[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 313 KB, 735x720, uf9YNVm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650665 No.10650665 [Reply] [Original]

I discovered a new identity
(π+e)/2 = 6
π = e+2/3
e = π-2/3

>> No.10650673

>>10650665
That’s amazing and works if you don’t know addition

>> No.10650676

>>10650665
I can see that you're saying that (pi+e)/2 = 6 is a new identity and that such an identity would be quite notable since it involves these two transcendental numbers, but to me it seems inconsistent with the fact that if you write this down in google's calculator it gives you a different result that is not eqiuvalent to 6, what is your opinion on this? Maybe you're redefining pi and e?

>> No.10650679

>>10650673
no it looks look: π = e+2/3 = π-2/3+2/3 = π
same with e: e = π-2/3 = e+2/3-2/3 = e

>> No.10650681
File: 3 KB, 384x95, 924816531023.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650681

Go the fuck to sleep you insufferable nigger kike faggot and dont you fucking post you dumbass fake quickmaths on this fucking website ever again you brainlet mother fucker.

>> No.10650682

>>10650676
I think they made a mistake in algorithm. Check >>10650679 (works*, not 'looks')

>> No.10650686

>>10650665
>I discovered a new identity
>(π+e)/2 = 6
>π = e+2/3
>e = π-2/3

Oh my god guys sorry I made a mistake it was π+e = 6, therefore (π+e)/2= 3

>> No.10650690
File: 99 KB, 220x199, wrong.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650690

>>10650686

>> No.10650692

>>10650681
that is fake you retard because irratonal+irratonal = integer

>> No.10650694

>>10650692
Go back to /b/

>> No.10650698
File: 15 KB, 480x480, 1498997914075.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650698

>(π+e)/2 = 6

>> No.10650702

>>10650694
sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) = 3

>> No.10650704

>>10650692
"no"

>> No.10650722

>>10650679
π=100+2/3=π-2/3+2/3=π

>> No.10650737

>>10650704
prove it

>> No.10650740
File: 10 KB, 375x375, 1511176867872.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650740

best and based thread on /sci/ rn

>> No.10650744

>>10650737
Sum of sqrt(2) and -sqrt(2) is rational
QED

>> No.10650747

This is the worst thread on /sci/, perhaps on all of 4chan currently. Jesus.

>> No.10650757

>>10650681

based

>> No.10650772

>>10650676
>if you write this down in google's calculator
You don't even need to do that much. Both of those are smaller than 4, how could their average be 6?

>> No.10650788
File: 9 KB, 184x184, renaissance-technologies-llc-squarelogo-1387233549104.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650788

>>10650665
Time to get hired at Renaissance Technologies.

>> No.10650793

>>10650772
it was supposed to be (pi+e)/2=3

>> No.10650806

>>10650793
e is roughly 0.28 below 3, pi is roughly 0.14 above 3. Average still isn't going to be 3.

>> No.10650846

>>10650806
>I just made that up: the post
Even if so - 2.73 is roughly 2.75 and 3.14 is roughly 3.25

>> No.10650850

>>10650744
>0 is not an integer
the ABSOLUTE state of this board

>> No.10650855

>>10650665
Poor Euler and Pi guy.
Their constants are bullshit. You must be +150 IQ guy.

>> No.10650856

>>10650846
>3.14 is roughly 3.25
Absolute state of engineers

>> No.10650876

>>10650855
yea i am

>> No.10650913
File: 21 KB, 360x360, 1557848473539.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10650913

>(π+e)/2 = 6

>> No.10650921

>>10650850
L2reading comprehension. The dipshit was saying that irrationals summed cannot be rational. This was my counter argument.

YOU are the absolute state of this board

>> No.10650947

>>10650921
actually, u