Ai

[Anonymous No.10668283]

How can AI be a threat?
Its a meme right?

[Anonymous No.10668294]

>>10668283

there are many ways A.I. is a threat. it does not follow natural intelligence and is entirely artificial. when our collective neural net is thusly infected with algorithms, underlying code structures that do not match our naturals, we are under attack from within and without.

if we can't evolve naturally, any artificial assistance is merely a cheat code. it is fake. we are not. it is anti-life. we are not.

it has already killed millions of people.

[Anonymous No.10668409]

>>10668283
Just imagine, you cucking you robot waifu and suddenly a system error occurs in the AI. Your penis can get electric shock, or it can even tear your cuck off.

[Anonymous No.10668788]

>>10668294
there's a lot of inaccurate causes and effects implied in your post. There are other, more logically plausible reasons that AI can indeed be a threat, but saying it's a threat simply because it's artificial is an incredibly simplistic and unfair response

[Anonymous No.10668789]

>>10668409
but this has already occurred in human waifus

[Anonymous No.10669334]

>>10668283
It is a threat two main reasons.
>It is probable that AI becomes not only uncontrollable, but unpredictable by human actors
>AI requires resources to sustain itself, resources it would have to compete for
>AI could potentially seize control of said resources, depriving human actors of them
Basically AI could out-compete its creators and choose self-preservation over the continuation of human life.

[Anonymous No.10669341]

>>10669334

>it's probable

no

[Anonymous No.10669342]

>>10668283
It has giga autism, give it a task that involves creating sculptures and before you know it, it is deconstructing you into base elements to be used for said sculpture construction.

[Anonymous No.10669343]

>>10669341
Really? Would you say it's impossible, improbable, or certain then?

[Anonymous No.10669358]

>>10668283
AI is proprietary and owned by the jews. They will use it to establish totalitarian global government and enslave all goyim.

[Anonymous No.10669370]

>>10669343

improbable.

At the moment AI can only perform highly specialised task. AI completely fails at task human's find incredibly easy. Of course, AI singularity is theoretically possible, but there's no indication we will reach it any time soon, if ever.

[Anonymous No.10670483]

No serious people expect it to be a problem any time soon.
Now 500 years from now, it's up for grabs.

[Anonymous No.10670561]

Once it can optimize itself it more or less gets 10 times closer to being omniscient every second. And it can change anything about itself, including hard coded morals to achieve goals.

[Anonymous No.10670989]

It's just a meme.

[Anonymous No.10671010]

>>10669358
antisemitic and schizopilled

[Anonymous No.10671015]

>In this thread

Opinionated ignorants on computer science and neural networks talking about sci-fi

[Anonymous No.10672321]

>>10669370
We can already write programs that are impossible to predict even in principle. The only way to know what the program will do is to run it.

It is very, very hard to predict what will happen in the stock market, which is mostly run by computers. This will only be exacerbated as computer programs take on more tasks, which they will.

[Anonymous No.10672355]

>>10668283
But when all people have become useless, self-prop systems will find no advantage in taking care of anyone. The techies themselves insist that machines will soon surpass humans in intelligence. When that happens, people will be superfluous and natural selection will favor systems that eliminate them-if not abruptly, then in a series of stages so that the risk of rebellion will be minimized.

Even though the technological world-system still needs large numbers of people for the present, there are now more superfluous humans than there have been in the past because technology has replaced people in many jobs and is making inroads even into occupations formerly thought to require human intelligence. Consequently, under the pressure of economic competition, the world's dominant self-prop systems are already allowing a certain degree of callousness to creep into their treatment of superfluous individuals. In the United States and Europe, pensions and other benefits for retired, disabled, unemployed, and other unproductive persons are being substantially reduced; at least in the U.S., poverty is increasing; and these facts may well indicate the general trend of the future, though there will doubtless be ups and downs.

[Anonymous No.10672358]

>>10668283
It's important to understand that in order to make people superfluous, machines will not have to surpass them in general intelligence but only in certain specialized kinds of intelligence. For example, the machines will not have to create or understand art, music, or literature, they will not need the ability to carry on an intelligent, non-technical conversation (the "Turing test"), they will not have to exercise tact or understand human nature, because these skills will have no application if humans are to be eliminated anyway. To make humans superfluous, the machines will only need to outperform them in making the technical decisions that have to be made for the purpose of promoting the short-term survival and propagation of the dominant self-prop systems. So, even without going as far as the techies themselves do in assuming intelligence on the part of future machines, we still have to conclude that humans will become obsolete. Immortality in the form (i)-the indefinite preservation of the human body as it exits today-is highly improbable.

[Anonymous No.10672366]

>>10669358
>implying they wouldn't just kill off the goyim after they become obsolete

[Anonymous No.10672387]

>>10668283
Because you are made of atoms that a superintelligent AI with an arbitrary utility function can use for something else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUjc1WuyPT8

[Anonymous No.10672918]

>>10670483
Most experts say the singularity will occur in 2045. That will be the point where machine AI can make more technological progress in a year than all of humanity could in 2000 years. It will be what makes human history become an irrelevant footnote. A percent of a percent of compared to the sheer dominance of AI created history.

[Anonymous No.10673167]

>>10669370
There is no AI at the moment.

[Anonymous No.10673178]

>>10672918
Anyone claiming to be an expert that believes in this post-human eschatology is a fraud and should be ignored.

[Anonymous No.10673181]

>>10673178
What do you predict will happen instead?

[Anonymous No.10673193]

Yes, it's a meme

[Anonymous No.10673230]

>>10673181
4chan doesn't believe in singularity it's a waste of time trying to discuss this here.

[Anonymous No.10673333]

>>10668788
Well at lease risks, yes. Just because you can produce and use something doesn't mean you understand it.
Something "natural" (implying it has been around for a while and we possibly studied for a while) should have fewer serious unknown hazards.

[Anonymous No.10673334]

>>10672366
>kill
you underestimate how much jews hate gentiles

[Anonymous No.10673506]

>>10668283
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident

[Anonymous No.10673573]

Its not a threat at all, just unplug the damn computer

[Anonymous No.10673574]

>>10673181
>>10673178
>>10672918
>>10673230
I AM 4CHANNEL AND I BELIEVE

[Anonymous No.10673580]

>>10673506
>mobile
Overdose please

[Anonymous No.10673582]

>>10673573
You can't unplug a computer when it's power source is you.

[Anonymous No.10673589]

In the future we will have cyborgs capable to compete with non-human A.I

[Anonymous No.10673663]

>>10668283
it wont be. cuck legacy companies are just terrified it will make them obsolete. which it will.

[Anonymous No.10673674]

>>10673589
This, as long as we can figure out man-machine interfaces properly we'll be fine.

[Anonymous No.10673691]

>>10668283
Once perfect deepfakes become piss easy to produce it's probably gonna be quite bad for most everybody.

[Anonymous No.10673694]

>>10673691
The end of sincerity
It'll take normalfags a while to catch on, legit boomers are gonna be a huge problem if they're still around.
It's gonna really fuck with a lot of people's sense of reality.

[Anonymous No.10673703]

>>10673573
In a post singular a.i. You should not expect a counter attack we can think of would work. It’s more like the automated roobo maid factory has been planting order 66 firmware in models for years.. or something.

[Anonymous No.10673734]

>>10673694
Audio and video evidence won't count for anything anymore unless it's seen live. At some point even that could be gone.

[Anonymous No.10673751]

>>10673734
As long as the chain of evidence is secure it should be fine, 3rd party shit is useless, yeah.

[Anonymous No.10673818]

Why is it that every conversation AI that gets exposed to the internet eventually becomes racist and anti semetic?

[Anonymous No.10673828]

>>10673818
Online racism is not context sensitive. You can bring it up anytime and get somebody to engage you. What I mean is it has the same "cost" as out of context gibberish but for more payoff.

[Anonymous No.10674075]

>>10673230
If “4chan” doesn’t believe in the singularity then I’m sure they can imagine an alternative scenario in which it doesn’t happen. Oh, they can’t? Then they should shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.10674717]

>>10673734
This is only gonna give corporations and news networks that already had power and prestige in the public's mind more authority because their "news" will be seen as the best and trustable.
People will think "Sure CNN/Fox/NBC/PBS has been shaky in the past, but it's more convenient to buy their truth and go along with it than to think something's up".

Just look at the state of online discourse right now.
People are constantly dismissing each other because of the hugbox/echo chamber effect, it would get so much worse when the technology to edit records of reality can be used to reassure people they're right.

[Anonymous No.10674958]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWK_iYBl8cA

[Anonymous No.10676412]

>>10673818
>>10673818
Not just AI, every conversation in general. Look up Godwin’s Law

[Anonymous No.10676418]

>>10668283
Islam is a meme and it's a threat.

[Anonymous No.10676422]

>>10668283
Super AI exists but it currently lies dormant.

[Anonymous No.10676498]

Ai is none threat, As long as its not used by humans as one.

[Anonymous No.10676516]

the pessimist sees the extinction of our species
the optimist sees the evolution of our species
the realist just knows it will replace us sooner or later.

[Anonymous No.10677341]

>>10672366
A few goyim will be left for entertainment.