[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 9 KB, 481x306, images (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10790777 No.10790777 [Reply] [Original]

What does /sci/ think of iq differences between men and women?
Is there a genetic component or is it all environment? Is sex even genetically real?

>> No.10790782

>>10790777
Thousands of years of geographical isolation. You can't deny evolution.

>> No.10790784
File: 289 KB, 428x428, nigger.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10790784

>another IQ thread
how does it feel to bring content to this board that's of even LOWER quality than what I post
jesus christ

>> No.10790790

have sex

>> No.10790806

>>10790784
This thread's already doing better than the non-iq ones I posted, so the people are getting what they want I guess.
Sex-iq is more interesting than race-iq anyway since there really might be genes involved.

>> No.10790812

>>10790806
Just go back. Every post in this thread is either ridiculing you or is being sarcastic (or is (You)). Feel free to stop posting any time.

Do not bump.

>> No.10790820

>>10790777
If it was environmental why would it be stretched from about the same center? Pretty bullshit that they're giving a ride for women into jobs that require that upper tail end of intelligence, though.

>> No.10790826

>>10790777
Women have slightly lower average IQ (1-2 points or so), but significantly lower mathematical and spatial intelligence, while also having lower spread of intelligence (less retards and geniuses).

All these differences get magnified at the tail of the distributions.

So even when all the environmental factors are equal, you would statistically expect advanced STEM subjects to be naturally dominated by men.

>> No.10790828

>>10790812
This is my thread. If you don't like it gtfo and make your own.

>> No.10790835
File: 60 KB, 581x714, 1562178775855.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10790835

>>10790784
>>10790790
>>10790812

>> No.10791491

>>10790777
Women are less likely to suffer from childhood head trauma but also less likely to be pushed to higher education.

>> No.10791545

>>10791491

They also make up disproportionally less of the autism spectrum as well as only 25% of the homeless population.

>> No.10791559

It can be empirically observed, and there is logic behind it. I'd say the onus is on the other side to prove that men and women are somehow mentally 1:1.

Only 40% of all men ever have reproduced while the same figure is 90% for women. There is no value in being exceptional for women.

>> No.10791579
File: 408 KB, 1043x627, women are retarded.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10791579

>>10790777
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YruxhWO8QSY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0XVuU-iF5U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNbMRmtEoS0

>> No.10791632
File: 119 KB, 583x482, 1548672444364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10791632

>another IQ thread

>> No.10791670

>>10790784
>being a furfaggot

>> No.10792884 [DELETED] 

Potential 13-12 set happening in men's doubles if anyone cares....

>> No.10792887

>>10790777
genetic ofc

>> No.10792912

>>10792887
Men and women have identical genes.

>> No.10792917

>>10792912
nope lol

>> No.10792954
File: 187 KB, 1047x629, foidiq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10792954

Posting the correct graph

>> No.10793059

>>10792912
>>10792917
he means the autosomes (chromosomes 1-22), not the sex ones (X/Y)