Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Maintenance is complete! We got more disk space.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 7 KB, 661x473, pythagoras.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10718882 No.10718882 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe]

Is this diagram sufficient to prove the theorem analytically?

>> No.10718893
File: 5 KB, 661x473, pythagoras v2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10718893

Here, I did a thing

>> No.10718904 [DELETED] 

>>10718882
>>10718893
looks like it yeah
that's pretty cool

>> No.10718932

>>10718882
doesn't that only work for isosceles triangles?

>> No.10718934

no, because you're triangle is equibilateral

>> No.10718936

>>10718882
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2htazYLoxQ

>> No.10718959

>>10718936
haha loud sounds are funny im 12 xd

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action