/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.10714165]

what are some boards where I can discuss science

[Anonymous No.10714167]

>>10714165
>there is literally a trump tweet thread still up
>better delete threads that discuss the science of electromagnetism and its effects on biochemistry
biggest sloppy job yet

[Anonymous No.10714168]

>>10714165
>>10714167
>archaic type cell radiation, is no longer used
>directly radiated throughout entire body
>also while fetuses, resulting in low birth weight
>effect of birth weight not controlled for/studied
>dose: 10 min every 10 min, for 18 hours a day
>5 to 7 days a week
>for their entire life (at 2 years, euthanized)
>6.0 W/kg
>literally cooking the rats gives them cancer
I rest my case.

[Anonymous No.10714170]

>>10714168
>less intense modulation of 2G and 3G
yes it is much less damaging than modern signals

>literally cooking the rats
This statement misrepresents risk to the brain from the whole-body exposures used in the NTP study. While the exposure limit to RF radiation in the US is 0.08 W/kg averaged over the whole body, the localized exposure limit is 1.6 W/kg averaged over any one gram of tissue. Body tissues located nearest to the cell phone antenna receive much higher exposures than tissues located distant from the antenna. Thus, when an individual uses a cell phone and holds it next to his or her head, exposure to the brain will be much higher than exposures averaged over the whole body. When considering organ-specific risk (e.g., risk to the brain) from cell phone RF, the important measure of exposure is the SAR value of 1.6 W/kg averaged over any gram of tissue. In the NTP study in which animals were exposed to whole-body RF at SARs of 1.5, 3, and 6.0 W/kg, exposures in the brain were within 10% of the whole-body exposure levels. Therefore, in the NTP study, exposure intensities in the brain of rats were similar to or only slightly higher than localized human exposures from cell phones held next to the head.

I rest my case.

[Anonymous No.10714173]

>>10714170
>exposures in the brain were within 10% of the whole-body exposure levels. Therefore, in the NTP study, exposure intensities in the brain of rats were similar to or only slightly higher than localized human exposures from cell phones held next to the head
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.10714174]

Mods did their job before I could finish this for the last thread

[Anonymous No.10714179]

>>10714173
read the study champ

>>10714174
hilarious meme!

[Anonymous No.10714182]

>>10714174
there are meta-analyses in OP's image too little guy. im sorry to say they're not in your employer's favor

[Anonymous No.10714184]

>>10714179
>>10714182
>ronald melnick

[Anonymous No.10714189]

>>10714184
what an argument