[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 49 KB, 430x430, odd-looking-scientists-cartoon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10800371 No.10800371 [Reply] [Original]

>to to conference at most elite university in world for particular scientific field
>it's composed of almost entirely elite academics, students and powerful company leaders in the field

>look around room
>90% male
>90% under 5'7"
>literally 100% below 5\10 face aesthetics
>even one guy, one of the most powerful men in the world right now, 5'4" , balding, 50kg soaking wet

What the helps going on here? I thought this was a meme...I thought scientists/Ai people were all intelligent and attractive.

I mean literally not a single person was attractive....not one female has gotten through by her looks alone like in every other area of society. And why are they all so short???

>> No.10800388
File: 64 KB, 758x644, 1547767012481.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10800388

also, would a guy who's pretty smart but not 180iq einstien tier have an advantage in such a field if he is ripped/tall and model attractive?

I'm sure attractive females would be at an advantage since the men are almost certainly desperate/virgin/incel types

>> No.10800397

>>10800371
>.I thought scientists/Ai people were all intelligent and attractive

What on earth gave you this impression..?

>> No.10800406

>>10800397
most people in other elite fields/universities are chads

IQ is actually positively correlated with attractiveness

success in every area depends not only on iq but soft skills (like looking attractive)

>> No.10800410

>>10800406
>most people in other elite fields/universities are chads
no they're not, most are fat slobs that dress well
>IQ is actually positively correlated with attractiveness
academics have above average IQ, not the highest IQ, and they're not representative of their IQ class

>> No.10800427

>>10800410
By my estimation STEM phd's in the most difficult field ever, studying the most complex systems are likely to be well above average IQ

they are also at elite institutions

>> No.10800447

>>10800371
whatever field you're talking about it's definitely not math or machine learning. there are lots of tall and attractive men and women there, in addition to people who are short or ugly or both. it's almost like there is an entire spectrum and how you look doesn't have significant influence on whether you enter the field, you stupid piece of shit.

>> No.10800460

>>10800388
>I'm sure attractive females would be at an advantage since the men are almost certainly desperate/virgin/incel types


ding ding ding, and now you understand why STEM is so cucked.

>> No.10800665
File: 1.92 MB, 3000x2109, -1x-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10800665

>>10800447
its literally half math/machine learning


one top guy who was speaking literally looked like an alien, he was 5'6" oversized head, strange features, and I had to google him to work out how old he was....45 and he was completely bald and looked near death/cancer patient tier.

He was a good speaker though, and probably highest tier iq

>>10800460
but there are literally none in this field...

I even looked at their official faculty/phd student page, they have a ton of women, but none remotely fuckable

>> No.10800675

>>10800388
Women are underrepresented. It's a common pattern in all economically productive societies, the more opportunity women have, the easier life they choose. The highest percents of women in STEM are in discriminatory nations like Iran and India, unironically.

>>10800427
PhD-tier IQ isn't that high. Most studies put PhDs ~130 IQ. +/- ~5 points, with a lower IQ bias due to it's higher likelihood than a higher IQ. There's very, very few PhD's with IQ > 140.

If you thought a PhD required >130 IQ, that's still 2% of the population. If you included 125, which is pretty common in PhDs, that's 5%.

>> No.10800694

>>10800371
Not everybody can build muscle
Jews tend to have high IQ and inability to build muscle
There seem to be an anticorrelation between muscle mass and intelligence

>> No.10800707

>>10800447

Uh oh, struck a nerve with this one OP

>> No.10800765

>>10800665
Name the alien man

>> No.10800774
File: 27 KB, 512x512, VtWMBXq6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10800774

>>10800765

>> No.10801265

>>10800371
Proper nutrition is overrated. Maintaining a healthy gut Flora is the ultimate red pill

>> No.10802444

>>10800774
no homo but he is above average in attractiveness for his age
I now doubt OP's claims

>> No.10802489

>>10800388
Attractive women dint get taken as seriously.

>> No.10802492

>>10800694
Jews uses to be big in sports.

>> No.10802527

>>10800406
>iq is positively correlated with attractiveness
for people under 2 SD’s yeah

>> No.10803261

>>10800371
This will clear it up for you

https://www.wildwill.net/blog/2018/11/24/letter-is-scientific-work-motivated-primarily-by-a-desire-to-improve-humanity/

Also take the lookismpill

>> No.10803274

>>10801265

>he thinks you can have a healthy microbiome with supplements and probioitics and NOT PROPER NUTRITION

lmao

>> No.10803372

>>10802492
Only in boxing and... chess lmao (yeah some nerds like to call it a sport)

>> No.10803378

Ah yes another IQ thread. Brilliant.

>> No.10803398

>>10800371
Now you know why these bitter faggots are so snobbish. Fucking seething, autistic manlets.

>> No.10803741

>>10803372
Chess Boxing was a sport that still lacks a similar game that pins both brawn and brains as against each opponent and the challenger themselves.
Do you brawn when you should brain? If you brawn, can you compensate if brain is compromised.

Much better than the "I can't believe these sub 140lb Taiwanese boys are selected considering ease of transition into Ladyboi-ism to pay off their coaching debt" if they never make it - Kick boxing.

>> No.10803746

>>10800371
You been watching too much movies

>> No.10803747

>>10800675
India and Iran aren't discriminatory. They just encourage STEM

>> No.10803772

>>10803747
>>10800675
>Iran
Wat.. I know I know fuck all about Iran beyond their constant image in international political rhetoric is suspicious. Given lack of a "why".
So hear me out.

I thought Iran was grappled by the Quran, but governed by Saudis so that Science could happen.
That it was a bare minimum knowledge import system, so that the Quran faithful can attain benefit without sin.
This was based on fragments I can remember from mainstream mention of Iran's modus operandi.
And that they allegedly have scores of Sumerian tablets/texts that they won't even photo graph. Just the number of documents they have is only made available.
So on those it's given me a this is a cult nation that only has so much freedom to uphold their own teaching.
But for science to be a general public acceptable pathway. Kinda fucks my rational to why they're a target by west nations.

>> No.10803783

>>10800371
how much were jewish?

>> No.10803864

>>10800371
People with above intelligence or those considered to have above average have almost always come off as plain or unattractive to me.

>> No.10803891

>>10800371
>And why are they all so short???

How many tall asians do you realistically expect.

>> No.10803896

>>10800371
Anon, don't you know how character creation works?

>> No.10804346

>>10800371
>backslash

>> No.10804437

>>10803772

You're an utter idiot.

>> No.10804479
File: 85 KB, 300x500, 1459513058733.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10804479

>>10804437
Yes, it would appear I have succumbed to my own hubris.
That I allowed assumption to shape a view.
But I'm still not satiated in this. You young Anon. You saw my blunder..
But why, why do you fail to strike a decisive blow? Do you try and spare me?
Don't weep for me Anon, I've already fallen on my sword a number of times, yet live to learn once more.

Dude, at least make room for lol when calling someone a faggot, especially when quantifiable.

>> No.10804980

I love you, SuiSeki