The moon landing was fake

[Anonymous No.10642447]

Prove to me that it wasn't used to faze and demoralize the soviets during the cold war.
Here's muh arguments or shoah or exodus as some of (((you))) may see it.
>But muh Buzz Aldrin using a pen on the ascent engine-arming circuit breaker.
>Muh there is absolutely no documented evidence that the LEM ever worked, ever took off from anywhere, evidence where we can see it is actually a flying craft.
>Muh led protects me from space radiation, which is worst then gamma radiation.
If these retards can't protect themselves from gamma radiaion what makes them think they can go into space?
Also to be fair the electronics would,ve stopped working and malfunctioned by the extreme temperatures exposed to them. The most deadly being the freezing temperatures with radiation being exposed to everything. While being further from the earth.
>Radiation does not cause a change of temperature in the vacuum of space.

[Anonymous No.10642450]

>>10642447
OP are you from an alternate dimension where telescopes haven't been invented yet?

[Anonymous No.10642451]

>>10642447
If there was no landing, how did the reflective plates used for laser rangefinding get there?

[Anonymous No.10642453]

>>10642450
>And you're from one where sub-temperatures and electonics work together.

[Anonymous No.10642454]

>>10642451
>Implying you ever went back to the moon with film stock.

[Anonymous No.10642460]

>>10642453
>>10642454
write like an adult you subhuman retard.
do you think GPS is a hoax, what makes you think electronics can't work in space you fucking imbecile.

[Anonymous No.10642477]

>>10642460
>Sub-human retard.
>Write like an adult
>I never knew typing was writing all you space tards sure are smart and i do mean it. As the true definition of smart is having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.
>Society fag tard belives everything everyone tells him.
>Your mommy didn't love you
Read what i said.
>>10642453
Also gps is not a hoax im using it right now to get to the moon on my Tesla Roadster.
>pic you

[Anonymous No.10643020]

>>10642447
If the purpose of the moon landing was to demoralize the Soviets, wouldn't they have called it out as fake? Tracking whether or not there were radio signals coming from the moon would be trivial for them. Not to mention all the spies they managed to plant in various US agencies and companies. Other governments hostile to the US, like China would have also been able to call shenanigans if they didn't detect radio signals coming from the moon.

[Anonymous No.10643052]

>>10642453
Electronics can work at very low temperatures without a care in the world. Where are you getting this idea that this would be a problem?

[Anonymous No.10643906]

>>10642447
There is still stuff on the moon from when we went there,like a reflective material that can be seen with a telescope.

[Anonymous No.10643924]

>>10643020
this is honestly the biggest argument for me.
They flat out gave the soviets moonrocks, the soviets would have done everything in their power to deem it as a fake if it was. But they themselves concluded they were real.

[Anonymous No.10643975]

>>10642447
There are retroreflectors on the surface that you can send a signal to and receive a response that arrives with a delay corresponding to the distance between the moon and Earth

These aren't visible by telescope (despite what some other users are saying here) but they're indisputable evidence that humans landed stuff on the moon. If we landed stuff there, it really isn't a huge jump to say that people went, so why deny it?

[Anonymous No.10643979]

>>10642453
They work fine, you just have to account for changes in conductivity (and therefore resistance) with temperature.

MRI machines, the LHC, and quantum computers all work at sub-zero temperatures so that's hardly a deal-breaker.

[Anonymous No.10644505]

>>10642447
Soviets disagree with you, they recognized the landing.

[Anonymous No.10644595]

>>10643020
They did call it out as fake. But we still went there