If 2+2=4, why is 2+2≠5?

[Anonymous No.10680600]

[Anonymous No.10680645]

Because 4=5... wait... you might be onto something here, OP.

[Anonymous No.10681925]

4*0=5*0 \÷0

4=5
qed

[Anonymous No.10681943]

2+2= 4 by necessity

[Anonymous No.10681950]

Unironically sounds like something Tesla would say. God he was such a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.10681955]

>>10681925
Everything begin in emptiness.
In a sense emptiness also mean infinite posibility.
That is why empty (0) when multiply by anything will equal emptiness because everything is just posibility.

[Anonymous No.10682015]

4=5
4-4=5-4
1=0
The equation states that something equals to nothing.
This breaks the law of non-contradiction, a metaphysical law of logic. It states that something cannot equal something it is not.
Quit wasting your time with drivel.

[Anonymous No.10682160]

>>10680600
Because numbers are like the wind.

[Anonymous No.10682163]

The wind is seen in necessary times and if the time doesn’t call for numbers they break down to those who can’t hold them due to what numbers mean for living beings.

[Anonymous No.10682332]

>>10682015
Youre euqasion is wrong
If 4=5 and we want to solve 4-4=5-4
We first need to switch 4 with 5 and 5 with 4
We then get 5-5=4-5 wich is obviously 0=-1 wich is true because its correctly solved

[Anonymous No.10682969]

>>10680600
Tesla hated fat people. So i fixed that pepe for you

[Anonymous No.10682976]

>>10681943
You mean by proximity. It is all numerical analysis at the end

[Anonymous No.10683031]

>>10682015
imagine being this guy. I would legitimately rather die

[Anonymous No.10683134]

>>10680600
x^2 = (-x)^2 for all x, therefore
(-1/2)^2 = (1/2)^2
(4-9/2)^2 = (5-9/2)^2
4-9/2 = 5-9/2
4 = 5, qed

[Anonymous No.10683149]

>>10680600
Are you fucking retarded?

[Anonymous No.10683164]

>>10681955
>Everything begin in emptiness.
A contradiction

>>10681925
>>10680600

Where is a "0" in reality?

[Anonymous No.10683209]

>>10681925
your soul is 0 like your grasp of math

[Anonymous No.10683397]

>>10682015
>1=0
>The equation states that something equals to nothing.
two somethings CAN equal nothing, when their weights are averaged. Their absolute value, however, will still equal one (or two, in this case)

[Anonymous No.10683565]

>>10680600
define 2
define +
define =
define 4
define ≠
define 5

[Anonymous No.10683630]

>>10682332
Retarded

[Anonymous No.10683634]

>>10683031
Then go do it faggot

>>10683397
That's not at equal to what I'm saying ya dope

[Anonymous No.10683642]

>>10680600
Because 4 ≠ 5
What are you people retarded?

[Anonymous No.10683986]

>>10680600
all the answers in here are based off of mathematical incongruity or falsifiable predicates
if we infer that 2, 4, and 5 represent quantities that are, as themselves, unfalsifiable and representative within controlled observational or experimental standards
that a single thing is that which claims properties that make it distinguished through specified descriptors and identifiably separated from that which it is not
that the symbol 2 represents the unfalsifiable and representative idea of that which is more than a single thing that can be described in a specified way, yet less than three of that same thing that can be described in a specified way
that the symbol 4 represents the unfalsifiable and representative idea of that which is more than a three single things that can be described in a specified way, yet less than five of that same thing that can be described in a specified way
that the symbol 5 represents the unfalsifiable and representative idea of that which is more than a four single things that can be described in a specified way, yet less than six of that same thing that can be described in a specified way
that the symbol + represents the action of joining symbolic quantities of that which can be described in a specified way (all of which share the same understood qualities of specification)
that the symbol = represents the equality of the expressed quantities within the described equation
and that the symbol ≠ is antonymic to the symbol =
then we can conclude that by joining the quantitative symbol 2 with the quantitative symbol 2 (that action represented by the symbol +), the resulting value is the same (represented by the symbol =) as the quantitative symbol 4
and since the quantitative value of the symbol 4 and the quantitative symbol 5 describe two different and distinct unfalsifiable and representative values, the symbol 4 ≠ the symbol 5
therefore, 2+2=4, but 2+2≠5