Fun thread

File: 46 KB, 720x597, fo83k84003d31.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:16:07 2019 No.10846290 [Reply] [Original]

Fun thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:16:30 2019 No.10846292 File: 25 KB, 720x604, i0ta6u4286d31.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:20:04 2019 No.10846302 >>10846290 the foundation of math is based on a sexual position

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:23:51 2019 No.10846308 >>10846290 Haha! The weed number. Dude, math lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:24:23 2019 No.10846310 File: 64 KB, 500x822, IMG_20181217_202157.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:36:08 2019 No.10846339 File: 64 KB, 749x1231, vylmlv2znqv21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:39:06 2019 No.10846349 File: 938 KB, 1080x1606, kkbrcgbute921.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:48:31 2019 No.10846372 log(1+2+3)=log(1)+log(2)+log(3)

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:52:04 2019 No.10846381 >>10846292 based

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 09:54:07 2019 No.10846386 File: 80 KB, 1080x618, erzok5zjfoh21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:00:09 2019 No.10846396 File: 3.10 MB, 3664x2844, 1563897231340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:01:03 2019 No.10846399 >>10846386 But 1 + 1 + 1 ... will actually revive half a person

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:01:13 2019 No.10846400 >>10846386 don't pull the lever of course

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:14:17 2019 No.10846426 >>10846396 2D>3D tho

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:22:08 2019 No.10846443 >>10846396 classic

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 10:22:38 2019 No.10846445 >>10846396 it's 1.5 how can anyone think otherwise?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:08:23 2019 No.10846819 File: 378 KB, 960x825, ajmc0wxw2t331.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:19:25 2019 No.10846850 File: 135 KB, 637x639, 1563910887118.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:28:31 2019 No.10846865 >>10846850 This was a nose laugh for me

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:32:37 2019 No.10846876 File: 4 KB, 500x430, topological skull.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:34:18 2019 No.10846879 File: 55 KB, 640x512, 1546802080441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 13:55:10 2019 No.10846924 >>10846850 not bad

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 14:25:08 2019 No.10846989 273 x 137.5 = 37537.5

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 14:47:36 2019 No.10847025 >>10846850 >>10846865 >>10846924 Mathlet here, I dont understand it how would one come with those examples? It seems like I would need to do the oppsite of factorial to find the original number, if I am thinking this right

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 14:54:01 2019 No.10847035 >>10846386 Since there are an infinite amount of real numbers between two natural numbers, wouldn't that mean that only 0 or 1 people qould die before the end of the universe?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 14:58:21 2019 No.10847042 >>10847035 Its one person for every real, not one person for every natural in the reals

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 15:03:02 2019 No.10847051 >>10847042 I mean if you pulled the lever, only killing a person every natural number, wouldn't it take infinity between two persons?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 15:12:44 2019 No.10847067 >>10847051 Or would the natural numbers be killed in a finite amount of time, and the real numbers at arate of infinity/second?

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 15:45:33 2019 No.10847124 >>10846879 That function is not invertible.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 15:48:05 2019 No.10847129 File: 743 KB, 920x697, __flandre_scarlet_and_remilia_scarlet_touhou_drawn_by_sakuraba_yuuki__696f29f0f8213c43b4a821cb80cc675b.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10847124 >he doesn't know about Hilbert's grand gangbang paradox

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 16:10:32 2019 No.10847188 File: 13 KB, 216x225, ---really?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10847042 >One person for every real Anon...

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 18:09:38 2019 No.10847479 File: 33 KB, 497x733, oknh3yamduc31.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:16:13 2019 No.10847582 >>10846386 >1 person for each real number, >a continuum of meat

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:23:50 2019 No.10847594 >>10846850 I don't believe it. >120

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:29:34 2019 No.10847616 >>10847479 Yikes

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:37:18 2019 No.10847632 File: 261 KB, 1080x720, 4opg5g33gi931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:43:42 2019 No.10847644 File: 5 KB, 210x240, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10847594 230 - 220 = 10 10 * 0.5 = ? ? ? ? ...Its 5!

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:49:51 2019 No.10847662 2x9 = 18 => 1+8 = 9 3x9 = 27 => 2+7 = 9 4x9 = 36 => 3+6 = 9 etc.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:55:11 2019 No.10847672 >>10846339 njehehe

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:58:34 2019 No.10847677 >>10846292 Holy shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 19:59:04 2019 No.10847680 File: 137 KB, 1024x640, 紅魔館２.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10847124 >>10847129 >Hilbert's grand gangbang paradox ahem https://youtu.be/LSAq1AT7g9Q https://youtu.be/Uj3_KqkI9Zo

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 20:06:10 2019 No.10847697 >>10846396 Good to see my OC is appreciated.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 20:17:32 2019 No.10847717 File: 671 KB, 768x568, ClealyAsphere.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Jul 29 22:21:59 2019 No.10848063

>>10846290
Help me with this math joke:
>Lebesgue, Riemann, and Borel walk into a bar
>Riemann wants to drink out of Gabriel's Horn
>Lebesgue doesn't care what he has as long as it's in a glass
>Borel ?
Please help me make it funny and also kinda make sense. thankyou.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 22:40:34 2019 No.10848113 >>10848063 You dont understand measure theory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 22:42:15 2019 No.10848121 >>10848113 prove it

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 22:57:19 2019 No.10848139 >>10848063 >>10848113 someone else please help with the joke and don't be a prick like this guy. I understand measure theory perfectly well and even better than he does he's just trying to be an asshole in a fun thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 23:24:28 2019 No.10848190 >>10847662 11*9 = 99 9+9=18

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 23:27:41 2019 No.10848201 >>10848139 >being this much of a faggot Cry more bitch. You are unfunny and illiterate about measure theory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 23:47:01 2019 No.10848225 >>10846339 I smiled. "Most matrices live on campus. In general, they don't commute." -my own terrible joke

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 23:49:23 2019 No.10848230 File: 1.14 MB, 250x250, 1564146377630.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10847697 It's my favorite one. I get a good chuckle every time I see it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Jul 29 23:58:19 2019 No.10848242 File: 150 KB, 970x300, b112c49a-41ff-47f2-8b51-9cf3828ca4fb.__CR0,0,970,300_PT0_SX970_V1___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 00:11:36 2019 No.10848252 >>10846445 >no mass of a fluid is displaced by other masses submerged in the fluid Okay, doc.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 00:49:59 2019 No.10848313 >>10847697 Anonymous is anonymous, anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 00:54:00 2019 No.10848320 >>10848190 18 = 2 * 9 :^)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 01:01:13 2019 No.10848332 >>10846396 I did the math and... 0.5kg is about 50,000 flies.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 01:07:44 2019 No.10848342 >>10846292 the thickness shouldn't be called a which is normally used for area

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 01:20:22 2019 No.10848360 >>10848242 this is a good one

Anonymous Tue Jul 30 01:44:05 2019 No.10848403
File: 94 KB, 920x584, noted mathematician at a symposium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10846290

This equation can be rendered more aesthetically elegant (and, at the same time, pose absolutely no trouble a la the PEMDAS/BEDMAS facebook memes, you all know what I men), by simply removing the parentheses, viz.

[eqn] 6 \times 9 + 6 + 9 = 69 [/eqn]

At this juncture, one is even tempted to permute two operations, to produce an LHS expression which is an AMBIGRAM-the sort of thing that certain types like to get tattoos of, viz.

[eqn] 6 + 9 \times 6 + 9 = 69 [/eqn]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 01:47:36 2019 No.10848409 >>10848403 it looks bad when operations aren't grouped together

Anonymous Tue Jul 30 04:13:45 2019 No.10848675

>>10848201
it's not really that complicated. You are going to grad school wasting another 5 years of your life to learn about math so nuanced it's not relevant to anyone and have a salary that caps out at $200k/year. But atleast you "really understand" measure theory. Whatever that means.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 04:28:37 2019 No.10848687 >>10848409 What an idiotic, human, subjective opinion. What matters is formalism and (ironically) human aesthetics, for this sort of thing. The ambigram. The ambigram.

Anonymous Tue Jul 30 07:32:05 2019 No.10848906

>>10846290
That statement is true for any two digit number that ends in 9.

1 x 9 + 1 + 9 = 19
2 x 9 + 2 + 9 = 29
3 x 9 + 3 + 9 = 39
4 x 9 + 4 + 9 = 49
5 x 9 + 5 + 9 = 59

etc

Reason being, if you factor it out, your expression becomes:
10n + 9 = n9

Which is a duh, no shit statement.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 08:44:07 2019 No.10849012 >>10846386 i'd do nothing because it's impossible to count real numbers, thus only the first person would actually die, whereas it is possible to count natural numbers, so in case you would pull the lever, 1< people would die

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 09:54:49 2019 No.10849147 >>10847632 good

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 10:26:53 2019 No.10849183 >>10847594 >120 >5!

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 10:34:06 2019 No.10849203 >>10846290 That is wrong. The real answer according to common core is either 65 0r 70, but I'd go with 70.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 11:54:59 2019 No.10849352 File: 9 KB, 225x225, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10848403 >>10846290 pffft plebs this is the true chad 69 identity [math]-6969^{ipi/ln(69)} = 69 [/math]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 12:26:16 2019 No.10849433 >>10849352 >requiring numbers other than 6 and 9 lame

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 15:14:09 2019 No.10849816 File: 51 KB, 1024x1024, bvddd459na331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 15:19:32 2019 No.10849832 >>10846292 r - radius h - height by the way multiply isnt represented by a comma

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 15:21:23 2019 No.10849838 >>10846386 >the lever is a lie

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 18:54:50 2019 No.10850418 >>10848906 >n9 Nice

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 19:04:54 2019 No.10850448 >>10847644 Emphatically

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 19:15:29 2019 No.10850483 File: 49 KB, 890x222, pizza.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10846292 That's not true. It may have come from an Italian word for "clamp"

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 19:19:16 2019 No.10850492 >>10849183 Solve carefully.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 21:16:21 2019 No.10850759 >>10846386 k... kaa... kano kaaka KANSEI DORIFTO

Anonymous Tue Jul 30 21:18:46 2019 No.10850772
File: 62 KB, 600x592, comment_xc04KfWOeZXUeHM0YdlMo6r2d9tswBrM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10847644
wait wait actual brainlet here
I just thought of this cause fuck me am dumb.

When you multiply something by half 0.5 the answer is always half of the original number right?
And same is the case for 0.75 ect right?
Please say yes ;-;

Anonymous Tue Jul 30 21:30:33 2019 No.10850810

>>10850772
Division is the inverse of multiplication.
The normal number system has two binary operators: addition and multiplication.
Subtraction and division are just names for the inverses (function which undo the effects of other functions) of these two operations.
So when multiplying by something between -1 and 1, it's superior to think of them in terms of fractions.

0.5 is five tenths. so it is the same as 5/10 (which simplifies to 1/2)
So multiplying by 0.5 is the same thing as multiplying by 5/10 aka 1/2
Multiplying by 0.75 is the same thing as multiplying by 75/100 (75 hundredths is what 0.75 actually means)
This simplifies to 3/4, so any number multiplied by 0.75 is three fourths of the original number (not half)

>>	Anonymous Tue Jul 30 21:32:34 2019 No.10850818 >>10846310 I recognize those runes Dynamics is such a pain in the ass to start learning

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 05:14:58 2019 No.10851685 >>10847644 except 220 * 0.5 comes first the answer is 120

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 05:36:08 2019 No.10851704 >>10851685 What? No, first is 230 - 220

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 11:20:44 2019 No.10852211 >>10848252 There's no fluid in the jar, those flies are clung to the inner surface of the jar. It's obviously 1.5 kg.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 13:18:20 2019 No.10852454 File: 633 KB, 564x603, 1563158132909.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10846879 KEK

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 16:20:16 2019 No.10852884 >>10852211 Almost fell for this

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 16:30:56 2019 No.10852917 >>10846339 kek

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 20:32:05 2019 No.10853594 >>10846310 >using rho

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 21:36:45 2019 No.10853728 >>10850772 I always figured that that meme wanted to say the reader's IQ is [math]\displaystyle \lim_{x\to0} {-\frac{1}{x^2}}[/math] instead.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 21:57:58 2019 No.10853764 >>10848675 Dont know what this projection is supposed to imply lmao.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jul 31 23:18:02 2019 No.10853890 >>10847025 Ur dumb

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 00:13:59 2019 No.10853984 Nice 1/x^2 eyebrows

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 00:33:04 2019 No.10854004 >>10846292 Shouldn't every round dish be called pizza then? IFLS tier bullshit

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 01:18:51 2019 No.10854078 File: 17 KB, 581x538, IMG_2440.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's theoretically possible

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 01:43:42 2019 No.10854106 >>10846386 >what is time

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 01:51:50 2019 No.10854115 File: 328 KB, 500x580, download_20181205_221712.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 02:01:44 2019 No.10854125 >>10854115 Ah yes. It’s all we have going for us as Chinese. It’s a shame that we’re horribly unattractive.

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 02:44:08 2019 No.10854160 >>10847717 "pseudo"

Anonymous Thu Aug 1 03:04:30 2019 No.10854187

>>10846386
i reckon it wouldn't matter whether you pulled the lever or not. how many bodies does it take to stop a train? if it was 4, then the number killed would be the same on either track, the only thing that would be different is the distance taken to stop it - top line, for example - 4 x 4 metres = 16m. bottom line, 4m + 4(30cm)

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 13:19:56 2019 No.10855087 >>10846386 Pull the lever and break the rails right in the middle of the curve

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 18:43:26 2019 No.10855815 >>10846445 1kg bc the flies weight isnt affecting the reading as they are flying

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 20:59:41 2019 No.10856118 >>10846349 every fucking test i take its like this based

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 21:11:48 2019 No.10856144 File: 212 KB, 506x632, 1470762156747.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10846386

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:09:22 2019 No.10856266 wow really none of you are funny

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:16:40 2019 No.10856285 >>10856266 “I don’t like things that other people like, so that makes me cool.”

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:23:04 2019 No.10856303 >>10856285 "if you don't like what I like you must be contrarian"

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:25:07 2019 No.10856308 >>10856303 Post something you think is funny

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:29:09 2019 No.10856317 >>10856308 NIGGER hahahahaha

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:33:48 2019 No.10856322 File: 126 KB, 1131x622, 1563820401235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:49:14 2019 No.10856348 >>10856317 this desu

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 22:53:00 2019 No.10856355 File: 69 KB, 1440x1440, IgRUQyX.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10846290

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 23:41:07 2019 No.10856429 >>10846290 >Unnecessary brackets If a student of mine would write that down i would take away a point.

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 1 23:55:53 2019 No.10856447 >>10856429 And you would be wrong in doing so, like the women who "correct" common core homework. In addition to being correct (albeit formally superfluous), the brackets act as a visual aid.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 00:00:38 2019 No.10856453 >>10856447 >Brainlet aids Might aswell wrap my students in bubble-wrap while i'm at it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 00:04:19 2019 No.10856458 >>10856144 looks like the tracks are diverging every so quickly that the tally will derail before it hits the people.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 00:36:03 2019 No.10856495 >>10856453 As usual, those who can't do, teach.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 04:41:17 2019 No.10856860 >>10846396 Imagine the jar's top is open and the flies is 1km above the scale. Now you now the answer

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 07:26:57 2019 No.10857067 >>10854115 They work at Jane Street now. What a waste of talent.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 07:30:11 2019 No.10857069 >>10856860 Imagine the jar's top is closed and the flies is landed on the scale. Now you now the answer

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 07:31:10 2019 No.10857072 >>10850483 C L A M P E D L A M P E D

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 07:34:57 2019 No.10857074 THEY CLAMP. THEY CLAMP. THEY CLAMP. THEY CLAMP AND CLAMP AND CLAMP.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 12:24:00 2019 No.10857702 >>10850483 Imagine taking a retarded meme this seriously. It's 2019 c'mon anon.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 12:39:40 2019 No.10857746 >>10850810 Wait, then we multiply by zero we can divide by it!

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 12:47:19 2019 No.10857762 >>10856860 Flies flap their wings, they get pushed up and air gets pushed up. The momentum of air particles is conserved in both magnitude and direction. This momentum is transferred to the scale hence 1.5kg

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:12:57 2019 No.10857836 >>10856322 Can someone tell me if this is valid?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:16:43 2019 No.10857846 >>10857836 No, but yes in Lorentzian geometry.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:18:13 2019 No.10857854 >>10857836 The Pythagorean Theorem only works on a 2-dimensional plane where length is what is considered, not cardinality nor direction. So a line of length -1 makes no sense to begin with and is therefore invalid

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:20:23 2019 No.10857865 >>10857854 But argand plane is 2d right?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:30:45 2019 No.10857905 >>10857865 Yeah, but the norm in the Argand plane is [math]\|z\|=z \overline{z}[/math]

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 2 13:31:47 2019 No.10857908 >>10857905 Nevermind, [math]\|z\|= \sqrt{z \overline{z}}[/math]

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math