[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 426 KB, 1684x802, classic_berzerkfag.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10866527 No.10866527[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

why does /sci/ has so many shizzos?

>> No.10866542

>>10866527
it's the modern version of believing you're Napoleon

>> No.10866626
File: 109 KB, 876x150, 1564474761806.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10866626

>>10866542
Basically this. Schizo is corruption of the ego to the point that the ego takes over, and in the modern world everyone wants to be smart, so the most egotistical people will try to come out as the smartest. Look at it from this point of view and you suddenly have an explanation as to why every schizo around the world wants to solve the RH or get into math for glory. It's never chemistry, biology or liberal arts, all of which are considered brainlet tier, it's always physics or math. The fact that popsci stuff is constantly popping up, that makes them believe that the whole subject is magic and that there's so many holes to fill, gives them hope that they can be the ones who discover the mysteries that no mortal man has so far, proving that they're in fact the smartest and finally satisfying the coup of their ego.

>> No.10866648

>>10866626
Physics and mathematics are highly imagination dependent areas of interest. Naturally this attracts the schizos. The fields should have been attracting the interest of females too as they also have a tendency to enjoy imagined fantasies which aren't actually real at all.

Like maths.

t.schizo

>> No.10866656

>>10866527
"the 0 height layer of neutrality"

he's not schizo.

>> No.10866719

>>10866527
The fact that you are asking me to validate zero using measurements proves you agree that there are measurements, and if there are measurements, then Descartes could say it like, "I measure, therefore there is no not measuring."
Once you have, you don't have 0, ever.
>but those are conjecture
if you prefer to believe you don't exist, stop asking for a nobel prize that doesn't exist either, and let me have your wallet.

>> No.10866739

>>10866719
kek

>> No.10866777
File: 366 KB, 469x537, ohno.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10866777

>>10866719
y-yes, ascended master

>> No.10866899

>>10866719
Measurement *of what* though? Measurements aren't actually real things. They're used in conjunction with what is actually real and are purely an abstraction.

>No I think therefore I am, even though a thing cannot logically define itself because that's circular reasoning.

Makes no sense.

>> No.10866910

>>10866527
People who are trying to be creative without rigor. I respect that people try hard to think outside the box, but rigor is there to try and guide good intuition and phase out the bad. Most math is done informally and through intuition / analogizing at first - as much as we give physicists shit for it, it's big in math - and then we work really hard to examine it with formality and make sure it checks out - or provides us with new insight.

>> No.10866961

>>10866527
>why does /sci/ has so many shizzos?
Because you morons indulge them with (You)'s instead of reporting their garbage off topic word salad posts,

>> No.10867101

We know it's you Kenneth wheeler