" has been around for ages, it's Witten. But if you want my opinion on the guy that'll actually develop a real complete TOE? It'll be some guy who didn't receive a lot of attention and won a bronze or silver medal at the IMO because he's talented but not obsessive, he, or it could be a she, will be a profoundly original thinker and will have insights which make them famous once published.

It won't be someone overhyped.

[Anonymous No.10868468]

>>10867607
Definitely a change for the better. It's time to make this male-dominated field open for all genders, as well as positively encourage women to participate.

[Anonymous No.10868476]

>>10867618
>>10868141

Haha my company tried to hire Sabrina but she has no interest in finance.

[Anonymous No.10868480]

>>10868085
"I shouldn't be expected to actually prove my point just google it!!!!!!!"

You're like the opposite of a Ken doll. Instead of a smooth crotch, you have a smooth brain.

>>10868131
this

[Anonymous No.10868505]

>>10868254

[Anonymous No.10868509]

>>10868453
Literally zero (by which I mean literally nonzero but almost zero) chance that one person will develop a ToE or anything close to it.
General relativity was only possible to be discovered more or less by one person because its definitely wrong. Development for a correct theory of gravitation will look much more like the invention of quantum mechanics, which came slowly and involved many different people working together and on various problems.
Regardless of whether string theory will yield something useful or not, development of a ToE will look exactly like that. A bunch of people working on something more and more unintuitive and abstruse until eventually something gives and people start getting nobel prizes and actual problems are solved and then a hundred years later people wont find it strange at all anymore and just accept the existence of something like 27 dimensional vibrating strings like we accept quantized energies and statistical distributions now...

[Anonymous No.10868513]

>>10868509
Well then after a fashion the threat is moot, there will be no "New Einstein" because the age of such discoveries is over.

[Anonymous No.10868529]

>>10868513
I mean yeah there's gonna be a new einstein but they will stand right next to the new debroglie, dirac, fermi, bohm, schrödinger, heisenberg and hundreds of others so really who cares about one of these names...

[Anonymous No.10868543]

>>10868529
That makes no sense, you just claimed that no global approximation of reality generated by a single person (Like GR by Einstein) will be developed, you claimed that the TOE will be the piecemeal construction of many minds, therefore there will be no Einstein. There can only be a new Bohr or Heisenberg (Or maybe Schrodinger) followed by a new Dirac, Von Neumann, Teller, Schwinger Wigner etc.

I would further say, that if you are right, then the closest thing we have to a leading mind in the sense of a Bohr, is Witten.

[Anonymous No.10868557]

>>10867607
This pic has floated around for years and she was never heard of again

[Anonymous No.10868585]

>>10867607
> einstien
Dirac and Schwinger where smarter, but get ignored, probabiy because brainlets can yet understand QM.

[Anonymous No.10868590]

>>10867675
> cite: your arse

[Anonymous No.10868599]

>>10868557
they say new eistein then fail to mention her contibution.

[Anonymous No.10868604]

>>10868543
Lol do you genuinely not actually know what einstein did beyond relativity? You should look it up. After all he got his nobel prize for his contributions to quantum mechanics and not special or general relativity.

[Anonymous No.10868609]

>>10868604
That's not what we're talking about you spaz. When people talk about "The new Einstein" what they generally mean is "who is going to make the next global fundamental paradigm-shifting theory?". And if no single person can do that, then obviously to be "The new Einstein" in that sense is impossible.

[Anonymous No.10868617]

>>10867607
I looked up the paper she co-authored about New Gravitational Memories and I don't have even faintest idea what's it about. Einsteins Theory of the General Relativity's basic ideas were easier to explain to a layman.

[Anonymous No.10868619]

>>10868609
>I mean yeah there's gonna be a new einstein but they will stand right next to the new debroglie, dirac, fermi, bohm, schrödinger, heisenberg and hundreds of others so really who cares about one of these names...

[Anonymous No.10868629]

>>10868619
That's just not what people mean when they talk about "An Einstein" you idiot. What elevates an Einstein beyond a Dirac or a Fermi or a Pauli and so on is that Einstein's Relativity was a categorical shift in understanding contributed by one dude. If there is no categorical shift of the Newtonic or Einsteinian kind, there will be no new "Einstein" because they won't have achieved something comparable to them.

Are you stupid?

[Anonymous No.10868643]

Every person has been called "the new Einstein" at this point. Why are none if them remembered 2 months later?

[Anonymous No.10868672]

how does one go about acquiring such a womb

[Anonymous No.10868699]

>>10868629
Why do you care what clickbait faggots write for their popsci newspapers? There WILL be a new einstein, he just wont be known for something he radically developed on his own, which is not what einstein is actually known for in the first place among people who actually know what the fuck theyre talking about.

Also how fucking bad is your reading comprehension? Do I have to quote my post again? How can you read anything about elevation into that when I explicitly say "stand right next to"?

[Anonymous No.10868708]

>>10867617
sorry but what does "clamp" means in this context? I've seen it all over this board

[Anonymous No.10868717]

>>10868699
>There WILL be a new einstein, he just wont be known for something he radically developed on his own,
Then he won't be like Einstein will he you fucking turnip. The fucking phrase is devoid of all meaning if the achievement isn't comparable.
>which is not what einstein is actually known for in the first place among people who actually know what the fuck theyre talking about.
Jesus fucking Christ when people think about Einstein they don't think about the EPR Paradox or the Photoelectric effect, the first thing that comes to mind is the categorical shift that is General Relativity, the single most important categorical shift of ideas since Newtonian Mechanics hit the scene you imbecile, and when people predict someone will be "The next Einstein" generally speaking they're predicting a comparable paradigm shift.

I don't even know how you don't get this you dense fuck.
>Also how fucking bad is your reading comprehension?
Bro you are actually fucking retarded, I can't believe you missed the obvious point of comparing someone to Einstein and are now stubbornly defending your position. Just shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.10868794]

>>10868717
>Its a lets reply to every sentence separately so I can avoid looking at the entire post at once episode

[Anonymous No.10868806]

>>10867607
Has she created a paradigm shift in the field of physics?

[Anonymous No.10868808]

>>10867765
>>get mad at sexist statement
>>use sexist statement against that person

wew the logic.

[Anonymous No.10868814]

>>10868794
terrible bait

[Anonymous No.10868819]

>>10868244
progressives have been pushing jews for the past hundred years to combat nazi nordicism. There were Germans on the same level as Einstein but he got all the attention because he was Jewish. Nobel prizes are given to Jews more not out of merit, but out of favoritism.

That isn't coping. That is correctly identifying the mafia like activity of "the chosen people"

[Anonymous No.10868824]

>>10868814
no u

[Anonymous No.10868835]

>>10868819
It's nerdics own faults for being lazy, at least Jews do their homework.

[Anonymous No.10869589]

>>10867864
>>10867875
it looks like its just a form of branding / personality cult

[Anonymous No.10869668]

>>10867607
I'm just impressed how media never covers the Science Olympiad beasts like Allen Liu or Calvin Ling Huang. They just talk about fags that have not even achieved something important.

[Anonymous No.10869680]

>>10868794
>ignore my mistakes please

[Anonymous No.10869719]

>>10869668
Do you think Stephen Hawking cited her math Olympics scores?

[Anonymous No.10869726]

>>10869589
It takes less than two minutes to Google her co-authored paper anon, it's all there.

[Anonymous No.10869742]

Looking at her makes me wonder how far ahead we'd be in science if only society had allowed and encouraged women to get educated couple of hundred years earlier. We'd literally already be in Mars.

[Anonymous No.10870448]

>>10867845
Lurk moar newfriend.

[Anonymous No.10870494]

>>10867765

[Anonymous No.10870498]

LOOK at her PHENOTYPE

RELISH in it

[Anonymous No.10870612]

>>10867675
>Female better at abstract
Wrong

[Anonymous No.10870635]

Do you retards just believe anything you read as long as its in big bold words?

[Anonymous No.10871098]

>>10867607

Regardless, this girl is more successful and intelligent than 99.9% of the retarded incels that browse this site.

[Anonymous No.10871157]

>>10867613
And what is not a waste of a brain for you..

[Anonymous No.10871186]

>>10868808
Wow your penis must be really small

[Anonymous No.10871247]

>>10871098
>99.9
So there's still at least someone here who's more successful than her?

[Anonymous No.10872266]

>>10871098
I got into USAMO so fuck it, I feel smarter than her

[Anonymous No.10872277]

>>10867607
I wouldn't allow anyone to call me a liar, a fraud, a thief, and a cheat. Wouldn't stand for it at all.
I passed the test to get into university.
I passed through university.
I worked at higher jobs than 3rd rate patent clerk.
And I'm not a Zionist puppet.

[Anonymous No.10872284]

>>10872277
>[[[this thread has been deleted and archived]]]

[Anonymous No.10872430]

>>10869726
mmmkay, did you make this thread about yourself?

[Anonymous No.10872432]

WE ARE CREATING AND ENCOURAGING THE STARS OF TEH FUTURE!!!11!!
Leave it alone faggots

[Anonymous No.10872441]

>>10868244
is there a board on 4chan that anime discord trannies aren't policing?

[Anonymous No.10872516]

>>10867607
> Harvard

No longer relevant.

[Anonymous No.10872520]

>>10867675
>Girls are actually better at

If men could give birth they'd be better at that too.

[Anonymous No.10873599]

>>10867675
Girls are better spies. They excel at forming a practical understanding of information flow through social networks and manipulating the flow of that information by spreading the 1s and 0s that will sever links in the networks.

That's about all they're good at.

[Anonymous No.10873657]

i dont want to hate women but they really don't make it easy

[Anonymous No.10873667]

>>10873657
She clearly doesn't like the label. It's just retarded journalists that don't understand anything about science trying to get clicks. Not sure why this thread is alive.

[Anonymous No.10873670]

>>10873667
because women are gay

[Anonymous No.10873677]

>>10873670
>gay
Why the homophobia?

[Anonymous No.10873693]

>>10873677
oh great its the fuckin schizo again

[Anonymous No.10873697]

>>10873667
>>10873670
>>10873677
>>10873693
Clamped.

[Anonymous No.10873949]

>>10873667
Because anons are even more retarded

[Anonymous No.10874042]

>>10872266
USA monthly?

[Anonymous No.10874056]

>>10867765

[Anonymous No.10874113]

>>10867698
There are just plenty of guys with huge IQ and great skill for their age. Yet, they are just guys, not girls. I hate modern academia, a center of circle jerking.

[Anonymous No.10874228]

>>10867607
Einstein is famous because of his ability to bring together new theories to rival the old ones. Being a genius alone is not enough to be considered a new Einstein, show me how she's changed the physics world and I'll believe this quote.

[Anonymous No.10874944]

>>10874228
At 13 she learned how to pilot and was flying fighter jets into the upper reaches of earth's atmosphere. What were you doing at 13 anon?

[Anonymous No.10874950]

>>10870635
Top kek, it's funny even the retards who hate fake news still believe in it.

[Anonymous No.10874976]

>>10874228
Einstein was also partly famous because he had a messy hair and was ''le funny science dude''

[Anonymous No.10875008]

>>10871247

At least 1

[Anonymous No.10875022]

>>10874944
At 13 I was helping my grandmother to sell stolen flowers at a distant subway station, and giving out booklets.
Must be easy and fun to grow up in America.

[Anonymous No.10875036]

>>10875008
Friendly reminder Mathematical Olympics don't advance science and are at best just Chinese/Russian/USA dick measuring contests.

[Anonymous No.10875130]

>>10867607
Which female /sci/entist is your favorite?

[Anonymous No.10875340]

>>10870635
so basically someone is trying to push a shill campaign for more women in stem but she isnt in on it

[Anonymous No.10875346]

>>10874042
USA Math Olympiad

[Anonymous No.10875414]

>>10875346
>not even IMO
| brainlet |

[Anonymous No.10875481]

>>10867607
>gets a job offer from NASA
>WOW SHES THE NEW EINSTEIN

I like to interpret this picture this way

Also who ACTUALLY IS the new Einstein in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.10875644]

>>10875130
i don't get the hand+apple statue? somebody explain?

[Anonymous No.10875698]

>>10868808
what goes around comes around

[Anonymous No.10875705]

>>10875481
Einstein is the new Einstein

[Anonymous No.10875707]

>>10875705
>t. Avi Einstein of Chestnut Ridge NY, class of 2025

[Anonymous No.10875775]

>>10867919
Actually they do better because that's the only thing the fucking do. What other option is there for a woman if she doesn't study well? To be a waitress or a prostitute. Also, it's generally frowned upon when girl has bad grades in school and it's usually expected of them to at least sit on their ass whole day and study. Just like different things are expected of men. And even if you fail in school as a man, you can always end up working hard manual work to support yourself, for most woman, that's not an option.

[Anonymous No.10875776]

I meant >>10875775 for >>10867888 but works either way.

[Anonymous No.10876411]

WHAT KIND OF RESEARCH IS SHE DOING?
I don't care about her pussy/penis
hell, tell us why her contributions are relevant to science

[Anonymous No.10876421]

>>10876411
Here you go anon: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06120

[Anonymous No.10876628]

>>10876421
>https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06120
yeah is like acadsemit guided reasearch
apply some theorem to new data and yadayada Good girl, schlomo

[Anonymous No.10876671]

>>10876628
>co-authors a paper that Stephen Hawking found useful
>some asian frog forumer says is not
Ok.

[Anonymous No.10876727]

>>10876628
I dunno, it does have 44 citations. Not that usual for a grad student.

[Anonymous No.10876729]

>>10867607
I wouldn’t mind taking quantum physics lessons from her.

[Anonymous No.10876752]

[Anonymous No.10876757]

>>10876752
nope

[Anonymous No.10876759]

>>10876757
?

[Anonymous No.10876760]

>>10876759
she ug af bro

[Anonymous No.10876762]

>>10867675
asstract thinking*

[Anonymous No.10876765]

>>10876760
u angri?

[Anonymous No.10876769]

>>10876760
umad bra?

[Anonymous No.10876781]

>>10876752
Look at those hagraven hands

[Anonymous No.10876787]

>>10872520
Kek

[Anonymous No.10876788]

>>10876781
they look like mine. shes cute.

[Anonymous No.10876802]

But there are always Math Olympiads, right guys?

[Anonymous No.10876817]

>>10876802
sure why not

[Anonymous No.10876867]

>Sabrina Pasterski is a proud first-generation Cuban-American
I guess she is not that proud of being Polish? For some reason you don't get victim points for that.

[Anonymous No.10876893]

>>10876867
do zoomers not know about the "polish are stupid" meme?

[Anonymous No.10876921]

Uh huh. So where is the grand unified theory proof? That connects gravity and relativity with quantum mechanics and the other 3 fundamental forces.

[Anonymous No.10876927]

>>10876921
>tfw einstein worked on it for 35 years with no success and sabrina’s only 26 still

[Anonymous No.10877071]

>>10876752
>wizchan anon thinks girls without makeup on makes them ugly
anon, learn girls. with makeup on, a girl like sabrina turns into your morning shower fap fantasy

[Anonymous No.10877077]

>>10877071
>YWH
>young womens honors
>YWH
you know what that acronym looks like?

[Anonymous No.10877082]

>>10877077
oh fuck ((((Jews)))) goddamn anon, the Cuban-Polish catholic who graduated with a PhD from Harvard and looks real hot with makeup and a dress BTFO!!!!! because ((((parenthesis))))

[Anonymous No.10877083]

>>10876927
>hmm i wonder what einstein did at 26 ... probably nothing important

[Anonymous No.10877087]

>>10877082
cool PTSD, anon.

[Anonymous No.10877104]

>>10877083
i honestly agree with sabrina that calling her the “new einstein” is a popsci media thing that should be ignored. but the (((jew))) conspiracy thing around her needs to stop. she is polish and cuban. which makes her like 900% catholic more than anyone else on this board

[Anonymous No.10877853]

>>10876411
no it's her pussy thats important. we need more women in real jobs, so that men with high IQ can get high IQ females.
so that higher IQ males are born, and maybe in a few generations a female with an IQ that can make a real innovation.

[Anonymous No.10878143]

>>10867607
harvard is just a bunch of liberals
of course they're pushing this feminist crap
they hate men

[Anonymous No.10878182]

>>10877853
High IQ isn't hereditary.

[Anonymous No.10878213]

>be decent but nothing out of the ordinary student
>be male
>...

>be decent but nothing out of the ordinary student
>be female
>OMGWTFBBQ IVY LEAGUE SCHOLARSHIPS NASA SUPER SMART POPSCI

tbqh I care more about science than meme gender politics, so if retards want to throw money at a scientist just because she has a vaj or black skin, whatever, but there is no denying this shit

[Anonymous No.10878233]

>>10878182
We appreciate and value your input, Africa